Re: [Rd] Is NULL a vector?

2018-07-23 Thread Hadley Wickham
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch
 wrote:
> On 23/07/2018 3:03 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Would you generally consider NULL to be a vector?
>
>
> According to the language definition (in the doc directory), it is not:
> "Vectors can be thought of as contiguous cells containing data. Cells are
> accessed through indexing operations such as x[5]. More details are given in
> Indexing.
>
> R has six basic (‘atomic’) vector types: logical, integer, real, complex,
> string (or character) and raw. The modes and storage modes for the different
> vector types are listed in the following table."
>
> and later
>
> "There is a special object called NULL. It is used whenever there is a need
> to indicate or specify that an object is absent. It should not be confused
> with a vector or list of zero length."

Perfect, thanks!

Also available online at
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Vector-objects

Hadley

-- 
http://hadley.nz

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


Re: [Rd] Is NULL a vector?

2018-07-23 Thread Duncan Murdoch

On 23/07/2018 3:03 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:

Hi all,

Would you generally consider NULL to be a vector? 


According to the language definition (in the doc directory), it is not: 
"Vectors can be thought of as contiguous cells containing data. Cells 
are accessed through indexing operations such as x[5]. More details are 
given in Indexing.


R has six basic (‘atomic’) vector types: logical, integer, real, 
complex, string (or character) and raw. The modes and storage modes for 
the different vector types are listed in the following table."


and later

"There is a special object called NULL. It is used whenever there is a 
need to indicate or specify that an object is absent. It should not be 
confused with a vector or list of zero length."


Duncan Murdoch

Base R functions are

a little inconsistent:

## In favour

``` r
identical(as.vector(NULL), NULL)
#> [1] TRUE

identical(as(NULL, "vector"), NULL)
#> [1] TRUE

# supports key vector vector generics
length(NULL)
#> [1] 0
NULL[c(3, 4, 5)]
#> NULL
NULL[[1]]
#> NULL
```

## Against

``` r
is.vector(NULL)
#> [1] FALSE

is(NULL, "vector")
#> [1] FALSE
```

## Abstentions

``` r
is.atomic(NULL)
#> [1] TRUE
# documentation states "returns NULL if x is of an atomic type (or NULL)"
# is "or" exclusive or inclusive?
```

Hadley



__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel


[Rd] Is NULL a vector?

2018-07-23 Thread Hadley Wickham
Hi all,

Would you generally consider NULL to be a vector? Base R functions are
a little inconsistent:

## In favour

``` r
identical(as.vector(NULL), NULL)
#> [1] TRUE

identical(as(NULL, "vector"), NULL)
#> [1] TRUE

# supports key vector vector generics
length(NULL)
#> [1] 0
NULL[c(3, 4, 5)]
#> NULL
NULL[[1]]
#> NULL
```

## Against

``` r
is.vector(NULL)
#> [1] FALSE

is(NULL, "vector")
#> [1] FALSE
```

## Abstentions

``` r
is.atomic(NULL)
#> [1] TRUE
# documentation states "returns NULL if x is of an atomic type (or NULL)"
# is "or" exclusive or inclusive?
```

Hadley

-- 
http://hadley.nz

__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel