On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 at 08:37, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 12 ++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index e68cbe9293..1fc809b2f9 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -5275,7 +5275,6 @@ int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run
> *run)
> uint64_t code;
> int ret;
> bool ctx_invalid;
> -char str[256];
> KVMState *state;
>
> switch (run->exit_reason) {
> @@ -5335,15 +5334,16 @@ int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run
> *run)
> case KVM_EXIT_NOTIFY:
> ctx_invalid = !!(run->notify.flags & KVM_NOTIFY_CONTEXT_INVALID);
> state = KVM_STATE(current_accel());
> -sprintf(str, "Encounter a notify exit with %svalid context in"
> - " guest. There can be possible misbehaves in guest."
> - " Please have a look.", ctx_invalid ? "in" : "");
> if (ctx_invalid ||
> state->notify_vmexit == NOTIFY_VMEXIT_OPTION_INTERNAL_ERROR) {
> -warn_report("KVM internal error: %s", str);
> +warn_report("KVM internal error: Encountered a notify exit "
> +"with invalid context in guest.");
> ret = -1;
> } else {
> -warn_report_once("KVM: %s", str);
> +warn_report_once("KVM: Encounterd a notify exit with valid "
"Encountered"
> + "context in guest. "
> + "The guest could be misbehaving. "
> + "Please have a look.");
"Please have a look" is a bit more chatty than we usually are
in warning messages...
thanks
-- PMM