[QGIS-Developer] UbuntuGIS builds of QGIS

2018-01-04 Thread Jeremy Palmer
Hi All,

Is there a reason for the QGIS 2.18.X builds of UbuntuGIS builds having a
dependency on GDAL ABI 2.2.2? linking to a patch release seems very weird.
I know the GDAL team tries to ensure ABI compatibility within a minor
version.

Cheers
Jeremy
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Better updating for QGIS3?

2018-01-04 Thread Jürgen E . Fischer
Hi Tim,

On Thu, 04. Jan 2018 at 19:44:13 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
> Just to make it clear, nobody is proposing to make any changes to the
> frequency of releases. Point releases will be every 4 months, bug fix
> releases still monthly on the LTR versions (if there are any fixes), weekly
> and nightly builds etc. will just continue exactly as they do at the moment.

Just to make that clear: Point releases are the bug fix releases and happen
every month.  Regular releases happen every 4 months.


Jürgen

-- 
Jürgen E. Fischer   norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31
Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13  Fax. +49-4931-918175-50
Software Engineer   D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de
QGIS release manager (PSC)  GermanyIRC: jef on FreeNode


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] 2.99 colour panel crash? (MacOS 10.13/Qt 5.10)

2018-01-04 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 5 January 2018 at 00:00, Vincent Habchi  wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Apparently there are recurring bug with the UI under OS X when using OS X 
> 10.13 / Qt 5.10 : some dialog box closure crash (I just tried to close the 
> project dialogue box and it crashed right away), and also the small colour 
> dialog with predefined hues that appears when you click on the right of the 
> standard colour picker.
>
> Just to say, sorry I can’t be of any more help because I only have so much 
> time these days (TBH, I’m currently writing a review of QGIS 3 for the 
> January issue of my magazine).
>

Hey Vincent,

How do you build QGIS? This looks very much like a local build issue.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Better updating for QGIS3?

2018-01-04 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Hi there!

Just to make that clear: I really like your work (QGIS & OSGeo4W).
I just want to give some hints to make it even better ;)

Since OSGeo4W is OpenSource, I could create a "slimmed down"
variante for users with limited access to the internet.

Best regards,
Tobias

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Better updating for QGIS3?

2018-01-04 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Hi Tim,

Am Do, 4.01.2018, 18:44 schrieb Tim Sutton:
> BTW I also live in a bandwidth impoverished society and share your
> desire for minimising bandwidth, but short of delta updates (which we
> don't have the resources to implement at the moment) there isn?t
> much room for optimising in my opinion.

I just did a small comparism of what changed between the latest
nightly builds and packed the files with changes only.

While a normal packed nightly release is about 61-65 MB, the changed
files only (no delta) is about 40 MB. So we're saving 25 MB only.
Facebook's zStandard packager can bring the diff to 36 MB (30 MB saving).

Maybe it's better to switch to XZ. It can bring the full release to
40 MB only, while zStandard is 52 MB and bzip2 is 62 MB?

Best regards,
Tobias

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing plugin - Set style on resulting layer

2018-01-04 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 3 January 2018 at 23:59, Jakob Lanstorp  wrote:
> I'm building a Processing plugin used as an interface between QGIS and a
> geological PostGIS database.
>
> The resulting layer is as standard loaded automatically (Processing best
> practices). This resulting load (shapefile) happens after method
> processAlgorithm of GeoAlgorithm has run.
>
> This gives me no chance of setting the resulting layer style. Is there any
> post-processingAlgorithm method or anything else I can use? I'm aware of
> "qgis:setstyleforvectorlayer" but my script is not meant for the modeller
> and would like the algorithm to be run in one step not two steps.
>
> I may be out of scoop for what a Processing plugin is meant for - but like
> the non ui and direct algorithm approach.
>

I don't believe this is possible in 2.x, nor currently in 3.0 either.
BUT - the API has changed significantly in 3.0 and could be expanded
to allow for this type of approach in future 3.x releases.

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] UbuntuGIS builds of QGIS

2018-01-04 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 01/05/2018 02:26 AM, Jeremy Palmer wrote:
> Is there a reason for the QGIS 2.18.X builds of UbuntuGIS builds having a
> dependency on GDAL ABI 2.2.2? linking to a patch release seems very weird.

Because the C++ ABI was not stable in the past, see:

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756867#40

> I know the GDAL team tries to ensure ABI compatibility within a minor
> version.

Maybe it is now, but it was not in the past.

GDAL 2.3.0 will be the first release for which I'll try not to bump the
virtual ABI dependency (keeping it at gdal-abi-2-3-0) to see if C++ ABI
is now actually stable. If that fails, the virtual ABI dependency will
be changed for every patch release again.

Kind Regards,

Bas
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing plugin - Set style on resulting layer

2018-01-04 Thread Nyall Dawson
On 5 January 2018 at 17:34, Alexander Bruy  wrote:
> Processing allows to define styles for outpus on the per-algorithm basis.
> Just open algorithm context menu by right-clicking on it and select "Edit
> rendering styles for outputs". In the dialog you can assign styles for each
> algorithm output. These styles will be applied to outputs automatically
> after algorithm execution.
>
> Hope this helps.

That works for a user, but I think Jakob is after a way for an
algorithm to define a style which is always used for the output for
that algorithm.

Is this correct?

Nyall
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Processing plugin - Set style on resulting layer

2018-01-04 Thread Alexander Bruy
Processing allows to define styles for outpus on the per-algorithm basis.
Just open algorithm context menu by right-clicking on it and select "Edit
rendering styles for outputs". In the dialog you can assign styles for each
algorithm output. These styles will be applied to outputs automatically
after algorithm execution.

Hope this helps.

2018-01-05 3:49 GMT+02:00 Nyall Dawson :
> On 3 January 2018 at 23:59, Jakob Lanstorp  wrote:
>> I'm building a Processing plugin used as an interface between QGIS and a
>> geological PostGIS database.
>>
>> The resulting layer is as standard loaded automatically (Processing best
>> practices). This resulting load (shapefile) happens after method
>> processAlgorithm of GeoAlgorithm has run.
>>
>> This gives me no chance of setting the resulting layer style. Is there any
>> post-processingAlgorithm method or anything else I can use? I'm aware of
>> "qgis:setstyleforvectorlayer" but my script is not meant for the modeller
>> and would like the algorithm to be run in one step not two steps.
>>
>> I may be out of scoop for what a Processing plugin is meant for - but like
>> the non ui and direct algorithm approach.
>>
>
> I don't believe this is possible in 2.x, nor currently in 3.0 either.
> BUT - the API has changed significantly in 3.0 and could be expanded
> to allow for this type of approach in future 3.x releases.
>
> Nyall
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer



-- 
Alexander Bruy
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Freeze exemption for feature duplication PRs

2018-01-04 Thread Paolo Cavallini
Il 04/01/2018 08:50, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
> Hi
> 
> Thanks Andreas - I have added loomio votes for them here:
> 
> https://www.loomio.org/d/38Aiya0q/3-0-soft-freeze-exemptions
> 
> @all please add any other last minute freeze exception requests there.

Thanks. Can we have a review of the PR, and an idea of the risk involved?
All the best.

-- 
Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu
QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all=IT=qgis,arcgis
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] Plugin [1380] Batch Hillshader approval notification.

2018-01-04 Thread noreply

Plugin Batch Hillshader approval by pcav.
The plugin version "[1380] Batch Hillshader 2.1.90 Experimental" is now approved
Link: http://plugins.qgis.org/plugins/batch_hillshader-master/
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Freeze exemption for feature duplication PRs

2018-01-04 Thread Andreas Neumann
The main risk is that something in the relation reference widget is
broken. Something that we as users (Province of Zug) would find out
first, because we use it a lot in many of our projects. We are already
using QGIS master a lot and would find out issues around relation
reference widgets. 

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5925/ is low risk, since it is mainly
UI changes (only 2 files changed). 

The other two PRs are a bit more complex, but still manageable to review
for a core dev. https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5961/ is introducing a
new context menu (also mainly UI).
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5922/ is probably the one of the three
PRs that needs most review. 

Just my own view of course. 

Andreas 

On 2018-01-04 10:38, Paolo Cavallini wrote:

> Il 04/01/2018 08:50, Tim Sutton ha scritto: 
> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Thanks Andreas - I have added loomio votes for them here:
>> 
>> https://www.loomio.org/d/38Aiya0q/3-0-soft-freeze-exemptions
>> 
>> @all please add any other last minute freeze exception requests there.
> 
> Thanks. Can we have a review of the PR, and an idea of the risk involved?
> All the best.___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Better updating for QGIS3?

2018-01-04 Thread Tobias Wendorff
Hi Jürgen,

Am Mi, 3.01.2018, 19:20 schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer:
> The builds only happen once a day - not on each commit.
> And the packages only cover qgis.  The dependencies are
> only updated the those package change - which doesn't happen (
> that) often.

if developers of QGIS3 will switch to "release once - update often",
there will/should be more updates. See Firefox or Chrome... they
are updating very often (even silently).

Seems like I am the only one seeing a problem here... so it doesn't
seem to matter. Ignore it please :)

Best,
Tobias

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Better updating for QGIS3?

