Dear Oswald,
Regarding this issue, is there a quick way to do a dry run on a plugin to
see how much a plugin conforms (or does not conform) to the coding style?
Regards,
-- Check out my SpellChecker Plugin for Qt Creator @
https://github.com/CJCombrink/SpellChecker-Plugin
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
oswald.buddenha...@theqtcompany.com wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 05:40:36PM +0200, Jochen Becher wrote:
(1) A static library that implements the modelling backend (entities,
persistence, diagrams, UI components)
(2) A plugin that links the modelling backend with QtCreator (mostly a
new editor for diagrams)
(3) A tool to export diagrams to image files
(4) A patch of projectexplorer supporting more dragdrop
I can update (2) and (3) following the coding style guide ((4) already
does).
yes, please.
But (1) is pretty large and I want to avoid all those changes. Is that
acceptable if I submit the library in src/libs/3rdparty?
size as such isn't an argument (the process can be mostly automated).
but if you are indeed maintaining that library independently of
qtcreator's existence, then it's by definition 3rdparty.
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
___
Qt-creator mailing list
Qt-creator@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/qt-creator
