from:"Anita Graser"

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2024 QGIS Grant Proposals final results

2024-05-08 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Dear QGIS Community,

It's my pleasure to provide you with further updates on the grant programme:

https://blog.qgis.org/2024/05/08/qgis-grant-programme-2024-update/

Thanks to the Danish User Group, we are able to fund another proposal. 

And we continue to look for additional funds to also make the remaining 
enhancements a reality. Please get in touch if you want to help. 

Regards,
Anita




On Wednesday, 01. May 2024 20:15:02 (+02:00), Anita Graser wrote:

> Dear QGIS Community,
> 
> On behalf of the QGIS.ORG project, I'm extremely pleased to announce the 
> winning proposals for our 2024 QGIS.ORG grant programme. Read all about the 
> voting results here:
> 
> https://blog.qgis.org/2024/05/01/qgis-grant-programme-2024-results/
> 
> A number of interesting and useful proposals didn’t make it because of our 
> limited budget; we encourage organizations to pick up one of their choices 
> and sponsor it.
> 
> Regards,
> Anita

-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2024 QGIS Grant Proposals final results

2024-05-01 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,

On behalf of the QGIS.ORG project, I'm extremely pleased to announce the 
winning proposals for our 2024 QGIS.ORG grant programme. Read all about the 
voting results here:

https://blog.qgis.org/2024/05/01/qgis-grant-programme-2024-results/

A number of interesting and useful proposals didn’t make it because of our 
limited budget; we encourage organizations to pick up one of their choices and 
sponsor it.

Regards,
Anita
-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2024 grant applications are now closed

2024-03-23 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,


This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now closed and 
that we have received 11 complete applications totaling € 65,200. (For 
comparison, the grant programme budget is €30,000.)


As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:
Update older annotation items to new framework  
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/269

Cleanup QGIS data provider code and move more providers to core library 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/288
Authentication System: allow Database (initially Postgres) storage for 
authentication DB
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/248
Switch to clang-format for C++ code and implement  pre-commit hooks 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/264QGIS Enhancement: 
Authentication system revision  
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/289
Clean up point cloud index and improve its thread safety
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/290
QGIS Enhancement Proposal: Mitigate Abusive Tile Fetching on OpenStreetMap 
(OSM) Servers
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/291
Implementing CI Qt6 Windows Builds through vcpkg
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/292
Fix access to remote data sources in WebAssembly builds 
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/294
PyQGIS linter warnings  
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/287
Embbeded end-user feedback and renewed report workflow  
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/295


All proposals are tagged with the Grant-2024 tag:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/labels/Grant-2024


We are now in the QEP discussion phase. 

The QEP discussion phase takes two weeks and ends on Saturday, 2024-04-06. 
Afterwards, we will proceed to writing discussion summaries (by 2024-04-13), 
followed by the voting phase with expected publication of voting results on 
2024-04-27. 

Thank you to everyone who submitted project proposals!



Anita___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2024

2024-03-22 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi Julien,


I was about to closed the grant application form now. All proposals submitted 
through the form are in. (It's not an exact process since I haven't found a way 
to automatically close the form at a certain time). 


Unfortunately, however, I don't see QEP295 in the list of QEPs that have been 
submitted through the form, so I'm missing the grant request information 
(requested budget, proposal history, qualification, implementation schedule / 
plan). 


I'll leave the form open until tomorrow noon. Then I'll close it and send the 
final summary of all submitted proposals. 


Hope this helps. 


Regards,
Anita








On Friday, 22. March 2024 11:11:17 (+01:00), Julien Moura (Oslandia) via 
QGIS-Developer wrote:



Dear Anita, PSC and devs,

Just to let you know that I posted my QEP just now 
(https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/295) and realized 
(thanks Julien Cabièces!) that the deadline was yesterday evening.
I'd like to tell you it's because I'm in a time zone where days are 36 hours 
long, but short of creating envy, it's just poor memorization on my part and a 
preconceived idea that a deadline is necessarily on a Friday.

Sorry, I hope it can still be taken into account for grant. If not, too bad, 
"c'est le jeu ma pov lucette" as we haven't been saying for a long time, even 
in France.

Have a good deadline days,
Regards,
Julien





On 15/03/2024 18:53, Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Dear devs,

Due to popular request, we are extending the deadline for proposals by one week 
until 21 March.

Please get your proposals in to make QGIS even better.

Regards,
Anita


Feb 15, 2024 20:11:31 Anita Graser  
<mailto:anitagra...@gmx.at> :

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have been a great success. We are very 
pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The call 
is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to 
the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline for this 
round is on Tuesday 2024-03-14.

For more details, please read:
http://blog.qgis.org/qgis-grants-9-call-for-grant-proposals-2024

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

Anita
--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com <http://anitagraser.com/>
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org



___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org> 
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2024

2024-03-15 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear devs,

Due to popular request, we are extending the deadline for proposals by one week 
until 21 March.

Please get your proposals in to make QGIS even better.

Regards,
Anita

Feb 15, 2024 20:11:31 Anita Graser :

> Dear QGIS Community,
> 
> Our previous rounds of grant proposals have been a great success. We are very 
> pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The 
> call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, 
> subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline 
> for this round is on Tuesday 2024-03-14.
> 
> For more details, please read:
> http://blog.qgis.org/qgis-grants-9-call-for-grant-proposals-2024
> 
> We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!
> 
> Anita
> -- 
> Anita Graser
> Home: http://anitagraser.com
> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2024

2024-02-15 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have been a great success. We are very 
pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The call 
is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to 
the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline for this 
round is on Tuesday 2024-03-14. 

For more details, please read: 
http://blog.qgis.org/qgis-grants-9-call-for-grant-proposals-2024

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

Anita
-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Details about the Grant Program?

2024-01-04 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi Thomas,

Please have a look at last years round for all the steps involved: 
https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/58

Regards
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Contributor meeting at BIDS23 Vienna

2023-10-03 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Hi,

This is a friendly reminder that we will have the 26th Contributor Meeting
in Vienna next month:

https://blog.qgis.org/2023/07/26/qgis-contributor-meeting-at-bids-23-vienna/


Please check out the blog post for details and sign up. We're looking
forward to seeing you there.

Regards,
Anita

--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2023 QGIS Grant Proposals final results

2023-06-26 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,

On behalf of the QGIS.ORG project, I'm extremely pleased to announce the 
winning proposals for our 2023 QGIS.ORG grant programme. Read all about the 
voting results here:

https://blog.qgis.org/2023/06/26/qgis-grant-programme-2023-results/

A number of interesting and useful proposals didn’t make it because of our 
limited budget; we encourage organizations to pick up one of their choices and 
sponsor it.

Regards,
Anita
-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin "MGP Connect" lacks valid repo

2023-06-08 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Hi,

I just published the plugin update for May
(https://blog.qgis.org/2023/06/08/plugin-update-may-2023/) and noticed that
the MGP Connect plugin (https://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/MGP_Connect/)
lacks a valid repo, i.e. the repo they linked does not contain the plugin.

Could the plugin reviewers please get in touch with the plugin developers
to fix this?

Thanks and regards,
Anita


--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Update on the 2023 grant programme

2023-05-30 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer




Dear QGIS Community,

We have now compiled the 2023 grant applications summary which is available
at https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/58#issuecomment-1567892412

As a quick reminder, here are the proposal titles:


1. QGIS Bug Tracker cleanup
2. Switch to clang-format for C++ code and implement pre-commit hooks
3. Add vertical CRS handling to QGIS
4. Improve test result handling on QGIS CI
5. Update older annotation items to new framework
6. QGIS Project Loading Performance
7. Conda Installer for macOS
8. Unify the geometric and topological verification and correction features
in QGIS
9. Porting to C++ and harmonization of Processing algorithms

The next step will be to set up the voting form and email our voting
members to review the proposals and cast their vote.

Regards,
Anita
--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2023 grant applications are now closed

2023-05-18 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi Martin,

Thank you for asking. The discussion summaries (including requested budgets)
will be prepared for voting members so they can make their decisions. In the
meantime, here are the requested amounts per proposal:

Proposal title Budget QEP link
QGIS Bug Tracker cleanup€6,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/266
Switch to clang-format for C++ code and implement pre-commit hooks
€5,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/264 and
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/265

Add vertical CRS handling to QGIS €20,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/267
Improve test result handling on QGIS CI €1,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/268
Update older annotation items to new framework €8,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/269
QGIS Project Loading Performance€16,500.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/261
Conda Installer for macOS €12,100.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/270
Unify the geometric and topological verification and correction features in
QGIS€25,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/236
Porting to C++ and harmonization of Processing algorithms €10,000.00
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/271

Regards,
Anita

On Tuesday, 16. May 2023 18:14:12 (+02:00), Martin Dobias wrote:

Hi Anita

Are the requested EUR amounts of individual grant proposals also available
anywhere? It would be useful to know the amounts as this is an important factor
to consider. For me, it is a combination of proposal quality, overall impact
and cost - what determines my personal ordering of proposals.

Cheers
Martin

On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:30 PM Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer
wrote:

Dear QGIS community,

This is a friendly reminder that today is the last day of the QEP discussion
phase. Please wrap up the discussions.

In the next week, the discussion summaries will be prepared.

Regards,
Anita

On Thursday, 04. May 2023 20:44:30 (+02:00), Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now closed and
that we have received 9 complete applications totalling € 103,600.

As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:

1. QGIS Bug Tracker cleanup -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/266
2. Switch to clang-format for C++ code and implement pre-commit hooks -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/264 and
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/265
3. Add vertical CRS handling to QGIS -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/267
4. Improve test result handling on QGIS CI -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/268
5. Update older annotation items to new framework -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/269
6. QGIS Project Loading Performance -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/261
7. Conda Installer for macOS -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/270
8. Unify the geometric and topological verification and correction features in
QGIS - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/262
9. Porting to C++ and harmonization of Processing algorithms -
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/271

We are now in the QEP discussion phase. Please tag all proposals with the
Grant-2023 tag:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2023

The QEP discussion phase takes two weeks and ends on Tuesday, 2023-05-16.
Afterwards, we will proceed to writing discussion summaries (by 2023-05-23),
followed by the voting phase with expected publication of voting results on
2023-06-06.

Thank you to everyone who submitted project proposals!

Regards,
Anita

--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2023 grant applications are now closed

2023-05-16 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS community,

This is a friendly reminder that today is the last day of the QEP discussion
phase. Please wrap up the discussions.

In the next week, the discussion summaries will be prepared.

Regards,
Anita

On Thursday, 04. May 2023 20:44:30 (+02:00), Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now closed and
that we have received 9 complete applications totalling € 103,600.

As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:

We are now in the QEP discussion phase. Please tag all proposals with the
Grant-2023 tag:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2023

Thank you to everyone who submitted project proposals!

Regards,
Anita

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2023 grant applications are now closed

2023-05-05 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi,

May 5, 2023 06:31:02 Loïc Bartoletti via QGIS-Developer 
:

Snip

>>> 8. Unify the geometric and topological verification and correction features 
>>> in QGIS - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/262
>>
>> This link points to a different proposal, and I can't work out which is the 
>> correct one. Was a qep submitted for this grant?
>>
> It's https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/236
>
> Sorry, if I miscopied the link :/

No worries. I'll update the link in the response sheet.

Regards
Anita






___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2023 grant applications are now closed

2023-05-04 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,

This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now closed and that we have received 9 complete applications totalling € 103,600.

As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:

1. QGIS Bug Tracker cleanup - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/266

2. Switch to clang-format for C++ code and implement pre-commit hooks - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/264 and https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/265

3. Add vertical CRS handling to QGIS - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/267

4. Improve test result handling on QGIS CI - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/268

5. Update older annotation items to new framework - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/269

6. QGIS Project Loading Performance - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/261

7. Conda Installer for macOS - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/270

8. Unify the geometric and topological verification and correction features in QGIS - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/262

9. Porting to C++ and harmonization of Processing algorithms - https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/271

We are now in the QEP discussion phase. Please tag all proposals with the Grant-2023 tag:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2023

The QEP discussion phase takes two weeks and ends on Tuesday, 2023-05-16.

Afterwards, we will proceed to writing discussion summaries (by 2023-05-23),

followed by the voting phase with expected publication of voting results on 2023-06-06.

Thank you to everyone who submitted project proposals!

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2023

2023-05-03 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Due to popular request, the grant deadline has been extended by 24 hours. Please get your submissions in.

 

Regards,

Anita

 
 

Gesendet: Dienstag, 02. Mai 2023 um 19:41 Uhr
Von: "Anita Graser" 
An: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Re: Aw: Call for Grant Proposals 2023

Dear developers,
 

This is the final call for submissions. The form will close today, by end of day, anywhere in the world. 

 

Regards,

Anita

On Saturday, 22. April 2023 13:59:05 (+02:00), Anita Graser wrote:
 


Dear developers,

 

This is a friendly reminder that we'll soon reach the deadline for applications to the grant programme on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 

Please get your ideas in: https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/

 

Regards,

Anita

 
 

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. April 2023 um 08:50 Uhr
Von: "Anita Graser" 
An: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Call for Grant Proposals 2023



Dear QGIS Community,

 

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline for this round is on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 

 

For more details, please read: 

 

https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/

 

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

 

Regards,

Anita


 








-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 




___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2023

2023-05-02 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear developers,


This is the final call for submissions. The form will close today, by end of 
day, anywhere in the world. 


Regards,
Anita

On Saturday, 22. April 2023 13:59:05 (+02:00), Anita Graser wrote:


Dear developers,
 
This is a friendly reminder that we'll soon reach the deadline for applications 
to the grant programme on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 
Please get your ideas in: 
https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/
 
Regards,
Anita
 
 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. April 2023 um 08:50 Uhr
Von: "Anita Graser" 
An: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Call for Grant Proposals 2023
Dear QGIS Community,
 
Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success. We are 
very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The 
call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, 
subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline 
for this round is on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 
 
For more details, please read: 
 
https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/
 
We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!
 
Regards,
Anita

 

-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2023

2023-04-22 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear developers,

 

This is a friendly reminder that we'll soon reach the deadline for applications to the grant programme on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 

Please get your ideas in: https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/

 

Regards,

Anita

 
 

Gesendet: Mittwoch, 05. April 2023 um 08:50 Uhr
Von: "Anita Graser" 
An: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Betreff: Call for Grant Proposals 2023



Dear QGIS Community,

 

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline for this round is on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 

 

For more details, please read: 

 

https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/

 

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

 

Regards,

Anita


 





___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2023

2023-04-05 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Dear QGIS Community,

 

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form. The deadline for this round is on Tuesday 2023-05-02. 

 

For more details, please read: 

 

https://blog.qgis.org/2023/04/04/qgis-grants-8-call-for-grant-proposals-2023/

 

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

 

Regards,

Anita


 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS QT6 meeting minutes

2023-03-16 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Mar 15, 2023 17:43:38 Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-PSC 
:

> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:38 PM Andreas Neumann  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ale and colleagues,
>>
>> Thank you all for your efforts to make QGIS qt6 build a reality - and work 
>> on overcoming the blockers.
>>
>> Perhaps we can speed up the PSC decision and give this a go through our 
>> approval on the QGIS PSC mailing list, rather than having to wait for the 
>> next meeting in 3 weeks.
>>
>> Budget wise we can cover the approximate estimated expenses of 20k €. The 
>> funding drive had good results - more sustaining members on the upper levels 
>> (large and platinum) are in the pipeline.
>>
>> From me it is a +1.
>
> Agreed, of course +1 from me too.

+1 from me too.

Thank you for tackling this issue.

Regards,
Anita


>
>
>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 09:52, Alessandro Pasotti via QGIS-PSC 
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Michel,
>>>
>>> thank you and welcome!
>>>
>>> The next step is to get this plan approved by the PSC (with the
>>> associated budget), the next PSC meeting is in about three weeks.
>>>
>>> If the plan is approved I'll set up monthly meetings to coordinate the 
>>> efforts.
>>>
>>> Kind regards.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 9:49 AM Nzikou, Michel
>>>  wrote:

 I am okay to land sometime if there are any parts I can contribute too.
 FYI been working with Qgis about 7 Months. Thanks

 On Wednesday, March 15, 2023, Julien Cabieces via QGIS-Developer 
  wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for the meeting minutes!
>
> I'm already planning to continue the effort in
> porting/fixing code for Qt6 in the next months using Oslandia own
> funding, so I'm candidate to join the working group.
>
>> …
>
> Is there a reason why we are switching from ubuntu for Qt5 builds to
> fedora for Qt6 builds ? Because there is already PyQt6 packages in 
> ubuntu:22.10.
>
> Regards,
> Julien
>
>
>
>> …
>
>
> --
>
> Julien Cabieces
> Senior Developer at Oslandia
> julien.cabie...@oslandia.com
> 09.72.52.52.76
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



 --
 Michel Nzikou, Ph.D.
 ASEG WA - President
 -

>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alessandro Pasotti
>>> QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
>>> ItOpen:   www.itopen.it
>>> ___
>>> QGIS-PSC mailing list
>>> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> --
>> Andreas Neumann
>> QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer)
>
>
>
> --
> Alessandro Pasotti
> QCooperative:  www.qcooperative.net
> ItOpen:   www.itopen.it
> ___
> QGIS-PSC mailing list
> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

2023-03-10 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


That's great. Thank you for the update, Nicolas.

Regards,
Anita

On Friday, 10. March 2023 19:12:26 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I played a bit with the site.  There is indeed an icon for deleting models 
> and uploading new models which is what I did.  My new models are waiting 
> approval.  I noticed at the end a « modify » button next to the delete 
> button.  You first need to select the model first before seeing those 
> options.  « Modify » would probably have been easier, would have probably 
> skipped the approval part and would have probably kept the download count.  
> 
> When all else fails… read the instructions I guess!
> 
> Thanks Anita,
> Nicolas
> 
> Envoyé de mon iPad
> 
> > Le 5 mars 2023 à 11:22, Anita Graser  a écrit :
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Nicolas,
> > 
> > Since there have been no answers so far, it seems like nobody has tried
> > this before.
> > 
> > In the footer of https://plugins.qgis.org/models it reads that Alessandro
> > Pasotti and Kartoza have developed the hub web app. Maybe they can point us
> > at the relevant source code sections or answer directly.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Anita
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Friday, 24. February 2023 20:29:53 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux via
> > QGIS-Developer wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
> > > Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
> > > QGIS OpenDay.
> > >
> > > I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
> > > was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.
> > >
> > > I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
> > > button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
> > > be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
> > > versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
> > > unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
> > > description myself or must I send and email somewhere?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Nicolas Cadieux
> > > ___
> > > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > >
> > 
> > --
> > Anita Graser
> > Home: http://anitagraser.com
> > Twitter: @underdarkgis
> > Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
> 

-- 
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] updating a model on the site

2023-03-05 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer




Hi Nicolas,

Since there have been no answers so far, it seems like nobody has tried
this before.

In the footer of https://plugins.qgis.org/models it reads that Alessandro
Pasotti and Kartoza have developed the hub web app. Maybe they can point us
at the relevant source code sections or answer directly.

Regards,
Anita



On Friday, 24. February 2023 20:29:53 (+01:00), Nicolas Cadieux via
QGIS-Developer wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a 3 models that have been improved (Fix Directional Network,
> Check Geometries, model 1 of 3.)  and fixed. I presented today at the
> QGIS OpenDay.
>
> I had to remove the "Snap to anchor nodes (single layer only)" as it
> was creating invalid geometries in QGIS 3.28.2-Firenze on Windows 11.
>
> I am not sure exactly how to upload the new models? I see the upload
> button but I am wondering what will happen to the old ones? Will they
> be removed by someone managing the site?  Can we have multiple
> versions of the model as I am using the new repair geometry tools
> unavailable before 3.28? Is it possible to modify a models'
> description myself or must I send and email somewhere?
>
> Thanks
> Nicolas Cadieux
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>

--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Save the dates - Contributor Meeting 2023

2022-12-31 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Hi Raymond,


I'm planning to publish a "Save the date" post (similar to
https://blog.qgis.org/2022/05/03/save-the-date-qgis-contributor-meeting-in-firenze/
on Jan 2nd. Please let me know if you want to add some particular piece of
information.


Regards,
Anita


On Monday, 19. December 2022 11:15:14 (+01:00), Andreas Neumann via
QGIS-Developer wrote:



Hi Raymond,

This is great news! Looking foward to a great week of QGIS presentations,
meetings, discussions, etc.

Happy to see the continuation of the QGIS user conference after the COVID
break!

Thank you for accepting this challenge with your local team!

Andreas

On 2022-12-19 11:04, Raymond Nijssen via QGIS-Developer wrote:

Save even more dates!!

Prior to the contributor meeting there will be an International User
Conference on 18 and 19 April. Thursday the 20th is going to be an
onboarding day for newcomers to the hackfest.

Details will follow soon. All six days are going to take place in the same
venue.

Hope many developers and other QGIS badasses will be around for giving
presentations and workshops.

Kind regards,
Raymond



On 12-12-2022 09:45, Raymond Nijssen via QGIS-Developer wrote:
Dear devs and contrbs,

The next QGIS Contributor Meeting will take place:

20-23 April 2023

in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. And it's very very likely that there
will be an International User Conference the 2 days prior to the meeting
(18+19 April). Details will follow. Please save these dates.

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/25th-Contributor-Meeting-in-'s-Hertogenbosch


Kind regards,
Raymond
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer





--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Save the dates - Contributor Meeting 2023

2022-12-14 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Yes, we can add a news item there as well when you're ready.
Anita

13 Dec 2022 07:36:30 Raymond Nijssen :

> Thank you Anita. When the conference details are clear and the conference 
> website is online, could there also be an item in the news feed in QGIS?
>
>
> On 12-12-2022 20:19, Anita Graser wrote:
>> Thank you for the update, Raymond.
>> I've added the event to the news feed for the website:
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/blob/master/source/feeds/qugsnews.atom
>> For anyone else planning events: please feel invited to add your events to
>> this news feed as well.
>> Regards,
>> Anita
>>
>> On Monday, 12. December 2022 09:45:15 (+01:00), Raymond Nijssen via
>> QGIS-Developer wrote:
>>
>>> Dear devs and contrbs,
>>>
>>> The next QGIS Contributor Meeting will take place:
>>>
>>> 20-23 April 2023
>>>
>>> in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. And it's very very likely that
>> there will be an International User Conference the 2 days prior to the
>> meeting (18+19 April). Details will follow. Please save these dates.
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/25th-Contributor-Meeting-in-'s-Hertogenbosch
>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Raymond
>>> ___
>>> QGIS-Developer mailing list
>>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
>>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>>>
>> --
>> Anita Graser
>> Home: http://anitagraser.com
>> Twitter: @underdarkgis
>> Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Save the dates - Contributor Meeting 2023

2022-12-12 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Thank you for the update, Raymond.

I've added the event to the news feed for the website:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/blob/master/source/feeds/qugsnews.atom

For anyone else planning events: please feel invited to add your events to
this news feed as well.

Regards,
Anita


On Monday, 12. December 2022 09:45:15 (+01:00), Raymond Nijssen via
QGIS-Developer wrote:


> Dear devs and contrbs,

>

> The next QGIS Contributor Meeting will take place:

>

> 20-23 April 2023

>

> in 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands. And it's very very likely that
there will be an International User Conference the 2 days prior to the
meeting (18+19 April). Details will follow. Please save these dates.

>

>
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/wiki/25th-Contributor-Meeting-in-'s-Hertogenbosch






> Kind regards,

> Raymond

> ___

> QGIS-Developer mailing list

> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org

> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

>

--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis
Mastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Offering QGIS installers through Windows store

2022-11-22 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Hi,

With QGIS functionality and user base constantly growing, the required
maintenance also keeps increasing.
To keep our project budget sustainable, we (the PSC) are considering
investigating the possibility of offering a Windows installers for sale
through the Windows store in addition to the free installers from qgis.org.

This approach would follow the example of projects such as Krita
(https://krita.org/en/download/krita-desktop/).
It would give our users an additional low-threshold way to support QGIS.
And - if I understand the Krita offering correctly - users will also get
automatic updates when new versions come out which is a nice service.

Of course, we will keep offering the free installers and using the store
would be completely optional.

If you have any experience offering software through the store, your
insights would be very much appreciated since we are still at the early
stages of exploring this option.

Regards,
Anita


--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgisMastodon: @underdark...@fosstodon.org
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector destination vs feature sink

2022-10-23 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Thank you Matthias, those future optimization possibilities sound really 
exciting.


Based on all your responses so far, I think I'd summarize that Processing 
script developers should always go for the feature sink parameter 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink. 


Given the info Nyall shared with me, the vector destination parameter is only 
used in implementations of third party tools (such as Saga/grass/otb) which are 
limited to outputting "plain old vector files". That's why the 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination class exists. 


This has been very helpful. I'll go update my materials accordingly. Thank you 
all.


Regards,
Anita




On Sunday, 23. October 2022 15:45:30 (+02:00), Matthias Kuhn wrote:


Hi Anita,


A QgsFeatureSink is an interface for accepting features. This can be a 
QgsVectorLayer but does not have to be one. It can also be a spatial index, a 
vector file writer or others.
I.e. your algorithm specifies that it produces "features" which can be sent to 
a vector layer, another algorithm or [you-name-it]. It doesn't care if it's a 
vector layer, which also has other properties like style.
This even leaves room for future optimization of processing pipelines, for 
example, features could be sent through various algorithms without waiting for 
the first one to be finished.


I hope that sheds some light
Matthias




On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 1:48 PM Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer 
 wrote:

Thank you very much, Thomas. This code comparison approach is very useful 
indeed. 

If FeatureSink covers all functions of VectorDestination and more, that still 
leaves me wonder what is the downside of a FeatureSink


"Note: Consider using the more flexible QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink 
wherever possible."


i.e. where is it not possible to use a Feature Sink? Only in older versions of 
QGIS? 


Regards,
Anita


On Saturday, 22. October 2022 23:32:11 (+02:00), Thomas Gratier wrote:


Hi,


Although, I do know the intend to recommend one against the other, doing some 
code differences helps to sort out things.
They both inherits from same classes but the constructor for 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink accepts an additionnal arg bool 
supportsAppend=false


You also find the additional methods in QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink to 
manipulate the same supportsAppend.


```
a = QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination(
  'OUTPUT',
  'Sortie'
)

b = QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink(
  'OUTPUT',
  'Sortie'
)

methods_a = dir(a)
methods_b = dir(b)
common_methods = set(methods_a).intersection(methods_b)
print(common_methods)

only_in_a = set(methods_a).difference(methods_b)

print(only_in_a)

only_in_b = set(methods_b).difference(methods_a)
print(only_in_b)
```


Regards


Thomas Gratier


Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 18:07, Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer 
 a écrit :

Thank you Stefan,


I saw that note but was hoping some developer could shed light on what they 
mean by "more flexible" and "wherever possible". I guess otherwise it's just 
trial and error. 


Regards,
Anita


On Wednesday, 19. October 2022 07:44:05 (+02:00), Stefan Giese (WhereGroup) 
wrote:



Hi Anita,

they are very similar, but the API Documentation says to 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination: "Note: Consider using the more 
flexible QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink wherever possible." 
(https://api.qgis.org/api/3.22/classQgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination.html#details)

Best regards

Stefan


Am 18.10.2022 um 20:35 schrieb Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer:

Hi.

Does any one of you know the real difference between 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination versus 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink? They seem to be used interchangably in the 
resources I can find.

Thank you.

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Giese
Projektleiter/Consultant
-
Aufwind durch Wissen!
Jetzt neu: Web-Seminare und Online-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.com
-
WhereGroup GmbH
Schwimmbadstr. 2
79100 Freiburg
Germany

Tel.: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 61
Fax: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 11

stefan.gi...@wheregroup.com
www.wheregroup.com
Geschäftsführer:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885

-- 
--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector destination vs feature sink

2022-10-23 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Thank you very much, Thomas. This code comparison approach is very useful 
indeed. 

If FeatureSink covers all functions of VectorDestination and more, that still 
leaves me wonder what is the downside of a FeatureSink


"Note: Consider using the more flexible QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink 
wherever possible."


i.e. where is it not possible to use a Feature Sink? Only in older versions of 
QGIS? 


Regards,
Anita


On Saturday, 22. October 2022 23:32:11 (+02:00), Thomas Gratier wrote:


Hi,


Although, I do know the intend to recommend one against the other, doing some 
code differences helps to sort out things.
They both inherits from same classes but the constructor for 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink accepts an additionnal arg bool 
supportsAppend=false


You also find the additional methods in QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink to 
manipulate the same supportsAppend.


```
a = QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination(
  'OUTPUT',
  'Sortie'
)

b = QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink(
  'OUTPUT',
  'Sortie'
)

methods_a = dir(a)
methods_b = dir(b)
common_methods = set(methods_a).intersection(methods_b)
print(common_methods)

only_in_a = set(methods_a).difference(methods_b)

print(only_in_a)

only_in_b = set(methods_b).difference(methods_a)
print(only_in_b)
```


Regards


Thomas Gratier


Le ven. 21 oct. 2022 à 18:07, Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer 
 a écrit :

Thank you Stefan,


I saw that note but was hoping some developer could shed light on what they 
mean by "more flexible" and "wherever possible". I guess otherwise it's just 
trial and error. 


Regards,
Anita


On Wednesday, 19. October 2022 07:44:05 (+02:00), Stefan Giese (WhereGroup) 
wrote:



Hi Anita,

they are very similar, but the API Documentation says to 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination: "Note: Consider using the more 
flexible QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink wherever possible." 
(https://api.qgis.org/api/3.22/classQgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination.html#details)

Best regards

Stefan


Am 18.10.2022 um 20:35 schrieb Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer:

Hi.

Does any one of you know the real difference between 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination versus 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink? They seem to be used interchangably in the 
resources I can find.

Thank you.

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Giese
Projektleiter/Consultant
-
Aufwind durch Wissen!
Jetzt neu: Web-Seminare und Online-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.com
-
WhereGroup GmbH
Schwimmbadstr. 2
79100 Freiburg
Germany

Tel.: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 61
Fax: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 11

stefan.gi...@wheregroup.com
www.wheregroup.com
Geschäftsführer:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885

-- 
--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Vector destination vs feature sink

2022-10-21 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Thank you Stefan,


I saw that note but was hoping some developer could shed light on what they 
mean by "more flexible" and "wherever possible". I guess otherwise it's just 
trial and error. 


Regards,
Anita


On Wednesday, 19. October 2022 07:44:05 (+02:00), Stefan Giese (WhereGroup) 
wrote:



Hi Anita,

they are very similar, but the API Documentation says to 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination: "Note: Consider using the more 
flexible QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink wherever possible." 
(https://api.qgis.org/api/3.22/classQgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination.html#details)

Best regards

Stefan


Am 18.10.2022 um 20:35 schrieb Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer:

Hi.

Does any one of you know the real difference between 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination versus 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink? They seem to be used interchangably in the 
resources I can find.

Thank you.

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stefan Giese
Projektleiter/Consultant
-
Aufwind durch Wissen!
Jetzt neu: Web-Seminare und Online-Schulungen
bei der www.foss-academy.com
-
WhereGroup GmbH
Schwimmbadstr. 2
79100 Freiburg
Germany

Tel.: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 61
Fax: +49 (0)761 / 519 102 - 11

stefan.gi...@wheregroup.com
www.wheregroup.com
Geschäftsführer:
Olaf Knopp, Peter Stamm
Amtsgericht Bonn, HRB 9885

-- 
--
Anita Graser
Home: http://anitagraser.com
Twitter: @underdarkgis___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Vector destination vs feature sink

2022-10-18 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi.

Does any one of you know the real difference between 
QgsProcessingParameterVectorDestination versus 
QgsProcessingParameterFeatureSink? They seem to be used interchangably in the 
resources I can find.

Thank you.

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

2022-10-01 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer

Hi Richard, Hi Tim,

Here's what I could come up with:
https://anitagraser.com/2022/10/01/visualizing-iot-time-series-with-qgis-mobilitydb/

I think it's promising but lacks GUI support.

Regards,

Anita

On 05.09.2022 01:34, Tim Sutton wrote:

Hi Richard

Thanks for clarifying your ideas. Could we not implement something
similar to how WMS-T works in that we have a PostgreSQL-T provider
extension for example that passes a time filter to the underlying data
base request. In another system we are build for a client we have some
logic to fetch min/max/mean/sum/etc from a time slice so we could have
something similar such that each point has only one value for the
current time slice.

Not sure if I make myself clear or not...

Regards

Tim

On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 4:22 PM Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer
 wrote:

Hi Richard,

On 02.09.2022 13:07, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:
> Anybody is aware of a model in which data owns a location, but THAT
> location has a (growing) set of [timestamp, value] observation
data to
> it

MobilityDB has temporal temporal bools, ints, floats, texts, and
geometries: https://docs.mobilitydb.com/MobilityDB/develop/ch03.html

So that would cover the storage question but the visualization issue
remains until we implement support for these types in Temporal
Controller.

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

--
--

Tim Sutton
Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
 * Desktop GIS programming services
 * Geospatial web development
* GIS Training
* Consulting Services
Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
---
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Model for Temporal Measurement (vector) Datasets ?

2022-09-04 Thread Anita Graser via QGIS-Developer


Hi Richard,

On 02.09.2022 13:07, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

Anybody is aware of a model in which data owns a location, but THAT
location has a (growing) set of [timestamp, value] observation data to
it


MobilityDB has temporal temporal bools, ints, floats, texts, and
geometries: https://docs.mobilitydb.com/MobilityDB/develop/ch03.html

So that would cover the storage question but the visualization issue
remains until we implement support for these types in Temporal Controller.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2022 grant applications are now closed

2022-02-15 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now
closed and that we have received a total of six applications, four of
which fulfill the call requirements. These four applications total €
25,300.

As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:

1.   Add SQL Logging to the debugging/development panel
   (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/242)
2. QGIS setting registry enhancement
   (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/245)
3. Fix handling of provider default value
   clauses/Autogenerate/nextval(...) handling
   (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/247)
4. Support building QGIS application on Qt 6
   (https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/243)

We are now in the QEP discussion phase. The QEP discussion phase ends on
Sunday, 2022-02-27.

Since the total requested budget is equal to the available budget, there
is no need for a voting this year. Assuming that no serious issues are
raised in the QEP discussion phase, all four projects will be funded.

Thank you to everyone who submitted project proposals!

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2022

2022-02-13 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

This is a friendly reminder that the deadline for this year's grant
programme is around the corner. Due to popular request, we will extend
the deadline by 24 hours. Therefore, the deadline is Monday 14th end of
day anywhere in the world and I will close the submission form on
Tuesday 12:00 CET.

Regards,

Anita


On 16.01.2022 16:02, Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great
success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of
grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make
a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined
in the application form. The deadline for this round is on Sunday
2022-02-13.

For more details, please read:
https://blog.qgis.org/2022/01/16/qgis-grants-7-call-for-grant-proposals-2022/

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2022

2022-01-16 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success.
We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now
available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded
contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the
application form. The deadline for this round is on Sunday 2022-02-13.

For more details, please read:
https://blog.qgis.org/2022/01/16/qgis-grants-7-call-for-grant-proposals-2022/

We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Early notice about QGIS Grant Programme 2022

2022-01-06 Thread Anita Graser


Dear developers,

In 2022, we'll be able to publish the call for proposals for the grant
programme earlier than usual. Please expect the official call
notification (email and blog post in January rather than February. (For
process details, see https://github.com/qgis/PSC/issues/57)

By moving the call opening date up by one month, we want to make it
easier to ensure that funded projects can be finished within the same
calendar year. This is important to help us with the volunteer work
involved in monitoring the programme and doing QGIS.org accounting.

Regards,

Anita




___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

2021-11-15 Thread Anita Graser




On 16.11.2021 06:46, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

On 11/16/21 5:19 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:

Most urgently: we _absolutely_ need to stop advertising 3.16.13 LTR on the 
website and fallback to 3.16.11 for now; can someone with access to the website 
do that ASAP within the next 24 hours?

That is if I am correct (Juergen?) editing this file:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Website/blob/master/source/schedule.py
and rebuild the websites...

But I do not want to do this, as I think PSC or the package manager should 
decide.
Please let me know...


I'm not sure if editing schedule.py is sufficient.

On our other media, I've taken down the update announcement on
https://blog.qgis.org.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] QGIS LTR releases -- is it time to pull the plug?

2021-11-15 Thread Anita Graser

Thank you Nyall for the candid assessment.
I'm ready to help wherever I can, which most likely comes down to writing 
announcements.
We had the budget meeting scheduled for Tuesday evening but it sounds like we 
should get on top of this issue asap.

Regards
Anita

15 Nov 2021 20:57:36 Nyall Dawson :

> Hi lists,
>
> I'd like to start some conversation about the dire condition of the
> QGIS LTR release and what we can do to remedy/avoid this in future.
>
> If you've missed the conversation, our QGIS 3.16 windows releases have
> been completely broken for nearly a month now. 3.16.12 had a critical
> issue which caused lockups in Python code, and now 3.16.13 has
> completely broken projection handling (resulting in loss of CRS,
> hangups when opening projects, etc).
>
> So what do we do? I can think of a few responses we could make:
>
> - Kill 3.16.13 with fire. It needs to be removed from the website and
> all traces of the internet ASAP. Rollback to only offering 3.16.11,
> which is the last good Windows 3.16 release.
>
> - Put out a massive apology (and ask users to step up their funding to
> better maintain QGIS releases in future ;)
>
> - Mark 3.16 as an early EOL. (I can't see anyone interested in
> resolving the actual issue, so we've no way forward here in releasing
> a "good" 3.16 release again.)
>
> - Write the LTR releases off as a failed concept. (i.e. if we don't
> have the resources to maintain them properly, we shouldn't be offering
> them at all and should resort back to the single maintained release at
> any one time situation.)
>
> - Lower the supported period of a LTR release to 6 months?
>
> - Offer "theoretical" LTR releases ONLY as source code, but leave it
> to users to compile themselves and accept responsibility for their own
> packaging of this release.
>
> - Go on a funding drive so that QGIS can **pay** a developer and
> packager so that we actually CAN say we have stable LTR releases
> again?
>
> - ...something else...?
>
> Suffice to say, these are big issues, with big responses. But we're
> also under extreme time pressure here -- 3.16 is broken beyond belief,
> and we DO need to make some public responses asap (i.e. TODAY)
>
> Nyall
> ___
> Qgis-psc mailing list
> qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] FOSS4G Community Sprint

2021-10-02 Thread Anita Graser


FOSS4G is not over yet. Today is Community Sprint day.

No ticket needed. Just
visit:https://play.workadventu.re/@/osgeo/foss4g/codesprint

More information: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021/Community_sprint

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Developer support channels

2021-10-02 Thread Anita Graser


Hi Richard,

On 21.09.2021 07:55, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

I would be ok with both IRC, but I think a #qgis-dev channel on either
matrix.org or matrix.osgeo.org would do.
There are proper matrix clients for web and phones ( even for Linux phones ;-) 
).


Do you have an overview of matrix activities?

https://qgis.org/en/site/forusers/support.html says "point your browser
to (https://matrix.to/#qgis:osgeo.org
)" which is an invalid link.

https://app.element.io/#/room/#qgis:osgeo.org says "QGIS.org QGIS
Official Matrix room | bridged to IRC and Gitter" but it does not bridge
to Gitter.

Instead, https://app.element.io/#/room/#qgis_QGIS:gitter.im is the one
that does bridge to Gitter but has pretty much no traffic.

Looks like some consolidation might be helpful but I'm not sure how / if
that is possible.

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2021 QGIS Grant Proposals final results

2021-05-04 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

On behalf of the QGIS.ORG project, I'm extremely pleased to announce the
winning proposals for our 2021 QGIS.ORG grant programme. Read all about
the voting results here:

https://blog.qgis.org/2021/05/04/qgis-grant-programme-2021-results/

A number of interesting and useful proposals didn’t make it because of
our limited budget; we encourage organizations to pick up one of their
choices and sponsor it.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Update on the 2021 grant programme

2021-04-08 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

We have now compiled the 2021 grant applications summary which is
available at:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mQeiuVpFQNhAvoQ1LAllVhYNQM1GfxYDfvqqCGyulR8/edit?usp=sharing

This year’s programme budget is € 25,000 and we initially received 12
applications totaling € 42,500.

During the QEP discussion phase, QEP:214 (€ 2,000) was withdrawn and
QEP:202 was reduced to a research & proof of concept proposal (€ 3,000
instead of € 12,500). The remaining 11 proposals amount to a total of €
31,000.

The next step will be to set up the voting form and email our voting
members to review the proposals and cast their vote.

Regards,

Anita




___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] 2021 grant applications are now closed

2021-03-24 Thread Anita Graser


Hi Nyall,

On 23.03.2021 23:32, Nyall Dawson wrote

I have another request -- are we able to get the quoted prices for
each request listed on the QEP page?


I cannot edit the QEP texts but here's the list including contacts and
prices:

1. Alessandro Pasotti    4500    Port DB Manager Table Management
   Functionalities to Browser: SQL execution
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/205
2. Alexandre Neto & Alessandro Pasotti    2800    Revision and
   completion of locale support for numeric input and display
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/210
3. Paul Blottiere    2500    QGIS Server, OGC tests and Continuous
   Integration: OGC API Features (part 2)
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/212
4. Paul Blottiere and Alessandro Pasotti    2000    QGIS Server and
   services documentation
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/213
5. Nyall Dawson    4500    Rework handling of multi-layer, mixed-format
   datasets https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/216
6. Nyall Dawson    2500    Integrate GPS Tools plugin functionality
   into core QGIS
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/217
7. MARTEAU David    2000    QgsRasterProjector optimization with linear
   interpolation
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/214
8. Peter Petrik    1000    Notarizing QGIS for macOS
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/218
9. Loïc Bartoletti (Oslandia)    4500    Improved code coverage of
   geometry and maptool classes.
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/222
10. Martin Dobias    2500    Fixing terrain and camera issues in 3D
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/215
11. Olivier Dalang    12500 PIP dependencies for Python plugins
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/202
12. Etienne Trimaille    1200    Plugin review on plugins.qgis.org
   https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/219

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] 2021 grant applications are now closed

2021-03-23 Thread Anita Graser


Dear Harrissou,

On 23.03.2021 12:19, DelazJ wrote:
Along with the technical proposal, there used to be a summary of who
are/is involved in the proposal, but also the cost of the proposal. Is
this no more available? I recall (maybe I'm wrong) that the budget is
lower this year, despite I can't find mention of it anymore on the Internet.

This year's budget is EUR 25,000. I'll paste the text from the (now
closed) form at the end of this email.

After the QEP discussion phase, I'll prepare a summary (including
authors, budget, timeline) of the eligible proposals (fulfilling the
formal requirements) for the voting phase.

Regards,
Anita



Original application form text:

What's new in 2021?
=

We have budgeted EUR 25,000 for the entire grant programme. Bear in mind
that we would like to support as many activities as possible so if your
budgeted amount is too large we may reject it.

This year, we will not accept proposals for the development of new
features. Therefore, proposals should focus on improving the QGIS
project infrastructure and polishing existing features. The target
version for all project work is QGIS 3.22.

Some examples of the kinds of topics you could propose are:

* Updating and improving documentation
* Improving API documentation
* Curating the pull request queue
* Bug fixing
* Rewriting and improving a part of the code base
* Improvements that improve the security of the QGIS code base
* Updating and improving QGIS.org web infrastructure
* Helping new QGIS devs to get started with improved developer
documentation and utilities
* etc.

The closing date for applications is 21st March 2021.

The winning proposals will be published in the end of April 2021.

There is a strict deadline: all grant projects need to be finished by
the end of 2021.

PLEASE NOTE: All applications made here will be PUBLICLY VISIBLE,
including your name, fees etc.
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] 2021 grant applications are now closed

2021-03-22 Thread Anita Graser


Thanks Nyall,

On 22.03.2021 10:53, Nyall Dawson wrote:

On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 19:03, Anita Graser  wrote:

Improved code coverage of geometry and maptool classes. 
https://github.com/qgis/WIP

What is the status with this one? Is the link a typo or is there no
QEP for discussion?


I reached out to the proposal authors and here's the QEP link:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/222

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2021 grant applications are now closed

2021-03-22 Thread Anita Graser

Dear QGIS Community,

This is to let you know that the form for grant applications is now
closed and that we have received 12 applications totaling € 42,500.

As a quick teaser, here are the proposals:

1. Port DB Manager Table Management Functionalities to Browser: SQL
execution https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/205
2. Revision and completion of locale support for numeric input and
display https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/210
3. QGIS Server, OGC tests and Continuous Integration: OGC API Features
(part 2) https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/212
4. QGIS Server and services documentation
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/213
5. Rework handling of multi-layer, mixed-format datasets
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/216
6. Integrate GPS Tools plugin functionality into core QGIS
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/217
7. QgsRasterProjector optimization with linear interpolation
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/214
8. Notarizing QGIS for macOS
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/218
9. Improved code coverage of geometry and maptool classes.
https://github.com/qgis/WIP
10. Fixing terrain and camera issues in 3D
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/215
11. PIP dependencies for Python plugins
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/202
12. Plugin review on plugins.qgis.org
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/219

We are now in the QEP discussion phase. Please tag all proposals with
the Grant-2021 tag:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2021

The QEP discussion phase takes two weeks and ends on Sunday, 4th April
2021. Afterwards, we will proceed to the voting phase with expected
publication of voting results on 18th April 2021.

Thank you to everyone who submitted their project proposals!

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2021

2021-03-05 Thread Anita Graser


Hi,

This is a friendly reminder that you have two more weeks to apply for a
grant:

https://blog.qgis.org/2021/02/21/qgis-grants-6-call-for-grant-proposals-2021/


Regards,

Anita


On 21.02.2021 10:28, Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is
now available:

https://blog.qgis.org/2021/02/21/qgis-grants-6-call-for-grant-proposals-2021/


The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to
QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form:

https://forms.gle/5h1XJc3nUTZP4Axh7

The deadline for this round is 21st March 2021.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Blog website down

2021-02-25 Thread Anita Graser


Hi Matteo,

I cannot confirm any issues.

https://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/blog.qgis.org?proto=https

Regards,

Anita


On 25.02.2021 11:59, matteo wrote:

Hi all,

just to report that https://blog.qgis.org/ gives a timeout

Cheers

Matteo
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2021

2021-02-21 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now
available:

https://blog.qgis.org/2021/02/21/qgis-grants-6-call-for-grant-proposals-2021/

The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded contribution to
QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the application form:

https://forms.gle/5h1XJc3nUTZP4Axh7

The deadline for this round is 21st March 2021.

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Issue tags relating to Temporal Controller

2020-11-15 Thread Anita Graser


15 Nov 2020 05:55:51 Nyall Dawson :

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 at 22:45, Anita Graser  wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some Issues related to the Temporal Controller are currently tagged with
>> "Time controller", others with "Temporal" and some don't have any
>> specific tags:
>>
>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+temporal
>>
>> Can we consolidate this? I can do it if somebody gives me the necessary
>> rights. (I currently cannot change issue tags.).
>
> Fixed -- I've removed the Time Controller tag and merged the tickets
> into the Temporal category.
>
> Nyall
>

Thank you, Nyall!

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Issue tags relating to Temporal Controller

2020-11-13 Thread Anita Graser


Hi,

Some Issues related to the Temporal Controller are currently tagged with
"Time controller", others with "Temporal" and some don't have any
specific tags:

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+temporal

Can we consolidate this? I can do it if somebody gives me the necessary
rights. (I currently cannot change issue tags.)

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [GUI/usability] Add 'Copy Style (all)' to the layer context menu ?

2020-11-06 Thread Anita Graser


Thanks Richard,

On 05.11.2020 15:24, Richard Duivenvoorde wrote:

...
To me it would be much easier to have a 'Copy Style' and 'Paste Style' in the 
first menu.
...
Is this something others would be happy with?


Huge +1 from me!

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] "Show selected features" is very slow in recent versions

2020-07-28 Thread Anita Graser



On 28.07.2020 22:15, Alessandro Pasotti wrote:

Hi,

Seems pretty bad, please file a ticket.


Thanks, Alessandro!

