Re: anti-spamassassin [was Re: (again) Proposed Patch for Spamassassin]

2004-10-15 Thread Matt Sergeant 
On 15 Oct 2004, at 17:16, Brian Grossman wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:01:40 +0100
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Block anything without a Message-ID header.
I tried this one out this week.  It turns out earthlink doesn't bother
adding a message-id header.  So rude!  :(
It's not their responsibility - it's the MUA's.
Matt.

Re: anti-spamassassin [was Re: (again) Proposed Patch for Spamassassin]

2004-10-15 Thread Brian Grossman 
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 23:01:40 +0100
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >> Block anything without a Message-ID header.

I tried this one out this week.  It turns out earthlink doesn't bother
adding a message-id header.  So rude!  :(

Blocking on no Received headers seems to work well.

Matching helo with m/\d{1,3}[.-]\d{1,3}[.-]\d{1,3}[.-]\d{1,3}/ seems to be
working well.

> > Is there a qpsmtpd DCC plugin floating around anywhere?
> 
> Here's what I use:

Thanks.

Brian