Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-05-02 Thread Jeremy Palmer 
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 3:54 AM, Tom Elwertowski 
wrote:

> I have posted my steps for building QGIS and dependencies from source
> here: https://gist.github.com/telwertowski/a047772c8ae38bb6612c0c7
> 180e82a0c


Thank you very much Tom. I will try these instructions this week :)
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-05-02 Thread Tom Elwertowski 
I have posted my steps for building QGIS and dependencies from source 
here: https://gist.github.com/telwertowski/a047772c8ae38bb6612c0c7180e82a0c


Tom

On 4/28/18 7:12 PM, Jeremy Palmer wrote:


On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Tom Elwertowski 
> wrote:


Currently, I install Qt binaries and Kyngchaos frameworks and use
configure/make for everything else. I can document the steps. I
haven't in the past because people asking for mac builds have said
they are not developers.

After review of my build process, we can determine if it can be
automated.

Big +1 for this and nightly builds :)

Cheers
Jeremy

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-04-28 Thread Jeremy Palmer 
On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Tom Elwertowski 
wrote:

>
>
> Currently, I install Qt binaries and Kyngchaos frameworks and use
> configure/make for everything else. I can document the steps. I haven't in
> the past because people asking for mac builds have said they are not
> developers.
>
> After review of my build process, we can determine if it can be automated.
>
>
Big +1 for this and nightly builds :)

Question: Was there any thought on using QT 5.10 in the official MacOSX
distribution? Currently we are using 5.9.3.

Cheers
Jeremy
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-04-28 Thread Tom Elwertowski 

Hi Matthias,

I build QGIS dependencies mostly from source. I don't use homebrew or 
macports. When I started, fink was popular and very useful for the first 
few months. Once I became familiar with Unix-style tools however, 
building directly from source was less problematic than dealing with the 
external issues in package managers.


Currently, I install Qt binaries and Kyngchaos frameworks and use 
configure/make for everything else. I can document the steps. I haven't 
in the past because people asking for mac builds have said they are not 
developers.


After review of my build process, we can determine if it can be automated.

Tom


On 4/26/18 2:19 PM, Matthias Kuhn wrote:

Hi Tom,

Sorry to hear that. In the past we had macOS continuous integration 
tests in place but had to disable them, because the package manager used 
there (homebrew) was breaking dependencies unpredictably (I don't think 
that's unexpected news for you if you are building on mac though ;) )


There is no "verification machine" on linux, but there is a docker 
image. However I am not sure how easy it is to modify this image put 
headers in different folders and make all the executables (xxx-config) 
return the modified paths - while keeping the infrastructure maintainable.


Alternatively, I would very much like to get the mac builds back up and 
running. I don't think we can do this again with the upstream homebrew 
repo since we don't want our pull requests flagged erroneous for 
external problems. The best alternative I see is, that we need a curated 
list of formulae in a separate repository, which would not only help the 
testing but potentially also the release process. Would you be 
interested in taking a lead on this?


Best regards

Matthias


On 04/26/2018 07:58 PM, Tom Elwertowski wrote:

Hi all,

Both yesterday and today, the macOS build failed due to missing CMake 
INCLUDE specifications.


MacOS puts each framework in a separate directory while Linux merges 
everything into /usr/local. Thus, Linux commits will compile when a 
new dependency is added as long as some other dependency already 
specifies /usr/local.


Here is an idea that would help macOS build compatibility. Place each 
dependency on the verification build machine in a separate directory 
such as

/usr/local/gdal-2.2.3/
/usr/local/geos-3.6.1/

This would make commits fail upfront on Linux if CMake INCLUDES needed 
by macOS were missing.


Tom
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



--
Matthias Kuhn
matth...@opengis.ch 
+41 (0)76 435 67 63 
OPENGIS.ch Logo 


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer


___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-04-26 Thread Nyall Dawson 
On 27 April 2018 at 03:58, Tom Elwertowski  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Both yesterday and today, the macOS build failed due to missing CMake
> INCLUDE specifications.

Should be fixed in master now.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-04-26 Thread Matthias Kuhn 
Hi Tom,

Sorry to hear that. In the past we had macOS continuous integration
tests in place but had to disable them, because the package manager used
there (homebrew) was breaking dependencies unpredictably (I don't think
that's unexpected news for you if you are building on mac though ;) )

There is no "verification machine" on linux, but there is a docker
image. However I am not sure how easy it is to modify this image put
headers in different folders and make all the executables (xxx-config)
return the modified paths - while keeping the infrastructure maintainable.

Alternatively, I would very much like to get the mac builds back up and
running. I don't think we can do this again with the upstream homebrew
repo since we don't want our pull requests flagged erroneous for
external problems. The best alternative I see is, that we need a curated
list of formulae in a separate repository, which would not only help the
testing but potentially also the release process. Would you be
interested in taking a lead on this?

Best regards

Matthias


On 04/26/2018 07:58 PM, Tom Elwertowski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Both yesterday and today, the macOS build failed due to missing CMake
> INCLUDE specifications.
>
> MacOS puts each framework in a separate directory while Linux merges
> everything into /usr/local. Thus, Linux commits will compile when a
> new dependency is added as long as some other dependency already
> specifies /usr/local.
>
> Here is an idea that would help macOS build compatibility. Place each
> dependency on the verification build machine in a separate directory
> such as
> /usr/local/gdal-2.2.3/
> /usr/local/geos-3.6.1/
>
> This would make commits fail upfront on Linux if CMake INCLUDES needed
> by macOS were missing.
>
> Tom
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>

-- 
Matthias Kuhn
matth...@opengis.ch 
+41 (0)76 435 67 63 
OPENGIS.ch Logo 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Suggestion for improved macOS build compatibility testing

2018-04-26 Thread Tom Elwertowski 

Hi all,

Both yesterday and today, the macOS build failed due to missing CMake 
INCLUDE specifications.


MacOS puts each framework in a separate directory while Linux merges 
everything into /usr/local. Thus, Linux commits will compile when a new 
dependency is added as long as some other dependency already specifies 
/usr/local.


Here is an idea that would help macOS build compatibility. Place each 
dependency on the verification build machine in a separate directory such as

/usr/local/gdal-2.2.3/
/usr/local/geos-3.6.1/

This would make commits fail upfront on Linux if CMake INCLUDES needed 
by macOS were missing.


Tom
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer