Re: VirtualUser/Aliases Help..

2001-07-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi Craig, 

Did you try using rcpthosts instead of locals?

regards
re2


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.


--=_NextPart_000_00FE_01C11864.3DF64330
Content-Type: text/plain;
   charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Everyone..

Sorry if this has been covered anywhere else.. but i havent been able to =

find it.. if it has been covered could someone please point me in the =
right direction..=20

My situation..=20

Ive got an address [EMAIL PROTECTED] being forwarded to =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (this is done from /etc/aliases and works fine)
but.. if there is a shell user locally called craig email is delivered =

there rather than being forwarded to the remote mailserver.. which =
means.. /etc/aliases isnt being looked at if the domain is listed as =
local..

The domain must be listed as local, otherwise i get this reply..

Sorry. Although I'm listed as a best-preference MX or A for that host,
it isn't in my control/locals file, so I don't treat it as local. =
(#5.4.6)


Any ideas?



--=_NextPart_000_00FE_01C11864.3DF64330



FYI: Windows is better

2001-07-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: Windows vs Unix
From:Charles Booher
h-64-105-140-243.lnoclli.covad.net
Tue Jul 3 12:25:05 

My second computer was a VA Linux box.  I tried to run 
SCO Unix on my first computer but that did not work out 
for a number of reasons.

When Windows 3.0 was young I was working on various 
applications for Sun, HP, Silicon Graphics and all those 
other soon to be defunct Unix Workstation vendors.  I was 
one of the first guys to write a P.O. for Rack mounted 
Linux boxes, and I have done a lot of developement with 
X-Windows, Motif, GNU, and all the GNU Toys.  I started 
learning Windows 3.0 and worked my way through all the 
other MS developement tool kits starting with the C/C++ 
7.0 compiler and Borland Compilers.

I have been working in both Unix and Windows for the Last 
10 years.

Windows is a better software system.  Linux is free and 
the only use I have had for it in the last four years was 
to set up a cheap router using an obsolete scrap computer.

Unix does very little that is usefull to the average 
computer user.

Unix is not a new technology.

Linux is just a free rewrite of the Unix system.

Where are the application packages for Linux?  They are 
mostly a pile of student written science fair experiments 
scattered on a large number of obscure web site.  So you 
can download the source to LaTex.  Who cares? People buy 
computers to run applications.  They don't buy computers 
to run compilers, although Microsoft does make better 
compilers for x86 than GNU.

MSDN is a better development environment than GNU,
Better software tools create better software.

People don't care how well an operating system works if 
there are no useful applications.

So how is Richard Stallman doing with his Hurd Operating 
system?

The entire GNU-Linux system is nothing more than a 
science fair experiment run by various techno-geeks. As a 
science fair experiment GNU-Linux has its uses.

I have looked very deeply into both systems and Microsoft 
has the better system.

Regards, 

Charles
 




No mail arrival notice!

2001-05-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

  There is no mail arrival notice while
the message would show up in $HOME/Mailbox!  What seems to be the
problem?  Thanks a lot!!

CY Wang





qmail retry

2001-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

 How can I set up the minimal retry time, the time for sending delivery
failure notice and the
time when qmail gives up delivering the message stay undelivered in the
outgoing queue??
Also, how can I set up the email account for the qmail administrator?
 Thanks a lot!  Please please answer these questions for me!

Evelyn Huang




qmail-clean

2001-05-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,

 When I try to qmail-clean the outgoing queue, isn't it supposed
to flush all the
messages in the queue for me?  But nothing happened!  Did I miss
something since I
simply gave the command, qmail-clean?
 Thank you!

Evelyn Huang




qmail

2001-04-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi at all
I installed qmail as lwq said.
when i try to connect to port 25 i recive nothinks .
It means that i don't recieve any error .
i see the connection typing netstat -a  but don't recive the server presentation .
cheers
Mauro




moving from post.office to qmail

2001-03-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hey there,

I am looking to migrate several thousand mail accounts from post.office to
qmail.  Are there any conversion scripts for this or an easy way to get this
done that someone knows about?

TIA 

Brendan




Re: Bare linefeeds not accepted by Qmail?

2001-03-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I am also interested in this.so please email me also on / off list.

thanks

brendan

 From: "Cameron Childress" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:19:48 -0500
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Bare linefeeds not accepted by Qmail?
 
 Hello list!  Just joined the list, and am looking to clear something up
 here.  Let me start by saying that I am not a Qmail admin, and am not
 familiar with the internals of Qmail, so be gentle if my question seems
 malformed.
 
 After scouring the list archives for some time today I haven't found quite
 the answer I need.  I'm having a problem similar to one described by the
 following thread:
 
 http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/2000/05/msg01580.html
 
 I'm in communications with a fairly well established/recognized software
 company who's product generates email whose lines end in bare linefeeds.
 Clearly, from my reading in the archives, there is some argument as to
 whether or not this actually violates RFC822 or not, but I need to either
 convince the software company to change it's product, or convince my ISP to
 make some sort of change to their Qmail implementation.  Till then, I am not
 able to send outgoing mail through my ISP's mailserver (which is a pretty
 significant problem for me).
 
 I'm still in discussions/arguments with the software company, who apparently
 uses Netscape's Messaging library to support their SMTP operations, to
 change their product so that it does not generate bare LFs.  I'm not sure
 what progress I'm going to make with that, but any advice would be
 appreciated.
 
 On the other hand, I am going to take a stab at convincing my ISP to change
 their Qmail implementation so that it will accept bare LFs and convert them
 into CRLFs.  I have found reference to a solution in the list archives (link
 below), but unfortunately, being completely unfamiliar with Qmail's
 internals, I am not going to be able to clearly communicate the solution to
 the engineers at my ISP based on this posting.
 
 What I am searching for is something similar to a Knowledge Base or FAQ
 article which would either assist me in understanding the changes which
 should be made, or that I could simply point the engineers at my ISP to.
 Without that, I am not sure that I will be able to effectively communicate
 the problem/solution.
 
 Bare LF workaround:
 http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1997/07/msg00957.html
 
 I would appreciate any suggestions on/offlist.
 
 Thanks!
 
 -Cameron
 
 
 Cameron Childress
 elliptIQ Inc.
 p.770.460.7277.232
 f.770.460.0963
 




IT WORKS!

2001-03-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]



I could not believe that my Lovely qmail server is 
now working ...!! 

I would like to share this great moment with you, 
for the stressthat everyonehad from me and the help that you 
offered.
I specialize my thanks to Mr. Edward J. Allen, who 
gave me excellent courage and helped me out to understand the mystries of 
qmail..Thank you very much Edward!

By the way, this e-mail is sent throughmy 
qmail server.. the reply address still not working as it will take up to 24 
hours to have my qmail.hahlabs.com registered in the internet.

I wanted to remove my name from the list, but I 
thought,since people were there to help me out.. I must be there to help 
others...
Well, I am not trying to say I am an expert .. but 
at least I know how to get this working..

Thanks all. 
regards, Hatem 




letter rip pro and qmail

2001-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Has anyone on the list had any problems getting qmail to accept mail
deliveries from someone using letter rip pro?  I have a user who is using
letter rip, but his session is "unexpectedly closed" every time when trying
to send mail to my server.  The domain he is trying to send to is hosted on
my mail machine, and has no problems receiving mail from any other source.
Any ideas?

Brendan




delay in connecting

2001-03-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

My qmail server seems to hang for about 30 seconds when an outbound smtp
connection is made to it on port 25  Once the short delay is over, the
server is very quick in sending out the mail.  What could be causing this
hang?  I don't have the server set to do reverse resolution as far as I can
tellso I don't know what else could cause it.

Brendan




relaying restrictions

2001-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi

If anyone could point me in the right direction I would appreciate it.  I
would like qmail to relay for a user if he/she comes from an allowable IP
address and/or from an allowable domain.  Right now the server is only
allowing relaying for people within allowable IP ranges and from one
specific domain.  Would I need the whole list of domains we host along with
their users corresponding ip address ranges in the tcp.smtp and
relaymailfrom files?

i would like to set relaying up based almost exclusively on ip address
ranges, with the exception of allowing relaying from one particular domain.

ideas?

thanks

brendan




tcp.smtp file

2001-02-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What is the proper format for the tcp.smtp file in regards to multiple class
c networks.  For example

209.168.128-143.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""

Is this correct for all the networks between 209.168.128.* and 209.168.143.*
or do we need to have individual entries as follows:

216.168.128.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
216.168.129.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
etc.
etc.

Brendan




Re: [vmailmgr] SMTP and VMailMgr

2001-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Lars,

I happen to be having the exact same problem.  Well, almost, I think my
issue is reversed. 

Mail coming in from external STMP checks fine, and ends up in the
correct area and mail boxes.  Users checking their e-mail via POP-3 are told
they do not exist, and therefore are not able to pickup mail.

I have one user exempt to this, but not on purpose.  A previous user set
up in the system seems to be able to read e-mails from his home Maildir.  I
know what your going to say, but mail is not sent to his home Maildir, it is
sent to the alternate within vmailmgr settings.  Well you got that one
right.  So infact that is the only user that can log in, but has not a
single piece of mail to where qmail is getting is mail from.

Basically when an external user attempts to connect to POP3 they are
told they don't exist, because qmail-pop3d is not looking in the correct
area when they get handled by 'checkvpw'. (my guess)  so, how do I change
it?

Anyway, no user is loosing mail, as it is all getting saved in the right
area.

If anyone comes up with a solution to this, it would be greatly appreciated!

Cheers,

Sean


Lars Skovlund wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 I have a problem with VMailMgr. When doing SMTP, I am told that the user
 does not exist - POP3 seems to work fine (although, of course, no mail is
 in the mailbox). Putting a few debug statements in vdeliver shows that
 the program is, in fact, invoked.
 
 Specifically, I am told:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 No mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1)
 
 I have created the domain user medarddk.
 
 The logs say: 
 
 starting delivery 12: msg 174209 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I am not sure what the above line _should_ read.
 
 I would be grateful for any help,
 
 Lars
 




qmail imapd?

2000-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hello list,

i'm new to qmail.
i've installed successfully qmail, qmail-smtpd and qmail-pop3d.
i would like to know if there's an imap server - working together with 
qmail - too?

regards
achim




smtp auth over sasl

2000-11-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hello,

does anyone know about an sasl patch for qmail?
or are there builtin features for sasl smntp auth i haven't found yet?
thanks in advance
achim.




unable to append to bounce messsage; HELP!(#2 settings)

2000-10-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I get lots of these error messagess and lots of other bad behavior
I described in a recently previous email:...

Here are my settings..

Script started on Wed Nov  1 00:49:26 2000
w4:/tmp# cat /admin/bin/chkqmail 
#!/bin/tcsh -f
/usr/local/bin/qmail-lint
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-showctl

w4:/tmp# /admin/bin/chkqmail
Warning: cannot receive mail (home directory writable by others): mail
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): operator
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): games
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): ftp
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): gdm
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): nobody
[tons of these that are known to be for gone accounts]
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): accounts
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _hostmaster
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _swbt
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _srl2
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _alias
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): ___man2
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _barrngtn
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _ipi
[ 148 edited for brevity ]
Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): _dfwec
Warning: qmail-local replaces dot with a colon in .qmail filenames: 
~dfwuug/.qmail-master.9906
Warning: qmail-local replaces dot with a colon in .qmail filenames: 
~dfwuug/.qmail-newsl.9906
[4 edited for brevity]

Warning: cannot receive mail (does not own home directory): texed

Warning: delivery of the virtual domain theranch.org is implicitly controlled by alias
Warning: delivery of the virtual domain sltagency.com is implicitly controlled by alias
Warning: delivery of the virtual domain nccj.org is implicitly controlled by alias
Warning: delivery of the virtual domain foleygroup.com is implicitly controlled by 
alias
Warning: delivery of the virtual domain dfwww.com is implicitly controlled by alias
Warning: delivery of the virtual domain gocertified.com is implicitly controlled by 
alias
qmail home directory: /var/qmail.
user-ext delimiter: -.
paternalism (in decimal): 2.
silent concurrency limit: 120.
subdirectory split: 23.
user ids: 1005, 1006, 1007, 0, 1008, 1009, 1010, 1011.
!! grep qmail /etc/passwd

alias:*:1005:101::/var/qmail/alias:
qmaild:*:1006:101::/var/qmail:/bin/true
qmaill:*:1007:101::/var/qmail:/bin/true
qmailp:*:1008:101::/var/qmail:/bin/true
qmailq:*:1009:102::/var/qmail:/bin/true
qmailr:*:1010:102::/var/qmail:/bin/true
qmails:*:1011:102::/var/qmail:/bin/true

group ids: 101, 102.