Done: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/38018

Anita




On Tue, Jul 28, 2020, 21:45 Anita Graser mailto:anitagra...@gmx.at>> wrote:

Hi,

There seems to be a performance regression concerning "Show
selected features" in the attribute table of recent QGIS versions.
(See also
https://twitter.com/DrChrisGeoSci/status/1288120808951312389)

I've tested this with the Natural Earth dataset
ne_10m_populated_places layer. The expression "NAME" like 'A%' is
close to instantaneous but switching to "Show selected features"
takes forever and freezes QGIS master and 3.14 in a way that looks
like it crashed (i.e. "not responding" on Windows).

In 3.4 "Show selected features" is much faster. There's no freeze.

Is this a known issue or should I open a ticket?

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org>
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] "Show selected features" is very slow in recent versions

2020-07-28 Thread Anita Graser


Hi,

There seems to be a performance regression concerning "Show selected
features" in the attribute table of recent QGIS versions. (See also
https://twitter.com/DrChrisGeoSci/status/1288120808951312389)

I've tested this with the Natural Earth dataset ne_10m_populated_places
layer. The expression "NAME" like 'A%' is close to instantaneous but
switching to "Show selected features" takes forever and freezes QGIS
master and 3.14 in a way that looks like it crashed (i.e. "not
responding" on Windows).

In 3.4 "Show selected features" is much faster. There's no freeze.

Is this a known issue or should I open a ticket?

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Grant Programme 2020 Results

2020-07-10 Thread Anita Graser

Dear QGIS Community, 

We are extremely pleased to announce the winning proposals for our 2020 QGIS.ORG grant programme. 

 

Thanks to the generous support by our sponsors and donors, we are happy that all proposals will receive funding, even if QEP#124 had to be reduced in scope.

For more details, please read: http://blog.qgis.org/2020/07/10/qgis-grant-programme-2020-results/

 

Thank you to everyone involved for making the QGIS grant programme possible! 


Regards, 
Anita 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] Grant proposal review results

2020-06-04 Thread Anita Graser

Hi Denis,

On 04.06.2020 09:22, Denis Rouzaud wrote:

Hi all,

Many thanks for handling this.
I have remove the labels from the concerned issues on the QEP repo.
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3AGrant-2020

Thank you for taking care of the labels!

I checked the list and it seems that 2 grants from René-Luc were not
in the evaluated list:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/188
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/187

Since no proposals for these two QEPs were submitted through the
submission form, they will not take part in this year's funding round.

Regards,

Anita

I am not sure how you want to handle this, so I'll let you decide
before doing anything to the labeld.

Cheers,

Denis

Le mer. 3 juin 2020 à 22:15, Anita Graser mailto:anitagra...@gmx.at>> a écrit :

Dear devs and fellow PSC members,

As part of yesterday's PSC meeting, we reviewed the grant
proposals with
regards to this year's formal grant programme criteria. You can
find the
results of this review in a new tab within the proposal
spreadsheet at:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing

12 out of 17 proposals meet the grant programme requirements and are
therefore eligible for funding. Out of these 12, there are two
documentation proposals that the PSC has decided to fund directly
through the (separate) documentation budget. The remaining 10
proposals
result in a total requested budget of EUR 45,400.

I'd like to stress that this eligibility check is by no means a
judgement of the quality of an idea. Therefore, I'd like to strongly
encourage to follow up on the related QEPs even if a proposal
cannot be
funded by this year's grant programme.

The QEP discussion deadline for eligible proposals is Tuesday, June 9.
Afterwards we will move forward to the voting.

Regards,

Anita

___
Qgis-psc mailing list
qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org <mailto:qgis-...@lists.osgeo.org>
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Grant proposal review results

2020-06-03 Thread Anita Graser


Dear devs and fellow PSC members,

As part of yesterday's PSC meeting, we reviewed the grant proposals with
regards to this year's formal grant programme criteria. You can find the
results of this review in a new tab within the proposal spreadsheet at:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing

12 out of 17 proposals meet the grant programme requirements and are
therefore eligible for funding. Out of these 12, there are two
documentation proposals that the PSC has decided to fund directly
through the (separate) documentation budget. The remaining 10 proposals
result in a total requested budget of EUR 45,400.

I'd like to stress that this eligibility check is by no means a
judgement of the quality of an idea. Therefore, I'd like to strongly
encourage to follow up on the related QEPs even if a proposal cannot be
funded by this year's grant programme.

The QEP discussion deadline for eligible proposals is Tuesday, June 9.
Afterwards we will move forward to the voting.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-29 Thread Anita Graser



On 29.05.2020 21:18, Anita Graser wrote:


Dear QGIS Community,

On 25.05.2020 13:55, Anita Graser wrote:

Due to popular demand, we have decided to reopen the submission form
and to extend the deadline to allow for submission of missing QEP
links. Please note the new and final deadlines:

* Proposal submission: Friday, May 29 (end of business day CET)
* QEP discussion deadline: Tuesday, June 9 (instead of June 7)

Proposals without QEP will not move forward to the voting.


It's my pleasure to present to you this year's list of proposals:

 1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
 2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
 3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
 4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
 5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
 6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
 7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
 8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
 9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/183
10. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
14. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184
15. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/185
16. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/186


Please also consider

17. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/182

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-29 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

On 25.05.2020 13:55, Anita Graser wrote:

Due to popular demand, we have decided to reopen the submission form
and to extend the deadline to allow for submission of missing QEP
links. Please note the new and final deadlines:

* Proposal submission: Friday, May 29 (end of business day CET)
* QEP discussion deadline: Tuesday, June 9 (instead of June 7)

Proposals without QEP will not move forward to the voting.


It's my pleasure to present to you this year's list of proposals:

1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/183
10. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
14. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/184
15. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/185
16. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/186

The QEP discussions are now ongoing. The deadline is on Tuesday, June
9th which will be followed by the voting period.

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-25 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

Due to popular demand, we have decided to reopen the submission form and
to extend the deadline to allow for submission of missing QEP links.
Please note the new and final deadlines:

* Proposal submission: Friday, May 29 (end of business day CET)
* QEP discussion deadline: Tuesday, June 9 (instead of June 7)

Proposals without QEP will not move forward to the voting.

Regards,
Anita

On 25.05.2020 08:19, Anita Graser wrote:

On 26.04.2020 11:51, Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great
success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of
grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to
make a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions
outlined in the application form. The deadline for this round is in
four weeks: 24th May 2020.

The submission phase is over now. This means that we are now entering
the 2 week QEP discussion period (ending 7th June 2020)

We received 14 submissions. The submitted QEP links are:

1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
10. https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/LOKtipgLzZNEY-yMeavllUf+/
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
14. https://openlittermap.com

(Please, can somebody with the necessary repo rights add the missing
QEP-2020 tags to the issues?)

For the full proposals, please see:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-25 Thread Anita Graser


Hi Nyall,

On 25.05.2020 08:43, Nyall Dawson wrote:

We clearly have a few submissions which definitively fall into the
"new feature" category. Shouldn't these be rejected outright?


I included all submissions here for complete transparency. During the
next two weeks, it makes sense to discuss if the proposals fulfill the
requirements. Only valid submissions should move forward to the voting.

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-25 Thread Anita Graser


Hi Paolo,

On 25.05.2020 08:52, Paolo Cavallini wrote:

Thanks Anita.
Glad to see such a wealth of high quality, very useful proposals, some
pretty exciting.
Is #7 ready for discussion?

Probably best to ask on the QEP.

Isn't it compulsory to submit a QEP? If so, #10 should be moved.

Yes it is compulsory. I included all submissions here for complete
transparency.

What is #14?


I don't know more than what you can also read in the submission form
results. :-)

Regards,

Anita


Cheers.

Il 25/05/20 08:19, Anita Graser ha scritto:

On 26.04.2020 11:51, Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great
success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of
grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make
a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined
in the application form. The deadline for this round is in four weeks:
24th May 2020.

The submission phase is over now. This means that we are now entering
the 2 week QEP discussion period (ending 7th June 2020)

We received 14 submissions. The submitted QEP links are:

  1. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/180
  2. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/178
  3. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/181
  4. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/174
  5. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/173
  6. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/124
  7. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/175
  8. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/163
  9. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/172
10. https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/LOKtipgLzZNEY-yMeavllUf+/
11. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/171
12. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/179
13. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/177
14. https://openlittermap.com

(Please, can somebody with the necessary repo rights add the missing
QEP-2020 tags to the issues?)

For the full proposals, please see:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing


Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-05-25 Thread Anita Graser

On 26.04.2020 11:51, Anita Graser wrote:

Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great
success. We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of
grants is now available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make
a funded contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined
in the application form. The deadline for this round is in four weeks:
24th May 2020.

The submission phase is over now. This means that we are now entering
the 2 week QEP discussion period (ending 7th June 2020)

We received 14 submissions. The submitted QEP links are:

(Please, can somebody with the necessary repo rights add the missing
QEP-2020 tags to the issues?)

For the full proposals, please see:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DICkD-aE7VlPPCrA44NlsHOkwfGO19UrGYHRKB_A648/edit?usp=sharing

Regards,

Anita

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2020

2020-04-26 Thread Anita Graser


Dear QGIS Community,

Our previous rounds of grant proposals have always been a great success.
We are very pleased to announce that this year’s round of grants is now
available. The call is open to anybody who wants to make a funded
contribution to QGIS, subject to the call conditions outlined in the
application form. The deadline for this round is in four weeks: 24th May
2020.

For more details, please read:

http://blog.qgis.org/2020/04/26/qgis-grants-5-call-for-grant-proposals-2020/


We look forward to seeing all your great ideas for improving QGIS!

Regards,

Anita


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Cancellation: QGIS Developer meeting and conference Nødebo

2020-03-30 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

Pi is awesome, always!

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:26 PM Tim Sutton  wrote:

> Another nice name candidate would be *Anchorage* in honour of our project
> founder who doesn’t get nearly enough credit other than an early splash
> screen containing a picture of his dog, Bandit (which would be a cool
> release name if it didn’t break our naming convention :-P).
>

We had Chugiak, remember? (I wouldn't mind Anchorage either)

Lg,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2020 budget proposal

2020-03-20 Thread Anita Graser

Thank you Andreas, looks good to me.

Anita


On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:50 PM Andreas Neumann 
wrote:

> Hi PSC and contributors,
>
> Please find the updated 2020 budget proposal at
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pUlUWa7PfgxLn-sX6K2ccPN7ZWXzqrw_QNNFyvw8Sl4/edit#gid=0
>
> Comments:
>
> - as proposed by some (e.g. Régis) for 2021 we will discuss and approve
> the budget in late 2020. Makes more sense.
>
> - I already took into account that the 1st contributor meeting was
> cancelled
>
> - I added the Python cookbook expenses as discussed recently
>
> - I added VAT reverse charge expense estimates
>
> - In some cells you can find comments - the cells with the yellow
> triangles in the upper-right corner of the cells
>
> I am awaiting your comments. Questions? Did I miss expenses that you see
> upcoming but haven't been taken into account?
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andreas
>
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Update layer styling panel using Python

2020-03-09 Thread Anita Graser

The open doc issue ticket also relates to the layer styling panel
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/issues/2071

It references an old blog post by Nathan which has meanwhile moved to
https://woostuff.wordpress.com/2016/06/29/qgis-style-dock-part-2-plugin-panels/.
This post illustrates how to add a panel but I couldn't find pointers on
how to update an existing one.

