[Qgis-developer] Plugin [1081] AutoFields approval notification.

2017-04-20 Thread noreply

Plugin AutoFields approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1081] AutoFields 0.5.0" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/AutoFields/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [683] OS Translator II approval notification.

2017-04-20 Thread noreply

Plugin OS Translator II approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[683] OS Translator II 1.4.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/OSTranslatorII/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] Plugin [995] dzetsaka : Classification tool approval notification.

2017-04-20 Thread noreply

Plugin dzetsaka : Classification tool approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[995] dzetsaka : Classification tool 2.4.1" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/dzetsaka/
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] 'Native' python docs for QGIS

2017-04-20 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Matthias Kuhn  wrote:

> Whee,
>
> Nice one. Does that mean we almost have appropriate docs for python
> development?
>
> Too good to be true :)
>
>
>

Yeah, thanks Tim!

I guess all we need to do now is to clean and update the cookbook :)

Reference is mandatory, but the cookbook has been an invaluable source of
information for years, unfortunately it is not easy to keep it up to date.




>
> On 4/17/17 8:56 AM, Tim Sutton wrote:
>
> Hi
>
>
> On 17 Apr 2017, at 3:14 AM, Nyall Dawson  wrote:
>
> On 14 April 2017 at 09:40, Tim Sutton  wrote:
>
>
> Hi All
>
> I made a first pass hack to build python docs from the sip bindings for
> QGIS.
>
> See the README & code here:
>
> https://github.com/qgis/QGISPythonAPIDocumentation
>
> There are a few things not yet documented like setting up sphinx etc
>
>
> Sounds great! Have you got a sample of the output online?
>
>
> Yes (same caveats apply about it being a rough first pass).
>
> http://qgis-python.kartoza.com/docs/
>
> When it is more tidy I will put it on a QGIS.ORG domain - I plan to split
> the docs into logical subgroups  and perhaps merge it into the cookbook so
> that we can cross reference the API from the examples. For now I am just
> playing around to see what is feasible - I will hopefully put some work
> into it a the QGIS hackfest in Essen.
>
> I'd also try to work up some guideline so that we can require incoming
> code generates nice docs. In InaSAFE we have a 'tidy everything you touch'
> policy - it would be nice to institute the same in QGIS so that as well as
> unit tests, peer reviews also require decent API docs in order for code to
> be merged.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>
> Nyall
>
>
> —
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tim Sutton*
>
> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
> *Project chair:* QGIS.org
>
> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>
> Desktop GIS programming services
> Geospatial web development
> GIS Training
> Consulting Services
>
> *Skype*: timlinux
> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
>
> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing listqgis-develo...@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
w3:   www.itopen.it
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] 'Native' python docs for QGIS

2017-04-20 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Whee,

Nice one. Does that mean we almost have appropriate docs for python
development?

Too good to be true :)


On 4/17/17 8:56 AM, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>> On 17 Apr 2017, at 3:14 AM, Nyall Dawson > > wrote:
>>
>> On 14 April 2017 at 09:40, Tim Sutton > > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I made a first pass hack to build python docs from the sip bindings
>>> for QGIS.
>>>
>>> See the README & code here:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGISPythonAPIDocumentation
>>>
>>> There are a few things not yet documented like setting up sphinx etc
>>
>> Sounds great! Have you got a sample of the output online?
>
> Yes (same caveats apply about it being a rough first pass).
>
> http://qgis-python.kartoza.com/docs/
>
> When it is more tidy I will put it on a QGIS.ORG 
> domain - I plan to split the docs into logical subgroups  and perhaps
> merge it into the cookbook so that we can cross reference the API from
> the examples. For now I am just playing around to see what is feasible
> - I will hopefully put some work into it a the QGIS hackfest in Essen.
>
> I'd also try to work up some guideline so that we can require incoming
> code generates nice docs. In InaSAFE we have a 'tidy everything you
> touch' policy - it would be nice to institute the same in QGIS so that
> as well as unit tests, peer reviews also require decent API docs in
> order for code to be merged.
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
>>
>> Nyall
>
> —
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Tim Sutton*
>
> *Co-founder:* Kartoza
> *Project chair:* QGIS.org 
>
> Visit http://kartoza.com  to find out about open
> source:
>
> Desktop GIS programming services
> Geospatial web development
> GIS Training
> Consulting Services
>
> *Skype*: timlinux 
> *IRC:* timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net 
>
> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Are there plans to create a unique "Add layer" tool?

2017-04-20 Thread Alexandre Neto
Fine with me.

Stéphane Henriod  escreveu no dia terça, 18/04/2017
às 05:46:

> Hi all
>
> Harrissou has quite intensively re-organised the doc, which is now, IMO,
> much clearer. Thanks for that!
>
> But lots of changes are in "suggestion mode". I'd like to accept all those
> changes to increase the clarity and readability. Any objection on this?
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Stéphane
>
>
> Le mercredi 12 avril 2017, Alexandre Neto  a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi Stéphane,
>>
>> I believe it's a great starting point, very complete (I would not
>> remember/consider some types of data).
>>
>> We still need to fill the second page and discuss the possible UI/UX
>> implementation. Then, we will need some developers (I'm not a developer) to
>> consider the requests and filter what would be hard or impossible to tackle.
>>
>> Our best chance to have this implemented is by doing baby steps. I would
>> not consider more data format/providers than the ones we have in the manage
>> layers toolbar in this first phase.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Stéphane Henriod  escreveu no dia terça,
>> 11/04/2017 às 12:57:
>>
>>> Hi Alexandre
>>>
>>> this is indeed great!
>>>
>>> Is the gdoc as it is now helpful enough for you to design a possible
>>> implementation? Or, if not, what other inputs / comments would be necessary?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Stéphane
>>>
>>>
>>> Le lundi 10 avril 2017, Alexandre Neto  a écrit :
>>>
 Hello all,

 At Boundless we are planning to put some development time in this
 "unified add layer" button/feature. As others already did, our idea was to
 use the browser panel as a base for replacing most of the buttons and add
 any capabilities that are still missing.

 So, let's work together to find what are those missing pieces, and how
 it would be the best way to implement it. We will put our thoughts in the
 Google document. As soon we have it stabilized we can start creating a QEP
 for it.

 Thanks,

 Alexandre Neto

 Stéphane Henriod  escreveu no dia quinta,
 6/04/2017 às 12:14:

> Thanks Harrissou!
>
> I took the liberty to remove the first table (that I created) and to
> leave only yours. It is more complete anyway
>
> Cheers
>
> Stéphane
>
>
> Le mercredi 5 avril 2017, DelazJ  a écrit :
>
>> I took the liberty to do some changes to the doc (especially add a
>> new table with more detailed features on the existing tools + comments).
>> It's supposed to replace the table already drafted but I didn't go so far
>> without a review.
>>
>> 2017-04-05 10:36 GMT+02:00 DelazJ :
>>
>>> Hi Stéphane,
>>> actually there's no more UX team (list). UX mailing list has been
>>> shut down months ago because it used to refer to dev list for most of
>>> decisions/advices so UX matters are now discussed either in the dev 
>>> mailing
>>> list (we maybe can keep this thread) or, I guess until QGIS3 release, in
>>> the qgis3_UIX_discussion repository.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Harrissou
>>>
>>> 2017-04-05 10:19 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Henriod :
>>>
 Hi all

 there have been a few additions in the Gdoc already (not sure from
 whom) but I don't know if this is already sufficient for developers to 
 take
 this up?

 Also, I am not sure how to reach out to the UX team. Through a
 separate mailing list? Or is it sufficient to have it here
 https://github.com/qgis/qgis3_UIX_discussion/issues/1 ?

 Cheer

 Stéphane


 Le mardi 4 avril 2017, Stéphane Henriod  a
 écrit :

> Thanks Nyall!
>
> Here I just created a Gdoc to collect info mentioned in your
> points 1-4 + a:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aMX9jOfl10q8oETRzOHSHnRpHCc7UJ1dDnCCq3VyTAY/edit?usp=sharing
>
> All interested, feel free to contribute, I might not have the full
> overview
>
> Thanks and cheers
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
> “When you travel, remember that a foreign country is not designed
> to make you comfortable. It is designed to make its own people
> comfortable." -- Clifton Fadiman
>
> 2017-04-04 13:53 GMT+06:00 Nyall Dawson :
>
>> On 4 April 2017 at 17:46, Stéphane Henriod 
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks a lot Anita for the info!
>> >
>> > I re-located the issue: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/9451
>> >
>> > Not sure though if this will make it alive again. Let's 

Re: [Qgis-developer] cmake fails

2017-04-20 Thread Paolo Cavallini
IMVHO yes.
All the best.

Il 20/04/2017 01:27, Alexandre Neto ha scritto:
> Should the INSTALL file be updated then?
> 
> Paolo Cavallini >
> escreveu no dia terça, 18/04/2017 às 17:06:
> 
> Il 18/04/2017 17:57, Paolo Cavallini ha scritto:
> 
> > a package is missing for
> > 2.99 though.
> 
> In fact, it was, quite predictably:
> qt5keychain-dev
> All the best.
> --
> Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu 
> QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
> https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all=IT=qgis,arcgis
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org 
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> 
> -- 
> Alexandre Neto
> -
> @AlexNetoGeo
> http://sigsemgrilhetas.wordpress.com
> http://gisunchained.wordpress.com


-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all=IT=qgis,arcgis
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer