Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-06 Thread petrus
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
[..]




 I've seen this problem as well while testing, but haven't had a chance to
 develop a fix. I think it has to do with the unionfs sandbox. Try a linked
 sandbox, and I think that'll work for you. To be honest, I don't want to
 waste any time debugging F11. Thanks for your understanding.

 --
 -Eric 'shubes'


Unfortunately it seems not to have anything todo with the unionfs sandbox,
since I get the same problem with all different versions of the sandbox.
 I understand your reasoning behind not debugging F11, ill just keep it
until i can migrate it to something never as the encrypted bootsection makes
upgrading fedora risky.
Are there any alternative ways of uppgrading that i could try?

/p


Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-06 Thread petrus
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
[..]





 What does qtp-ami-up2date show you?


 ~ qtp-ami-up2date
New Qmail-Toaster Packages Available:
 available: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.20-1.3.17
(installed: squirrelmail-toaster-1.4.19-1.3.15.noarch)
 available: clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38
(installed: clamav-toaster-0.95.3-1.3.31.i686)


Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-06 Thread petrus
Im not all that experienced with running src rpm's, i just downloaded the
srpm and did
r...@fury:~ rpmbuild --rebuild --with fc11
clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Installing clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf clamav-0.96.3
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.3.tar.bz2
+ /bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.3
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):'
Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file etc/clamd.conf.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY (%prep)

As stated im a bit outside my competence zone here, but looking at the
clamav-0.96.0-patch
shouldnt I have a clamav-0.96.0.vanilla/etc/clamd.conf somewhere?
Cause i cant find that anywhere on my system..


Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-06 Thread petrus
qtp-whatami returns
qtp-whatami v0.3.6
DISTRO=Fedora
OSVER=11
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586
BUILD_DIST=fedora_11
BUILD_DIR=/root/rpmbuild
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

so using fedora_11, still produces the same error.
Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file etc/clamd.conf.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djCRZE (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djCRZE (%prep)






On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 What does qtp-whatami show you?
 Try:
 rpmbuild --rebuild --with fedora_11 clamav-toaster...
 (not fc11)


 petrus wrote:

 Im not all that experienced with running src rpm's, i just downloaded the
 srpm and did
 r...@fury:~ rpmbuild --rebuild --with fc11
 clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
 Installing clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
 Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY
 + umask 022
 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
 + LANG=C
 + export LANG
 + unset DISPLAY
 + cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
 + rm -rf clamav-0.96.3
 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.3.tar.bz2
 + /bin/tar -xf -
 + STATUS=0
 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
 + cd clamav-0.96.3
 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
 + echo 'Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):'
 Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):
 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2
 + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file etc/clamd.conf.rej
 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY (%prep)


 RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a6cgpY (%prep)

 As stated im a bit outside my competence zone here, but looking at the
 clamav-0.96.0-patch
 shouldnt I have a clamav-0.96.0.vanilla/etc/clamd.conf somewhere?
 Cause i cant find that anywhere on my system..





 --
 -Eric 'shubes'



 -
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (
 www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

 -
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
 packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-06 Thread petrus
The contents off clamd.conf.rej

--- etc/clamd.conf  2010-03-31 08:17:12.0 -0400
+++ etc/clamd.conf  2010-04-09 01:34:54.0 -0400
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@

 # Enable verbose logging.
 # Default: no
-#LogVerbose yes
+LogVerbose yes

 # This option allows you to save a process identifier of the listening
 # daemon (main thread).




On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 petrus wrote:

 qtp-whatami returns
 qtp-whatami v0.3.6
 DISTRO=Fedora
 OSVER=11
 QTARCH=i686
 QTKERN=2.6.30.10-105.2.23.fc11.i586
 BUILD_DIST=fedora_11
 BUILD_DIR=/root/rpmbuild
 This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

 so using fedora_11, still produces the same error.
 Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):
 + /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2
 + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
 1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file etc/clamd.conf.rej
 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djCRZE (%prep)


 RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.djCRZE (%prep)


 So we need to find out why that patch is failing on fedora.


 --
 -Eric 'shubes'



 -
 Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (
 www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
 If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!

 -
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and
 packages.
 To unsubscribe, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-unsubscr...@qmailtoaster.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
 qmailtoaster-list-h...@qmailtoaster.com





[qmailtoaster] Problem using qtp-newmodel on fedora 11

2010-10-05 Thread petrus
Hello

Im trying to do a long overdue update on my qmail-toaster using
qmail-newmodel
However this fails with these messages

Building clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38 ...
Installing /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/SRPMS/clamav-toaster-0.96.3-1.3.38.src.rpm
Building target platforms: i686
Building for target i686
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vnyHRi
+ umask 022
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ LANG=C
+ export LANG
+ unset DISPLAY
+ cd /root/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ rm -rf clamav-0.96.3
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.3.tar.bz2
+ /bin/tar -xf -
+ STATUS=0
+ '[' 0 -ne 0 ']'
+ cd clamav-0.96.3
+ /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w .
+ echo 'Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):'
Patch #0 (clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2):
+ /usr/bin/bzip2 -dc /root/rpmbuild/SOURCES/clamav-0.96.0.patch.bz2
+ /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0
1 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file etc/clamd.conf.rej
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vnyHRi (%prep)


RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.vnyHRi (%prep)


/mnt/qtp-sandbox/root/rpmbuild/BUILD/clamav-0.96.3/etc/clamd.conf.rej
--- etc/clamd.conf2010-03-31 08:17:12.0 -0400
+++ etc/clamd.conf2010-04-09 01:34:54.0 -0400
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@

 # Enable verbose logging.
 # Default: no
-#LogVerbose yes
+LogVerbose yes

 # This option allows you to save a process identifier of the listening
 # daemon (main thread).

Any ideas?


Re: [qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel on Fedora 11

2009-10-07 Thread petrus
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:


 Thanks Jake. I won't be able to get to my FC11 test host for a couple
 weeks.

 Looks like the stock fuse for FC11 is v2.7.4, and I used v2.8 in my testing
 (wanted to use the lastest I could). Petrus, it looks like there's a problem
 removing fuse-2.7.4. The preun scriplet (part of the stock spec file)
 apparently is having a problem.

 Can you try doing
 # rpm --noscripts -e fuse
 ?
 That should remove the older package and bypass the preun script. If you
 continue to have a problem with this, you might try google and see if others
 are having a problem upgrading from 2.7.4 to 2.8.

 Once you get past that, I'm betting it will work.


This is what i get

$ rpm --noscripts -e fuse
error: fuse specifies multiple packages:
  fuse-2.7.4-3.fc11.i586
  fuse-2.8.0-1.qtp.i586

Doing
 rpm --noscripts -e  fuse-2.7.4-3.fc11.i586

Works better and your right, after this everything seems to work perfectly
Thanks for the help!


[qmailtoaster] qtp-newmodel on Fedora 11

2009-10-06 Thread petrus
running qtp-newmodel on Fedora11, im running into problems with the new FUSE
chroot
[..]

Would you like a unionfs/overlay sandbox? (recommended) [y]/n: y

Using FUSE union filesystem ...
qtp-mount-sandbox v0.3.3
qtp-mount-sandbox - installing  fuse-unionfs ...
qtp-mount-sandbox - this could take a few moments - please be patient
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, refresh-packagekit
qtp-Fedora
qtp-Fedora/primary
qtp-Fedora
Setting up Install Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package fuse-unionfs.i586 0:0.23-1.qtp set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: libfuse.so.2(FUSE_2.8) for package:
fuse-unionfs-0.23-1.qtp.i586
-- Running transaction check
--- Package fuse.i586 0:2.8.0-1.qtp set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

===
 Package   Arch
Version
===
Installing:
 fuse  i586
2.8.0-1.qtp
 replacing  fuse-libs.i586 2.7.4-3.fc11

 fuse-unionfs  i586
0.23-1.qtp

Transaction Summary
===
Install   2 Package(s)
Upgrade   0 Package(s)

Total download size: 165 k
Downloading Packages:
(1/2): fuse-2.8.0-1.qtp.fc11.i586.rpm
(2/2): fuse-unionfs-0.23-1.qtp.fc11.i586.rpm
---
Total
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
  Installing : fuse-2.8.0-1.qtp.i586
MAKEDEV: no such group: fuse
warning: group fuse does not exist - using root
  Installing : fuse-unionfs-0.23-1.qtp.i586
service fuse does not support chkconfig
Error in PREUN scriptlet in rpm package fuse
  Erasing: fuse-libs-2.7.4-3.fc11.i586
error: %preun(fuse-2.7.4-3.fc11.i586) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
fuse-2.7.4-3.fc11.i586 was supposed to be removed but is not!

Installed:
  fuse.i586
0:2.8.0-1.qtp
fuse-union

Replaced:
  fuse-libs.i586 0:2.7.4-3.fc11

Complete!
qtp-mount-sandbox - installation of dependent packages failed
qtp-mount-sandbox - is your qmailtoaster-plus.repo package up to date?
qtp-newmodel - qtp-mount-sandbox failed, exiting

So did i forget to update the repo?


r...@fury:~ yum update qmailtoaster-plus.repo
Loaded plugins: dellsysidplugin2, refresh-packagekit
qtp-nodist  |  951
B 00:00
updates/metalink|  24
kB 00:00
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update

nope


[qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
Hi List

Iv been trying to get domainkeys to work, but even after reading and
following the wiki(and the video) I still cant get my Toaster to sign
outgoing emails.
My /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp looks like this:
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/
apati.se/private
:allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/
apati.se/private

that key exits:
-r--r-. 1 root vchkpw 396 2009-10-01 17:12
/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/apati.se/private

but still sa-t...@sendmail.net reports no key:

Authentication System:   Domain Keys

   Result:   (no result present)


Iv looked for anything interesting in the logfiles but nothing there.

Is there anyway to turn on some sort of debug output from qmail-dk?


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Jake Vickers j...@qmailtoaster.com wrote:


  Change your tcp.smtp file back to have the % in it instead of your domain
 name, and try again. the % gets expanded when it signs automatically.
 Did you configure DNS?



My tcp.smtp is now
127.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private
:allow,BADMIMETYPE=,BADLOADERTYPE=M,CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT=50,CHKUSER_WRONGRCPTLIMIT=10,DKSIGN=/var/qmail/control/domainkeys/%/private

I have no local dns server but iv updated the master one with this content

_domainkey.apati.se. IN TXT t=y; o=-; r=postmas...@apati.se
private._domainkey.apati.se IN TXT k=rsa;
p=MEwwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADOwAwOAIxAMSpnXFOCgURB8DoKs0Pl6OSCI6aJtLJEJ//MyCRioeTbkJpB2K9qZOYbNhrTYtTGQIDAQAB


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:59 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:


 What does
 # ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
 show?


 $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*

$ ls -l  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk
-rws--x--x. 1 qmailq qmail 49K 2009-09-30 15:42 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

   $ ls -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue
 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 23 2009-09-30 15:49 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue -
 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*
  $ ls -l  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk
 -rws--x--x. 1 qmailq qmail 49K 2009-09-30 15:42 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk*


 qmail-dk shouldn't have an asterisk at the end of it. I don't know for sure
 if that's causing your problem or not. Do you know how to get rid of the
 asterisk in the file names?


The asterix is because the default ls alias on Fedora uses -F

r...@fury:~ alias
[..]
alias ls='ls -hF --color=auto'

from ls manpage

 *-F*   Puts a */*  (slash) after each filename if the file
is a directory, an *** (asterisk) after each
filename if the file can be executed


r...@fury:~ unalias ls
r...@fury:~ ls -l  /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk
-rws--x--x. 1 qmailq qmail 49964 2009-09-30 15:42 /var/qmail/bin/qmail-dk


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:


 Oh yeah. Haven't seen that in a while. Links look ok then.
 Are permissions/ownership ok on the /var/qmail/control/domain and lower
 directories/files? I have them readable by vchkpw group.

 Me to, apati.se is the one Iv created but iv made it owned by vchkpw

r...@fury:~ ls -la  /var/qmail/control/domainkeys/
total 4
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root qmail21 2009-10-01 17:12 .
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root qmail  4096 2009-10-02 18:46 ..
drwxrwxr-x. 2 root vchkpw   37 2009-10-01 17:12 apati.se

r...@fury:~ ls -la  /var/qmail/control/domainkeys/apati.se/
total 8
drwxrwxr-x. 2 root vchkpw  37 2009-10-01 17:12 .
drwxr-xr-x. 3 root qmail   21 2009-10-01 17:12 ..
-r--r-. 1 root vchkpw 396 2009-10-01 17:12 private
-rw-rw-r--. 1 root vchkpw 142 2009-10-01 17:12 public.txt


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:


 That looks ok to me.
 If you send yourself an email, do you see a signature in the headers?


Yea i do
Thats a bit odd?


Re: [qmailtoaster] Domain Keys

2009-10-02 Thread petrus
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:


 Then they're being signed.
 I don't know why sa-t...@sendmail.net would report no result. Perhaps you
 should ask them. ;)



Your absolutly right, i just sent a email to another acount and yes, its
signed.
Ill think ill ask the sendmail guys.

Thanks for the help, ill admit to feeling a bit silly :/


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-10 Thread petrus
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 petrus wrote:




 Stopping freshclam:[FAILED]
 qtp-build-rpms v0.3.1
 qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
 ls: cannot access /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/*: No such file or directory
 /usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 125: 23.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
 operator (error token is .i386)
 REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
 REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
 Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 ...
 Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 in the sandbox ...
 qtp-build-rpms - binary rpm not found for daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6
 qtp-build-rpms - Script Error - aborting.

 Build failed, Exiting.

 My /usr/src/redhat/RPMS  looks like this:

 [r...@fury bin]# ls /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/*
 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386:
 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686:
 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch:
 /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64:


 Looks like those directories were removed from the sandbox to trim things
 down at some point. I've put it back into the attached script. Can you try
 this script to be sure that it works? You'll need to rebuild the sandbox
 when you test it of course.
 Thanks.


The fix for directory's seems to work. Im still getting a syntax error due
to i386 and the script still doesnt find a binary rpm, possibly due to the
above error?
output:

qtp-build-rpms v0.3.1
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
/usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 125: 23.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
operator (error token is .i386)
REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 ...
Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - binary rpm not found for daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6
qtp-build-rpms - Script Error - aborting.


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-10 Thread petrus
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:



 It appears that you're not running the qtp-config script which contains the
 fix to strip off the .i386 from the package name. It should have
 myver=v0.3.1 near the end of the script. If it does, then it's perhaps not
 in the right place to be executed. It should be in the
 /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/ directory. If it is, then check that
 /usr/sbin/qtp-config is a symlink to the file.


I think i do :(

[r...@fury bin]# ls -l /usr/sbin/qtp-config
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 42 2009-07-07 17:17 /usr/sbin/qtp-config -
../../opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-config
[r...@fury bin]# grep myver /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/qtp-config
myver=v0.3.1
  echo $myname $myver
[r...@fury bin]#

Couldnt it have something todo with that my system is i686 and not i386?

also rpmbuild on fc10 uses ~/rpmbuild as root not /usr/src/redhat/

/p


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-09 Thread petrus
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 Thanks. If you'd care to use qtp-newmodel in the interim (I would), just
 comment out the a4_check_dependencies routine near the bottom of the script
 like so:
 #a4_check_dependencies
 and it'll probably run ok. If there is a dependency problem it'll let you
 know about it and you can install the dependency manually.



So i commented out the dependencies checking  and it seemed to work.
Untill the script tried to create a unioned sandbox where it chockes on
compiling aufs

HidePrePath=\\\/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25\\\ -C
/lib/modules/2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686/build
M=/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25 modules
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686'
  CC [M]  /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/module.o
In file included from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/branch.h:35,
 from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/aufs.h:37,
 from /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/module.c:26:
/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/super.h: In function
‘au_test_tmpfs’:
/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/super.h:304: error:
‘TMPFS_MAGIC’ undeclared (first use in this function)
/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/super.h:304: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is reported only once
/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/super.h:304: error: for each
function it appears in.)
/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/module.c:186:2: warning: #warning
CONFIG_AUFS_SYSAUFS is unnecessary for linux-2.6.25 and later.
make[2]: *** [/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25/module.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_module_/opt/qmailtoaster-plus/src/aufs/fs/aufs25] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.27.25-170.2.72.fc10.i686'
make: *** [fs/aufs25/aufs.ko] Error 2

So I tried with a regular sandbox and it worked a bit better, but still
Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Stopping freshclam:[  OK  ]
qtp-build-rpms v0.3.1
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
/usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 123: 23.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
operator (error token is .i386)
REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 ...
Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - binary rpm not found for daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6
qtp-build-rpms - Script Error - aborting.

I cant find a binary rpm for daemontools on the system, but perhapse it
fails to build or the script cleans up afterwards?

/p


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-09 Thread petrus
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:




 The problem with building aufs appears to be something related to our aufs
 version vs FC10's kernel version.

 Hey Justice, can you look into this?


 The latest qtp-config in the qtp.qmailtoaster.com svn repository should
 fix this last problem for you. Can you manually download it and try it? It
 should go in /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/, and be sure to check the
 permissions. You'll need to add it to the sandbox as well unless you rebuild
 the sandbox.


downloaded both qtp-config and qtp-newmodel
It skips rpmforge as intended and I choose to rebuild the sandbox.
but unfortunately I run into problem again:

Starting to build the binary rpms ...(pizza anyone?)

If you want to view compile messages, you can open another terminal and:
# tail -f /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/qtp-upgrade/log/build-recent.log

Stopping freshclam:[FAILED]
qtp-build-rpms v0.3.1
qtp-remove-pkgs v0.3.1
ls: cannot access /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/*: No such file or directory
/usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 125: 23.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
operator (error token is .i386)
REMOVED control-panel-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
REMOVED clamav-toaster from sandbox (not for real)
Building daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 ...
Installing daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 in the sandbox ...
qtp-build-rpms - binary rpm not found for daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6
qtp-build-rpms - Script Error - aborting.

Build failed, Exiting.

My /usr/src/redhat/RPMS  looks like this:

[r...@fury bin]# ls /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/*
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386:
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i686:
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch:
/usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64:




 Thanks for you help with getting this working with FC10.


NP, I think you guys provide a great service and im only thankful that I may
assist in some way :)


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-08 Thread petrus
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:

 Newer simscan-toaster-1.3.1-1.3.6.i386 is already installed,
 simscan-toaster-1.4.0-1.3.1 bypassed
 which is wrong i think?



 This is a separate issue. When Jake updated simscan, he went from 1.3.6 to
 1.3.1 in the toaster portion of the version id. He's going to republish the
 simscan-toaster package with something higher than 1.3.6 so this works as it
 should.


O oki now I understand the message, sorry for this.





 I don't think I'd go mixing different fedora versions of rpmforge packages.
 qtp-newmodel should apparently be changed to not use rpmforge for later
 fedora versions. Would you care to create a ticket for this at
 http://qtp.qmailtoaster.com? Thanks.


Iv created a ticket, a bit unsure on what to put in some of the fields but I
think it turned out allright :)
Thanks for all the help!
Ill do some manual updates to the toaster while this gets fixed.

/p


[qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-07 Thread petrus
Hi
a while ago i did a install of qmail-toaster using the instructions found in
the qmail-toaster wiki.
Now i want to update and therefore run qtp-newmodel from Qmailtoaster plus.
It runs into problem thou.

Issuing command: qtp-newmodel
qtp-newmodel v0.3.7 starting Tue Jul  7 17:27:39 CEST 2009
qtp-whatami v0.3.4
DISTRO=Fedora
OSVER=10
QTARCH=i686
QTKERN=2.6.27.21-170.2.56.fc10.i686
BUILD_DIST=fedora_10
BUILD_DIR=/usr/src/redhat
This machine's OS is supported and has been tested

Let's get on with it!

Getting package list ...


Qmailtoaster is an integrated distribution.
Packages are preconfigured for the whole distro.
As a result, a partial install might be misconfigured.
Upgrading all packages to their latest version is strongly recommended.
Now that you've been warned, we will proceed with package selection ...

/usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 118: 3.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
operator (error token is .i386)

Newer daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3.i386 is already installed,
daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.6 bypassed
/usr/sbin/qtp-config: line 118: 5.i386: syntax error: invalid arithmetic
operator (error token is .i386)


so I figure its a issue regarding arch, since i have i386 and it wants to
use i686.
Is there a way to fix this?


Re: [qmailtoaster] Problem running qtp-newmodel

2009-07-07 Thread petrus
Hi Eric and thanks for the quick reply

I trimmed the email a bit, hope nobody mind.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net wrote:
[snip]

 You've come to the right place. ;)
 Looks like a bug. I don't expect that anyone has run qtp-newmodel on FC10
 yet.

 The .i386 shouldn't be part of the installed package name. This is causing
 the compare_versions routine in qtp-config to choke.


 Hey Jake, since when did the arch become part of the package name


 I've modified qtp-config (attached) to work around this anomaly (that Jake
 appears to have introduced in the FC10 version that you've installed).
 Please test it for me by putting it in /opt/qmailtoaster-plus/bin/, check
 the ownership and permissions (should be the same as all others there), and
 try running qtp-newmodel once more.

 Thanks for you help with fixing this.



Your fix seems to work.
from qtp-newmodel:

daemontools-toaster-0.76-1.3.3.i386 is installed.
Do you want to Upgrade daemontools-toaster to version 0.76-1.3.6

So without doing a full run it seems to work, or at least doesn't produce
the same error ;)
Ill do a full update tommow when i have a bit more time, cause iv got a
fealing the update may take some time.
Sorry for not having the time right now.

/p