Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-11-01 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Lee R. Copp wrote:
 Eric Shubes wrote:
 Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
 the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
 handle this?
 
 Forwarding the message to a spam/ham training address will distort the
 message but dspam won't care.  When dspam is first run the message is
 scanned to create tags that all belong to a unique id.  The tags
 determine spam or ham and dspam marks it as such along with embedding
 the id in the header or body.  To train on a false-pos or false-neg
 dspam only really needs the id and the right command line switch.  So,
 it doesn't matter if you forward it as long as that id is in there.
 Each qmail-alias is set to run dspam with the 'oops, spam' or 'oops,
 ham' switch and dspam learns from its mistake.
 
 To make things really slick only 1 qmail-alias is needed.  Simply scan
 the header for the prior dspam classification and pipe it back to dspam
 with the correct switch...;)

Sounds slick.

Is that one qmail-alias per server, domain, or user? (I'm not real clear on
the process yet)

Do I understand correctly that dspam also keeps track of ham/spam on a
per-user basis? In this manner, a piece of mail might be spam to one user
and ham to another (in the same domain)?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-11-01 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote:
 Is that one qmail-alias per server, domain, or user? (I'm not real clear on
 the process yet)

Its per user but it might be possible to have a global address if dspam
was tweaked.  It might support it now but I'm not sure...my dspam
version is over a year old.

 Do I understand correctly that dspam also keeps track of ham/spam on a
 per-user basis? In this manner, a piece of mail might be spam to one user
 and ham to another (in the same domain)?

Yes. Yes.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Lee R. Copp
Rangi Biddle wrote:
 With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
 wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
 mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.

POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.  Even
though my setup uses IMAP people can still download the contents of
their inbox which would be clean.  Training could be done by forwarding
ham and spam to email aliases which would be pretty basic using
.qmail-alias files.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Jake Vickers




Eric "Shubes" wrote:

  Lee R. Copp wrote:
  
  
Rangi Biddle wrote:


  With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
  

POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.  Even
though my setup uses IMAP people can still download the contents of
their inbox which would be clean.  Training could be done by forwarding
ham and spam to email aliases which would be pretty basic using
.qmail-alias files.

  
  
Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
handle this?

  

I imagine it would. To train spamassassin this way, you need to
"bounce" or redirect the message to a spam account for it to learn from.
Sorry, I just jumped in the middle of this. Here is some more info:
Many thanks to all the contributors, listed in
parentheses. 
AOL's integrated email client 
Redirecting mail is
not available. (Dave
Goldsmith) 
Eudora 
Select the message, go
to the
"Message" menu, choose redirect, fill in the address, and choose
send. (Brian Corcoran and Erik Wheeler) 
Evolution 
Select the message. In
the
"Actions" menu, choose the "Forward" submenu (not
"Forward message", the "Forward" submenu). Pick
"Redirect", fill in the "To" field, and press
"Send". (Johannes Ullrich) 
OS/X Mail.app 
With the email message
open or
selected, go to Mail's 'Message' menu and select 'Bounce to sender' or
'Redirect'. If you use this frequently, go to the "View" menu, choose
"Customize toolbar", and add a button for "Redirect". (Marion
Bates) 
Microsoft Outlook 97 
Double-click on the
message so it
opens in a new window. Click on Tools-Resend This Message. A
warning will
appear about you not being the original sender of the message. Click
Yes. A
message window appears. Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. (Dave
Goldsmith) 
Microsoft Outlook 2000 
Double-click on the
message so it
opens in a new window. Click on Actions-Resend This Message. A
warning will
appear about you not being the original sender of the message. Click
Yes. A
message window appears. Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. (Dave
Goldsmith) 
Microsoft Outlook Express 
It does not appear to
have a
redirect option. (Dave Goldsmith and Alex Bates) 
Netscape Communicator 4.x and 7.x 
They don't appear to
have a
redirect option. 
Pine 
For a single message,
highlight the
message and press "b" to bounce it. Enter the target address and
press enter. 
For multiple messages, select all the
messages
you'd like to bounce with either ":" to select them one at a time, or
";" to select multiple messages by message number, subject, body
text, etc. Once selected, press "a", then "b" to Apply the
Bounce command to all of them. Enter the target email address. Once
done, press
";", then "a" to Unselect All selected messages.
More
info can be found at: http://www.itc.virginia.edu/desktop/email/pine/bounce.html




Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Lee R. Copp wrote:
 Rangi Biddle wrote:
 With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
 wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
 mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
 
 POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.  Even
 though my setup uses IMAP people can still download the contents of
 their inbox which would be clean.  Training could be done by forwarding
 ham and spam to email aliases which would be pretty basic using
 .qmail-alias files.

Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
handle this?

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Justice London wrote:
 Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the
 dspam stuff.
 
 Justice London
 

That's ok, Justice. There's no hurry. Slow and steady wins the race! If we
get anything going at all on this by the end of the year, I'll be happy. ;)

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Justice London
Well, apparently I lied. I'm not going to have time this week to work on the
dspam stuff.

Justice London

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:38 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

Jake Vickers wrote:
 Eric Shubes wrote:
 Lee R. Copp wrote:
   
 Rangi Biddle wrote:
 
 With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
 wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could
filter
 mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
   
 POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.  Even
 though my setup uses IMAP people can still download the contents of
 their inbox which would be clean.  Training could be done by forwarding
 ham and spam to email aliases which would be pretty basic using
 .qmail-alias files.
 

 Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming
from
 the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
 handle this?

   
 I imagine it would. To train spamassassin this way, you need to bounce
 or redirect the message to a spam account for it to learn from.
 Sorry, I just jumped in the middle of this. Here is some more info:
 
 Many thanks to all the contributors, listed in parentheses.
 
 AOL's integrated email client
 
 Redirecting mail is not available. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Eudora
 
 Select the message, go to the Message menu, choose redirect, fill in
 the address, and choose send. /(Brian Corcoran and Erik Wheeler)/
 
 Evolution
 
 Select the message. In the Actions menu, choose the Forward submenu
 (not Forward message, the Forward submenu). Pick Redirect, fill in
 the To field, and press Send. /(Johannes Ullrich)/
 
 OS/X Mail.app
 
 With the email message open or selected, go to Mail's 'Message' menu and
 select 'Bounce to sender' or 'Redirect'. If you use this frequently, go
 to the View menu, choose Customize toolbar, and add a button for
 Redirect. /(Marion Bates)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook 97
 
 Double-click on the message so it opens in a new window. Click on
 Tools-Resend This Message. A warning will appear about you not being
 the original sender of the message. Click Yes. A message window appears.
 Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook 2000
 
 Double-click on the message so it opens in a new window. Click on
 Actions-Resend This Message. A warning will appear about you not being
 the original sender of the message. Click Yes. A message window appears.
 Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook Express
 
 It does not appear to have a redirect option. /(Dave Goldsmith and Alex
 Bates)/
 
 Netscape Communicator 4.x and 7.x
 
 They don't appear to have a redirect option.
 
 Pine
 
 For a single message, highlight the message and press b to bounce it.
 Enter the target address and press enter.
 
 For multiple messages, select all the messages you'd like to bounce with
 either : to select them one at a time, or ; to select multiple
 messages by message number, subject, body text, etc. Once selected,
 press a, then b to Apply the Bounce command to all of them. Enter
 the target email address. Once done, press ;, then a to Unselect All
 selected messages.
 
 More info can be found at:
 http://www.itc.virginia.edu/desktop/email/pine/bounce.html

I was wondering about dspam w/ pop3. This answers a lot of questions.

I'm disappointed to see that Netscape doesn't have a redirect option.
However, there *is* a mailredirect extension for Mozilla Thunderbird (0.7
and above) and Mozilla Mail. I don't know if this would work with Netscape
or not.

In addition, I see on the dspam list that some people have used both
spamassassin *and* dspam. That being the case, I think we should be looking
to provide dspam in addition to SA on the toaster. It'd be sweet if people
could choose either/and with a simple configuration. Keyword: simple.
Neither one is looking very simple to me at this point. :( Doesn't mean it
can't be done though.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Jake Vickers wrote:
 Eric Shubes wrote:
 Lee R. Copp wrote:
   
 Rangi Biddle wrote:
 
 With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
 wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
 mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.
   
 POP3 would work fine except for the training portion of dspam.  Even
 though my setup uses IMAP people can still download the contents of
 their inbox which would be clean.  Training could be done by forwarding
 ham and spam to email aliases which would be pretty basic using
 .qmail-alias files.
 

 Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
 the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
 handle this?

   
 I imagine it would. To train spamassassin this way, you need to bounce
 or redirect the message to a spam account for it to learn from.
 Sorry, I just jumped in the middle of this. Here is some more info:
 
 Many thanks to all the contributors, listed in parentheses.
 
 AOL's integrated email client
 
 Redirecting mail is not available. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Eudora
 
 Select the message, go to the Message menu, choose redirect, fill in
 the address, and choose send. /(Brian Corcoran and Erik Wheeler)/
 
 Evolution
 
 Select the message. In the Actions menu, choose the Forward submenu
 (not Forward message, the Forward submenu). Pick Redirect, fill in
 the To field, and press Send. /(Johannes Ullrich)/
 
 OS/X Mail.app
 
 With the email message open or selected, go to Mail's 'Message' menu and
 select 'Bounce to sender' or 'Redirect'. If you use this frequently, go
 to the View menu, choose Customize toolbar, and add a button for
 Redirect. /(Marion Bates)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook 97
 
 Double-click on the message so it opens in a new window. Click on
 Tools-Resend This Message. A warning will appear about you not being
 the original sender of the message. Click Yes. A message window appears.
 Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook 2000
 
 Double-click on the message so it opens in a new window. Click on
 Actions-Resend This Message. A warning will appear about you not being
 the original sender of the message. Click Yes. A message window appears.
 Update the To: field and click on 'Send'. /(Dave Goldsmith)/
 
 Microsoft Outlook Express
 
 It does not appear to have a redirect option. /(Dave Goldsmith and Alex
 Bates)/
 
 Netscape Communicator 4.x and 7.x
 
 They don't appear to have a redirect option.
 
 Pine
 
 For a single message, highlight the message and press b to bounce it.
 Enter the target address and press enter.
 
 For multiple messages, select all the messages you'd like to bounce with
 either : to select them one at a time, or ; to select multiple
 messages by message number, subject, body text, etc. Once selected,
 press a, then b to Apply the Bounce command to all of them. Enter
 the target email address. Once done, press ;, then a to Unselect All
 selected messages.
 
 More info can be found at:
 http://www.itc.virginia.edu/desktop/email/pine/bounce.html

I was wondering about dspam w/ pop3. This answers a lot of questions.

I'm disappointed to see that Netscape doesn't have a redirect option.
However, there *is* a mailredirect extension for Mozilla Thunderbird (0.7
and above) and Mozilla Mail. I don't know if this would work with Netscape
or not.

In addition, I see on the dspam list that some people have used both
spamassassin *and* dspam. That being the case, I think we should be looking
to provide dspam in addition to SA on the toaster. It'd be sweet if people
could choose either/and with a simple configuration. Keyword: simple.
Neither one is looking very simple to me at this point. :( Doesn't mean it
can't be done though.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Jake Vickers

Eric Shubes wrote:


I was wondering about dspam w/ pop3. This answers a lot of questions.

I'm disappointed to see that Netscape doesn't have a redirect option.
However, there *is* a mailredirect extension for Mozilla Thunderbird (0.7
and above) and Mozilla Mail. I don't know if this would work with Netscape
or not.

In addition, I see on the dspam list that some people have used both
spamassassin *and* dspam. That being the case, I think we should be looking
to provide dspam in addition to SA on the toaster. It'd be sweet if people
could choose either/and with a simple configuration. Keyword: simple.
Neither one is looking very simple to me at this point. :( Doesn't mean it
can't be done though.

  
That was from a while ago; they may have a fix for Netscape now. Figured 
that would help a little.


-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-31 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote:
 Would forwarding distort the message since it would appear to be coming from
 the recipient (forwarder) instead of the original sender? How would dspam
 handle this?

Forwarding the message to a spam/ham training address will distort the
message but dspam won't care.  When dspam is first run the message is
scanned to create tags that all belong to a unique id.  The tags
determine spam or ham and dspam marks it as such along with embedding
the id in the header or body.  To train on a false-pos or false-neg
dspam only really needs the id and the right command line switch.  So,
it doesn't matter if you forward it as long as that id is in there.
Each qmail-alias is set to run dspam with the 'oops, spam' or 'oops,
ham' switch and dspam learns from its mistake.

To make things really slick only 1 qmail-alias is needed.  Simply scan
the header for the prior dspam classification and pipe it back to dspam
with the correct switch...;)
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Firdaus Tjahyadi wrote:
 
 
 On 10/27/06, *Eric Shubes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
 Great.
 
 I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get
 going on
 this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?
 
 I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers.
 
 Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how
 DS is
 going to hook into the process.
 
 
 
 hi eric
 feel free to contact me as volunteer for Mandriva 2007
 i've running Mandriva 2007 + Qmailtoaster for my running and backup server
 
 i'm glad to try simscan + Dspam for my backup server
 
 regards

Thanks, Firdaus. We'll let you know if/when the time comes.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote:
 I suppose that answers anyother question, which AV? I'm think that we'll
 want to change as little as possible of the toaster configuration. Why
 Vexira instead of ClamAV (which is plugged into simscan)?

I setup Vexira before ClamAV got added to the toaster.

 Also, is there some reason you've plugged RBL into Vexira instead of using
 the blacklists control file? Using the blacklists file would block the
 message at the smtp session, before it's even transmitted. I think that
 would save you some bandwidth and processing.

Vexira is a smtp proxy in front of qmail so there is no reason to use
qmail's blacklist control file.  Vexira dumps spam just fine using the RBL.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
Eric Shubes wrote:
 the administration CGI scripts (if you intend to run the CGI scripts).  This
 was wholly an apache suexec issue more than a DSpam one.
 
 Hey Lee, what do you know about this problem? (Please see Rangi's earlier
 post) Did you come across this problem? Solution?

I ignored the admin cgi scripts since I only used IMAP folders for
training...much easier than another website to click around for my users.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Lee R. Copp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 BTW Vexira? with which conf, 2 qmails and vams between them ?

Internet  Vexira  Qmail

 God save simscan :-P

I will have to check that out.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

2006-10-30 Thread Rangi Biddle

Hey Lee,

With your setup, does it allow pop3 clients to download less spam? Just
wondering as this would be an easier approach considering you could filter
mail marked as spam into a mail folder and train Dspam that way.

If so care to share?



-Original Message-
From: Lee R. Copp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, 31 October 2006 10:53 a.m.
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] Dspam on the toaster

Eric Shubes wrote:
 the administration CGI scripts (if you intend to run the CGI scripts).
This
 was wholly an apache suexec issue more than a DSpam one.
 
 Hey Lee, what do you know about this problem? (Please see Rangi's earlier
 post) Did you come across this problem? Solution?

I ignored the admin cgi scripts since I only used IMAP folders for
training...much easier than another website to click around for my users.
-- 
Lee R. Copp
Project Engineer (EE/ME)
http://www.michsci.com/

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.13.18/506 - Release Date: 30/10/2006



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-29 Thread Firdaus Tjahyadi
On 10/27/06, Eric Shubes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great.I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going onthis. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers.Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how DS is
going to hook into the process.

hi eric 
feel free to contact me as volunteer for Mandriva 2007 
i've running Mandriva 2007 + Qmailtoaster for my running and backup server

i'm glad to try simscan + Dspam for my backup server

regards


Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-27 Thread Simone Marzona


Hi all

I'm  a volunteer to test dsmap on qmail toaster on a Mandriva2006 test 
system and send feedback to list/wiki.



Craig Smith wrote:

Hi Guys,


I mentioned this to my boss yesterday highlighting that it is potentially
better than SA and after reading the FAQ it certainly seems that way.

They are fairly reluctant to change anything at this point, but I'm all for
it.  If I can help I will,  it might be a good idea to collate all
information that we can find in relation to dspam and qmail and simscan.
There are already a few links on the list.

Our SA currently is very effective, but I belief in improving where
possible. 


Craig
 


-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 26 October 2006 21:49

To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

Thanks Marco. We're (obviously) a long way from testing, but I'll let you
know when we need you.

Marco Cordeiro wrote:

I'm a volunteer to test dspam on one of my servers running centos4.4 and
send feedback to the list.
I fact this server act only as mx secundary to some clients but,
I can use as primary MX to a specific domain and test on it.

Eric, fell free to contact me.

[]'s
Marco Cordeiro


  






--
Dr. Simone Marzona
Clikkapuntocom
via Castellana 45/a
33100 Udine
tel. 0432 2428 804
fax. 0432 2428 999
http://www.clikka.com

-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-27 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Lee R. Copp wrote:
 Did anyone check out my dspam toaster page?
 
 http://mail.michscimfd.com/dspam/
 
 Its a bit dated but might provide some help...;)

This is a fantastic start for us, Lee. I haven't gotten around to googling
background for this project, but your site is a gold mine!

A few questions:

.) I notice that you started with toaster 1.2.3. What's the latest version
you're running with DSpam?

.) What kind of performance are you seeing with mysql as the database
server? Will this be suitable for a high volume toaster?

.) I see that DSpam is hooked in via maildrop. I presume this means that
messages are never rejected during the smtp session, correct? Are rejection
messages ever sent to the sender? I suppose not, but what is the use,
really? (/I'm thinking to myself)

.) Do you use any RBLs in conjunction with DSpam? If so, which ones?

.) Do you have some automated method of creating the necessary .qmail,
.qmail-default, and .mailfilter files automatically when creating a new
domain/user (via qmailadmin or CLI)? Note, I would think that the
.mailfilter file should maybe be in a /bin somewhere, linked to from each
user (for ease of maintenance).

.) Most importantly, are  you volunteering to help us out on this project?
;) You've already done a very large part, but I'm wondering if you'll be
available for at least consultation.

Please help us, oh-Lee-one! :)

Many thanks!
-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-27 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Justice,

I hope you've checked out Lee's site.

Justice London wrote:
 I'll try to work on implementation today and hopefully have some sort of
 working test within the next week or two.  I'll keep you guys informed.
 
 Justice London
 

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread zsoft

Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
 spamassassin.
 
 I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change?
 
 I think a nice approach about this will be options.
 
 You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)
 
 AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via
 trophie).
 
 
 This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P
 
 Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P)
 
 
 
 
 -
  QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM.

When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but 
meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin.

But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan.

I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???.



-- 
Zsoft

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
 spamassassin.

 I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic change?

 I think a nice approach about this will be options.

 You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)

 AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via
 trophie).


 This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P

 Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P)




 
 I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about DSPAM.
 
 When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but 
 meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin.
 
 But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan.
 
 I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???.
 
 
 

After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out.

I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user
situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at
the user level, not at a domain or server level.

I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low
administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster.

I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs,
If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of
training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less
accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as
inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small
number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test
results before making a call on this though.

So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to
work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion.
Anyone else?

P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the
meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread Justice London
Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good
idea.  I'll help how I can.  I have a few free systems sitting around I'll
try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time.

Justice London

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
 spamassassin.

 I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic
change?

 I think a nice approach about this will be options.

 You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)

 AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via
 trophie).


 This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P

 Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P)




 
 I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about
DSPAM.
 
 When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but
meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin.
 
 But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan.
 
 I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???.
 
 
 

After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out.

I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user
situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at
the user level, not at a domain or server level.

I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low
administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster.

I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs,
If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of
training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less
accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as
inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small
number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test
results before making a call on this though.

So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to
work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion.
Anyone else?

P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the
meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though.

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread Eric \Shubes\
Great.

I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on
this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?

I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers.

Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how DS is
going to hook into the process.

We'll need to look closely at simscan (I'm already on that email list). It'd
be nice if we could keep simscan, and simply turn SA/DS on/off using
simcontrol file. Just a thought.

Also, I read something in the DS FAQs about easily integrating DSpam w/
clamav. I don't know anything about that yet.

Justice London wrote:
 Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a good
 idea.  I'll help how I can.  I have a few free systems sitting around I'll
 try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time.
 
 Justice London
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster instead
 spamassassin.

 I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic
 change?
 I think a nice approach about this will be options.

 You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)

 AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro (via
 trophie).


 This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P

 Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P)




 I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced about
 DSPAM.
 When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test server, but
 meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin.
 But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan.

 I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???.



 
 After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out.
 
 I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to per-user
 situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is best applied at
 the user level, not at a domain or server level.
 
 I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low
 administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster.
 
 I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the FAQs,
 If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other form of
 training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the tool is less
 accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM to be just as
 inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to continue using a small
 number of loose RBLs in order to save resources. I'd like to see some test
 results before making a call on this though.
 
 So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers formed to
 work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some fashion.
 Anyone else?
 
 P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the
 meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though.
 

-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

2006-10-26 Thread Marco Cordeiro
I'm a volunteer to test dspam on one of my servers running centos4.4 and
send feedback to the list.
I fact this server act only as mx secundary to some clients but,
I can use as primary MX to a specific domain and test on it.

Eric, fell free to contact me.

[]'s
Marco Cordeiro


  

-Original Message-
From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:59 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster

Great.

I was hoping we wouldn't need to wait for Kyle's VMs before we get going on
this. Can we use CentOS4.4 and current toaster on a devel box?

I'd also like to see 1 or 2 other volunteers.

Before we jump right in, I'm thinking that we need to figure out how DS is
going to hook into the process.

We'll need to look closely at simscan (I'm already on that email list). It'd
be nice if we could keep simscan, and simply turn SA/DS on/off using
simcontrol file. Just a thought.

Also, I read something in the DS FAQs about easily integrating DSpam w/
clamav. I don't know anything about that yet.

Justice London wrote:
 Since I had to completely turn off bayes for now, I think this is a 
 good idea.  I'll help how I can.  I have a few free systems sitting 
 around I'll try testing, devel, etc. on if I have time.
 
 Justice London
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Eric Shubes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:41 AM
 To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
 Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Citando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi guys, i've read something about getting dspam on the toaster 
 instead spamassassin.

 I don't know how dspam works but, shouldn't this be a very traumatic
 change?
 I think a nice approach about this will be options.

 You can use spamassassin or dspam ( can be used BOTH ?)

 AFAIK. This is the same as clamav, you can use clamav or TrendMicro 
 (via trophie).


 This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P

 Just my 2 cents (euro-cents :-P)




 I think that BOTH is the right way. I'm still not very convinced 
 about
 DSPAM.
 When I've the time I'm going to read the docs and setup a test 
 server, but
 meantime I'm sticking to spamassassin.
 But I think the best is to integrate DSPAM support into simscan.

 I've read a post about it somewhere, maybe on this list???.



 
 After reading the DSpam FAQs, I'm eager to try this out.
 
 I'm particularly impressed with the DSpam's ability to adapt to 
 per-user situations. I've always believed that adaptive learning is 
 best applied at the user level, not at a domain or server level.
 
 I also like DSpam's aspects of (claimed) high performance and low 
 administrative requirements. These philosophies fit well with the toaster.
 
 I think that SA and DSpam should not be used together though. Per the 
 FAQs, If you are using blacklists, other spam filters, or any other 
 form of training guides, you may be doing more harm than good. If the 
 tool is less accurate than DSPAM is, then you will be training DSPAM 
 to be just as inaccurate. As far as RBLs go, I'd be inclined to 
 continue using a small number of loose RBLs in order to save 
 resources. I'd like to see some test results before making a call on this
though.
 
 So where do we go from here? I'd like to see a team of volunteers 
 formed to work on a DSpam-toaster project. I'd like to participate in some
fashion.
 Anyone else?
 
 P.S. I'm still going to attempt to fix my SA bayes DB problem in the 
 meantime. It's urgency just dropped a bit though.
 

--
-Eric 'shubes'

-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [qmailtoaster] dspam on the toaster / TMDA

2006-10-25 Thread Harry Zink


On Oct 25, 2006, at 3:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


This could let spamassassin and dspam fans be happy together :-P


I'm not keen on DSPAM, as it appears to require too much work.

I'm a big fan of TMDA. (tmda.net)

whitelisting, that works.


---
Antoine De Saint-Exupery
True happiness comes from the joy of deeds well done, the zest of  
creating things new.





-
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]