Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/20] target/arm: Fix arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian for aa64 user-only

2018-08-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On 08/17/2018 09:02 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 August 2018 at 05:21, Richard Henderson
>  wrote:
>> Unlike aa32, endianness cannot be adjusted by userland in aa64.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson 
>> ---
>>  target/arm/cpu.h | 27 +--
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> index 9526ed27cb..2d6d7d03aa 100644
>> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
>> @@ -2709,8 +2709,6 @@ static inline bool arm_sctlr_b(CPUARMState *env)
>>  /* Return true if the processor is in big-endian mode. */
>>  static inline bool arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian(CPUARMState *env)
>>  {
>> -int cur_el;
>> -
>>  /* In 32bit endianness is determined by looking at CPSR's E bit */
>>  if (!is_a64(env)) {
>>  return
>> @@ -2729,15 +2727,24 @@ static inline bool 
>> arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian(CPUARMState *env)
>>  arm_sctlr_b(env) ||
>>  #endif
>>  ((env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_E) ? 1 : 0);
>> +} else {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
>> +/* AArch64 does not have a SETEND instruction; endianness
>> + * for usermode is fixed at compile-time.
>> + */
>> +# ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
>> +return true;
>> +# else
>> +return false;
>> +# endif
>> +#else
>> +int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
>> +if (cur_el == 0) {
>> +return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[1] & SCTLR_E0E) != 0;
>> +}
>> +return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[cur_el] & SCTLR_EE) != 0;
>> +#endif
>>  }
>> -
>> -cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
>> -
>> -if (cur_el == 0) {
>> -return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[1] & SCTLR_E0E) != 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[cur_el] & SCTLR_EE) != 0;
>>  }
>>
> 
> When does this make a difference? For user-mode, we've already
> dealt with the "aa32" case, so the code here is aa64-only.
> In linux-user/aarch64/cpu_loop.c we set sctlr_el[1]'s E0E bit
> if TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN is defined, and cur_el is definitely
> zero, so we should already be returning true from this function
> if TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN and false otherwise.

I should have re-ordered this after the other following
simplifications to see if it still matters.  But I was
after a code-size reduction.


r~




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/20] target/arm: Fix arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian for aa64 user-only

2018-08-17 Thread Peter Maydell
On 9 August 2018 at 05:21, Richard Henderson
 wrote:
> Unlike aa32, endianness cannot be adjusted by userland in aa64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson 
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h | 27 +--
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 9526ed27cb..2d6d7d03aa 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -2709,8 +2709,6 @@ static inline bool arm_sctlr_b(CPUARMState *env)
>  /* Return true if the processor is in big-endian mode. */
>  static inline bool arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian(CPUARMState *env)
>  {
> -int cur_el;
> -
>  /* In 32bit endianness is determined by looking at CPSR's E bit */
>  if (!is_a64(env)) {
>  return
> @@ -2729,15 +2727,24 @@ static inline bool 
> arm_cpu_data_is_big_endian(CPUARMState *env)
>  arm_sctlr_b(env) ||
>  #endif
>  ((env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_E) ? 1 : 0);
> +} else {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +/* AArch64 does not have a SETEND instruction; endianness
> + * for usermode is fixed at compile-time.
> + */
> +# ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
> +return true;
> +# else
> +return false;
> +# endif
> +#else
> +int cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
> +if (cur_el == 0) {
> +return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[1] & SCTLR_E0E) != 0;
> +}
> +return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[cur_el] & SCTLR_EE) != 0;
> +#endif
>  }
> -
> -cur_el = arm_current_el(env);
> -
> -if (cur_el == 0) {
> -return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[1] & SCTLR_E0E) != 0;
> -}
> -
> -return (env->cp15.sctlr_el[cur_el] & SCTLR_EE) != 0;
>  }
>

When does this make a difference? For user-mode, we've already
dealt with the "aa32" case, so the code here is aa64-only.
In linux-user/aarch64/cpu_loop.c we set sctlr_el[1]'s E0E bit
if TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN is defined, and cur_el is definitely
zero, so we should already be returning true from this function
if TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN and false otherwise.

thanks
-- PMM