Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Per Witte
Great DVD! Nice last read! I particularly enjoyed Marcel's piece on how QPC
came to be. Thanks for that.

Now its over, mainly due to the lack of copy and readers, which in turn is
probably due to much reduced activity. For my part, I stopped contributing
due to the almost total lack of feedback. You spend hours of free time on
something, doing your best to make it relevant, intelligible and enjoyable,
and then pour it into a black hole. Pointless. In my case, it was probably
the QL-community telling me to shut up and take up knitting instead; in the
case of Norman and others, perhaps it was merely the silence of eager
anticipation. The problem is it is virtually impossible to tell the
difference! Duh! In a commercial environment feedback is amply provided in
terms of profit/loss (and complaints), however on the free/open/voluntary
scene it is much harder to tell whether more of the same is wanted,
correction is needed, or whether its time to change tack. I think that this
laziness(?) is one of the reasons for our rapid demise.

Thanks to those who persevered for so long! Goodbye QLToady!

Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Per Witte
On 24 September 2013 18:38, Per Witte pjwi...@online.no wrote:

 Great DVD! Nice last read! I particularly enjoyed Marcel's piece on how
 QPC came to be. Thanks for that.

 Now its over, mainly due to the lack of copy and readers, which in turn is
 probably due to much reduced activity. For my part, I stopped contributing
 due to the almost total lack of feedback. You spend hours of free time on
 something, doing your best to make it relevant, intelligible and enjoyable,
 and then pour it into a black hole. Pointless. In my case, it was probably
 the QL-community telling me to shut up and take up knitting instead; in the
 case of Norman and others, perhaps it was merely the silence of eager
 anticipation. The problem is it is virtually impossible to tell the
 difference! Duh! In a commercial environment feedback is amply provided in
 terms of profit/loss (and complaints), however on the free/open/voluntary
 scene it is much harder to tell whether more of the same is wanted,
 correction is needed, or whether its time to change tack. I think that this
 laziness(?) is one of the reasons for our rapid demise.

 Thanks to those who persevered for so long! Goodbye QLToady!

 Per

PS I havent put QPC v4.00 though its paces yet. At the moment all I can say
is that it just works! I think it was a splendid initiative to make it
generally available (at least to all QLT readers). I hope we'll see a whole
bunch of new QPCers come crawling and blinking out of the microdrive
undergrowth and into the light to see what the fuss has been about these
past 17 years. Perhaps therell be a mini-renaissance?

So, heres a welcome gift to new and old QPCers:

1 REMark Minimise Button
2 REMark pjwitte Sep 2013
3 :
4 REPeat loop: BUTTON_WAIT MINIMISE,,,2: BEEP 2,2: QPC_MINIMIZE
5 :
Compile and include in your boot program with EX pathMinimise_exe. If the
Button frame is active itll put itself there. It requires Qmenu
(menu_rext), a commercial proram by JMS, also included with many commercial
PE programs from JMS and others. A must-have in the PE world.

Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Geoff Wicks

On 24/09/2013 17:38, Per Witte wrote:

Great DVD! Nice last read! I particularly enjoyed Marcel's piece on how QPC
came to be. Thanks for that.

Now its over, mainly due to the lack of copy and readers, which in turn is
probably due to much reduced activity. For my part, I stopped contributing
due to the almost total lack of feedback. You spend hours of free time on
something, doing your best to make it relevant, intelligible and enjoyable,
and then pour it into a black hole. Pointless. In my case, it was probably
the QL-community telling me to shut up and take up knitting instead;
I don't think you should blame yourself. It is a universal problem in 
the QL community.

in the
case of Norman and others, perhaps it was merely the silence of eager
anticipation.
The tragedy is that Norman now has had feedback and knows from the 
number of people that registered with him how much his articles were 
appreciated. I found it frustrating as editor of QL Today that we had 
very little feedback. In the later years there was a heavy emphasis on 
assembler and I wondered whether it was too technical for most readers. 
Given the reaction to Norman's registration offer I think perhaps not.

The problem is it is virtually impossible to tell the
difference! Duh! In a commercial environment feedback is amply provided in
terms of profit/loss (and complaints), however on the free/open/voluntary
scene it is much harder to tell whether more of the same is wanted,
correction is needed, or whether its time to change tack. I think that this
laziness(?) is one of the reasons for our rapid demise.
I think one of the problems we have is that there are many people in the 
QL community who are loyal to the QL, but who are no longer active 
QL-ers. We should never forget how revolutionary the QL was at the 
beginning and how much that meant to people.


Since the last issue was published I have had an email from a former 
trader from the black box days who came across some old issues of QL 
Today on eBay. He now seems to follow my website and is one of the 
people who bought a subscription to volume 17 to get the DVD. He has 
never seen QPC and is looking forward to trying it out.


One of the things I like about the web is that you get feedback from the 
statistics although it is not easy to discover who are the QL-ers and 
who not. (I get numerous hits from China - their search engine robot!) 
Nevertheless I get an idea of what topics people are interested in. This 
is one of the reasons I think an in depth website would be a good idea, 
but, guess what, no feedback!


Finally to get on  my favourite hobby horse, the Quanta officers want 
the members to be apathetic. The organisation has frequently stifled 
discussion and the constitutional amendments in the last decade were 
designed to decrease democracy rather than increase it.


Thanks to those who persevered for so long! Goodbye QLToady!

Thanks from me to our, all too few, faithful writers. I first felt QL 
Today was becoming editorially unviable 3 years ago, but we managed to 
go on for another 3 years. I particularly liked the practical nostalgia 
content of the final issue,


Best wishes,


Geoff
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread François Van Emelen

Per Witte schreef op 24/09/2013 19:09:

On 24 September 2013 18:38, Per Witte pjwi...@online.no wrote:


Great DVD! Nice last read! I particularly enjoyed Marcel's piece on how
QPC came to be. Thanks for that.

Now its over, mainly due to the lack of copy and readers, which in turn is
probably due to much reduced activity. For my part, I stopped contributing
due to the almost total lack of feedback. You spend hours of free time on
something, doing your best to make it relevant, intelligible and enjoyable,
and then pour it into a black hole. Pointless. In my case, it was probably
the QL-community telling me to shut up and take up knitting instead; in the
case of Norman and others, perhaps it was merely the silence of eager
anticipation. The problem is it is virtually impossible to tell the
difference! Duh! In a commercial environment feedback is amply provided in
terms of profit/loss (and complaints), however on the free/open/voluntary
scene it is much harder to tell whether more of the same is wanted,
correction is needed, or whether its time to change tack. I think that this
laziness(?) is one of the reasons for our rapid demise.

Thanks to those who persevered for so long! Goodbye QLToady!

Per


PS I havent put QPC v4.00 though its paces yet. At the moment all I can say
is that it just works! I think it was a splendid initiative to make it
generally available (at least to all QLT readers). I hope we'll see a whole
bunch of new QPCers come crawling and blinking out of the microdrive
undergrowth and into the light to see what the fuss has been about these
past 17 years. Perhaps therell be a mini-renaissance?

So, heres a welcome gift to new and old QPCers:

1 REMark Minimise Button
2 REMark pjwitte Sep 2013
3 :
4 REPeat loop: BUTTON_WAIT MINIMISE,,,2: BEEP 2,2: QPC_MINIMIZE
5 :
Compile and include in your boot program with EX pathMinimise_exe. If the
Button frame is active itll put itself there. It requires Qmenu
(menu_rext), a commercial proram by JMS, also included with many commercial
PE programs from JMS and others. A must-have in the PE world.

Per
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm



Hi Per,

Thank you for that oneliner ... but  shouldn't the compiled prog be 
Minimise_obj  (QLib) or Minimise_task (turbo) instead of Minimise_exe.
Lack of feedback? You can't expect hunderds of feedbacks from a 
community of a few tens of persons, can you?


This is the first reaction to your prog, I am sure others will follow.

François Van Emelen




___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Per Witte wrote:
 PS I havent put QPC v4.00 though its paces yet. At the moment all I can say
 is that it just works! I think it was a splendid initiative to make it
 generally available (at least to all QLT readers).

Thanks for all the feedback so far! I've just arrived back from a
(much needed) holiday in Istanbul. Of course QPC2 will be made
available for all later on, but I want to finish the installer first
and time is somewhat limited currently. Until then it remains an
exclusive bonus for all loyal QLT readers.

In the rush to finish for the DVD I've also revised the manual as much
as I could. QPC2 v4 uses a new configuration scheme and even
experienced QPC users should read the chapter about the new way things
are done to avoid surprises.

Cheers, Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Tobias Fröschle

Am 24.09.2013 um 19:09 schrieb Per Witte:

 
 1 REMark Minimise Button
 2 REMark pjwitte Sep 2013
 3 :
 4 REPeat loop: BUTTON_WAIT MINIMISE,,,2: BEEP 2,2: QPC_MINIMIZE
 5 :

All,

I was about to write a review for the magazine, but alas,..

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [Ql-Users] QL Today + DVD

2013-09-24 Thread Per Witte
On 24 September 2013 22:35, François Van Emelen 
francois.vaneme...@telenet.be wrote:

 Per Witte schreef op 24/09/2013 19:09:

 On 24 September 2013 18:38, Per Witte pjwi...@online.no wrote:

  Great DVD! Nice last read! I particularly enjoyed Marcel's piece on how
 QPC came to be. Thanks for that.

 Now its over, mainly due to the lack of copy and readers, which in turn
 is
 probably due to much reduced activity. For my part, I stopped
 contributing
 due to the almost total lack of feedback. You spend hours of free time on
 something, doing your best to make it relevant, intelligible and
 enjoyable,
 and then pour it into a black hole. Pointless. In my case, it was
 probably
 the QL-community telling me to shut up and take up knitting instead; in
 the
 case of Norman and others, perhaps it was merely the silence of eager
 anticipation. The problem is it is virtually impossible to tell the
 difference! Duh! In a commercial environment feedback is amply provided
 in
 terms of profit/loss (and complaints), however on the free/open/voluntary
 scene it is much harder to tell whether more of the same is wanted,
 correction is needed, or whether its time to change tack. I think that
 this
 laziness(?) is one of the reasons for our rapid demise.

 Thanks to those who persevered for so long! Goodbye QLToady!

 Per

  PS I havent put QPC v4.00 though its paces yet. At the moment all I can
 say
 is that it just works! I think it was a splendid initiative to make it
 generally available (at least to all QLT readers). I hope we'll see a
 whole
 bunch of new QPCers come crawling and blinking out of the microdrive
 undergrowth and into the light to see what the fuss has been about these
 past 17 years. Perhaps therell be a mini-renaissance?

 So, heres a welcome gift to new and old QPCers:

 1 REMark Minimise Button
 2 REMark pjwitte Sep 2013
 3 :
 4 REPeat loop: BUTTON_WAIT MINIMISE,,,2: BEEP 2,2: QPC_MINIMIZE
 5 :
 Compile and include in your boot program with EX pathMinimise_exe. If
 the
 Button frame is active itll put itself there. It requires Qmenu
 (menu_rext), a commercial proram by JMS, also included with many
 commercial
 PE programs from JMS and others. A must-have in the PE world.

 Per
 __**_
 QL-Users Mailing List
 http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/**smsqe.htmhttp://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


  Hi Per,

 Thank you for that oneliner ... but  shouldn't the compiled prog be
 Minimise_obj  (QLib) or Minimise_task (turbo) instead of Minimise_exe.
 Lack of feedback? You can't expect hunderds of feedbacks from a community
 of a few tens of persons, can you?

 This is the first reaction to your prog, I am sure others will follow.

 François Van Emelen



 Hundreds would have been nice. Sometimes just one might have been enough.

 obj/task/exe: Notice I didnt specify which compiler? I didnt want to risk
 starting a war..  ;)


 Per


___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[Ql-Users] GST assemblers

2013-09-24 Thread Dilwyn Jones
With much appreciated help from Rich Mellor, the GST QL Assembler, Macro 
Assembler and Quanta Q-Mac are now available to download from my website at 
http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/asm/index.html

The Macro Assembler is available as a floppy disk version, or a two microdrive 
cartridge (program and library cartridges) version.

Thomas Kral will be glad to know the editor is included now.

Manuals are also available to download as PDF files. Note that the manual for 
the QL Assembler is rather large by QL standards at about 10MB.

Urs Koenig got permission from GST’s founder to release GST’s QL software as 
freeware a little while back, and Quanta committee decided after that to allow 
the Q-Mac (Quanta modified version of the Macro Assembler) to be mad eavailable 
for all QL users (previously only available to members).

I have to explain that these packages were prepared in rather a hurry tonight 
as I have to get up early for work tomorrow, so I haven’t had time to test 
them, especially as I am not familiar with these programs, so if anyone finds 
problems, please let me know (e.g. missing files).

Dilwyn Jones
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm