Re: [Qgis-developer] Question about QEP process

[Mark Johnson]

>
> Hey Mark,
>
> A QEP should be opened in order for review to take place on any design
> changes that might need descussion.
>
The 'design changes' will be more on how the Georeferencer will work, not
QGIS 3.0 itsself.

> Also please note that 2.x is not receiving any new features as we are now
> working on 3.0. 2.x will only be bug fixes.
>
Although this is being developed with 2.x (where the major changes are
Georeferencer
internal)
- the intention is to offer it mainly as a QGIS 3.0 version (that will also
run with 2.*)
- correcting this that could work better
- extending it ways that as someone who has used it for 100s of projects in
the last 4-5 years useful

The idea of the QEP would therefore be to
- introduce the concept with the reasons why
- and come to consensus

Mark

Regards,
> Nathan
>
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [Qgis-developer] Question about QEP process

[Nathan Woodrow]

Hey Mark,

A QEP should be opened in order for review to take place on any design
changes that might need descussion.

Also please note that 2.x is not receiving any new features as we are now
working on 3.0. 2.x will only be bug fixes.

Regards,
Nathan

On Tue, 27 Dec 2016 7:29 pm Mark Johnson  wrote:

> I am preparing a worked over version of the Georeferencer and have come to
> the stage where most of the adapted/new functionality is nearing completion
> and the extensive testing starts.
>
> I have started working on a QEP, based on the template 'QEP-0-Template.md'.
>
> Since a full explanation of the changes and additions are extensive, it
> may take a while to complete the draft.
>
> Since there is no Label 'Draft in preparation', my question is whether to
> continue working on it here until the Draft is complete:
>
> https://github.com/mj10777/QGIS/wiki/QGIS-Enhancement:-Georeferencer
>
> or submit it now, completing it within the next 7-10 days.
>
> There is also the question: keep it short or (what I would prefer)
> extensive?
>
> Mark Johnson, Berlin Germany
> ___
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[Qgis-developer] Question about QEP process

[Mark Johnson]

I am preparing a worked over version of the Georeferencer and have come to
the stage where most of the adapted/new functionality is nearing completion
and the extensive testing starts.

I have started working on a QEP, based on the template 'QEP-0-Template.md'.

Since a full explanation of the changes and additions are extensive, it may
take a while to complete the draft.

Since there is no Label 'Draft in preparation', my question is whether to
continue working on it here until the Draft is complete:

https://github.com/mj10777/QGIS/wiki/QGIS-Enhancement:-Georeferencer

or submit it now, completing it within the next 7-10 days.

There is also the question: keep it short or (what I would prefer)
extensive?

Mark Johnson, Berlin Germany
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer