[Qgis-user] Batch Processing

[Surya Pratap]

Hi,

I have a set of shapefiles on which I want to do some experimental
analysis. since the same actions need to be done on each file, I thought
batch process may be the place to go. The issue is for each run I need to
select the files and set values in the batch.

Is there a way to save and edit the batch files and then load it?

Regards
Surya
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] OpenLayers plugin and Google Aerial maps and Print Composer

[Donovan Cameron]

Hey John,

That's a bug.

See, http://hub.qgis.org/issues/6653
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11132
http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11401

They seem to be related.

A few folks have reported that the google maps layer offset, when 
exporting from print composer, can be avoided by setting the map frame 
size (width x height) exactly the same as the paper size in the print 
composer.



Donovan

On 02/04/15 09:50 AM, John Barnes wrote:


QGIS 2.8.1

Windows 7 64bit

Installed via standalone installer

New to QGIS, 18 years with the 800 pound gorilla.

Google Maps added as a layer lines up with my data absolutely 
fantastic.  Works great.


When I create a Print Composer it looks really good as well.  When I 
export the Print Composer to a pdf or image file the Google Aerial Map 
is offset to the southeast probably 100’.  Happens every time.


Any ideas how to export these so the image does not offset and stays 
lined up as it is in the map and the Composer?


Thanks,

*John Barnes* | GIS Specialist

City of McMinnville

Community Development | Engineering Department

231 NE Fifth Street, McMinnville, OR 97128

Office: (503) 434-7312 | Fax: (503) 474-4955

john.bar...@ci.mcminnville.or.us | www.ci.mcminnville.or.us



___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS

[G. Allegri]

Thanks Marco ;)
I will test it tomorrow.
Il 02/apr/2015 18:29 "Peter Borissow"  ha scritto:

> Wow, this is great news! I can't wait to test it.
>
> Thanks for your help!
> Peter
>
>   --
>  *From:* Marco Hugentobler 
> *To:* qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; peter.boris...@yahoo.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 2, 2015 11:34 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
>
> Hi all
>
> I've added the checkbox to only load the features intersecting the current
> extent (
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/e4e4839823fad1b980cb815889c18edb9c4352b7
> ).
>
> Regards,
> Marco
>
> --
> Dr. Marco Hugentobler
> Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
> Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, switzerlandmarco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch 
> http://www.sourcepole.ch
> Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee
>
>
>
> On 31.03.2015 12:01, Peter Borissow wrote:
>
>
>
> Thanks Giovanni-
> Do you know when the dev team is planning the next release? I wonder
> if there's time to get this fixed before the next release.
>
>  Peter
>
>   --
>  *From:* G. Allegri 
> *To:* Peter Borissow 
> *Cc:* "t...@wildintellect.com" ;
> "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" 
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
>
>  I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)
> I think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new
> suggestions/ideas to the existing one.
>
>  giovanni
>
> 2015-03-27 10:04 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow :
>
>
>Thanks Alex-
> Do you think we should open a new ticket?
>
>  Peter
>
>  --
>  *From:* Alex Mandel 
> *To:* Peter Borissow ; G. Allegri <
> gioha...@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" 
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:10 PM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
>
> That's exactly how I would expect it to work.
>
> To cache a whole WFS and start seems overboard, in that case why
> wouldn't you just download the data set. BBOX is a must for web services
> as a main part of the purpose is to allow users to only grab the part
> they need when they need it.
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
>
>
>
> On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Peter Borissow wrote:
> > Thanks Giovanni-It seems to me that the "cache features" option and
> the option to fetch only the features intersecting the current map extent
> should be 2 separate options.
> >
> > For example, when I open a WFS layer, I might want to retrieve only the
> features intersecting the current map extent. Once it is loaded, I would
> want QGIS to cache the features.
> >
> > This is a common rendering technique used for WMS. A client requests an
> initial BBOX and renders the image. The when the client pans, a new request
> is made but only for the "missing" area. The original response is cached
> and merged with the second response. Just a thought...
> >
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> >  From: G. Allegri 
> >  To: Peter Borissow 
> > Cc: "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" 
> >  Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:27 PM
> >  Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
> >
> > As Marco explained in the realted post on qgis-dev the bbox filter
> should be used if "cahce features" option is turned off, but at the moment
> it seems broken, maybe because of new improvements in the rendering
> process. The issue has been already reported in
> http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968
> > In the meanwhile a manual filter could be set within the WFS add layer
> dialog.
> > giovanni
> > 2015-03-26 16:07 GMT+01:00 G. Allegri :
> >
> >
> >
> > It's an intereseting question Peter. I've verified that the wfs provider
> still requests the whole data the first time, then it stores eveything (and
> create a spatial index for subsequent calls).I suppose that sponsoring this
> feature could be the right way to have it, but I'm curious to know what the
> latest answer from Marco was referring to (I mean within the svn code he
> indicates) [1]
> > Giovanni
> > [1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1421#note-4
> > 2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow :
> >
> > Sorry for being impatient but I was wondering if anyone can shed some
> light on this issue.
> > I have a WFS that's serving out over a billion features (several million
> records per layer). When I add a layer from the WFS into QGIS, it calls
> DescribeFeature and then GetFeature without a BBOX filter. QGIS then waits
> for ALL of the data to come back (which can take a while).
> > In the past, there was an option only fetch features that intersect the
> current map extent. Without this option, it is extremely difficult to do
> anything with the WFS using QGIS.
> >
> > IMHO, this is a pretty significant bug but hopefully one that should be
> really easy to fix. Afterall, the code was there at some point...
> >
> >
> > Related (unanswered) questions on stack exchange:
> >
> >
> http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/53387/quantumgis-1-8-how-to-define-bounding-box-within-add-wfs-lay

[Qgis-user] OpenLayers plugin and Google Aerial maps and Print Composer

[John Barnes]

QGIS 2.8.1
Windows 7 64bit
Installed via standalone installer

New to QGIS, 18 years with the 800 pound gorilla.

Google Maps added as a layer lines up with my data absolutely fantastic.  Works 
great.

When I create a Print Composer it looks really good as well.  When I export the 
Print Composer to a pdf or image file the Google Aerial Map is offset to the 
southeast probably 100'.  Happens every time.

Any ideas how to export these so the image does not offset and stays lined up 
as it is in the map and the Composer?

Thanks,

John Barnes | GIS Specialist
City of McMinnville
Community Development | Engineering Department
231 NE Fifth Street, McMinnville, OR 97128
Office: (503) 434-7312 | Fax: (503) 474-4955
john.bar...@ci.mcminnville.or.us | www.ci.mcminnville.or.us

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS

[Peter Borissow]

Wow, this is great news! I can't wait to test it.
Thanks for your help!
Peter

  From: Marco Hugentobler 
 To: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org; peter.boris...@yahoo.com 
 Sent: Thursday, April 2, 2015 11:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
   
 Hi all
 
 I've added the checkbox to only load the features intersecting the current 
extent(https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/e4e4839823fad1b980cb815889c18edb9c4352b7).
 
 Regards,
 Marco
 
 -- 
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee  
 
 On 31.03.2015 12:01, Peter Borissow wrote:
  
 

 Thanks Giovanni-     Do you know when the dev team is planning the next 
release? I wonder if there's time to get this fixed before the next release. 
  Peter
   
  From: G. Allegri 
 To: Peter Borissow  
 Cc: "t...@wildintellect.com" ; 
"qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org"  
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
   
   I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :) I 
think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new suggestions/ideas 
to the existing one. 
  giovanni  
 2015-03-27 10:04 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow :
 
 
   
   Thanks Alex-     Do you think we should open a new ticket?  
  Peter
   
 From: Alex Mandel 
 To: Peter Borissow ; G. Allegri  
 Cc: "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org"  
 Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:10 PM  
 Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
  
 That's exactly how I would expect it to work.
 
 To cache a whole WFS and start seems overboard, in that case  why
 wouldn't you just download the data set. BBOX is a must for web  services
 as a main part of the purpose is to allow users to only grab the  part
 they need when they need it.
 
