Hi,

https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/271#issue-1694300882

> the entry in Raster menu will open the Processing algorithm instead

Looks like the Raster menu still points to the old C++ Raster calculator.
I thought the Processing algorithm would replace the old C++ tool but now, 
instead of 3 raster calculators (gdal, c++ and Processing python) that already 
confused some users, the refactoring leads to 4 raster calculators where the 
new Processing ones _almost_ cover what the old C++ one actually does. Should 
we not remove that one?

Regards,
Harrissou

Le 19 décembre 2023 12:54:05 GMT+01:00, Andrea Giudiceandrea via QGIS-User 
<qgis-user@lists.osgeo.org> a écrit :
>> Luigi Pirelli luipir at gmail.com
>> Mon Dec 18 15:39:19 PST 2023
>
>> intentionally I would say:
>
>At 
>https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals/issues/271#issuecomment-1775492835
> it is stated that:
>
><<The existing Raster Calculator algorithm has been ported to C++. The 
>algorithm now has two variants: a toolbox version that works the same way as 
>before...>>
>
>Anyway, it looks like the toolbox processing algorithm's GUI doesn't work 
>_exactly_ the same way as before, since the reported missing possibility to 
>save and load custom expression and also the missing functionalities reported 
>at [1] and [2].
>
>Best regards.
>
>Andrea
>
>[1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/55386
>[2] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/55387
>_______________________________________________
>QGIS-User mailing list
>QGIS-User@lists.osgeo.org
>List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
>Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
_______________________________________________
QGIS-User mailing list
QGIS-User@lists.osgeo.org
List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user
Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-user

Reply via email to