badmailfrom: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] not accepted in MAIL FROM.

bouncefrom: (Default.) Bounce user name is MAILER-DAEMON.

bouncehost: (Default.) Bounce host name is w4.metronet.com.

concurrencylocal: Local concurrency is 25.

concurrencyremote: Remote concurrency is 30.

databytes: (Default.) SMTP DATA limit is 0 bytes.

defaultdomain: Default domain name is metronet.com.

defaulthost: (Default.) Default host name is w4.metronet.com.

doublebouncehost: (Default.) 2B recipient host: w4.metronet.com.

doublebounceto: (Default.) 2B recipient user: postmaster.

envnoathost: (Default.) Presumed domain name is w4.metronet.com.

helohost: (Default.) SMTP client HELO host name is w4.metronet.com.

idhost: (Default.) Message-ID host name is w4.metronet.com.

localiphost: (Default.) Local IP address becomes w4.metronet.com.

locals: 
Messages for LOCALHOST are delivered locally.
Messages for www14.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for w6.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for w5.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for w4.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for wnew.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for accessology.com are delivered locally.
Messages for w3.metronet.com are delivered locally.
Messages for w3-2.metronet.com are delivered locally.

me: My name is w4.metronet.com.

percenthack: (Default.) The percent hack is not allowed.

plusdomain: Plus domain name is metronet.com.

qmqpservers: (Default.) No QMQP servers.

queuelifetime: (Default.) Message lifetime in the queue is 604800 seconds.

rcpthosts: 
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at 1861-1865.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at .1861-1865.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at 207.227.169.50.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at .207.227.169.50.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at 4hcs.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at .4hcs.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at DawsonSCHP.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at .DawsonSCHP.com.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at LOCALHOST.
SMTP clients may send messages to recipients at .LOCALHOST.
SMTP clients may send

RE: A couple newbie install questions

2000-10-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I had similar problems (I'm also a newbie), and I'm sure exactly how they
were resolved, but here is what I did. I'm running RH 6.2 and the 'Life with
qmail' setup qmail-send and qmail-smtp directories correctly, but did not do
qmail-pop3d. I had to figure out on my own. Well, here it is:

mkdir /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
chmod 777 /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
chmod +t /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
mkdir /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log

the owner should be root.

/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/run looks like:

#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -R 0 pop-3 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
yourdomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir 21

the exec is all on one line. Replace yourdomain.com with your own FQDN. I'm
using redhat 6.2 so the port 110 is aliased as 'pop-3'.
/var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d/log/run looks like:

#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/setuidgid qmaill /usr/local/bin/multilog t
/var/log/qmail/pop3d

mkdir /var/log/qmail/pop3d
chown qmaill /var/log/qmail/pop3d

then I still had a problem with the same error messages you are getting.
Then I ran these commands, which I think created the lock files.

svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/qmail-pop3d
svc -u /var/qmail/supervise/*/log

It still did not work, then I rebooted, and everything started working.

Since tcpserver handles pop-3 (port 110), you should comment out your entry
in inetd.conf and then restart (killall -HUP inetd).

Documentation for supervise is at http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html

Hope this helps,
Greg James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-Original Message-
From: Carey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 6:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A couple newbie install questions


Hello all,

Problem 1: When starting qmail under svscan via the startup script (I'm
using Life With Qmail as my guide), I get errors complaining about being
unable to acquire a lock of certain files:
Supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-send/supervise/lock: temporary
failure
Supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure
Supervise: fatal: unable to acquire qmail-smtpd/supervise/lock: temporary
failure
Supervise: fatal: unable to acquire log/supervise/lock: temporary failure

My guess is that this is a permission or ownership problem? I tried
chmodding the directories the lock files are in to 777 and deleted the lock
files, but no dice. Any ideas?

Problem 2: When I manually start qmail (no svscan running), I am able to
connect to port 110, but only for a moment. It immediately disconnects me
like so:
Trying my.ip.address...
Connected to dellhost.wierd.ip.address (my.ip.address)
Escape character is '^]'.
Connection closed by foreign host.

I am able to manually run qmail-popup like this:
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup host /bin/checkpassword pwd

Do you think my problem has to do with my pop3 entry in inetd.conf? What
should my entry to inetd.conf look like? Thanks for any help anyone can
offer.

Gregg




Monitoring Email

2000-09-06 Thread Leslie Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Is there a way to have all incoming and outgoing 
emails (with attachments) sent to a secret user for later viewing?

Les



Re: Monitoring Email

2000-09-06 Thread Leslie Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Being new to Qmail, and even after going to the url that you so politely
provided, I still do not see the answer.

Does that method you pointed to via url actually provide a pop-account where
one can login and view all sent/received messages from any pop3 client?
And, once viewing each individual message, provide the ability to save
attachments?

Les.

- Original Message -
From: "Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 2:51 AM
Subject: Re: Monitoring Email


 * Leslie Bester  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000906 02:55]:
  Is there a way to have all incoming and outgoing emails (with
  attachments) sent to a secret user for later viewing?

 http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies

 I sometimes wonder why so many people running this excellent piece of
 software are so blatantly unable to configure their MUAs to conform to
 minimal standards, though. Oh well...




Re: Monitoring Email - Clarified

2000-09-06 Thread Leslie Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED]

What a useful list.

I would of thought that posting what I thought was a pretty basic question
would yield something resembling an answer from someone.

I hope the responses I received so far, both on and off list, are not
examples of typical hospitality and support I hope to receive.

I would ask that people who do reply, to actually include an answer instead
of a veiled flame..  send the flames off-list to spare the rest of the users
the enjoyment of reading what essentially is static noise.

...

For your enjoyment thought Adam, I will dig out some prescription glasses
and re-read and re-state my last message, just for you in an easier to
understand way..

Here it is:

Based on the answer from the friendly people on the list that I've
encountered so far, I'm to understand the URL to the FAQ (which I so
blatantly did not read) describes a method to do what I asked in my original
message...

And I'll restate that as well, with some extra commentary just so everyone
know what and why I wish to know if this can be done.

I've been contacted by a client who wishes to monitor incoming and outgoing
email, to the extent of message body contents, and attachments.  (Please,
send your "This is immoral/illegal/un-right" comments to me off-list).  For
reasons which are really not relevant to the users of the list, I won't
explain why they want to do this, other than, they want to do it.

The final outcome I would like to achieve is to have a pop account where the
client can retrieve all mail sent in and out of their company.  I would like
each message to be available to your typical outlook/Eudora/pop3 compatible
mail client.  I would also like the ability to select each message and if
desired, view its contents in full, as well as the ability to save
attachments added to the email in question.

What is not suitable, is a log of To/From/Message Size, incase there is any
confusion.  The actual contents (and attachments) must be easily viewable,
just as if the email was sent to you (instead of nabbed/copy/forwarded in
the process)

So!  If the URL http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies actually
provides the exact answer I'm looking for, please excuse my ignorance.

Otherwise, I would really appreciate anyone who can provide me with relevant
information (minus the flames, and non-answer yielding responses) (Send
those off-list)

Thanks,
Les.

- Original Message -
From: "Adam McKenna" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: Monitoring Email


 On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:47:14AM -0500, Leslie Bester  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  Being new to Qmail, and even after going to the url that you so politely
  provided, I still do not see the answer.

 Read closer, or get glasses.

  Does that method you pointed to via url actually provide a pop-account
where
  one can login and view all sent/received messages from any pop3 client?
  And, once viewing each individual message, provide the ability to save
  attachments?

 Does qmail actually provide a pop-account where one can login and view all
 sent/recieved messages from any pop3 client?  And, once viewing each
 individual message, provide the ability to save attachments?

 Does Linux actually provide a pop-account where one can login and view
 all sent/received messages from any pop3 client?  And, once viewing each
 individual message, provide the ability to save attachments?

  Les.

 --Adam




Flame (Dont read if you hate this like I do)

2000-09-06 Thread Leslie Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Please excuse my rash comments, but yes I'd like to 
bite off my nose to spite my face.

I'm quite surprised that after joining the list 
about... 1 hour ago? That I raised the (over-used) Signal to noise 
ratio.

For anyone who despises the seemingly inevitable 
flame wars that occur on technical mailing lists, I apologize for being what 
seems to be a catalyst.

I still await the days when one can post a 
legitimate question to a list, without receiving a barrage of out of context 
messages with personal opinions, and RTFM a**hole, especially when they send 
them to the list.Perhaps this is why some lists are 
moderated.

I was hoping that this list for tech support would 
be above the level of your typical IRC #linux channel, but from what I've seen, 
it hasn't.

Perhaps the people who have taken it upon 
themselves to respond to me as if I were some belligerent idiot should try to 
realize that everyone is not as smart as they are, or experienced as they 
are. 

Frankly, coming from a very basic sendmail 
background, the url that points to the FAQ would make very little sense to 
anyone reading it, especially when they are not familiar with a product they've 
just downloaded.

If it wasn't for the apparent O'Riely(sp) book in 
the works (or is it done?), I would cease to use the product based on the TONE 
of the support I've received so far.. It seems like the list (at least 
this early in the morning) is stockedby a bunch of know-it-all teenagers 
with a severe lack of etiquette.

So to end, I thought the list was a forum for 
asking questions and getting answers.. not getting slammed.

To all the nice people, who will wake this morning 
to read all this crap, I'll apologize yet again for bringing the crap users on 
this list out of the wood work.

Les.



Re: Monitoring Email

2000-09-06 Thread Leslie Bester [EMAIL PROTECTED]

So your answer is no then.  Okey, thanks for your "help".

- Original Message -
From: "Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: Monitoring Email


 * Leslie Bester  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000906 04:04]:
  "Robin S. Socha" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Leslie Bester  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000906 02:55]:

 [Message reformatted, cropped and trimmed. Thanks for the extra work,
Leslie]

Is there a way to have all incoming and outgoing emails (with
attachments) sent to a secret user for later viewing?
  
   http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/admin.html#copies

  Being new to Qmail, and even after going to the url that you so politely
  provided, I still do not see the answer.

 Huh? Grab the sources, add the changes, recompile, reinstall - done.

  Does that method you pointed to via url actually provide a pop-account
  where one can login and view all sent/received messages from any pop3
  client?

 It provides a mailbox /var/qmail/alias/msg-log. You could put
 "big_brother" in /var/qmail/alias/.qmail-log and have all mail
 forwarded there.

  And, once viewing each individual message, provide the
  ability to save attachments?

 All it does is copy each mail to a file that can be read with any decent
 MUA. That does specifically exclude  anything from Mircosoft.




Email to SMS

2000-09-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Is there a add on for qmail to enable email to SMS.

Best regards

Rod





problem with qmailadmin

2000-07-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear all,
I've installed qmailadmin on OSF1 4.0F and it was successfully, but I've got
problem "Out of memory" if I try to add user virtual pop3 account via
browser.  anybody know what the problem is ?




Best regards,
 wars  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Genericstable/User Masquerade

2000-06-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dear all,
does qmail support genericstable or user masquerade like sendmail ??
if yes, how to replace genericstable or user masquerade in sendmail
with qmail ???



Best regards,
 wars  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Pop3 with Maildir support and logging

2000-03-28 Thread Ryszard Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi!

Do you know any pop3 daemon with Maildir support, wich enables basic logging?
Statistics such as those produced by e.g. qpopper or cucipop would be just fine
(incomming connections, number of messages/bytes downloaded/leaved,
authorization failures etc.)

Siaco.

-- 
Ryszard ach
Internet Designers s.c. 
http://www.id.pl



Re: Qmail-pop3d

2000-03-28 Thread Ryszard Lach [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 10:19:55PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 10:04:09AM +0700, em9652015 wrote:
  DEar,
  
  I am using Pop3d, and i try telnet to port 110.
  And then :
  
  user alex
  +OK
  pass 
  -ERR this user has no $HOME/Maildir
  Connection closed by foreign host.
  
  Iam using redhat 6.1 + with sendmail and I uninstall sendmail with RPM
  and I install qmail with RPM. What's wrong with my configuration?

Well, I think it is written above. User has no $HOME/Maildir, so you should
create it. Try 'man maildirmake'.

Siaco.

-- 
Ryszard ach
Internet Designers s.c. 
http://www.id.pl



Unexpected EOF

2000-03-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello,

I am getting the following error when qmail tries to deliver a message
locally:

2000-03-09 01:43:49.934939500 delivery 160: deferral:
/bin/sh:_unexpected_EOF_while_looking_for_`"'//bin/sh:_-c:_line_2:_syntax_erro
r/

I've investigated what could it be but I've run out of ideas :-/
The message in question looks like this (got it from the qmail/mess
directory):


Received: (qmail 13820 invoked by uid 600); 9 Mar 2000 10:34:48 +0100
Date: 9 Mar 2000 10:34:48 +0100
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This is a test
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

This is a test



I added a dot . to the last line (I believe this is not necessary,
right?) but same thing happens... All other messages continue being
processed without a problem, whether they are processed by qmail-remote
or qmail-local. Is anyone familiar with this error?

Thanks!



Re: Unexpected EOF - Solved

2000-03-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Ok so I just found the problem. I had moved a .qmail-* file from a NT
machine, and the CR/LF  were creating all the headache. Oh well...

Next time I'll do 5 *more* minutes research before asking!

Thanks!

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
 
 Hello,
 
 I am getting the following error when qmail tries to deliver a message
 locally:
 
 2000-03-09 01:43:49.934939500 delivery 160: deferral:
 /bin/sh:_unexpected_EOF_while_looking_for_`"'//bin/sh:_-c:_line_2:_syntax_erro
 r/
 
 I've investigated what could it be but I've run out of ideas :-/
 The message in question looks like this (got it from the qmail/mess
 directory):
 
 
 Received: (qmail 13820 invoked by uid 600); 9 Mar 2000 10:34:48 +0100
 Date: 9 Mar 2000 10:34:48 +0100
 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: This is a test
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
 
 This is a test
 
 
 
 I added a dot . to the last line (I believe this is not necessary,
 right?) but same thing happens... All other messages continue being
 processed without a problem, whether they are processed by qmail-remote
 or qmail-local. Is anyone familiar with this error?
 
 Thanks!



multilog: fatal: unable to open directory /var/log/qmail: access denied

2000-03-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The first time i launch Qmail i get this error.
 I've tried 2 times the installation on 2 different linux version but
 every time
 i get this error, i've tried to gave the full permission to
 /var/log/qmail but
 i still get this error.
 I've installed qmail reading "life with qmail" and "qmail howto" and
 after the
 problem i've read the faq but i haven't find nothing about this error.
 
 
 



qmail ok but don't deliver mail, stay in queue

2000-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all
 I'm running Qmail latest version on a Linux Red Hat 6.0 (installed
 from tarball), all seems to be ok but when i send a mail it doesn't 
 arrive to the destinatary, it stay in queue.
 How can i solve the problem?
 Thanks
 
 



Re: OT: Mailing list bandwidth

2000-03-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm not in a position to give an informed opinion, but in terms of
bandwidth, one significant parameter is the average size of messages.
Most lists with "well-behaved" users tend to have an average msg size of
2-4k, but some others - especially those that allow binary attachments,
be it pictures, documentc, etc. - may go up to 20-30k or even more
depending on the 'tolerance' level. 

I'd be interested to know what numbers you come up with!

Steve Wolfe wrote:
 
 [...deleted...]
 
So, if I were to decide that I wanted to allocate 512k of my bandwidth
 for mailing list purposes, what sort of load could I realistically expect
 to handle?
 
 [...deleted...]



Messages not getting preprocessed

2000-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi,

I have a new installation of qmail running 'supervised', but whenever I
try to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is queued, it just
sits there. Say, after sending two messages, this is what I get :

$ qmail queue
messages in queue: 2
messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2

I'm not even sure the message is passed to qmail-send and that's where
it "sits", or it sits right before that (??). Doing a 'qmail doqueue'
doesn't help. They just sit there. Sometimes (only sometimes),
restarting qmail-send does it, but normally it doesn't help either. All
processes seem to be running fine:

  447 ?S  0:00 svscan
  448 ?S  0:00 supervise qmail-send
  449 ?S  0:00 supervise log
  450 ?S  0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
  451 ?S  0:00 supervise log
  454 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail
  455 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t
/var/log/qmail/smtpd
 1272 ?S  0:00 qmail-send
 1274 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x
/etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 503 -g 503 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
 1275 ?S  0:00 qmail-lspawn |preline procmail
 1276 ?S  0:00 qmail-rspawn
 1277 ?S  0:00 qmail-clean

I first suspected of identd, because at first I had it enabled, and when
the server would receive a message, it would launch a number of
in.identd processes that when killed (manually by me), it'd get the
messages preprocessed and delivered, but then I did disable identd and
same thing happened but without the identd processes - the messages
would simply sit there.

I then thought of dns problems (??), looking for something that was
perhaps slowing it all down - but I just can't nail it, and as far as
the messages sit there, nothing is logged that'd give me a clue what's
wrong.

Could anyone think of something that'd be causing this problem?

Thanks!



Re: Messages not getting preprocessed

2000-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Problem fixed (or why always the simplest of it all drives you nuts the
most)

The INTERNALS file and LWQ had the answer right in front of my nose all
the time: /var/qmail/queue/lock/trigger was messed up -
http://Web.InfoAve.Net/~dsill/lwq.html#trigger

Thanks,

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 I have a new installation of qmail running 'supervised', but whenever I
 try to send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], the message is queued, it just
 sits there. Say, after sending two messages, this is what I get :
 
 $ qmail queue
 messages in queue: 2
 messages in queue but not yet preprocessed: 2
 
 I'm not even sure the message is passed to qmail-send and that's where
 it "sits", or it sits right before that (??). Doing a 'qmail doqueue'
 doesn't help. They just sit there. Sometimes (only sometimes),
 restarting qmail-send does it, but normally it doesn't help either. All
 processes seem to be running fine:
 
   447 ?S  0:00 svscan
   448 ?S  0:00 supervise qmail-send
   449 ?S  0:00 supervise log
   450 ?S  0:00 supervise qmail-smtpd
   451 ?S  0:00 supervise log
   454 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t /var/log/qmail
   455 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/multilog t
 /var/log/qmail/smtpd
  1272 ?S  0:00 qmail-send
  1274 ?S  0:00 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -v -p -x
 /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 503 -g 503 0 smtp /var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
  1275 ?S  0:00 qmail-lspawn |preline procmail
  1276 ?S  0:00 qmail-rspawn
  1277 ?S  0:00 qmail-clean
 
 I first suspected of identd, because at first I had it enabled, and when
 the server would receive a message, it would launch a number of
 in.identd processes that when killed (manually by me), it'd get the
 messages preprocessed and delivered, but then I did disable identd and
 same thing happened but without the identd processes - the messages
 would simply sit there.
 
 I then thought of dns problems (??), looking for something that was
 perhaps slowing it all down - but I just can't nail it, and as far as
 the messages sit there, nothing is logged that'd give me a clue what's
 wrong.
 
 Could anyone think of something that'd be causing this problem?
 
 Thanks!



daemontools killing a filesystem?

2000-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hello,

I had a RH 6.0 server running qmail with rather quite success for a few
months, until I decided to install daemontools and the
supervise/multilog/svscan/... tools.

I mainly followed the LWQ docs to get the daemontools installed and
configured, and things seemed ok. Mail was going in and out, no problem.
Until once I had to manually stop the service (qmail stop) and when I
tried restarting it (qmail start) multilog started to continuosly echo
to the console that it didn't have write permissions (sorry don't have
the exact error log right now) about every second. When rebooting the
system, qmail would however run 'supervised'  without a problem. Only a
manual 'qmail start' would cause it.

So I was in this situation for about three days, when this morning I
found an error log being echoed to the console non-stop, every second.
The error was:

Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: scsi0: MEDIUM ERROR on channel 0, id 0, lun
0, CDB: Read (10) 00 00 26 6b 38 00 00 02 00
Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: Current error sd08:05: sense key Medium
Error
Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: Additional sense indicates Unrecovered read
error
Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: scsidisk I/O error: dev 08:05, sector
2244648
Feb 17 21:03:45 www kernel: EXT2-fs error (device sd(8,5)):
ext2_write_inode: unable to read inode block - inode=280580, block=11223
24

I tried to telnet to the machine and take a look at it (impossible to
work on the console with all those messages being spit every second) but
it didn't work, so I managed to do a soft reboot, after which, the
/dev/sda5 filesystem (where /var is) was being reported as a bad
filesystem: "Attempting to read block from filesystem resulted in short
read while trying ot open /dev/sda5. Could this be a zero-lenght
partition?"

I managed to recover the filesystem by defining a different superblock
with e2fsck. Reboot, and the SCSI IO ERROR comes up again. /var ends up
screwed up again. Another fix with e2fsck. Fixed. Reboot. Same IO error. 

Now, going back to the subject of the e-mail, I found out how to stop
those IO errors. All I need to do is 'qmail stop' and the error would go
away, and the rest of the system would continue working as usual -
except no mail being delivered or accepted of course.

Now I wouldn't say "daemontools did this" but rather, what the heck have
I done wrong to get this odd error? I'd suspect that the first problem I
experienced with multilog might be related but dont really know. My next
step would be to remove the daemontools from managing qmail, and leave
qmail on its own, but I deeply don't think this problem is impossible to
fix, and don't want to give up on these tools just because I can't get
it right the first time. Though it is kind of scary when you start to
see these errors on a machine that otherwise has run almost flawlessly
up til now (fairly new system as well).

Any hint would be greatly appreciated!!

PS: I've run all sorts of checks on the hard drive for bad sectors, the
filesystem tables always show the right info, etc. I don't think it's a
hardware failure.



qmail

2000-01-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]



dear sir, 

i facing some prob with qmail . the prob is i want 
send unknown local user to another smtp server without doing any changes in 
header files.

means i got two location both got same domain. 
which is configure in qmail as local domain. so whenx location send mess 
to y location then is try to send loacally . there should be do with 
.qmail-default but this useful when you got some other domain who received mail 
for your domain put in prop queue. pl tell me how 
to send mess to unkown local user to another smtp 
server without changin cotains of rcpt to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] the same domain is locally but 
user is not here .


by

sachin sawant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: anybody using smtp-auth with qmail ? (NOT smtp after pop)

1999-12-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello Olivier,

I found your message in my qmail mailing list archive. Is the smtpd
patch now working for you? I installed it, but it works only with the
standard checkpassword. It doesn't work with checkvpw.

To Bruce: checkvpw also does not work with smtp-auth perl scripts from
Mrs. Brisby. So checkvpw have to be different from checkpassword.

Smoerk

On Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:38:39 +0100, Olivier M. wrote:

Netscape  Outlook allow to setup a login/passwd pair for
smtp outgoing mails : I saw a kind of patch on http://www.nimh.org, but
I can't understand how it work : it doesn't call any "checkpasswd" program.

Is anybody using this (or other smtp-auth) patch ? If possible with vmailmgrd.




relay-ctrl 1.2 - doesn't work

1999-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello,

I tried to setup relay-ctrl on a new machine, but it doesn't work.
relay-ctrl-allow writes the IP in the spool dir, but does not make a
new cdb file. relay-ctrl-age (executed via cron) builds a new cdb file
every five minutes. So I have to wait up to 5 minutes to relay a mail.
It's a little bit weird, because I installed an older version on
another system and it worked perfectly. Do you have any idea what could
be wrong? I thinks relay-ctrl-allow executes relay-ctrl-age. Maybe
there is a problem in executing relay-ctrl-age, but I don't know why.
AGE_CMD looks fine.

pop3d part from my qmail startup file:

sh -c "start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --user root \
  --exec /usr/bin/tcpserver -- \
  0 pop-3 /usr/sbin/qmail-popup `hostname`.`dnsdomainname` \
  /opt/vmailmgr/bin/checkvpw /opt/relay-ctrl/sbin/relay-ctrl-allow
/usr/sbin/qmail-pop3d Maildir "


Here my defines.h:

#ifndef AGE_MINUTES
#define AGE_MINUTES 10
#endif

#ifndef BUFSIZE
#define BUFSIZE 4096
#endif

#ifndef RULESDIR
#define RULESDIR "/etc"
#endif

#ifndef SPOOLDIR
#define SPOOLDIR "/opt/relay-ctrl/spool"
#endif

#ifndef AGE_CMD
#define AGE_CMD "/opt/relay-ctrl/sbin/relay-ctrl-age"
#endif

#ifndef TCPRULES
#define TCPRULES "/usr/bin/tcprules"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPRULES
#define SMTPRULES "tcp.smtp"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPCDB
#define SMTPCDB "tcp.smtp.cdb"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPFIXUP
#define SMTPFIXUP "smtp.fixup"
#endif





Re: relay-ctrl 1.2 - doesn't work

1999-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:38:31 -0800, Jon Rust wrote:

At 1:30 AM +0100 12/2/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The IPs are written to the spool dir and relay-ctrl-age creates a new
cdb file every 5 minutes via cron. It's strange. Are there other relay
solutions which works?

Hmmm... are you using the same cdb files for your qmail-smtpd 
invocation that you're specifying here? If you run a cdbdump, what 
does it show?

cdbdump /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb | tr '\0' :

I have no cdbdump, but I can relay mails, after cron executed
relay-ctrl-age. So I fetch mails via POP3, but cannot relay, because
the cdb file was not refreshed. After some minutes, when cron executes
relay-ctrl-age, my IP was written to the cdb and I can relay mail. This
is the strange behaviour I do not understand. If the IP is not be
written to the spool or the cdb is not be created, I would know where I
should look.

Thanks for your help :)



Re: relay-ctrl 1.2 - doesn't work

1999-12-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Wed, 1 Dec 1999 16:20:55 -0800, Jon Rust wrote:

It does work-- I'm using it now, but I can't see what you've missed 
here. Is anything showing up in the spool directory, 
/opt/relay-ctrl/spool? Does it exist? Are you positive you have the 
names of the rules files correct?

The IPs are written to the spool dir and relay-ctrl-age creates a new
cdb file every 5 minutes via cron. It's strange. Are there other relay
solutions which works?

At 11:16 PM +0100 12/1/99, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,

I tried to setup relay-ctrl on a new machine, but it doesn't work.
relay-ctrl-allow writes the IP in the spool dir, but does not make a
new cdb file. relay-ctrl-age (executed via cron) builds a new cdb file
every five minutes. So I have to wait up to 5 minutes to relay a mail.
It's a little bit weird, because I installed an older version on
another system and it worked perfectly. Do you have any idea what could
be wrong? I thinks relay-ctrl-allow executes relay-ctrl-age. Maybe
there is a problem in executing relay-ctrl-age, but I don't know why.
AGE_CMD looks fine.

pop3d part from my qmail startup file:

sh -c "start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --user root \
  --exec /usr/bin/tcpserver -- \
  0 pop-3 /usr/sbin/qmail-popup `hostname`.`dnsdomainname` \
  /opt/vmailmgr/bin/checkvpw /opt/relay-ctrl/sbin/relay-ctrl-allow
/usr/sbin/qmail-pop3d Maildir "


Here my defines.h:

#ifndef AGE_MINUTES
#define AGE_MINUTES 10
#endif

#ifndef BUFSIZE
#define BUFSIZE 4096
#endif

#ifndef RULESDIR
#define RULESDIR "/etc"
#endif

#ifndef SPOOLDIR
#define SPOOLDIR "/opt/relay-ctrl/spool"
#endif

#ifndef AGE_CMD
#define AGE_CMD "/opt/relay-ctrl/sbin/relay-ctrl-age"
#endif

#ifndef TCPRULES
#define TCPRULES "/usr/bin/tcprules"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPRULES
#define SMTPRULES "tcp.smtp"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPCDB
#define SMTPCDB "tcp.smtp.cdb"
#endif

#ifndef SMTPFIXUP
#define SMTPFIXUP "smtp.fixup"
#endif







451 qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)

1999-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi:
now when I telnet 127.0.0.1 25
and process the smtp coversation,all r ok except when at last I type .
to end the data ,the systeme
says "451 qq trouble creating files in queue (#4.3.0)"
and advice will be very appreciated
thanks

Akai

--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085




virtuldoamin problem!!

1999-10-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have setup a virtualdomain 2best.com on my server.and
the controls/virtualdomains like "2best.com:2best-com"
the user/assign like this
"=2best-com-joe:popuser:888:888:/home/popuser/2best-com/joe:::"
and I haved created popuser with 888:888 id and gid.
Directory /home/popuser/2best-com/joe be created with the proper uid and
gid and chmod 700.
Maildir be created via maildirmake too.
when I telnet 127.0.0.1 25 for testing delivering message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
it failed.the /var/log/qmail/ looks like the following


941176499.174538 info msg 149059: bytes 178 from akai qp 931 uid 515
941176499.333182 starting delivery 10: msg 149059 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
941176499.333263 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
941176499.574474 delivery 10: failure:
Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/

and the /var/qmail/controls/defaultdelivery is "/Maildir/".
It is ok when I send messge to the realuser on this server.
greetings

Akai
--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085




Is there a Hotmail clone webmail system.

1999-10-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi,Last I asked about the webmail,and got many appreciated reply.I think
I have made a mistake.
what I  want is hotmail like webmail system.
I have installed Atdot(www.atdot.org) on my server. It is cool, but
there are a little feature not be included
(like users quota limit,virtualhost etc),and it use sendmail,which
processes mail more slowly than qmail.
above all ,the I dont know how may users can Atdot works well with on my
Intel PIII RH6.0 server.
Does there r an open source project about the hotmail like webmail
system.
Thanks

Kai
--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085




Re: confign problem: pls help, urgent.

1999-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi,
Try sending emial to user@[xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx]
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is your IP.
Pay attention about the bracket.
hope this help.

Akai

dd wrote:

  i have just installed qmail on my linux machine.  it has no running dns,
  though but instead using an upstream dns server to resolve domain names.
  i do not have a registered domain name for my server so my email address
  shld be:  user@my ip address.
 
  internal sending of mails is no problem.  however, when i try to send
  messages to remote clients and vice versa, the message could not be
  delivered.  on my remote machines, the message says "host unknown" for my
  ip address.

 hi

 errm i had the same problem and it wasn't solved until i got my domain
 registered to the dns server. i tried sending mail to user@IP but it
 doesn't work, don't know why. afaik you'll have to wait for your domain
 name... :/  btw you _should_ be able to send mail to remote hosts.

 good luck and love  peace etc etc,
 dd

--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085




webmail

1999-10-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hi all:
Has anyone performanced a webmail powered by qmail?
Now I want to programme a webmail system with qmail,
which supports virtuldoamins.
anyone have some ready-mode examples for me?
or give some advice about the interface of web to Maildir.
thanks

Akai
--
Song Kaicheng
http://www.1stChina.com/
ICQ:16229085




maildir newbie problem

1999-10-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

hi all:
now I use maildir mode of qmail ,
do I have to make .qmail and Maildir   for all users manually.
and can it automatically be produced
when a mail arrive like the Mbox or /var/spool/mail/users in Sendmail.




have i stumped you?

1999-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

shall i take the silence of the list to mean that i've stumped even the
qmail gurus?  or have i missed something in the faq that will solve my
whole problem?  In case the problem is the former, let me provide you with
more information.  

my address "@earthling.net" is a service provided by iname.com so you
never have to change your email address.  it bounces your email from their
server to an email account you designate, in my case "@geocities.com".  I
then send fetchmail out to retrieve my mail from the geocities account.
fetchmail then deposits the mail on qmail using the mda option of sendmail
emulation.  when fetchmail gets it, it logs in /var/log/maillog who the
mail is from and where it's going to. fetchmail is logging the correct
From: and To:.  qmail however is rewriting the headers to look like this:

From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 16 01:05:44 1999 -0400
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recieved: (qmail 16625 invoked by uid 1000); 16 Apr 1999 01:05:43 -
Date 16 Apr 1999 01:05:43 -000
[...]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
Status:RO
X-Status:
X-Keywords:
X-UID: 1

by geocities.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA18891
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mail.geocities.com
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-5.0.0)
for sungo@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 15 Apr 1999 21:05:43 -0400
(EDT)
Received: from mercury.upn.net 
by smv18.iname.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1SMV) with ESTMP id UAA16582
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:59:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sebastian.slashdot.org
by mercury.upn.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 728CF2C5A4
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 24 Hours of Slashdot Headlines For sungo
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:59:49 -0700 (PDT)


any thoughts anyone? (sorry for the long spamish email) hope this info
helps. 

--
Foco Theory  |   
  It is not necessary to wait until revolutionary|
  conditions have developed, since a dedicated   |Matt Cashner
  small group can ignite a revolution, thus creating | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  both the uprising and the conditions which make|
  it possible.   |   
--



re: Re: have i stumped you?

1999-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You wrote:

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  shall i take the silence of the list to mean that i've stumped even
the
 qmail gurus?
 fetchmail then deposits the mail on qmail using the mda option of
sendmail
 emulation.

The following is an indication of improper or missing headers in the
mail that fetchmail sends using /usr/lib/sendmail.  Replace
/usr/lib/sendmail with a program that simply records its arguments and
stdin, then examine that information.

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: recipient list not shown: ;

ok. so how do i go about doing this?  i'm rather new to smtp, qmail, and
the whole ball of wax.  thanx again.

--
Foco Theory  |   
  It is not necessary to wait until revolutionary|
  conditions have developed, since a dedicated   |Matt Cashner
  small group can ignite a revolution, thus creating | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  both the uprising and the conditions which make|
  it possible.   |   
--




Re: the fun never ends...

1999-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Evan Champion" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

"Did you just chown root's crontab file, or did you make a new crontab
under your userid?"

i made a /var/spool/cron/crontabs/sungo, owned by sungo, with the proper
entry. i have, however, dropped this approach for the moment and gone back
to fetchmail. i will illustrate why:

with fetchmail:
"alyosha qmail [...] info msg 690182: bytes 2644 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
(of course that From: eventually gets mysteriously changed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but we'll ignore that for now)

with getpop3:
"alyosha qmail [...] info msg 691082: bytes 2380 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

don't want getpop3 compounding the problem.  fetchmail seems to be getting
the mail to qmail correctly. 

--
Foco Theory  |   
  It is not necessary to wait until revolutionary|
  conditions have developed, since a dedicated   |Matt Cashner
  small group can ignite a revolution, thus creating | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  both the uprising and the conditions which make|
  it possible.   |   
--





headers with extra bounce

1999-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


here's my setup.  someone sends mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which is a
remailer which moves the mail to my geocities acct. from their fetchmail
picks it up and drops it qmail.  my problem is this.  once qmail gets a
hold of my mail, it's adding a section to the header which makes all of my
mail look like it's coming from "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" with no subject.  I
don't think the problem is with fetchmail as i have fetchmail set to not
make any changes to the headers.  any thoughts?  please cc: me at the
address below as well as sending any responses to the list. thanx :)

-matt cashner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Windows is a 32 bit patch to a 16 bit GUI based on a 8 bit operating
system, written for a 4 bit processor but a 2 bit company which can not
stand 1 bit of competition."





Re: Hardware selection help

1999-01-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

In what way would you break this into two separate machines?  Would you be
using NFS or Coda to do some network mounting scheme, or would you just
split the users down the middle assigning half to one box and half to the
other?


At 03:13 PM 1/7/99 -0800, you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 1999, Sean Rietze wrote:

 OK, little advice.  Getting ready to order a Dell Poweredge 2300 machine
 to run qmail and about 35,000 pop accounts on.
 
 Like some advice on the setup of the disks:
 
 Base machine will be dual 400 with 512MB RAM running RH 5.2

You'd be better off with two seperate boxes rather than a single dual
processor box.

You are going to be I/O bound before you ever run out of processor. 

Make one a POP server, and one the mail server.

 My questions are about the mail spool and queue areas.
 My thoughts have been dual-controller DPT card (32MB cache onboard)

I use DPT PM3334UW's for redundancy(RAID 0+1) but not for speed. They
aren't particularly fast cards in my experience. 

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
Patrick Greenwell   (800) 299-1288 v
   CTO (925) 377-1212 v
NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f
Coming to the ISPF-II?  The Forum for ISPs by ISPs   http://www.ispf.com
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/