 Thanks,
 Alex
 
 
 
  
 On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Peter Borissow wrote:
 > Thanks Giovanni-    It seems to me that the "cache features" option and the  
 > option to fetch only the features intersecting the current map extent should 
 > be 2  separate options. 
 > 
 > For example, when I open a WFS layer, I might want to retrieve only the 
 > features  intersecting the current map extent. Once it is loaded, I would 
 > want QGIS to cache the features.
 > 
 > This is a common rendering technique used for WMS. A client requests an  
 > initial BBOX and renders the image. The when the client pans, a new request 
 > is made but only for the "missing" area. The original response is  cached 
 > and merged with the second response. Just a thought...
 > 
 > 
 > Peter
 > 
 > 
 >      From: G. Allegri 
 >  To: Peter Borissow  
 > Cc: "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org"  
 >  Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:27 PM
 >  Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
 >    
 > As Marco explained in the realted post on qgis-dev the bbox filter should be 
 > used if  "cahce features" option is turned off, but at the moment it seems 
 > broken, maybe because of new improvements in the rendering process. The 
 > issue  has been already reported in http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968
 > In the meanwhile a manual filter could be set within the WFS add layer 
 > dialog.
 > giovanni
 > 2015-03-26 16:07 GMT+01:00 G. Allegri :
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > It's an intereseting question Peter. I've verified that the wfs provider 
 > still  requests the whole data the first time, then it stores eveything (and 
 > create a spatial index for subsequent calls).I suppose that  sponsoring this 
 > feature could be the right way to have it, but I'm curious to know what  the 
 > latest answer from Marco was referring to (I mean within the svn code he 
 > indicates) [1]
 > Giovanni
 > [1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1421#note-4
 > 2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow :
 > 
 > Sorry for being impatient but I was wondering if anyone can shed some light 
 > on this  issue.
 > I have a WFS that's serving out over a billion features (several million  
 > records per layer). When I add a layer from the WFS into QGIS, it calls 
 > DescribeFeature and then GetFeature without a BBOX filter. QGIS then waits  
 > for ALL of the data to come back (which can take a while). 
 > In the past, there was an option only fetch features that intersect the 
 > current map  extent. Without this option, it is extremely difficult to do 
 > anything with the WFS using QGIS. 
 > 
 > IMHO, this is a pretty significant bug but hopefully one that should be 
 > really easy  to fix. Afterall, the code was there at some point...
 > 
 > 
 > Related (unanswered) questions on stack exchange:
 > 
 > http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/53387/quantumgis-1-8-how-to-define-bounding-box-within-add-wfs-layer-dialog
 > http://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/59656/is-there-free-desktop-wfs-client-with-bbox-support
 > 
 > Thanks,Peter
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >      From: Peter Borissow 
 >  To: "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org"  
 >  Sent: Monday, March 23, 2

Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS

[Marco Hugentobler]

Hi all

I've added the checkbox to only load the features intersecting the 
current extent 
(https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/e4e4839823fad1b980cb815889c18edb9c4352b7).


Regards,
Marco

--
Dr. Marco Hugentobler
Sourcepole -  Linux & Open Source Solutions
Weberstrasse 5, CH-8004 Zürich, Switzerland
marco.hugentob...@sourcepole.ch http://www.sourcepole.ch
Technical Advisor QGIS Project Steering Committee



On 31.03.2015 12:01, Peter Borissow wrote:

Thanks Giovanni-
Do you know when the dev team is planning the next release? I 
wonder if there's time to get this fixed before the next release.


Peter


*From:* G. Allegri 
*To:* Peter Borissow 
*Cc:* "t...@wildintellect.com" ; 
"qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org" 

*Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2015 5:15 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS

I totally agree with you... but I'm not the mantainer of this code :)
I think that a nre ticket is not necessary. Yuo could add new 
suggestions/ideas to the existing one.


giovanni

2015-03-27 10:04 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow >:



Thanks Alex-
Do you think we should open a new ticket?

Peter


*From:* Alex Mandel mailto:tech_...@wildintellect.com>>
*To:* Peter Borissow mailto:peter.boris...@yahoo.com>>; G. Allegri mailto:gioha...@gmail.com>>
*Cc:* "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
" mailto:qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>>
*Sent:* Thursday, March 26, 2015 5:10 PM

*Subject:* Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS

That's exactly how I would expect it to work.

To cache a whole WFS and start seems overboard, in that case why
wouldn't you just download the data set. BBOX is a must for web
services
as a main part of the purpose is to allow users to only grab the part
they need when they need it.

Thanks,
Alex




On 03/26/2015 01:28 PM, Peter Borissow wrote:
> Thanks Giovanni-It seems to me that the "cache features"
option and the option to fetch only the features intersecting the
current map extent should be 2 separate options.
>
> For example, when I open a WFS layer, I might want to retrieve
only the features intersecting the current map extent. Once it is
loaded, I would want QGIS to cache the features.
>
> This is a common rendering technique used for WMS. A client
requests an initial BBOX and renders the image. The when the
client pans, a new request is made but only for the "missing"
area. The original response is cached and merged with the second
response. Just a thought...
>
>
> Peter
>
>
>  From: G. Allegri mailto:gioha...@gmail.com>>
>  To: Peter Borissow mailto:peter.boris...@yahoo.com>>
> Cc: "qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
" mailto:qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org>>
>  Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2015 1:27 PM
>  Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] BBox Filter for WFS
>
> As Marco explained in the realted post on qgis-dev the bbox
filter should be used if "cahce features" option is turned off,
but at the moment it seems broken, maybe because of new
improvements in the rendering process. The issue has been already
reported in http://hub.qgis.org/issues/11968
> In the meanwhile a manual filter could be set within the WFS add
layer dialog.
> giovanni
> 2015-03-26 16:07 GMT+01:00 G. Allegri mailto:gioha...@gmail.com>>:
>
>
>
> It's an intereseting question Peter. I've verified that the wfs
provider still requests the whole data the first time, then it
stores eveything (and create a spatial index for subsequent
calls).I suppose that sponsoring this feature could be the right
way to have it, but I'm curious to know what the latest answer
from Marco was referring to (I mean within the svn code he
indicates) [1]
> Giovanni
> [1] http://hub.qgis.org/issues/1421#note-4
> 2015-03-25 12:25 GMT+01:00 Peter Borissow
mailto:peter.boris...@yahoo.com>>:
>
> Sorry for being impatient but I was wondering if anyone can shed
some light on this issue.
> I have a WFS that's serving out over a billion features (several
million records per layer). When I add a layer from the WFS into
QGIS, it calls DescribeFeature and then GetFeature without a BBOX
filter. QGIS then waits for ALL of the data to come back (which
can take a while).
> In the past, there was an option only fetch features that
intersect the current map extent. Without this option, it is
extremely difficult to do anything with the WFS using QGIS.
>
> IMHO, this is a pretty significant bug but hopefully one that
should be really easy to fix. Afterall, the code was there at some
point...
>
>
> Related (unanswered) quest

[Qgis-user] Re: Labels not visible when setting them programmatically.

[Christophe Damour]

Hi,

I have the same problem when I tried to set labels from a python plugin :

With this code, labels are correctly displayed without having to apply 
layer properties, but only for points or polygons layers.
For lines layers, I have to apply layer properties in order to display 
labels.

palLayer = QgsPalLayerSettings()
palLayer.readFromLayer(self.serpLayer)
palLayer.enabled = True
palLayer.fieldName = 'id'
palLayer.textFont.setPointSize(10)
palLayer.writeToLayer(self.serpLayer)

With this code, I get the same problem for points, lines and polygons 
layers :

self.serpLayer.setCustomProperty('labeling', 'pal')
self.serpLayer.setCustomProperty('labeling/enabled', 'true')
self.serpLayer.setCustomProperty('labeling/fieldName', 'id')
self.serpLayer.setCustomProperty('labeling/fontSize', '10')

self.serpLayer.triggerRepaint() and/or self.iface.mapCanvas().refresh() 
don't help.


Hope someone can help...

--
Christophe

Le 01/04/2015 14:20, Werner Macho a écrit :

hmm -
well - as the qchainage plugin clearly sets labeling (when enabled)
you could take it and search for the missing piece..
regards
Werner

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO)  wrote:

No the triggerRepaint() didn't work, just to clarify that I tried that :)

Regards, Casper

-Original Message-
From: Werner Macho [mailto:werner.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 1. april 2015 13:52
To: Casper Børgesen (CABO)
Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Labels not visible when setting them programmatically.

Hi!

I thought maybe it is the
triggerRepaint()

but it was just a guess.

regards
Werner

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO)  wrote:

Hi Werner

Sadly no, it does not.


Regards, Casper

-Original Message-
From: Werner Macho [mailto:werner.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: 1. april 2015 13:43
To: Casper Børgesen (CABO)
Cc: qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
Subject: Re: [Qgis-user] Labels not visible when setting them programmatically.

Hi,
does
https://github.com/mach0/qchainage/blob/master/chainagetool.py

line 150 ff help you?

regards
Werner

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Casper Børgesen (CABO)  wrote:

I’m trying to programmatically set and enable labelling on a layer
using Python in QGis 2.9.0.



 label = QgsPalLayerSettings()

 label.readFromLayer(myLayer)



 label.enabled = True

 label.fieldName = 'myField'



 # Just to change something clearly visible.

 label.textColor = QColor(255,0,0,255)



 label.writeToLayer(myLayer)



This doesn’t enable labelling, but if I enter the Layer Properties on
myLayer, everything looks okay and when pressing Apply, the labels
become visible.



Is there something I need to set to avoid having to manually click
Apply to get the labels visible?



Calling iface.mapCanvas().refresh() afterwards doesn’t work.





Regards, Casper


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user



---
Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant parce 
que la protection avast! Antivirus est active.
http://www.avast.com

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] programmatically load a plugin

[PIERRE Sylvain]

Hello,

I would like to programmatically load a plugin from QGIS official repository 
(eg in startup python script)
I've found QgsPluginManagerInterface class but I'm not sure 
addPluginMetadata
 can do the trick...
I've explored QWebPluginFactory class which can be access by 
qgis.utils.plugins, but it's a little bit confusing for me...


Sylvain


___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] Transparent Shapeburst Fill

[Thomas Colley]

Hi

 

Appearance of shapeburst fill seems strange when going to/from
transparent. 

 

The linked image shows one shapeburst with a colour ramp White > Colour
and another that goes Transparent > Colour. They're both on a white
background so my thinking is they should both look the same? 

 

http://i.imgur.com/yzi6gJU.png

 

The transparent one has a grey shading to all of the transparent areas
that doesn't look right.

 

I don't know if this is down to a setting, or if there's something that
can be done with the blending modes (I've tried different modes but
don't have a good understanding).

 

Any ideas would be great.

 

Thanks


Tom

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Re: [Qgis-user] CadTools don't work in qgis 2.8.1 on Windows 7

[Junior Delaz]

Hi Chris,
I also had issues with some tools, but not all.
Whatever, it would be better to report the issue directly on the bug
tracker of the plugin (https://github.com/geopython/CadTools/issues)

Regards,
Harrissou

2015-04-02 9:30 GMT+02:00 Chris Wouters :

>  Hello
>
>
>
> Recently I have installed qgis version 2.8.1 successfully. I have noticed
> that the plugin CadTools doesn't work in this version. Do you have the
> same experience? How can this be solved?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Chris Wouters
>
> GIS-coördinator
>
>
>
>
>
> [image: logo_bertem handtekening.gif] Gemeentebestuur
> Bertem - Tervuursesteenweg 178 - 3060 Bertem - www.bertem.be
>
> tel. 016 49 99 81 - fax 016 49 97 89 - chris.wout...@bertem.be -
> g...@bertem.be
>
>
>
> ___
> Qgis-user mailing list
> Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>
___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

[Qgis-user] CadTools don't work in qgis 2.8.1 on Windows 7

[Chris Wouters]

Hello

Recently I have installed qgis version 2.8.1 successfully. I have noticed that 
the plugin CadTools doesn't work in this version. Do you have the same 
experience? How can this be solved?

Kind regards

Chris Wouters
GIS-coördinator


[logo_bertem handtekening.gif]Gemeentebestuur Bertem - 
Tervuursesteenweg 178 - 3060 Bertem - www.bertem.be
tel. 016 49 99 81 - fax 016 49 97 89 - 
chris.wout...@bertem.be - 
g...@bertem.be

___
Qgis-user mailing list
Qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user