[ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread François Van Emelen
Hi all,
While updating my 'Sbasic keywords list' I discovered some new 
functions related to SERNET.
Here they are: SBAD%,SRES%,SNET_C%,SNET_N%.
What do these names stand for, what about their syntax?
Any idea where I can find some explanation about them?
François Van Emelen

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread dilwyn.jones
François Van Emelen wrote:
 While updating my 'Sbasic keywords list' I discovered some new 
 functions related to SERNET.
 Here they are: SBAD%,SRES%,SNET_C%,SNET_N%.
 What do these names stand for, what about their syntax?
 Any idea where I can find some explanation about them?
 François Van Emelen
Bernd Reinhardt was the last person working on Sernet AFAIK.

Hopefully, he's listening to this list (or someone else knows it) as I haven't 
got his email address with me in work.


-- 
Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Quite quiet

2005-02-23 Thread dilwyn.jones
Per Witte wrote:
 Nice and quiet around here for a change ..

Then along came Per ;-)))

Everyone too busy digging themselves out of snow perhaps. It's lovely around 
here, not much snow on the low ground but the mountains and hills are like a 
scene from Christmas cards!

How lucky I am to have a scene like this through my office window...

And even luckier to have a QPC2 on this machine (sorry, desperately struggling 
to get back on topic)


-- 
Dilwyn Jones

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Marcel Kilgus
François Van Emelen wrote:
 Here they are: SBAD%,

In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad
packets.

 SRES%,

In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the
number of retries done.

 SNET_C%,

This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which returns whether it is
connected or not.

 SNET_N%.

No idea. Probably SNET_STATION%, which returns the current station
number.

There's also SNET_TEST%(X) which returns whether station X is up or
not.

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] RESET in SMSQE

2005-02-23 Thread Geogwilt
The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels and then 
perform the assembler instruction RESET. This assembler instruction sets the 
(supervisor) stack equal to the first long word in ram and sets the PC to the 
second long word in ram. Unfortunately for those who have LRESPRd their 
versions of SMSQE on the Q40/60 this will not have the desired effect.

The first five bytes of ram contain the length of a string (3) and the three 
bytes of the string (RES). The second long word of ram is not a good place to 
branch to. First of all the address is odd (not a good omen) and secondly 
there is no program there. At least that is what I surmised. To test this I 
actually typed RESET followed by ENTER and - the machine (Q60) stopped.

Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? Does anyone use it?

George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE

2005-02-23 Thread Marcel Kilgus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels
 and then perform the assembler instruction RESET.

Hmm no, in my sources it doesn't (smsq_sbas_procs_reset_asm/
smsq_smsq_reset_asm). It branches to the same place CTRL+ALT+SHIFT+TAB
jumps to.

 Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? Does anyone use it?

Do you have another tool that replaces the SMSQ/E RESET command?

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE

2005-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 23 Feb 2005 at 10:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The code for the keyword RESET in SMSQE seems to close all channels and then 
 perform the assembler instruction RESET. 

()


It definitely works here. It doesn't do what you say.

 
 Why has RESET not been reprogrammed? 

As a general rule, concerning SMSQE; the answer to such a question would be : 
Because you didn't do it.

Does anyone use it?

It definitey works here,and I use it.
Wolfgang

www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread François Van Emelen
Marcel Kilgus schreef:
François Van Emelen wrote:
Here they are: SBAD%,
In my sources it's called SNET_BAD% and returns the number of bad
packets.
SRES%,
In current versions this is called SNET_RETRIES% and returns the
number of retries done.
SNET_C%,
  This is probably SNET_CONNECT% now, which returns whether it is
connected or not.
SNET_N%.
No idea. Probably SNET_STATION%, which returns the current station
number.
There's also SNET_TEST%(X) which returns whether station X is up or
not.
Marcel
Thanks for the info, but SNET_BAD%,SNET_RETRIES%, 
SNET_CONNECT%,SNET_STATION%, SNET_TEST%(X) are not present in my 
version (2.25). I suppose you are referring to a more recent one, 
probably available with the next version of SMSQE?

François Van Emelen
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Marcel Kilgus
François Van Emelen wrote:
 Thanks for the info, but SNET_BAD%,SNET_RETRIES%,
 SNET_CONNECT%,SNET_STATION%, SNET_TEST%(X) are not present in my 
 version (2.25). I suppose you are referring to a more recent one, 
 probably available with the next version of SMSQE?

The version in my disc is 3.01. However, I have no idea about the
history of it, whether it's fit for release, whether it has been
released or anything else about it. I am in NO way affiliated with
SerNet.

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 23 Feb 2005 at 17:42, François Van Emelen wrote:
(...)

. I suppose you are referring to a more recent one,
 probably available with the next version of SMSQE?

No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.

Wolfgang

www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE

2005-02-23 Thread wolfgang mhlegger
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
Does anyone use it?
It definitey works here,and I use it.
Wolfgang
i use it too
wolfgang mühlegger
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread François Van Emelen
Wolfgang Lenerz schreef:
snip
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Wolfgang
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE I thought we 
would get the latest version of Sernet with each new version of 
SMSQE. It seems I was wrong about that.
Thanks
François Van Emelen

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:

(...)

  No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
 

 Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang

www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread wolfgang mhlegger
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:
(...)

No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.

Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang

www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

:-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk  :-))
wolfgang
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Arnould

That explains why I thought that it was part of SMSQE

Arnould

 Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
  
  ??
  I didn't even know that!
  Wolfgang

  
  
 :-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk  :-))
 
 wolfgang



WebMail / Magic OnLine
http://www.magic.fr

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] SERNET revisited

2005-02-23 Thread Franois Van Emelen
wolfgang mühlegger schreef:
Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
snip
On 23 Feb 2005 at 20:07, François Van Emelen wrote:
No, SERNET has nothing to do with SMSQE.
Yes, I know, but as a free Sernet comes with SMSQE
??
I didn't even know that!
Wolfgang
snip

:-) then look at your qpc2 - program disk  :-))

wolfgang
Thanks. Your reply saves me a few hours of browsing my 'QL-today' 
piles.
François Van Emelen

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


[ql-users] QL Today Indexes

2005-02-23 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Thanks to Brian Kemmett, I have added a set of index files for QL 
Today volumes 5-8 onto my website. This adds to the existing indexes 
for volumes 1-4.

These are available in both plain text and Word .DOC file versions for 
you to print off.

The web page address is:
http://homepages.tesco.net/dilwyn.jones/qltoday/qltoday.html
Dilwyn Jones
dilwyn DOT jones AT tesco DOT net 


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 266.4.0 - Release Date: 22/02/2005
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] RESET in SMSQE

2005-02-23 Thread Michael Grunditz
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wolfgang mühlegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Wolfgang Lenerz schrieb:
 
  
  Does anyone use it?
  
  It definitey works here,and I use it.
  Wolfgang
 
 i use it too
 
 wolfgang mühlegger

I use it and it works fine with smsq/e 3. But it did not work with
2.x versions on my Q40.

Michael Grunditz
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm