Re: [Qgis-developer] How should work the placement over on adv-label
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 10:38:54PM +0200, Andrea Peri wrote: Hi, I have a situation of polygon like this: - | A | || | | | | B || | ||| | ||| | ||| | ||| | | || - Where the poly A has a hole and the poly-B fill exactly the hole of poly-A I need to have a labeling like this: - | value1 | || | | | ||| | ||| | | value2 || | ||| | ||| | | || - I try with the label-advanced plugin and use the option Placement Over. But it produce instead this situation: - || || | | | | value1 || | ||| | | value2 || | ||| | ||| | | || - I don't know if this is a wanted result or not for the over placement. But I guess this is not the better solution , because don't allow to understand what is the label of PolyA and the label of PolyB. Recently someone committed a fix for labeling that used GEOS intersection to avoid scanning too many segments for candidates. Since GEOS is involved already, it could as well be used for GEOSPointOnSurface on the intersection between the polygon and the viewport. That will give you what you want. Sounds like worth a ticket on the tracker. --strk; () Free GIS Flash consultant/developer /\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Approximate reprojection for vectors
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch I did a lot of profiling for the FOSS4G WMS benchmark (osm data, reprojected to google crs, complex symbology with a lot of rules). The pattern was mostly the following: the rendering itself (QPainter-drawPolyline) was the most time consuming operation (appr. 50% of rendering time), I always thought that Qt4 rendering engine is quite efficient. Also in my case (I am testing with Shapefile) QPainte::drawPolyline takes only 0.05% (!!!), it seems that I am looking on some wrong results comaring to your 50%, but I cannot find what am I doing wrong. Could it be that a different paint device is doing the difference? But when rendering on screen, we are using QImage or QImage anyway and in that case graphics card's power is not used, is it? next was evaluation in rule based renderer (20% of time), getNextFeature in PostgresProvider 10%, coordinate transformation 10%. In my case, with Shapefile, QgsOgrProvider::getNextFeature is taking over 50% and most of it is strcasecmp in GDAL (probably because of unnecessary calls from QGIS (for Frank, if you are reading this)). I believe that it can be optimised, I'll look at it. Radim ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Approximate reprojection for vectors
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote: Hm, I just see that UMN uses a normal select statement (not a binary cursor as QGIS does). Don't know if that could make a difference, probably something for me to test (the benchmark infrastructur should still be in place). Just an experience from GRASS. Once, 'many' years ago, there was in GRASS the possibility to use PostGIS as a backend to store geometry, instead of in files. IIRC, first, obviously, we used binary cursor, to make it more efficient, later we found that it is less efficient than normal text cursor. Radim ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Approximate reprojection for vectors
Hi Radim Did you measure with callgrind or any other tool. Maybe this explains the difference (as Martin pointed out). Could it be that a different paint device is doing the difference? But when rendering on screen, we are using QImage or QImage anyway and in that case graphics card's power is not used, is it? Both QGIS server and desktop use QImage (except if you have 'fix problem with incorrectly filled polygons' checked. In this case QPixmap is used). I'm not sure how important the graphics card is for 2D rendering. In the wms benchmark, the servers with AGG rendering engine performed best. And afaik AGG is pure software rendering. I'm however not a computer graphics guru, so maybe someone with more insight could correct / comment here. In my case, with Shapefile, QgsOgrProvider::getNextFeature is taking over 50% and most of it is strcasecmp in GDAL (probably because of unnecessary calls from QGIS (for Frank, if you are reading this)). I believe that it can be optimised, I'll look at it. I remember in last years wms benchmark, we were completely out of the game at the shapefile test. Could well be there is some room for improvements here. Regards, Marco Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011, 09.14:37 schrieb Radim Blazek: On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch I did a lot of profiling for the FOSS4G WMS benchmark (osm data, reprojected to google crs, complex symbology with a lot of rules). The pattern was mostly the following: the rendering itself (QPainter-drawPolyline) was the most time consuming operation (appr. 50% of rendering time), I always thought that Qt4 rendering engine is quite efficient. Also in my case (I am testing with Shapefile) QPainte::drawPolyline takes only 0.05% (!!!), it seems that I am looking on some wrong results comaring to your 50%, but I cannot find what am I doing wrong. Could it be that a different paint device is doing the difference? But when rendering on screen, we are using QImage or QImage anyway and in that case graphics card's power is not used, is it? next was evaluation in rule based renderer (20% of time), getNextFeature in PostgresProvider 10%, coordinate transformation 10%. In my case, with Shapefile, QgsOgrProvider::getNextFeature is taking over 50% and most of it is strcasecmp in GDAL (probably because of unnecessary calls from QGIS (for Frank, if you are reading this)). I believe that it can be optimised, I'll look at it. Radim -- Dr. Marco Hugentobler Sourcepole - Linux Open Source Solutions Churerstrasse 22, CH-8808 Pfäffikon SZ, Switzerland marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo
Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tim Sutton t...@linfiniti.com wrote: Hi On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think we should run this soon or wait for closer to the 2.0 release. Ideally I would like to see the QGIS home page redesigned too but it should really be something that compliments the logo and the feel of QGIS. So maybe if we get logo done soonish we can look into new designs for the website that work with the new logo. I was thinking about posting a blog post about a logo comp and see if we can get some more funds. Thoughts? +1 from me to get cracking with it now. blog post sounds good - I can do the same and maybe we can get Anita to also advertise it on her blog. Sure, just let me know which sites to link to. Or are we organizing it ourselves now without a logo designer competition website? Best wishes, Anita Regards Tim - Nathan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote: Il 01/09/2011 23:17, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: Is anyone willing to pool a bit more money in to go with Simon's effort. The more money the better chance of getting some good logos. we also have some money from our sposnsor; we normally use it for hackfests, but if we prefer we can set aside some of this for the logo competition. BTW, I encourage the community to keep on donating to the project. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo
I'll write a post up tonight. I think we should just point people to this thread or to contact Paolo to handle the money side of things then we can kick it off. I don't see a point running it ourself. I would like to use that http://99designs.com/logo-design website as there is some really good stuff on there. I think we could get good designer coverage then. - Nathan On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tim Sutton t...@linfiniti.com wrote: Hi On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think we should run this soon or wait for closer to the 2.0 release. Ideally I would like to see the QGIS home page redesigned too but it should really be something that compliments the logo and the feel of QGIS. So maybe if we get logo done soonish we can look into new designs for the website that work with the new logo. I was thinking about posting a blog post about a logo comp and see if we can get some more funds. Thoughts? +1 from me to get cracking with it now. blog post sounds good - I can do the same and maybe we can get Anita to also advertise it on her blog. Sure, just let me know which sites to link to. Or are we organizing it ourselves now without a logo designer competition website? Best wishes, Anita Regards Tim - Nathan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote: Il 01/09/2011 23:17, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: Is anyone willing to pool a bit more money in to go with Simon's effort. The more money the better chance of getting some good logos. we also have some money from our sposnsor; we normally use it for hackfests, but if we prefer we can set aside some of this for the logo competition. BTW, I encourage the community to keep on donating to the project. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Re: [Qgis-community-team] New QGIS logo
Hi, madman...@gmail.com wrote: I don't see a point running it ourself. I would like to use that http://99designs.com/logo-design website as there is some really good stuff on there. +1 We should try to get as many designers interested as possible. Anita I think we could get good designer coverage then. - Nathan On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Anita Graser anitagra...@gmx.at wrote: Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Tim Sutton t...@linfiniti.com wrote: Hi On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote: Do you think we should run this soon or wait for closer to the 2.0 release. Ideally I would like to see the QGIS home page redesigned too but it should really be something that compliments the logo and the feel of QGIS. So maybe if we get logo done soonish we can look into new designs for the website that work with the new logo. I was thinking about posting a blog post about a logo comp and see if we can get some more funds. Thoughts? +1 from me to get cracking with it now. blog post sounds good - I can do the same and maybe we can get Anita to also advertise it on her blog. Sure, just let me know which sites to link to. Or are we organizing it ourselves now without a logo designer competition website? Best wishes, Anita Regards Tim - Nathan On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote: Il 01/09/2011 23:17, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto: Is anyone willing to pool a bit more money in to go with Simon's effort. The more money the better chance of getting some good logos. we also have some money from our sposnsor; we normally use it for hackfests, but if we prefer we can set aside some of this for the logo competition. BTW, I encourage the community to keep on donating to the project. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini: http://www.faunalia.it/pc ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-community-team mailing list qgis-community-t...@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-community-team ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] New plugins web application
Hi, during last Hackfest in Lisbon, me with Tim and the two Ric[h]?ard? have been working on the new web infrastructure (plugins.qgis.org), the work has continued in the last months with bug fixing and other improvements. I'm not sayng that this new system is perfect but I'm asking myself why there is a so strong lack of interest for it. The only time I've pressed slightly for a shift towards the new system, I've been told it was too early. I feel that, even if it could certainly be improved, the new system is better than the old one and should replace it ASAP. I'm considering to participate to the next Hackfest in Zuerich in order to work on that, but I need a clear statement from the steering comitee about the future of that application. Any comment/feedback is warmly welcome! Thanks. 2011/10/1 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it: Hi all. Organization of the metting is starting. Please let us know if you need financial help to participate, so we can work out a budget. Please also help us soliciting potential donors and sponsors. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New plugins web application
Hi Alessandro, As a not very good programmer I am probably not that helpful but if I can help in any way just tell me what to do and I will support you as I feel you are perfectly right .. we should consolidate and replace the old system .. If you want to work on that also in Zürich - I am there too - maybe I can help you .. kind regards Werner On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, during last Hackfest in Lisbon, me with Tim and the two Ric[h]?ard? have been working on the new web infrastructure (plugins.qgis.org), the work has continued in the last months with bug fixing and other improvements. I'm not sayng that this new system is perfect but I'm asking myself why there is a so strong lack of interest for it. The only time I've pressed slightly for a shift towards the new system, I've been told it was too early. I feel that, even if it could certainly be improved, the new system is better than the old one and should replace it ASAP. I'm considering to participate to the next Hackfest in Zuerich in order to work on that, but I need a clear statement from the steering comitee about the future of that application. Any comment/feedback is warmly welcome! Thanks. 2011/10/1 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it: Hi all. Organization of the metting is starting. Please let us know if you need financial help to participate, so we can work out a budget. Please also help us soliciting potential donors and sponsors. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
[Qgis-developer] accessing project properties
Hi all, I got stuck... From within a Python plugin I want to know the current project's selection color. I guess I need the corresponding QgsPropertyKeys' values. Any hints? regards Bernhard P.S. The long way would be to read the project's XML-file and access the relevant nodes directly. Information from NOD32 This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server. http://www.nod32.com ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Approximate reprojection for vectors
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch wrote: the time spent within postgres provider while waiting for server to return the features may not be considered. That might be a valid point. Is it better to use oprofile for the waiting time? OProfile is a system-wide statistical profiler. Being system-wide means that it profiles all applications (and kernel, too!) running on the system. So it is able to measure time not only in qgis but also in postgresql etc. And being statistical means that it is periodically triggered by hardware and records samples what code is running at each time. With enough samples you should have quite good idea what is going on. However I am not yet sure how to profile i/o waiting times - maybe strace is a better tool in this regard. Additionally there is no such nice GUI like kcachegrind for oprofile output - although op2callgraph tool may be of some use. In any case, the other servers in the benchmark had to fetch the features from the same database. So there must be very performance critical differences in the other parts of the code. As you might know, QGIS didn't really win first price... Is the benchmark (data + configuration) publicly available? Is it simple to download it and run on a local machine? Regards Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] Approximate reprojection for vectors
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Radim Blazek radim.bla...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Marco Hugentobler marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch I did a lot of profiling for the FOSS4G WMS benchmark (osm data, reprojected to google crs, complex symbology with a lot of rules). The pattern was mostly the following: the rendering itself (QPainter-drawPolyline) was the most time consuming operation (appr. 50% of rendering time), I always thought that Qt4 rendering engine is quite efficient. Also in my case (I am testing with Shapefile) QPainte::drawPolyline takes only 0.05% (!!!), it seems that I am looking on some wrong results comaring to your 50%, but I cannot find what am I doing wrong. Could it be that a different paint device is doing the difference? But when rendering on screen, we are using QImage or QImage anyway and in that case graphics card's power is not used, is it? Qt4 rendering should be quite fine performance-wise. But there are some paint operations that are slow anyway - antialiasing, thick lines (must be convert to polygon!), drawing with opacity etc. This is a good reading material: http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2009/12/16/qt-graphics-and-performance-an-overview/ http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2009/12/14/qt-graphics-and-performance-whats-hot-and-whats-not/ In any case we should look into the performance in a more coordinated way: 1. choose a dataset for testing - ideally just 1-3 layers of real data with lots of features (e.g. 1+) for each feature type - points, polylines, polygons. Any ideas for a free dataset? 2. write a benchmark that could be run repeatedly easily - I would volunteer to provide it 3. test and analyze the results 4. optimize bottlenecks next was evaluation in rule based renderer (20% of time), getNextFeature in PostgresProvider 10%, coordinate transformation 10%. In my case, with Shapefile, QgsOgrProvider::getNextFeature is taking over 50% and most of it is strcasecmp in GDAL (probably because of unnecessary calls from QGIS (for Frank, if you are reading this)). I believe that it can be optimised, I'll look at it. Which version of GDAL? From 1.8 there are some important enhancements, mainly in case that the shapefile consists of lots of features. Martin ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] qgis 1.7 install error
I'm not an install guru, but knowing what is your architecture might help. Myself I'm using non standard install procedure that I described here: http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Talk:Building_QGIS_from_Source It might help. Mayeul Le samedi 01 octobre 2011 à 18:31 +, Jules Kouadio a écrit : Hello. I get this error after the commands mkdir build-master cd build-master ccmake .. make .. Scanning dependencies of target python_module_qgis_analysis [ 93%] Building CXX object python/CMakeFiles/python_module_qgis_analysis.dir/analysis/sipanalysispart0.cpp.o /home/sekedoua/qgis-Quantum-GIS-7bf7110/build-master/python/analysis/sipanalysispart0.cpp: In function ‘void initanalysis()’: /home/sekedoua/qgis-Quantum-GIS-7bf7110/build-master/python/analysis/sipanalysispart0.cpp:161: erreur: ‘SIP_MODULE_NAME’ was not declared in this scope make[2]: *** [python/CMakeFiles/python_module_qgis_analysis.dir/analysis/sipanalysispart0.cpp.o] Erreur 1 make[1]: *** [python/CMakeFiles/python_module_qgis_analysis.dir/all] Erreur 2 make: *** [all] Erreur 2 Please Help me. Thanks. -- -- ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New plugins web application
Hi Alessandro On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Werner Macho werner.ma...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Alessandro, As a not very good programmer I am probably not that helpful but if I can help in any way just tell me what to do and I will support you as I feel you are perfectly right .. we should consolidate and replace the old system .. If you want to work on that also in Zürich - I am there too - maybe I can help you .. My understanding is that your fine new plugin repo will be the official repo of QGIS 2.0 and at some point in the close future master will point to that repo instead of the old one. I think Borys and Martin also had some thoughts on it so they will correct me if I got anything wrong. We were also going to ask you if you could work on the symbol repository during the Zurich hackfest if you attend. Look forward to seeing you there! Regards Tim kind regards Werner On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, during last Hackfest in Lisbon, me with Tim and the two Ric[h]?ard? have been working on the new web infrastructure (plugins.qgis.org), the work has continued in the last months with bug fixing and other improvements. I'm not sayng that this new system is perfect but I'm asking myself why there is a so strong lack of interest for it. The only time I've pressed slightly for a shift towards the new system, I've been told it was too early. I feel that, even if it could certainly be improved, the new system is better than the old one and should replace it ASAP. I'm considering to participate to the next Hackfest in Zuerich in order to work on that, but I need a clear statement from the steering comitee about the future of that application. Any comment/feedback is warmly welcome! Thanks. 2011/10/1 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it: Hi all. Organization of the metting is starting. Please let us know if you need financial help to participate, so we can work out a budget. Please also help us soliciting potential donors and sponsors. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager) == Please do not email me off-list with technical support questions. Using the lists will gain more exposure for your issues and the knowledge surrounding your issue will be shared with all. Visit http://linfiniti.com to find out about: * QGIS programming and support services * Mapserver and PostGIS based hosting plans * FOSS Consulting Services Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net == ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New plugins web application
Hi Alessandro, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alessandro Pasotti apaso...@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sayng that this new system is perfect but I'm asking myself why there is a so strong lack of interest for it. IMHO there's only one really missing feature: more integration between the plugin site and the Redmine trac. Ok to keep each developer free to choose the preferred tracking system, but I think that the plugin site should suggest to create a new project on the Redmine. Furthermore I'd like if in the plugin details page there's a link to report an issue or just to go to the trac page (Redmine or whatever). The plugin site will be the user interface of the QGis plugins system, so that kind of integration is required IMHO, it can do the difference! Just my 2 cents. I feel that, even if it could certainly be improved, the new system is better than the old one and should replace it ASAP. +1, I agree with you. Regards. Thanks. 2011/10/1 Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it: Hi all. Organization of the metting is starting. Please let us know if you need financial help to participate, so we can work out a budget. Please also help us soliciting potential donors and sponsors. All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia www.faunalia.eu Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Alessandro Pasotti w3: www.itopen.it ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer -- Giuseppe Sucameli ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Re: [Qgis-developer] New plugins web application
I apologize for the Orror, but it's 3:30am. On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:24 AM, Giuseppe Sucameli sucam...@faunalia.it wrote: it can do the difference! it can _make_ the difference! N8! -- Giuseppe Sucameli ___ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
