Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 06:22:07PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote: David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. Is there a solution? Probably both patches touch qmail-smtpd (I don't use either patch). It may be possible to apply by hand -- it's not tricky. However, if either one changes functionality that the other depends on, it's more a matter of rewriting one or both patches. I'm not sure about the contes of the spamcontrol patch, but qmail-ldap contains a lot of spam elimination techniques, perhaps this code is already included. qmail-ldap's qmail-smtpd varies heavyly from stock qmail's one. There are no ldap related functions in it, but TLS support, RBL stuff and so on. Greetings Henning -- * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de * * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany * Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie)
Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Henning Brauer wrote: My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. I'm not sure about the contes of the spamcontrol patch, but qmail-ldap contains a lot of spam elimination techniques, perhaps this code is already included. I did notice that, happily. The one thing I'll miss that I didn't see duplicated in the control set provided by qmail-ldap is the 'badmailfrom' feature, which allows regex-based filtering of incoming mail. - -d -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQEVAwUBOxTIs71ZYOtSwT+tAQHojQf/QSCnPSWQMAnVGCnp3doEQbMO0gBkfCpg 0MHn4mzNmTas611afAYXBoc3rf45NYYUS0tFWebh26ScNUwikMU4pTMYlG4r6bO8 9nIphNE1SuPYsQUUtXircDnBu8S/UsUHLL2EskqCzjaJoASifVT+PcD2PwDNGveW iDOk1npMrzg4WgYkSFpmzAIRfkmLf2HcHaex2lCbVVA0ImAK76mHnBVN5b5x33V3 sX8joR7Nrbdo6v9gSCHdBw/L3M0JDutGDUX/hZA1HWW7HIc9VEzVlkdFVDm1yDYo P4CMV9KclFrzmdgwNr/by1gwprUYdnkHG2fe1VKhGmvg5QVWiHcwDA== =0L24 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. Is there a solution? GNU 'patch' on rh7.1, if it matters. Thank you -d - -- David Talkington http://www.spotnet.org PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQEVAwUBOxQQEr1ZYOtSwT+tAQG3YQf9FBjQky+HRA625lnYdGwWIiK+xyIo6WZg JX0TPjFp2cnvVY1iu9njwebvEL1xZp3+hpeLDYw6zTswKfVcN2Hn0dp/1ZVg+juK xRVxlaQJi9KY8ngYQunVRdjwaqIx2p8uH9KP5uRBvRqIJV+SeOxo/+xb2TaSZYxA QXj9qBn+fIcH0qsYegyfXrOJ4jppJYyz3FNA4kfZt5oqG7/V+Yz6gRRB+dnoV8lj v3bdZQBj3xYAJwS3ucuNh9fSmiYfrtOg8j3gGe/q7EDfeYm6QvNTraNmZlvzTwla 96TtOHlYmleYOacv3tGqR9Hi8/qI9nQr0eMJuXIqQDvIym8xuOpC6g== =2PPP -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: spamcontrol with qmail-ldap
David Talkington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My apologies for the cross post. It appears that the qmail-ldap and spamcontrol patches cannot cohabitate. Either patch is successful on its own, but the second will fail with lots of rejects. Is there a solution? Probably both patches touch qmail-smtpd (I don't use either patch). It may be possible to apply by hand -- it's not tricky. However, if either one changes functionality that the other depends on, it's more a matter of rewriting one or both patches. Charles -- --- Charles Cazabon[EMAIL PROTECTED] GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.sk.ca/~charlesc/software/ Any opinions expressed are just that -- my opinions. ---