Regards,
Anita



On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 9:10 PM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> After changing a layer's symbology using Python, how can I update the
> layer styling panel to reflect the changes? I'm specifically asking because
> data-defined overrides are not displayed after
>
> exp = 'coalesce(scale_exp("pop_max", 0, 1000, 0, 7, 0.57), 0)'
> vlayer.renderer().symbol().symbolLayer(0).setDataDefinedProperty(
> QgsSymbolLayer.PropertySize, QgsProperty.fromExpression(exp) )
> vlayer.triggerRepaint()
>
> Regards,
> Anita
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Update layer styling panel using Python

2020-03-08 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

After changing a layer's symbology using Python, how can I update the layer
styling panel to reflect the changes? I'm specifically asking because
data-defined overrides are not displayed after

exp = 'coalesce(scale_exp("pop_max", 0, 1000, 0, 7, 0.57), 0)'
vlayer.renderer().symbol().symbolLayer(0).setDataDefinedProperty(
QgsSymbolLayer.PropertySize, QgsProperty.fromExpression(exp) )
vlayer.triggerRepaint()

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Import geopandas fails in OSGeo4W install

2020-02-26 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

Importing pandas works fine but geopandas fails with DLL not found. It
affects both 3.10.3 and master

QGIS version
3.10.3-A Coruña
QGIS code revision
0b57cb7b51

QGIS version
3.13.0-Master
QGIS code revision
bb93dbcf13

import pandas
import geopandas
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\OSGEO4~1\apps\Python37\lib\code.py", line 90, in runcode
exec(code, self.locals)
  File "", line 1, in 
  File "C:/OSGEO4~1/apps/qgis-ltr-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py", line 744, in
_import
mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level)
  File "C:\OSGEO4~1\apps\Python37\lib\site-packages\geopandas\__init__.py",
line 1, in 
from geopandas.geoseries import GeoSeries
  File "C:/OSGEO4~1/apps/qgis-ltr-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py", line 744, in
_import
mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level)
  File
"C:\OSGEO4~1\apps\Python37\lib\site-packages\geopandas\geoseries.py", line
6, in 
import pyproj
  File "C:/OSGEO4~1/apps/qgis-ltr-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py", line 744, in
_import
mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level)
  File "C:\OSGEO4~1\apps\Python37\lib\site-packages\pyproj\__init__.py",
line 70, in 
from pyproj import _datadir
  File "C:/OSGEO4~1/apps/qgis-ltr-dev/./python\qgis\utils.py", line 744, in
_import
mod = _builtin_import(name, globals, locals, fromlist, level)
ImportError: DLL load failed: The specified module could not be found.


Should I open a ticket?

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Handling NULL differs in concat vs || in expressions: let's remove ||

2020-01-28 Thread Anita Graser

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:21 PM Matthias Kuhn  wrote:

> I'm in favor of removal of the quick access button too.
> The functionality of `||` on the other hand should be left untouched.
> (it's useful to have e.g. `prefix || filename` produce NULL if filename
> is NULL)
>

+1
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

2020-01-24 Thread Anita Graser

Is the following "unknown publisher" issue expected or a regression?

https://twitter.com/atanas/status/1220709096992710657

Regards,
Anita





On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:06 AM Paolo Cavallini 
wrote:

> Thanks a lot everybody, nice cooperation!
> Cheers.
>
> On 24 January 2020 13:05:09 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin <
> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fantastic, thank you.
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020, 15:48 Anita Graser  wrote:
>>
>>> I can do it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anita
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:15 AM Mathieu Pellerin 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jürgen, thanks for the successful re-release of 3.10.2.
>>>>
>>>> Paolo, Anita, who is in a position to publish the drafted post on the
>>>> blog?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:59 Mathieu Pellerin 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 to that plan. We're 33% done already since the blocking PR has been
>>>>> merged.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:47 PM Matthias Kuhn 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> How about
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Waiting for https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/33971
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Releasing 3.10.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Announce on twitter, blog, news panel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Clear cut for everyone (including those 95% of our users not
>>>>>> following [qgis on] twitter)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>> On 1/22/20 12:39 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it time to send an update on Twitter yet? I don't see new
>>>>>> installers at https://qgis.org/downloads/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Anita
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mathieu Pellerin <
>>>>>> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the QGIS twitter account already mentioned that the 3.10.2
>>>>>>> installer had been retired due to issues and re-build.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:07 PM DelazJ  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those
>>>>>>>> who have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Harrissou
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin <
>>>>>>>> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Good idea.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Math
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias Kuhn 
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. It reads very well!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Something that I'd like to add is that in case of still finding a
>>>>>>>>>> bug, users should file issues and to mention proximity of LTR 
>>>>>>>>>> replacement.
>>>>>>>>>> If you still happen to find QGIS behaving in an unexpected way,
>>>>>>>>>> please let us know on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues
>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues=D=hangouts=1579773605204000=AFQjCNHP21SO7MPYwrn023vHOeZwMUBKuQ>
>>>>>>>>>> as always. We are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to 
>>>>>>>>>> replace 3.4
>>>>>>>>>> as LTR in a month time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Bests
>>>>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

2020-01-24 Thread Anita Graser

I can do it.

Regards,
Anita

On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:15 AM Mathieu Pellerin 
wrote:

> Jürgen, thanks for the successful re-release of 3.10.2.
>
> Paolo, Anita, who is in a position to publish the drafted post on the blog?
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020, 10:59 Mathieu Pellerin  wrote:
>
>> +1 to that plan. We're 33% done already since the blocking PR has been
>> merged.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 6:47 PM Matthias Kuhn 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> How about
>>>
>>> - Waiting for https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/33971
>>>
>>> - Releasing 3.10.3
>>>
>>> - Announce on twitter, blog, news panel
>>>
>>> Clear cut for everyone (including those 95% of our users not following
>>> [qgis on] twitter)
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>> On 1/22/20 12:39 PM, Anita Graser wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it time to send an update on Twitter yet? I don't see new installers
>>> at https://qgis.org/downloads/
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anita
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mathieu Pellerin 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the QGIS twitter account already mentioned that the 3.10.2
>>>> installer had been retired due to issues and re-build.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:07 PM DelazJ  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those
>>>>> who have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Harrissou
>>>>>
>>>>> Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin 
>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthias,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Math
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias Kuhn 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Mathieu,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot. It reads very well!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something that I'd like to add is that in case of still finding a
>>>>>>> bug, users should file issues and to mention proximity of LTR 
>>>>>>> replacement.
>>>>>>> If you still happen to find QGIS behaving in an unexpected way,
>>>>>>> please let us know on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues
>>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues=D=hangouts=1579773605204000=AFQjCNHP21SO7MPYwrn023vHOeZwMUBKuQ>
>>>>>>> as always. We are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to replace 
>>>>>>> 3.4
>>>>>>> as LTR in a month time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bests
>>>>>>> Matthias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/22/20 10:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paolo, here's the draft blog post:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point release now*
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> QGIS users who have adopted the 3.10 version when initially released
>>>>>>> at the end of October 2019 have likely noticed a sharp drop in 
>>>>>>> reliability.
>>>>>>> The underlying issues have now been addressed in 3.10.2, all users are
>>>>>>> advised to update *now*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When QGIS 3.10 was first released in the end of October 2019, a pair
>>>>>>> of libraries – namely GDAL and PROJ – were updated to their 
>>>>>>> next-generation
>>>>>>> versions. The advantages are plenty: GeoPDF export[1] support, more
>>>>>>> accurate coordinate transformation, etc. For those interested, more
>>>>>>> technical information on this is available here[2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The update of these crucial libraries led to a number of
>>>>>>> regressions. While we expected some issues to arise, the seriousness of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> disruption caught us off guard. Yet, it was also somewhat inevitable: 
>>>>>>> QGIS
>>>>>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

2020-01-22 Thread Anita Graser

Thank you for proof reading, Stefan!

Please note, however, that the tone of the message (i.e. "Posting that
would be embarrassing") may come off as rude.

As our code of conduct [0] states: "Be kind to others. Do not insult or put
down other participants."

Regards,
Anita

[0]
https://www.qgis.org/en/site/getinvolved/governance/codeofconduct/codeofconduct.html



On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 4:52 PM Stefan Steiger 
wrote:

> You made a mistake translating/editing:
>
> „the impor*tant* of“ è „the impor*tance* of“
>
>
>
> As such, we cannot stress enough the important of updating now.
> è
>
> As such, we cannot stress enough the *importance* of updating now.
>
>
>
> Posting that would be embarrassing
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* QGIS-Developer [mailto:qgis-developer-boun...@lists.osgeo.org] *Im
> Auftrag von *Mathieu Pellerin
> *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2020 10:58
> *An:* Paolo Cavallini ; qgis-developer <
> qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org>
> *Betreff:* Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2
> installer from site
>
>
>
> Paolo, here's the draft blog post:
>
>
>
> *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point release now*
> --
> QGIS users who have adopted the 3.10 version when initially released at
> the end of October 2019 have likely noticed a sharp drop in reliability.
> The underlying issues have now been addressed in 3.10.2, all users are
> advised to update *now*.
>
> When QGIS 3.10 was first released in the end of October 2019, a pair of
> libraries – namely GDAL and PROJ – were updated to their next-generation
> versions. The advantages are plenty: GeoPDF export[1] support, more
> accurate coordinate transformation, etc. For those interested, more
> technical information on this is available here[2].
>
> The update of these crucial libraries led to a number of regressions.
> While we expected some issues to arise, the seriousness of the disruption
> caught us off guard. Yet, it was also somewhat inevitable: QGIS is the
> first large GIS project to expose these next-generation libraries to the
> masses. The large number of QGIS users across the globe were essentially
> stress testing both new code within QGIS as well as the libraries
> themselves.
>
> Thanks to dedicated users taking time to file in report and the community
> helping out as well as our project sponsors for allowing us to fund
> development time, developers have been able to fix all known regressions in
> both in QGIS as well as underlying GDAL and PROJ libraries, benefiting a
> large number of open source projects.
>
> As a result of this collective effort by the community, QGIS 3.10.2 is now
> back to being the reliable and stable GIS software we all love. As such, we
> cannot stress enough the important of updating now.
>
> Once again, thanks to our community of testers, sponsors, and developers
> for their countless hours and efforts in making QGIS better.
>
> Happy mapping!
>
> [1] https://north-road.com/2019/09/03/qgis-3-10-loves-geopdf/
> [2] https://gdalbarn.com/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini 
> wrote:
>
> Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it?
> Thanks.
>
> On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin <
> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +100 on all that's been said here.
>
>
>
> Also, once 3.10.2 is updated to include the updated packages &
> above-referred fix, I'd suggest writing a QGIS.org blog post to inform
> users of the worthiness of updating to 3.10.2(.2) *ASAP*, and expand a bit
> on why 3.10.0/.1 were such rough releases. We can finish the post by
> thanking users that have reported bugs (an inevitable nightmare to go
> through as QGIS was exposing brand new GDAL3/PROJ6 versions to the masses).
> IMHO, we should not skip this communication to our users.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:27 AM Nyall Dawson 
> wrote:
>
> Also, we better wait for a fix for
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902 (incoming)...
>
> Gosh, will the nightmare ever end... Let's agree never to change
> anything in gdal or proj or qgis ever again ;)
>
> Nyall
>
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Nyall Dawson 
> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 06:28
> Subject: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site
> To: qgis-developer 
>
>
> Can we please remove the 3.10.2 installer from the website as a matter
> of urgency? This installer was released using the older gdal 3.0.2 and
> proj 6.2 versions, which directly lead to crashes and reprojection
> failures in QGIS.
>
> QGIS SHOULD NEVER EVER*** be
> used with gdal >= 3 and gdal < 3.0.3 or proj >6 and proj < 6.3.0.
>
> This combination is a world of hurt for users :(
>
> Tickets filed at https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/618, and
> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/ticket/617, and later today I'm going
> to commit cmake blocks which will completely prevent compilation under
> the affected gdal/proj versions.
>
> Nyall
>

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Fwd: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site

2020-01-22 Thread Anita Graser

Is it time to send an update on Twitter yet? I don't see new installers at
https://qgis.org/downloads/

Regards,
Anita

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 11:08 AM Mathieu Pellerin 
wrote:

> I think the QGIS twitter account already mentioned that the 3.10.2
> installer had been retired due to issues and re-build.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:07 PM DelazJ  wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Thanks Mathieu. Should it be 3.10.2 or 3.10.3? Asking because those who
>> have already downloaded the broken 3.10.2 may not think to update.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Harrissou
>>
>> Le mer. 22 janv. 2020 à 11:05, Mathieu Pellerin  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Matthias,
>>>
>>> Good idea.
>>>
>>> Math
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:02 PM Matthias Kuhn 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 Hi Mathieu,

 Thanks a lot. It reads very well!

 Something that I'd like to add is that in case of still finding a bug,
 users should file issues and to mention proximity of LTR replacement.
 If you still happen to find QGIS behaving in an unexpected way, please
 let us know on https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues

 as always. We are very happy that QGIS 3.10 is now in shape to replace 3.4
 as LTR in a month time.

 Bests
 Matthias

 On 1/22/20 10:58 AM, Mathieu Pellerin wrote:

 Paolo, here's the draft blog post:

 *Public Service Announcement: Update to the latest point release now*
 --
 QGIS users who have adopted the 3.10 version when initially released at
 the end of October 2019 have likely noticed a sharp drop in reliability.
 The underlying issues have now been addressed in 3.10.2, all users are
 advised to update *now*.

 When QGIS 3.10 was first released in the end of October 2019, a pair of
 libraries – namely GDAL and PROJ – were updated to their next-generation
 versions. The advantages are plenty: GeoPDF export[1] support, more
 accurate coordinate transformation, etc. For those interested, more
 technical information on this is available here[2].

 The update of these crucial libraries led to a number of regressions.
 While we expected some issues to arise, the seriousness of the disruption
 caught us off guard. Yet, it was also somewhat inevitable: QGIS is the
 first large GIS project to expose these next-generation libraries to the
 masses. The large number of QGIS users across the globe were essentially
 stress testing both new code within QGIS as well as the libraries
 themselves.

 Thanks to dedicated users taking time to file in report and the
 community helping out as well as our project sponsors for allowing us to
 fund development time, developers have been able to fix all known
 regressions in both in QGIS as well as underlying GDAL and PROJ libraries,
 benefiting a large number of open source projects.

 As a result of this collective effort by the community, QGIS 3.10.2 is
 now back to being the reliable and stable GIS software we all love. As
 such, we cannot stress enough the important of updating now.

 Once again, thanks to our community of testers, sponsors, and
 developers for their countless hours and efforts in making QGIS better.

 Happy mapping!

 [1] https://north-road.com/2019/09/03/qgis-3-10-loves-geopdf/
 [2] https://gdalbarn.com/

 On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 9:56 AM Paolo Cavallini 
 wrote:

> Fully agreed. Mathieu, would you like to write it?
> Thanks.
>
> On 21 January 2020 06:39:08 GMT+04:00, Mathieu Pellerin <
> nirvn.a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +100 on all that's been said here.
>>
>> Also, once 3.10.2 is updated to include the updated packages &
>> above-referred fix, I'd suggest writing a QGIS.org blog post to inform
>> users of the worthiness of updating to 3.10.2(.2) *ASAP*, and expand a 
>> bit
>> on why 3.10.0/.1 were such rough releases. We can finish the post by
>> thanking users that have reported bugs (an inevitable nightmare to go
>> through as QGIS was exposing brand new GDAL3/PROJ6 versions to the 
>> masses).
>> IMHO, we should not skip this communication to our users.
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 7:27 AM Nyall Dawson 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Also, we better wait for a fix for
>>> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/33902 (incoming)...
>>>
>>> Gosh, will the nightmare ever end... Let's agree never to change
>>> anything in gdal or proj or qgis ever again ;)
>>>
>>> Nyall
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Forwarded message -
>>> From: Nyall Dawson 
>>> Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 06:28
>>> Subject: Urgent: Remove windows 3.10.2 installer from site
>>> To: qgis-developer 
>>>
>>>
>>> Can we please remove the 3.10.2

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Time Management Call

2020-01-10 Thread Anita Graser

Let's do it after family hours then.

How about
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2020=1=17=10=0=0=259=240

Regards,
Anita



On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 11:45 PM Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 00:59, Anita Graser  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Good to hear that work on the time integration is advancing!
> >
> > The best time next week for me would be Friday morning, for example
> 09:00 Vienna time / 19:00 Melbourne time (
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=17=1=2020=259=152=0
> ).
> > A bit earlier or later is also possible. I just have a different call
> scheduled for 10:00 already.
>
> Between 18:00 and 19:30 AEST is not an option for me --  that's crazy
> hour with the family! The couple of hours either side of this is fine
> though.
>
> Nyall
>
>
> >
> > Anita
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tim Sutton  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Folks (cc QGIS Developer List, anyone else interested in
> contributing to this please let us know).
> >>
> >> I think we (Saber, Peter, Nyall, Samweli and myself) have all chatted
> barring Anita about
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/161 and the
> related https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/128
> >>
> >> Anita I am including you in the conversation since you have invested a
> lot of energy and time [sic] into time management with your plugin. We are
> hoping we can build something that time manager hooks into (short term) and
> ultimately replaces time manager with core functionality (longer term).
> >>
> >> We have some time zone issues, but I am wondering if we could have a
> little 1 hour hang out session some time next week to plan and collude?
> Anita I think you might have the most issues with timings so how about you
> suggest a time and day if you are able to join (bearing in mind Nyall being
> in Australia) and the rest of us can see if we can make that work?
> >>
> >> Thanks all, look forward to chatting soon!
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> --
> >>
> >> Tim Sutton
> >> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
> >>  * Desktop GIS programming services
> >>  * Geospatial web development
> >> * GIS Training
> >> * Consulting Services
> >> Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> >> Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
> >>
> ---
> >> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS Time Management Call

2020-01-09 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

Good to hear that work on the time integration is advancing!

The best time next week for me would be Friday morning, for example 09:00
Vienna time / 19:00 Melbourne time (
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?day=17=1=2020=259=152=0
).
A bit earlier or later is also possible. I just have a different call
scheduled for 10:00 already.

Anita





On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 3:27 PM Tim Sutton  wrote:

> Hi Folks (cc QGIS Developer List, anyone else interested in contributing
> to this please let us know).
>
> I think we (Saber, Peter, Nyall, Samweli and myself) have all chatted
> barring Anita about
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/161 and the
> related https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/128
>
> Anita I am including you in the conversation since you have invested a lot
> of energy and time [sic] into time management with your plugin. We are
> hoping we can build something that time manager hooks into (short term) and
> ultimately replaces time manager with core functionality (longer term).
>
> We have some time zone issues, but I am wondering if we could have a
> little 1 hour hang out session some time next week to plan and collude?
> Anita I think you might have the most issues with timings so how about you
> suggest a time and day if you are able to join (bearing in mind Nyall being
> in Australia) and the rest of us can see if we can make that work?
>
> Thanks all, look forward to chatting soon!
>
> Regards
>
> Tim
>
> --
>
> --
>
> Tim Sutton
> Visit http://kartoza.com to find out about open source:
>  * Desktop GIS programming services
>  * Geospatial web development
> * GIS Training
> * Consulting Services
> Skype: timlinux Irc: timlinux on #qgis at freenode.net
> Tim is a member of the QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
> ---
> Kartoza is a merger between Linfiniti and Afrispatial
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-psc] 2019 Grant Final reports: Rendering optimisation and labeling work

2019-12-02 Thread Anita Graser

Thank you for the detailed report and the excellent work, Nyall!
I'm looking forward to testing it by upgrading some projects to the new
labeling.

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Geometry generator expression for line segment length

2019-11-23 Thread Anita Graser

Fixing the code prefix fixed the issue. Thanks Nyall!

Ad proj build: funnily enough, QGIS aboug says "Running against PROJ Rel.
7.0.0, March 1st, 2020"  ... Welcome to the future!

Anita

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:36 AM Anita Graser  wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Nyall Dawson 
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 05:34, Anita Graser  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I recently noticed that the expression I used in
>> https://anitagraser.com/2016/10/09/movement-data-in-gis-2-visualization/
>> does not work in current QGIS versions anymore. Specifically, I computed
>> the metric length of a line segment by transforming from WGS84 'EPSG:4326'
>> to 'EPSG:54027':
>> >
>> > length(
>> >   transform(
>> > geometry_n($geometry,@geometry_part_num),
>> > 'EPSG:4326','EPSG:54027'
>> > )
>> > )
>> >
>> > While debugging, I found that the transformation is not applied
>> anymore. (Some other EPSG codes do work though.) However, I couldn't figure
>> out how to get this transformation to work again.
>>
>> Is this a proj 6 based build? In any case, EPSG:54027 doesn't exist.
>> The correct code is "ESRI:54027" (see https://epsg.io/54027).
>
>
> Good catch, different four letters starting with E! The issue appeared on
> OSGeo4W so I'll have to check if that means proj6 already. Anyway, I'll
> give the other code a try!
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
>
>
>
>> It's
>> possible that < proj 6 builds had some exception in place for this
>> particular CRS, but with a proj 6 based build we rely on proj to
>> interpret CRS auth/id pairs so any exceptions in place for earlier
>> QGIS versions won't apply anymore.
>>
>> Nyall
>>
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Geometry generator expression for line segment length

2019-11-18 Thread Anita Graser

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 4:40 AM Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 05:34, Anita Graser  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently noticed that the expression I used in
> https://anitagraser.com/2016/10/09/movement-data-in-gis-2-visualization/
> does not work in current QGIS versions anymore. Specifically, I computed
> the metric length of a line segment by transforming from WGS84 'EPSG:4326'
> to 'EPSG:54027':
> >
> > length(
> >   transform(
> > geometry_n($geometry,@geometry_part_num),
> > 'EPSG:4326','EPSG:54027'
> > )
> > )
> >
> > While debugging, I found that the transformation is not applied anymore.
> (Some other EPSG codes do work though.) However, I couldn't figure out how
> to get this transformation to work again.
>
> Is this a proj 6 based build? In any case, EPSG:54027 doesn't exist.
> The correct code is "ESRI:54027" (see https://epsg.io/54027).


Good catch, different four letters starting with E! The issue appeared on
OSGeo4W so I'll have to check if that means proj6 already. Anyway, I'll
give the other code a try!

Thanks
Anita




> It's
> possible that < proj 6 builds had some exception in place for this
> particular CRS, but with a proj 6 based build we rely on proj to
> interpret CRS auth/id pairs so any exceptions in place for earlier
> QGIS versions won't apply anymore.
>
> Nyall
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Geometry generator expression for line segment length

2019-11-14 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

I recently noticed that the expression I used in
https://anitagraser.com/2016/10/09/movement-data-in-gis-2-visualization/
does not work in current QGIS versions anymore. Specifically, I computed
the metric length of a line segment by transforming from WGS84 'EPSG:4326'
to 'EPSG:54027':

length(
  transform(
geometry_n($geometry,@geometry_part_num),
'EPSG:4326','EPSG:54027'
)
)

While debugging, I found that the transformation is not applied anymore.
(Some other EPSG codes do work though.) However, I couldn't figure out how
to get this transformation to work again.

Thanks!

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] [Qgis-user] Geodesic Line Simplification

2019-10-01 Thread Anita Graser

Hi Calvin,

On 26 Sep 2019, at 17:13, C Hamilton>  wrote:
> For GPS tracks I also see a need to throw out all points that are less
than a certain distance or less than a certain time interval. I don't see
any simplification algorithms that make use of time. Am I just missing them?

I've implemented a function for this time-based generalization in
MovingPandas:
https://github.com/anitagraser/movingpandas/blob/c26fdf5307f2067d37a0f4cd018fe56c5d6c9839/movingpandas/trajectory.py#L372
I hope to soon provide a plugin that makes MovingPandas accessible from
within Processing. (However, the installation of Moving/GeoPandas
requirements on Windows is difficult without conda.)

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] New QGIS dev splash screen

2019-08-30 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

As promised on the QGIS Hackfest chat, I want to make a new splash screen
with the group picture that was posted. However the resolution is of the
picture I could download via the chat app is quite poor (just 1280px wide).
Can anyone send me a higher res version of this image please?

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-tcdJ_e24_R7B5LFRqGfekrnFyCU90yf/view?usp=sharing

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Dropping the extra label placement algorithms?

2019-08-06 Thread Anita Graser

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 4:40 AM Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> Does ANYONE understand or change this setting? Or would object to its
> complete removal?
>

I'd be +1 for removal. I know about the setting, don't understand the
algorithmic differences, have tried them in the past, didn't see meaningful
differences in the results.

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2019

2019-07-01 Thread Anita Graser

Dear QGIS community,

We are extremely pleased to announce the winning proposals for our 2019
QGIS.ORG grant programme.