2018-01-04 Thread Tim Sutton
Hi Tobias

> On 04 Jan 2018, at 17:58, Tobias Wendorff  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jürgen,
> 
> Am Mi, 3.01.2018, 19:20 schrieb Jürgen E. Fischer:
>> The builds only happen once a day - not on each commit.
>> And the packages only cover qgis.  The dependencies are
>> only updated the those package change - which doesn't happen (
>> that) often.
> 
> if developers of QGIS3 will switch to "release once - update often",
> there will/should be more updates. See Firefox or Chrome... they
> are updating very often (even silently).


Just to make it clear, nobody is proposing to make any changes to the frequency 
of releases. Point releases will be every 4 months, bug fix releases still 
monthly on the LTR versions (if there are any fixes), weekly and nightly builds 
etc. will just continue exactly as they do at the moment.

BTW I also live in a bandwidth impoverished society and share your desire for 
minimising bandwidth, but short of delta updates (which we don't have the 
resources to implement at the moment) there isn’t much room for optimising in 
my opinion.

Regards

Tim

> 
> Seems like I am the only one seeing a problem here... so it doesn't
> seem to matter. Ignore it please :)
> 
> Best,
> Tobias
> 
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

 



---

Tim Sutton
QGIS Project Steering Committee Chair
t...@qgis.org




___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] no shapefile editing with activated filter after project reload

2018-01-04 Thread EFTAS Christian Röttger
Hi everybody,

i found a mysterious behaviour during a shapefile editing session. Using qgis 
2.8.14(15).
I have some shapefiles which I want to edit. I create a filter on it, editing 
is possible.
I save the project and after reopening it, there is no more editing possible. 
Even if I remove the filter it can't be edited anymore.
I tried the same with a postgis layer which doesn't have this problem.So this 
might be shapefile specific!?

Can anyone confirm this? Is this a bug? Should I open an report. Or maybe is 
there a solution/workaround?

Kind regards
Christian
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] Freeze exemption for feature duplication PRs

2018-01-04 Thread Matthias Kuhn
Hi Paolo,
On 01/04/2018 10:38 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> Il 04/01/2018 08:50, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks Andreas - I have added loomio votes for them here:
>>
>> https://www.loomio.org/d/38Aiya0q/3-0-soft-freeze-exemptions
>>
>> @all please add any other last minute freeze exception requests there.
> 
> Thanks. Can we have a review of the PR,

The pull requests were reviewed and discussed internally extensively,
except for the last one (#5961 "Contextmenu with individual actions").

> and an idea of the risk involved?

Hard to tell, we never can exclude all the risks. On the pro side I
would mention that these are new buttons/menus/actions so code is only
executed on user interaction and only a minimal amount of bootstrap code
is executed silently to create the buttons and menus.

Regards
Matthias

> All the best.
> 
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Re: [QGIS-Developer] no shapefile editing with activated filter after project reload

2018-01-04 Thread Alessandro Pasotti
This reminds me of a similar bug (that should have been fixed), please have
a look to

https://issues.qgis.org/issues/17507
https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/5741

If you think that the scenario is different please file a separate ticket
and link to the original ticket (they are related for sure), if you don't
think it is a separate issue just re-open #17507 and add a note with the
exact procedure to reroduce your issue, please also attach a minimal simple
project and data to allow me to quickly reproduce the issue...

Make sure you are testing a build that is newer than 27 Nov 2017, that is
the date when the patch landed into 2.x code base.

Thanks



On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:25 PM, EFTAS Christian Röttger <
christian.roett...@eftas.com> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
>
>
> i found a mysterious behaviour during a shapefile editing session. Using
> qgis 2.8.14(15).
>
> I have some shapefiles which I want to edit. I create a filter on it,
> editing is possible.
>
> I save the project and after reopening it, there is no more editing
> possible. Even if I remove the filter it can’t be edited anymore.
>
> I tried the same with a postgis layer which doesn’t have this problem.So
> this might be shapefile specific!?
>
>
>
> Can anyone confirm this? Is this a bug? Should I open an report. Or maybe
> is there a solution/workaround?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Christian
>
> ___
> QGIS-Developer mailing list
> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>



-- 
Alessandro Pasotti
w3:   www.itopen.it
___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

[QGIS-Developer] 2.99 colour panel crash? (MacOS 10.13/Qt 5.10)

2018-01-04 Thread Vincent Habchi
Folks,

Apparently there are recurring bug with the UI under OS X when using OS X 10.13 
/ Qt 5.10 : some dialog box closure crash (I just tried to close the project 
dialogue box and it crashed right away), and also the small colour dialog with 
predefined hues that appears when you click on the right of the standard colour 
picker.

Just to say, sorry I can’t be of any more help because I only have so much time 
these days (TBH, I’m currently writing a review of QGIS 3 for the January issue 
of my magazine).

Good luck!

Vincent

___
QGIS-Developer mailing list
QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer