Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread P Witte


Marcel Kilgus writes:

> P Witte wrote:
> > 10 a = 0
> > 20 OPEN#1;'con_0x0'
> > 30 PAUSE#1; 200
> > it zaps QPC.
>
> Cannot reproduce that. OS? Memory settings?

I did mention you had to EX it? The cut-of value is at 2x2; 1x1 and 0x0 both
kill QPC2v2.

M$ Windoze 2000 5.00.2195
AMD Athlon 700MHz
130,544Mb RAM
Plenty of free memory
QPC2v2 is set to 16Mb with about 11 free after boot

Per




Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread P Witte

Peter Graf writes:

> >Of course Im interested in a Q60, but I know very little about them,
like:
<>
Thanks for all that, Peter. I hope there were many more interested readers
out there. I shant sport with your collective patiences by replying to it
all in detail ;) I should be happy to be kept posted on developments, and
can only hope that those non-technical details may be resolved quickly!

Wouldnt it be an idea to fish in the Atari community, to see if there was an
interest and anyone willing to do a port? If it works it should further
reduce costs, and may produce other benefits..

Strange to think the Q60 is the end of the line.

Per







Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread P Witte

Dilwyn Jones writes:

> Exactly the same problem as I reported a week or so ago.
>
> GO to SBASIC, enter OPEN#3,PAR and you'll find that seems to flush out
> the printed output, if it's the same problem as I have with
> QPC2v2final.

It wasnt, but thank you all the same. However, it is now fixed. Yet Im not
the wiser as to when or how that happened. Im not the sort of user who is
accustomed to request help with reading the manual, so although Im pretty
convinced it wasnt me, Im now also pretty convinced that the reported
problem had nothing to do with QPC/SMSQ.

HTH

Per





Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread Peter Graf

Per wrote:

>Of course Im interested in a Q60, but I know very little about them, like:
>cost, delivery, compatibility, reliability, how difficult is it to assemble
>(special equipment required, etc), networking (can you network two+ of them
>under Linux, for example?), upgradability (CPU, RAM), expansion,
>warranty/support, .. that should just about cover it! ;)

Cost, delivery:

Too early for an official announcement, because some non-technical problems
have to be solved before series production can start. I have only built few
prototypes for developers and the costs for single machines are higher than
a batch of boards. But you can expect the Q60 to be faster and cheaper than
the Atari clones with 68060.

compatibility:

Only known incompatibility is with a few CDROM drives. Everything else like
Q40 so far. SMSQ/E patch required.

reliability:

What are you asking for? A 10 year test? :-)
Only thing I can tell is that the Q40 hardware runs for 3.5 years without
any hardware failures. The Q60 is build on the same PCB with some
modifications.

how difficult is it to assemble:

As simple as a PC mainboard. A few screws and the connectors. Fits directly
into Minitower/Desktop case (AT formfactor preferred).

networking (can you network two+ of them under Linux, for example?)

Yes you can. Full TCP/IP and Ethernet support under Linux. Modern 10 Mbit
ethernet ISA card with jumpers required.

Upgradability (CPU, RAM):

Upgrade CPU to what? The Q60 uses the fastest possible 68K processors. The
80 MHz Q60 is the fastest 68K computer on the whole world I heard of. If
you know something faster, please let me know :-)

RAM: 60ns PS/2 EDO modules 16 MB upgradeable to 32 MB on existing second
socket. Option for 64 / 80 / 128 MB will probably be offered, but only
Linux support available by now. SMSQ /QDOS work, but only use up to 32 MB.

expansion:

No PCI/AGP/USB, since 32 bit graphics onboard and no SMSQ / QDOS support
anyway. Q60 extension bus has two slots for ISA cards, one use by IO card.
More slots electrically possible if you find a case with slot riser/extender.

warranty/support:

Well the QL community is known to help each other, isn't it. What more do
you expect? A 24 hour phone hotline?

Peter




Re: [ql-users] MinisQL

2001-02-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones

Thank you Norman, will try your suggestion. BTW, the DJToolkit Norman
refers to can be obtained from my Web site (Other Softyware Page).
--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html

-Original Message-
From: Norman Dunbar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 09 February 2001 16:47
Subject: RE: [ql-users] MinisQL


>Years ago I wrote some toolkit routines when Dilwyn was still trading
as
>DJC.
>I just mentioned them in passing in reply to Dilwyn's message about
editing
>the directory entries on a floppy he is having problems with.
>
>Norman.
>
>-
---
>
>Norman Dunbar EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Database/Unix administrator Phone: 0113 289 6265
>Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. Fax: 0113 201 7265
> URL: http://www.LynxFinancialSystems.com
>-
---
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Claude Mourier 00 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:43 PM
>To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>Subject: RE: [ql-users] MinisQL
>
>
>
>




RE: [ql-users] MinisQL

2001-02-09 Thread Norman Dunbar

Years ago I wrote some toolkit routines when Dilwyn was still trading as
DJC.
I just mentioned them in passing in reply to Dilwyn's message about editing
the directory entries on a floppy he is having problems with.

Norman.



Norman Dunbar   EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database/Unix administrator Phone:  0113 289 6265
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. Fax:0113 201 7265
URL:http://www.LynxFinancialSystems.com



-Original Message-
From: Claude Mourier 00 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:43 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] MinisQL






RE: [ql-users] MinisQL

2001-02-09 Thread Claude Mourier 00



-Message d'origine-
De : Norman Dunbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : vendredi 9 février 2001 17:38
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : RE: [ql-users] MinisQL


:o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) 

DJ_OPEN_DIR("FLP1_")
FETCH_BYTES(#Chan, 64)
Do changes here
MOVE_POSITION(#Chan, -64)
print #Chan, New 64 bytes header ; <-- SEMI-COLON VERY IMPORTANT !!!

from DJToolkit might be of use then !

:o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) 

Norman.



Norman Dunbar   EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database/Unix administrator Phone:  0113 289 6265
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. Fax:0113 201 7265
URL:http://www.LynxFinancialSystems.com



-Original Message-
From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] MinisQL


>> I'll try this - I also wanted to try opening a directory channel and
>> setting headers ro replace the NUL with a valid character.



RE: [ql-users] MinisQL

2001-02-09 Thread Norman Dunbar

:o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) 

DJ_OPEN_DIR("FLP1_")
FETCH_BYTES(#Chan, 64)
Do changes here
MOVE_POSITION(#Chan, -64)
print #Chan, New 64 bytes header ; <-- SEMI-COLON VERY IMPORTANT !!!

from DJToolkit might be of use then !

:o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) :o) 

Norman.



Norman Dunbar   EMail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database/Unix administrator Phone:  0113 289 6265
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd. Fax:0113 201 7265
URL:http://www.LynxFinancialSystems.com



-Original Message-
From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] MinisQL


>> I'll try this - I also wanted to try opening a directory channel and
>> setting headers ro replace the NUL with a valid character.



Re: [ql-users] MinisQL

2001-02-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones


>> Time to give up on this one I think until I can get an old level 1
QL
>> out of the attic (it's an old QDOS disk so presumably worked at
some
>> time!)
>
>You could use a disc editor like wined, search for the filename and
>replace the 0 with a valid character.
>
>Marcel

I'll try this - I also wanted to try opening a directory channel and
setting headers ro replace the NUL with a valid character.
Thanks for the suggestion. And I'll get back to you tonight or
tomorrow on the PAR printing problem.

--
Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.soft.net.uk/dj/index.html





Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus

P Witte wrote: 
> 10 a = 0
> 20 OPEN#1;'con_0x0'
> 30 PAUSE#1; 200
> it zaps QPC.

Cannot reproduce that. OS? Memory settings?

Marcel





Re: [ql-users]GD2 again

2001-02-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus

P Witte wrote: 
> Perhaps youd care to update the manual:

Needs to be done, yes...

Marcel





Re: [ql-users] QPC Printing etc.

2001-02-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus

Ian Pizer wrote:
> However with Aurora (and perhaps QPC) sometimes the printer does not print
> immediately as though something blocks it, but by running other programs it
> suddenly begins printing. Have not sorted that out yet.

Will be fixed in QPCv2.02. The problem is the difference between QPC
and all other platforms. If you close a PAR port on a QL, the PAR port
is still there (it's a piece of hardware after all ;-) and remaining
bytes can be printed without difficulties. But if QPC closes the
(physical Windows-) port at the same time it's just gone and can't be
accessed anymore. Now the close routine is delayed until all bytes are
printed.

>  I still cannot use CTRL/SHIFT/SCROLLock to close QPCIIv2f (creates havoc) 
> so I do ALT/TAB and close it with right mouse key in the task bar.

Your mail regarding this problem still lies in my inbox... together
with about one hundred others. Everything that lies in my inbox will
be processed sooner or later, so I'll come back to it when I find the
time. But you're still the only one with that problem, therefore it
does not really have top priority ;-)

Marcel





Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again

2001-02-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus

P Witte wrote: 
> Help! I just discovered I cant print from QPC2v2!

Please wait for QPCv2.02.

Marcel