Please read the announcement at
http://blog.qgis.org/2019/06/30/qgis-grant-programme-2019-results/

Regards,
Anita




On Sun, May 26, 2019 at 9:12 PM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Dear devs,
>
> This is a reminder that there is only one week left to this year's
> proposal deadline.
>
> Regards,
> Anita
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 PM Anita Graser  wrote:
>
>> Dear QGIS Community
>>
>> Our first three rounds of Grant Proposals were a great success. We are
>> very pleased to announce the fourth round of grants is now available to
>> QGIS contributors.
>>
>> Please read the QGIS.ORG blog post for details:
>>
>> http://blog.qgis.org/2019/05/06/qgis-grants-4-call-for-grant-proposals-2019/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anita Graser
>>
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] QGIS 4.0 - let's start some early discussions!

2019-06-25 Thread Anita Graser

Hi Calvin,

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 6:16 PM C Hamilton  wrote:

>  I had offices that were primarily using QGIS and who were developing
> scripts to handle their work flow. When QGIS 3 came out they got so
> frustrated with the lack of documentation and the complete break of the
> API, with no program that would take their scripts and make them QGIS 3
> compatible, that they completely abandoned QGIS and went back to ESRI.
> Despite the fact that I love QGIS 3 and think it is better than QGIS 2, I
> find there is now less interest in using QGIS. I have less customers then I
> used to have and it will probably take at least another year or two to get
> back to where I was at.
>

I agree that there is a problem here.

I know that as developers we want to continue to improve the code, add new
> features, and have a fun time. Fun tends not to be associated with
> documentation. I cannot tell you how important the documentation and
> training materials are. I would prefer seeing less new features but make
> sure the documentation is excellent and up-to-date.
>

I don't agree with the implied solution (i.e. slowing down development to
focus on documentation) because I don't see how this is economically
feasible.

If those offices that switched back from QGIS to ESRI would have invested
the money they are now paying for licenses into QGIS, we could probably
have fulfilled Tim's vision of having someone working full-time on QGIS
documentation and Q

They could also have hired a developer to write the missing documentation.
Or hired someone to port their scripts. Or stayed with QGIS 2 until more
documentation is ready ...

This story is sad and frustrating but we need to find an economically
feasible solution and I think that involved educating users about how open
source projects work.

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] SpatiaLite and GeoPackage provider changes format of datetime strings

2019-06-20 Thread Anita Graser

I've opened a ticket for this issue:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/30288

Regards,
Anita



On Sun, Jun 9, 2019 at 11:10 PM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a SpatiaLite (
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/4dtkpmlyhs741bn/geolife-beijing.sqlite?dl=0)
> with string fields that contain timestamps in %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S format.
> However, if I access the min or max values through the provider, the format
> changes to  %Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S
>
> p = l.dataProvider()
> p.minimumValue(2)
> '2008/11/11 00:38:00'
>
>
> This messed up TimeManager
> https://github.com/anitagraser/TimeManager/issues/218
>
> Would you consider that a bug? Should I open a ticket?
>
> Regards,
> Anita
>
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] SpatiaLite and GeoPackage provider changes format of datetime strings

2019-06-09 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

I have a SpatiaLite (
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4dtkpmlyhs741bn/geolife-beijing.sqlite?dl=0) with
string fields that contain timestamps in %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S format. However,
if I access the min or max values through the provider, the format changes
to  %Y/%m/%d %H:%M:%S

p = l.dataProvider()
p.minimumValue(2)
'2008/11/11 00:38:00'


This messed up TimeManager
https://github.com/anitagraser/TimeManager/issues/218

Would you consider that a bug? Should I open a ticket?

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2019

2019-05-26 Thread Anita Graser

Dear devs,

This is a reminder that there is only one week left to this year's proposal
deadline.

Regards,
Anita



On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 PM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Dear QGIS Community
>
> Our first three rounds of Grant Proposals were a great success. We are
> very pleased to announce the fourth round of grants is now available to
> QGIS contributors.
>
> Please read the QGIS.ORG blog post for details:
>
> http://blog.qgis.org/2019/05/06/qgis-grants-4-call-for-grant-proposals-2019/
>
> Regards,
> Anita Graser
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

2019-05-25 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

I've started a PR with the aggregate expression example here:
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/3769

Regards,
Anita




On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:15 AM Nyall Dawson 
wrote:

> On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 05:53, Anita Graser  wrote:
> >
> > Dear Nyall,
> >
> > for f in vl.getFeatures():
> > scope[-1].setFeature(f)
>
> This works, but isn't very nice. Better to use
>
> context.setFeature(f)
>
> (behind the scenes it's doing the same, but is more descriptive and
> has some extra checks, e.g. starting with an empty context:
> context = QgsExpressionContext()
> context.setFeature(f)
> will automatically add an initial scope in which to set the feature)
>
> > scope = QgsExpressionContextUtils.globalProjectLayerScopes(vl)
>
> Being pedantic, this should be "scopes = ...", since the call returns
> a list of scopes.
>
> Nyall
>
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

2019-05-20 Thread Anita Graser

Dear Nyall,

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:01 AM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Thank you Nyall, that's really helpful! The expression system is awesome
> and powerful but I don't think anyone could guess how to use it correctly
> in PyQGIS.
> I'll write it up into a tutorial and the documentation team is always
> welcome to reuse the content in the official documentation.
>

The following code works for me. However, I'm uncertain if the
scope.setFeature approach below is how it's meant to be used. Is there
something I should change?

context = QgsExpressionContext()
scope = QgsExpressionContextUtils.globalProjectLayerScopes(vl)
context.appendScopes(scope)

expression1 = QgsExpression('Revenue/Employees')
expression2 = QgsExpression('sum(Revenue)')

vl.startEditing()

for f in vl.getFeatures():
scope[-1].setFeature(f)
f['Rev. per employee'] = expression1.evaluate(context)
f['Sum'] = expression2.evaluate(context)
vl.updateFeature(f)

vl.commitChanges()

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

2019-05-20 Thread Anita Graser

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 9:41 AM matteo  wrote:

> Hi Anita,
>
> you hit a good missing topic in the pyqgis documentation. I see very
> often people asking for support on Expressions and their use in pyqgis.
>
> What do you think to add the example also in the pyqgis documentation
> directly? Since the last meeting we also have the test framework ready
> to go [0] that helps a lot to have strong code snippet.
>
> Having all the pieces in one box is the best solution IMHO
>

I agree. I'm only hesitant since I don't have a doc writing setup on my
Windows machine yet and the instructions seem to be Linux only.

I'll see what I can do. Otherwise, I'll get back to you with the content
and ask for help integrating it.

Regards,
Anita




>
> Cheers and thanks
>
> Matteo
>
> [0]
>
> https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/documentation_guidelines/cookbook_guidelines.html
>
> On 5/20/19 9:01 AM, Anita Graser wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:37 AM Nyall Dawson  > <mailto:nyall.daw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 01:21, Anita Graser  > <mailto:anitagra...@gmx.at>> wrote:
> > > I'd like to add an example of an aggregate expression to my recent
> > PyQGIS 101 tutorial on expressions [0]. I got expressions for
> > individual features working but cannot figure out how to set the
> > context for aggregate expressions correctly.
> > > As far as I can tell, the PyQGIS Cookbook doesn't contain any
> > information on this either [1].
> >
> > You aren't correctly constructing your expression context:
> > ...
> >
> > A documentation update covering this would be most welcome ;)
> >
> >
> > Thank you Nyall, that's really helpful! The expression system is awesome
> > and powerful but I don't think anyone could guess how to use it
> > correctly in PyQGIS.
> >
> > I'll write it up into a tutorial and the documentation team is always
> > welcome to reuse the content in the official documentation.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Anita
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > QGIS-Developer mailing list
> > QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> >
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

2019-05-20 Thread Anita Graser

On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:37 AM Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 01:21, Anita Graser  wrote:
> > I'd like to add an example of an aggregate expression to my recent
> PyQGIS 101 tutorial on expressions [0]. I got expressions for individual
> features working but cannot figure out how to set the context for aggregate
> expressions correctly.
> > As far as I can tell, the PyQGIS Cookbook doesn't contain any
> information on this either [1].
>
> You aren't correctly constructing your expression context:
> ...

A documentation update covering this would be most welcome ;)

Thank you Nyall, that's really helpful! The expression system is awesome
and powerful but I don't think anyone could guess how to use it correctly
in PyQGIS.

I'll write it up into a tutorial and the documentation team is always
welcome to reuse the content in the official documentation.

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Expressions with aggregate in PyQGIS

2019-05-19 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

I'd like to add an example of an aggregate expression to my recent PyQGIS
101 tutorial on expressions [0]. I got expressions for individual features
working but cannot figure out how to set the context for aggregate
expressions correctly.

As far as I can tell, the PyQGIS Cookbook doesn't contain any information
on this either [1].

I'd appreciate any examples!

Regards,
Anita

[0]
https://anitagraser.com/pyqgis-101-introduction-to-qgis-python-programming-for-non-programmers/pyqgis-101-using-expressions-to-compute-new-field-values/
[1]
https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/pyqgis_developer_cookbook/expressions.html#evaluating-expressions
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Recent rendering changes that might affect TimeManager

2019-05-18 Thread Anita Graser

On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:29 AM Patrick Dunford 
wrote:

> Can I suggest that you need to be more specific and not comparing to 2.8
>

Thank you for the feedback Patrick!

I assume, the question can be simplified:

TimeManager changes the SubsetString of some layers in a project. Is there
a way to avoid that other layers (e.g. XYZ or WMS layers that are not
managed by TimeManager) are reloaded every time the SusetString of
TimeManager layers is changed?

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Recent rendering changes that might affect TimeManager

2019-05-16 Thread Anita Graser

Sorry, only #290 is about rendering.
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] FIELDS_TO_COPY syntax for native:joinattributestable

2019-05-13 Thread Anita Graser

On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 7:30 AM Nyall Dawson  wrote:

> On Sat, 11 May 2019 at 00:03, Anita Graser  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out the syntax for using native:joinattributestable
> in the modeller. Specifically, I'd like to specify the FIELDS_TO_COPY
> parameter. I know from the Processing history, that the correct syntax is :
> >
> > FIELDS_TO_COPY: ['NAME','USE']
> >
> >
> > but no matter how I try to enter the field names into to modeller GUI, I
> always end up with either everything mashed into one field name, e.g.
> >
> >
> > FIELDS_TO_COPY: 'NAME,USE'
>
> NAME;USE
>

Thank you, Nyall! That did the trick.

It's completely opaque and not user friendly at all. This will
> eventually get fixed when the fields parameter is ported to the new
> wrapper API, where we can add specific helper tooltips and text around
> the widget.


That will be a huge improvement. Without tooltips this is really difficult
to figure out.

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] FIELDS_TO_COPY syntax for native:joinattributestable

2019-05-10 Thread Anita Graser

Hi,

I'm trying to figure out the syntax for using native:joinattributestable in
the modeller. Specifically, I'd like to specify the FIELDS_TO_COPY parameter.
I know from the Processing history, that the correct syntax is :

FIELDS_TO_COPY: ['NAME','USE']


but no matter how I try to enter the field names into to modeller GUI, I
always end up with either everything mashed into one field name, e.g.


FIELDS_TO_COPY: 'NAME,USE'


or escaped:


FIELDS_TO_COPY: '[\'NAME\',\'USE\']'


What's the correct way to specify the "Layer 2 fields to copy" in the
modeler GUI?


Regards,

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Call for Grant Proposals 2019

2019-05-06 Thread Anita Graser

Dear QGIS Community

Our first three rounds of Grant Proposals were a great success. We are very
pleased to announce the fourth round of grants is now available to QGIS
contributors.

Please read the QGIS.ORG blog post for details:
http://blog.qgis.org/2019/05/06/qgis-grants-4-call-for-grant-proposals-2019/

Regards,
Anita Graser
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Can't import GeoPackage generated by QGIS into PostGIS

2019-04-04 Thread Anita Graser

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 1:46 PM Anita Graser  wrote:

> Here it is: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21714
>

Thanks for fixing, Alessandro!

Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Can't import GeoPackage generated by QGIS into PostGIS

2019-03-31 Thread Anita Graser

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 11:42 AM Anita Graser  wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 10:11 PM Alessandro Pasotti 
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2019, 21:55 Anita Graser  wrote:
>>
>>> - Option #2: QGIS shouldn't create GeoPackages that store long strings
>>> in field defined as text(255)
>>>
>> I'll create a ticket for #2 then.
>

Here it is: https://issues.qgis.org/issues/21714

Regards,
Anita
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 >

1 - 100 of 707 matches

Mail list logo