Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2014-02-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
On Sun, 03 Nov 2013 21:06:22 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
 01.11.2013 13:54, Michael Büsch wrote:
 On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:

 That looks right.  Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
 you initially submitted?  If yes, I'll make a formal patch submission
 upstream.

 Here you go.

 Thank you!

 Adding Jan as slirp maintainer, and my

 Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru

 If Jan picks it up, that's fine.  If not, I think it can go
 to the trivial patches queue.

 Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.

 But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious for a reader
 (unless you know smb.conf semantics by heart).

Jan, did you forget to push the queue?  Its been more than 2 months ago,
and qemu git is still not fixed?

Thanks,

/mjt



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-11-04 Thread Michael Tokarev

04.11.2013 00:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:

[]

If Jan picks it up, that's fine.  If not, I think it can go
to the trivial patches queue.


Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.


Okay, thank you Jan.


But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious for a reader
(unless you know smb.conf semantics by heart).


It's trivial for my understanding.  If we require that every
change going to -trivial should be obvious to everyone, we
should just close it right away.

And this area does not have an active maintainer anyway, at least
according to MAINTAINERS and ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl.

Thanks,

/mjt



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-11-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2013-11-04 14:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
 04.11.2013 00:06, Jan Kiszka wrote:
 On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
 []
 If Jan picks it up, that's fine.  If not, I think it can go
 to the trivial patches queue.

 Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.
 
 Okay, thank you Jan.
 
 But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious for a reader
 (unless you know smb.conf semantics by heart).
 
 It's trivial for my understanding.  If we require that every
 change going to -trivial should be obvious to everyone, we
 should just close it right away.

Then we may need -less-trivial, because - to my understanding - -trivial
was once set up according to the rule that (most) QEMU hackers should be
able to understand that a trivial change is at least mostly harmless.

 And this area does not have an active maintainer anyway, at least
 according to MAINTAINERS and ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl.

Yeah, I think we have some holes there. That smb configuration
conceptually belongs to slirp is right, just not clear documented in our
script.

Jan




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu: Broken -smb with latest SAMBA package. (Unsupported security=share option)

2013-11-03 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2013-11-01 11:10, Michael Tokarev wrote:
 01.11.2013 13:54, Michael Büsch wrote:
 On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 13:32:49 +0400
 Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:

 That looks right.  Are you okay adding your Signed-off-by to the patch
 you initially submitted?  If yes, I'll make a formal patch submission
 upstream.

 Here you go.
 
 Thank you!
 
 Adding Jan as slirp maintainer, and my
 
 Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
 
 If Jan picks it up, that's fine.  If not, I think it can go
 to the trivial patches queue.

Works fine, applied to queues/slirp.

But this is not a trivial patch as the fix is not obvious for a reader
(unless you know smb.conf semantics by heart).

Jan




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature