[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1919] Export to SQL Server approval notification.

2020-05-29 Thread noreply

Plugin Export to SQL Server approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[1919] Export to SQL Server 0.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/export_to_sql_server/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Online Q plus discussion session - QEP 179 (Turning Plugin Management into Actual Package Management)

2020-05-29 Thread Sebastian M. Ernst
Hi all,

I am organizing a small online Q plus discussion session for QEP 179
for actually *talking* about this proposal *next week*. If you are
interested in joining, please let me know what time is best. Proposed
times are in Central European Summer Time (CEST):

https://terminplaner4.dfn.de/wulb19ehAr8rSv9W

Thanks & regards,
Sebastian


Am 21.05.20 um 21:33 schrieb Sebastian M. Ernst:
> Hi all,
> 
> please see https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
> for a proposal to add `pip` and `conda` support to QGIS, i.e. turning
> the current plugin management into actual package management.
> 
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
> 
> Following up on this earlier discussion, among others:
> 
> Am 16.03.20 um 19:56 schrieb Olivier Dalang:
>> [...]
>> I'd suggest drafting a QEP already, as adding support for pip/conda
>> dependencies (which would be awesome !!) raises a few important
>> questions (for example whether we have virtualenvs or similar on all
>> systems, how plugins would declare their deps, how to deal with
>> incompatible deps, or if we even go one step further and support
>> distribution qgis plugin as pip packages, etc...). [...]
> Best regards,
> Sebastian
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-29 Thread Anita Graser


On 29.05.2020 21:18, Anita Graser wrote:


Dear QGIS Community,

On 25.05.2020 13:55, Anita Graser wrote:

Due to popular demand, we have decided to reopen the submission form
and to extend the deadline to allow for submission of missing QEP
links. Please note the new and final deadlines:

* Proposal submission: Friday, May 29 (end of business day CET)
* QEP discussion deadline: Tuesday, June 9 (instead of June 7)

Proposals without QEP will not move forward to the voting.


It's my pleasure to present to you this year's list of proposals:

 1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
 2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
 3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
 4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
 5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
 6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
 7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
 8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
 9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/183
10. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
14. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184
15. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/185
16. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/186


Please also consider

17. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/182

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-29 Thread Anita Graser

Dear QGIS Community,

On 25.05.2020 13:55, Anita Graser wrote:

Due to popular demand, we have decided to reopen the submission form
and to extend the deadline to allow for submission of missing QEP
links. Please note the new and final deadlines:

* Proposal submission: Friday, May 29 (end of business day CET)
* QEP discussion deadline: Tuesday, June 9 (instead of June 7)

Proposals without QEP will not move forward to the voting.


It's my pleasure to present to you this year's list of proposals:

1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/183
10. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
14. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184
15. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/185
16. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/186

The QEP discussions are now ongoing. The deadline is on Tuesday, June
9th which will be followed by the voting period.

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Using SVG symbology files

2020-05-29 Thread r.agui...@utwente.nl


Dear Devs,

I would like to use the SVG symbology files of QGIS (e.g., those located at 
../OSGeo4W64/apps/qgis-ltr/svg) in a web Map.

Is there any copyright or license that I should be aware of?

Best regards,



Rosa

-
MSc Rosa Aguilar
PhD Candidate
Faculty of Geoinformation Science and Earth Observation
University of Twente
Enschede, The Netherlands
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rosamaguilar/?locale=en_US
https://rosaguilar.github.io/
-

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [2071] BDOT10k_GML_SHP approval notification.

2020-05-29 Thread noreply

Plugin BDOT10k_GML_SHP approval by zimbogisgeek.
The plugin version "[2071] BDOT10k_GML_SHP 0.9.2" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/BDOT10k_GML_SHP_Loader/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Python Plugins external libs

2020-05-29 Thread Sebastian M. Ernst
Hi Michał,

I was waiting for any of the QGIS developers to comment on this ... A
collection of common, bad approaches can be found here [1]. Bottom line:
There is no clean way to do it. I recently wrote a summary of the
situation and those approaches, see here [2]. I also released an
official QGIS enhancement proposal which is currently being discussed.
It addresses this issue, among other stuff, see here [3]. I'd appreciate
if you could describe your desired use-case and put it as a comment into
the discussion. It would help to support the proposal.

Best regards,
Sebastian


[1]: https://gis.stackexchange.com/q/196002/13332
[2]:
https://github.com/qgist/pluginmanager-qep/blob/master/QEP.md#currently-missing-links
[3]: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179


Am 27.05.20 um 15:30 schrieb michal.wl...@envirosolutions.pl:
> Dear All,
> 
>  
> 
> What is the best approach to include third-party python modules into the
> QGIS python plugin?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> EnviroSolutions Sp. z o. o.
> Michał Włoga
> 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Search/filter boxes in service dialogs

2020-05-29 Thread Richard Duivenvoorde
Hi List,

One of my longtime wishes comes true:

https://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/version/3.14/#allow-filtering-wmts-list-source-dialog

I did not even notice it at first because the search input is so small.
Had a little chat about it with Denis, and thought to bring it here.
We have a lot of different search/filter inputs:

We have several service/connection dialogs, and all have different
search/filter boxes:
- WMS has (now) a small one above the table
- WFS has a large one aboven the table
- Oracle connection has a set of fields below the table
- Just like postgres
- Network connection tree has one above the tree (with 'Filter requests')
- browser has one above the tree, but hidden (you have to click the
litte Y (funnel/filter sign?) first) with 'Type here to filter visible
items...)
- Options has a small one above the left column telling 'Search '

etc etc

Would it not be nice to streamline those to more or less the same
size/icons/text in it? There is also the normal input and the qgis input
with the 'clean input' icon.

We have: https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/developers_guide/hig.html

Anyone enough into this (or has a strong opinion) to create some guidelines?
Some of my preferences but I'm not so strong, happy to change:

- I would be ok with a hidden input(set_ over the total length of the
filtered widget) showing itself when clicked on the filter-icon and
preferably 'rembembered' (some tables I really like to always filter)
- always above the widget to filter
- I'd say: always a little 'magnifying glass'-icon in it
- no pref with me about the 'clean icon'
- always with 'Filter...' unless you need to give more info so: 'Filter
visible items'
(not sure if 'filter' is the same as 'search' though)

I think with all the features flying in, we have to try to be a little
consistent in what it looks like?

(mmm, sorry, did not want to make it this long :-( )

Regards,

Richard Duivenvorode


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer