Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] vnc: tight: Fix crash after 2GB of output

2011-04-11 Thread Corentin Chary
Aurelien, could you also take a look at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/87717/ ?
Thanks,

-- 
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] vnc: tight: Fix crash after 2GB of output

2011-04-11 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:27:23AM +0200, Corentin Chary wrote:
 Aurelien, could you also take a look at
 http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/87717/ ?

I gave a look, but I don't really know this part of QEMU, so I would
prefer if someone else look at it.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] vnc: tight: Fix crash after 2GB of output

2011-04-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:34:35AM +0100, Corentin Chary wrote:
 From: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
 
 fix 2Gb integer overflow in in VNC tight and zlib encodings
 
 As found by Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com (excellent
 catch!), when amount of VNC compressed data produced by zlib
 and sent to client exceeds 2Gb, integer overflow occurs because
 currently, we calculate amount of data produced at each step by
 comparing saved total_out with new total_out, and total_out is
 something which grows without bounds.  Compare it with previous
 avail_out instead of total_out, and leave total_out alone.
 
 The same code is used in vnc-enc-tight.c and vnc-enc-zlib.c,
 so fix both cases.
 
 There, there's no actual need to save previous_out value, since
 capacity-offset (which is how that value is calculated) stays
 the same so it can be recalculated again after call to deflate(),
 but whole thing becomes less readable this way.
 
 Reported-by: Roland Dreier rol...@purestorage.com
 Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
 Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com
 ---
  ui/vnc-enc-tight.c |5 +++--
  ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c  |4 ++--
  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Thanks, applied.

 diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
 index 2522936..87fdf35 100644
 --- a/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
 +++ b/ui/vnc-enc-tight.c
 @@ -868,8 +868,8 @@ static int tight_compress_data(VncState *vs, int 
 stream_id, size_t bytes,
  zstream-avail_in = vs-tight.tight.offset;
  zstream-next_out = vs-tight.zlib.buffer + vs-tight.zlib.offset;
  zstream-avail_out = vs-tight.zlib.capacity - vs-tight.zlib.offset;
 +previous_out = zstream-avail_out;
  zstream-data_type = Z_BINARY;
 -previous_out = zstream-total_out;
  
  /* start encoding */
  if (deflate(zstream, Z_SYNC_FLUSH) != Z_OK) {
 @@ -878,7 +878,8 @@ static int tight_compress_data(VncState *vs, int 
 stream_id, size_t bytes,
  }
  
  vs-tight.zlib.offset = vs-tight.zlib.capacity - zstream-avail_out;
 -bytes = zstream-total_out - previous_out;
 +/* ...how much data has actually been produced by deflate() */
 +bytes = previous_out - zstream-avail_out;
  
  tight_send_compact_size(vs, bytes);
  vnc_write(vs, vs-tight.zlib.buffer, bytes);
 diff --git a/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c b/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
 index 3c6e6ab..e32e4cd 100644
 --- a/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
 +++ b/ui/vnc-enc-zlib.c
 @@ -103,8 +103,8 @@ static int vnc_zlib_stop(VncState *vs)
  zstream-avail_in = vs-zlib.zlib.offset;
  zstream-next_out = vs-output.buffer + vs-output.offset;
  zstream-avail_out = vs-output.capacity - vs-output.offset;
 +previous_out = zstream-avail_out;
  zstream-data_type = Z_BINARY;
 -previous_out = zstream-total_out;
  
  // start encoding
  if (deflate(zstream, Z_SYNC_FLUSH) != Z_OK) {
 @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int vnc_zlib_stop(VncState *vs)
  }
  
  vs-output.offset = vs-output.capacity - zstream-avail_out;
 -return zstream-total_out - previous_out;
 +return previous_out - zstream-avail_out;
  }
  
  int vnc_zlib_send_framebuffer_update(VncState *vs, int x, int y, int w, int 
 h)
 -- 
 1.7.3.4
 
 
 

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net