Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Controlling SMTP access to mail server.

2007-01-31 Thread Alexey Loukianov
Greetings, Erik.

31 ?? 2007 ?., 6:02:20 you have wrote:
 Separate tcprules file for submission port seems to me as a better
 approach. It keeps administration of QT flexible and unified, and also
 it is more cross-platforming way, as tcpserver works on any platform
 qmail can run on, while iptables is available only on linux systems
 based on kernels 2.4.x and later.

 Who cares? We don't even support Debian. . . :)

Me, for example ;-D. A friend of mine, also a system engineer,
administer small FreeBSD based cluster, and he uses QT in his setup.
Accordingly to his words, it wasn't too hard to build and install RPM
system on his BSD boxes, and then to correct specs so basic QT parts
builds up and install successfully.

Well, in any case we can always create tcp.submission ourselves, just
like I do it for tcp.pop3 ;-D. But the laziness of sysadmin is the
thing that makes me want tcp.submission to be included in stock
toaster.

-- 
Best Regards,
 Alexey Loukianov  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Software Development Department,
Lavtech Corp
http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Re[2]: [qmailtoaster] Controlling SMTP access to mail server.

2007-01-31 Thread Erik Espinoza

A BSD admin that can take qmailtoaster and make it run on BSD can
implmenet a firewall policy using ipf.

I don't think having two tcp.smtp's is going to help, it doesn't seem
to solve any problems we are having.


Erik

On 1/31/07, Alexey Loukianov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Greetings, Eric.

31 января 2007 г., 22:05:38 you have wrote:

 Alexey Loukianov wrote:
 Greetings, Erik.

 31 ?? 2007 ?., 6:02:20 you have wrote:
 Separate tcprules file for submission port seems to me as a better
 approach. It keeps administration of QT flexible and unified, and also
 it is more cross-platforming way, as tcpserver works on any platform
 qmail can run on, while iptables is available only on linux systems
 based on kernels 2.4.x and later.

 Who cares? We don't even support Debian. . . :)

 Me, for example ;-D. A friend of mine, also a system engineer,
 administer small FreeBSD based cluster, and he uses QT in his setup.
 Accordingly to his words, it wasn't too hard to build and install RPM
 system on his BSD boxes, and then to correct specs so basic QT parts
 builds up and install successfully.

 Well, in any case we can always create tcp.submission ourselves, just
 like I do it for tcp.pop3 ;-D. But the laziness of sysadmin is the
 thing that makes me want tcp.submission to be included in stock
 toaster.

 I agree with Alexey on this. Besides which, wouldn't it be nice to have QT
 on BSD as well? I wonder if Alexey's friend would care to contribute in this
 area.

It is not so easy, as BSD way is not to use RPMS, while main toaster
advantage is it's RPM nature. A friend of mine came to BSD world from
RedHad based linux distros, that is why he uses RPM even on BSD - it
is just a matter of habbit.

Well, it is still possible to port QT on BSD and distribute is as a
bunch of tarballs if we will find some BSD geek who will want to
maintenance it. But I don't think it is a urgent task for qt-dev team
;-D.

--
Best Regards,
 Alexey Loukianov  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Software Development Department,
Lavtech Corp
http://mnogo.ru, http://lavtech.ru


-
 QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted http://www.vr.org
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]