Re: [R] Bug in predict.lm?

2013-11-16 Thread peter dalgaard

On 16 Nov 2013, at 03:06 , Charles Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu wrote:

 Rolf Turner r.turner at auckland.ac.nz writes:
 
 
 
 I *do* see the same phenomenon that Bert describes and the code of 
 predict.lm()
 *does* appear to contain a bug.  There is a line:
 
 [snip]
 
 
 The operative difference between my set-up and Chuck's is that I am using
 version 3.0.2 Patched.  So I am very puzzled as to why Chuck does *not* get
 an error thrown!
 
 
 [rest deleted]
 
 The answer is that I made a rookie error.
 
 I ran
 
  example(predict.lm)
 
 before trying Bert's ECM.
 
 And then I did not bother to see what example(predict.lm) left lying
 around in R_GlobalEnv ...
 
 As you can probably guess, there was an object called 'w'.
 
 So predict.lm finds it and is.null(w) is FALSE.
 
 Mea culpa!

Hmm, maybe, but this is the sort of thing that code analysis tries to catch (as 
in no visible binding for global variable 'w'). Apparently, the code checker 
is not smart enough to detect cases where a local variable is _sometimes_ not 
defined.

-- 
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd@cbs.dk  Priv: pda...@gmail.com

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] The smallest enclosing ball problem

2013-11-16 Thread Hans W.Borchers
I wanted to solve the following geometric optimization problem, sometimes 
called the enclosing ball problem:

Given a set P = {p_1, ..., p_n} of n points in R^d, find a point p_0 such 
that max ||p_i - p_0|| is minimized.

A known algorithm to solve this as a Qudratic Programming task is as follows:

Define matrix C = (p_1, ..., p_n), i.e. coordinates of points in columns,
and minimize
x' C' C x - \sum (p_i' p_i) x_i
subject to
\sum x_1 = 1, x_i = 0 .

Let x0 = (x0_1, ..., x0_n) be an optimal solution, then the linear combination

p0 = \sum x0_i p_i

is the center of the smallest enclosing ball, and the negative value of the 
objective function at x0 is the squared radius of the ball.

As an example, find the smallest ball enclosing the points (1,0,0), (0,1,0), 
and (0.5, 0.5, 0.1) in 3-dim. space. We would expect the center of the ball to 
be at (0.5, 0.5, 0), and with radius 1/sqrt(2).

C - matrix( c(1, 0, 0.5,
   0, 1, 0.5,
   0, 0, 0.1), ncol = 3, byrow = TRUE)

# We need to define D = 2C' C, d = (p_i' p_i), A = c(1,1,1), and b = 1
D - 2 * t(C) %*% C
d - apply(C^2, 2, sum)
A - matrix(1, nrow = 1, ncol = 3)
b - 1

# Now solve with solve.QP() in package quadprog ...
require(quadprog)
sol1 - solve.QP(D, d, t(A), b, meq = 1)

# ... and check the result
sum(sol1$solution)  # 1
p0 - c(C %*% sol1$solution)# 0.50  0.50 -2.45
r0 - sqrt(-sol1$value) # 2.55

# distance of all points to the center
sqrt(colSums((C - p0)^2))   # 2.55 2.55 2.55

As a result we get a ball such that all points lie on the boundary.
The same happens for 100 points in 100-dim. space (to keep D positive 
definite, n = d is required).
That is a very nice, even astounding result, but not what I had hoped for!

Compare this with another quadratic programming solver in R, for example 
LowRankQP() in the package of the same name.

require(LowRankQP)
sol2 - LowRankQP(D, -d, A, b, u = rep(3, 3), method=LU)

p2 - c(C %*% sol2$alpha)   # 5.00e-01 5.00e-01 1.032019e-12
sqrt(colSums((C - p2)^2))   # 0.7071068 0.7071068 0.100

The correct result, and we get correct solutions in higher dimensions, too. 
LowRankQP works also if we apply it with n  d, e.g., 100 points in 2- 
or 3-dimensional space, when matrix D is not positive definite -- solve.QP( ) 
does not work in these cases.

*** What do I do wrong in calling solve.QP()? ***

My apologies for this overly long request. I am sending it through the weekend
hoping that someone may have a bit of time to look at it more closely.

Hans Werner

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Help

2013-11-16 Thread Bert Gunter
Sorry to do this to you, but questions about mixed models(especially
lmer) are better handled on the mixed models list, r-sig-mixed-models
. So subscribe and post this there.

Cheers,
Bert

On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dalal Hanna dalal.e.ha...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I tried to post the below message and it was rejected because I hadn't yet
 received my subscription to the group.

 Can it be posted now?

 Cheers,
 Thanks very much for all your dedication to this project!
 Dalal


 MESSAGE I ATTEMPTED TO POST BELOW

 I am trying to code the following idea using lmer (package lme4) and
 running into problems. I am also unsure that I am coding this properly and
 wanted to double check, as there are not enough people in my entourage that
 can do this for me.

 For individual fish i of species j in lake k,
 Hgijk ~ b0j[i] + b1k[i] + b2j[i]*lengthi + ei
 ei ~ N(0,s2e)
 b0j ~ N(mb0,s2b0)
 b1k ~ go + g1*chlorophyll-ak + eb1
 eb1 ~ N(0,s2b1)
 b2j ~ N(mb2,s2b2)

 This model says that the Hg for fish i of species j from lake k is a
 function of the species, the lake, and the length of the fish. The species
 effects are like intercepts – the average Hg for a particular species at
 average length (if the length data are centered) in an average lake – and
 they come from a normal distribution. The lake effect is itself a linear
 function of chlorophyll concentration, so that lakes with higher
 chlorophyll can potentially have higher or lower average Hg concentrations.
 The length effects vary by species, on the assumption that Hg concentration
 may change with size differently in different species (which is the case in
 the systems I am working in). These length effects come from a normal
 distribution.

 *Problems:*
 1. My original idea was to code this as such:

 M.A4-lmer(LogTHg~ Chlorophyll + Length+ (1 + Length|SpeciesCode)
 +(1|Location), data=mercury.subset)

 -Does this function really represent the ideas I explained above?  I am not
 sure if Length is supposed to be included in 2 places as it is here
 -When I run this model, the se.ceof() of Length always comes out to 0,
 which doesn't really make sense.  Any ideas why this might be happening?

 Thank you very much for taking the time to read this and providing input.
  I appreciate it.

 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]


 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.




-- 

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

(650) 467-7374

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] R 2.14.2 - Installation problem - could not load lattice

2013-11-16 Thread Yael Inbar
Hello, 

I'm new to R, and have a problem related to spss integration with R (but is
actually related to the R installation): 
I have windows 8, 64bit, and installed R 2.14.2, and then the R plug in for
spss (spss version 21). 
When I tried to run somthing in spss, I got the following error messgae: 
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : 
there is no package called 'lattice' 
Installing package(s) into 'C:/Program
Files/IBM/SPSS/Statistics/21/extensions' 
(as 'lib' is unspecified) 

I unserstood that lattice should come with the default installation, and
that this messgae indicates that something went wrong with the installation,
but after uninstalling and re-installing I got the same thing... I have some
suspicion that this might be related to 32/64 bit. When I downloaded R I
took the default installation suggestion and this downloaded both 32 and 64.
Could it be the case? 

Any help would be very much appreciated 


Yael


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Apply function to one specific column / Alternative to for loop

2013-11-16 Thread Stageexp
Hi guys, I am a total newbie to R, so I hope this isn't a totally dumb
question. I have a dataframe with a title in one row and the corresponding
values in the next rows. Let's take this example: 

test_df - data.frame(cbind(titel = , x = 4:5, y = 1:2))
test_df = rbind(cbind(titel=1.Test, x=, y=), test_df,
cbind(titel=2.Test, x=, y=), test_df, cbind(titel=3.Test, x=,
y=), test_df)

test_df
   titel x y
1 1.Test
24 1
35 2
4 2.Test
54 1
65 2
7 3.Test
84 1
95 2

What I want to have is:
   titel x y
2 1.Test 4 1
3 1.Test 5 2
5 2.Test 4 1
6 2.Test 5 2
8 3.Test 4 1
9 3.Test 5 2

In my example, the title is in every third line, but in my real data there
is no pattern. Each title has at least one line but can have x lines.

I was able to solve my problem in a for loop with the following code:
test_df$titel - as.character(test_df$titel)
for (i in 1:nrow(test_df))
{
  if (nchar(test_df$titel[i])==0){
test_df$titel[i]=test_df$titel[i-1]
  }
}
test_df - subset(test_df,test_df$x!=)


The problem is, I have a lot of data and the for loop is obviously very
slow. Is there a more elegant way to achieve the same? I think I have to use
the apply function, but I don't know how to use it with just one column.




--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Apply-function-to-one-specific-column-Alternative-to-for-loop-tp4680566.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] R 2.14.2 - Installation problem - could not load lattice

2013-11-16 Thread Uwe Ligges



On 16.11.2013 09:36, Yael Inbar wrote:

Hello,

I'm new to R, and have a problem related to spss integration with R (but is
actually related to the R installation):
I have windows 8, 64bit, and installed R 2.14.2, and then the R plug in for
spss (spss version 21).
When I tried to run somthing in spss, I got the following error messgae:
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) :
there is no package called 'lattice'
Installing package(s) into 'C:/Program
Files/IBM/SPSS/Statistics/21/extensions'
(as 'lib' is unspecified)

I unserstood that lattice should come with the default installation, and
that this messgae indicates that something went wrong with the installation,
but after uninstalling and re-installing I got the same thing... I have some
suspicion that this might be related to 32/64 bit. When I downloaded R I
took the default installation suggestion and this downloaded both 32 and 64.
Could it be the case?



Probably not, but version R-2.14.2 is ancient and hence unsupported.
If SPSS requires it, please contact your SPSS support for help.

Best,
Uwe Ligges




Any help would be very much appreciated


Yael


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] there is no package called 'boot'

2013-11-16 Thread Uwe Ligges



On 14.10.2013 21:59, Christian Hoffmann wrote:

Hi,

R CMD  mypackage  /Users/hoffmann/R/cwhmisc  check --as-cran

gives me

* checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING
Error in find.package(package, lib.loc) :
   there is no package called 'boot'

although there is no textual reference to 'boot' in my /R and /man
within /cwhmisc nor any file of that name.

How could I possibly find the culprit?


I do not know your current version of the package, but probably you 
forgot to declare it as a dependency level (e.g. Suggests) in the 
DESCRIPTION file?


Best,
Uwe Ligges







TIA

C.

sessionInfo()  R version 3.0.1 (2013-05-16)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0 (64-bit)

locale:
[1] C

attached base packages:
  [1] tools tcltk stats4splines   parallel  datasets compiler
  [8] graphics  grDevices stats grid  utils methods base

other attached packages:
  [1] survival_2.37-4spatial_7.3-6  rpart_4.1-1 nnet_7.3-6
  [5] nlme_3.1-109   foreign_0.8-53 codetools_0.2-8 cluster_1.14.4
  [9] class_7.3-7Matrix_1.0-12  MASS_7.3-26 KernSmooth_2.23-10
[13] cwhmisc_4.1lattice_0.20-15



__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Double Pareto Log Normal Distribution DPLN

2013-11-16 Thread b. alzahrani
Guys 
Any help in this please.
Regards
Bander



 On 14 Nov 2013, at 09:29 pm, David R Forrest d...@vims.edu wrote:
 
 Hi Bander,
 
 I'm pushing this discussion back to the list, because I'm not sure of the 
 shape/rate parameters for rpareto and rexp and how they'd be applied across 
 this mix of typo'd papers.
 
 # Reed Equation 6 http://www.math.uvic.ca/faculty/reed/dPlN.3.pdf 
 exponentiated per end of sec 3:
 rdpln-function(n,a=1,b=1,t=1,v=0){exp(v+t*rnorm(n,sd=t)+rexp(n,rate=1/a)-rexp(n,rate=1/b))}
 
 # Reed Equation 10:
 library(VGAM)
 rdpln2-function(n,a,b,v,t){ rlnorm(n,meanlog=v,sdlog=t)*
   rpareto(n,location=1,shape=1/a)/
   rpareto(n,location=1,shape=1/b)}
 
 boxplot(data.frame(x1= log(rdpln(a=2.5,b=.01,t=0.45,v=6.5,n=10)), x2= 
 log(rdpln2(a=2.5,b=.01,t=0.45,v=6.5,n=10  
 
 # Reed equation 8 http://www.math.uvic.ca/faculty/reed/dPlN.3.pdf 
 # with S1 errata #1 from 
 http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0048964 
 
 ddpln - function(x, a=1, b=1, v=0, t=1){
 # Density of Double Pareto LogNormal distribution
 # from b. alzahrani cs_2...@hotmail.com email of 2013-11-13
 # per formula 8 from http://cs.stanford.edu/people/jure/pubs/dpln-kdd08.pdf
 
  c - (a * b /(a+b))
 
  norm1-pnorm((log(x)-v-(a*t^2))/t)
  norm2-pnorm((log(x)-v+(b*t^2))/t)
  expo1-  a*v+(a^2*t^2/2)
  expo2- -b*v+(b^2*t^2/2)  # edited from the paper's eqn 8  with: s/t/v/
 
  z- (x^(-a-1)) * exp(expo1)*(  norm1)
  y- (x^( b-1)) * exp(expo2)*(1-norm2)  # 1-norm is the complementary CDF of 
 N(0,1)
 
  c*(z+y)
 }
 
 
 Dave
 
 
 
 On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:12 AM, David Forrest d...@vims.edu
 wrote:
 
 
 I think exponentiation of eqn 6 from the Reed paper generates DPLN variates 
 directly, so maybe:
 
 rdpln=function(n,a=1,b=1,t=1,v=0){exp(v+t*rnorm(n,sd=t)+rexp(n,rate=1/a)-rexp(n,rate=1/b))}
 
 
 Dave
 
 
 On Nov 13, 2013, at 4:34 PM, b. alzahrani cs_2...@hotmail.com
 wrote:
 
 You help is much appreciated. Just one last point if you could help, Now I 
 want to pass this curve to a function that can generate random numbers 
 distributed according to DPLN ( right curve).
 
 I found the package Runuran can do that 
 http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Runuran/Runuran.pdf  but I do not 
 know how to do it I think it would be something similar to page 8 and 9.
 
 Regards
 **
 Bander 
 *
 
 
 
 From: d...@vims.edu
 To: cs_2...@hotmail.com
 Subject: Re: [R] Double Pareto Log Normal Distribution DPLN
 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:13:43 +
 
 
 I read the parameters in Fig 4, right as DPLN[2.5,0.1,0.45,6.5], so:
 
 x- 10^seq(0,4,by=.1)
 plot(x,ddpln(x,a=2.5,b=.01,v=6.5,t=0.45),log='xy',type='l')
 
 ... and the attached graph does not look dissimilar the figure--It starts 
 at 10^-2, goes through 10^-4 at x=100, and elbows down around 900 and 
 passes through 10^-6 at about 2000.
 
 The correction of Reed helps -- The uncorrected Reed Eq9 equation suggests 
 that the the 't' in Sehshadri Eq9 should be a 'v' , but it doesn't exactly 
 make sense with the extra 'a' in there.  If the errata clears that up, then 
 your expo2 term looks just like the expo1 term, but with a=-b.
 
 
 
 
 
 On Nov 13, 2013, at 3:43 PM, b. alzahrani wrote:  Thank you very much 
 for the help and the change you suggested in my code, I also found a 
 correction on equation 9 that has been published by Reed ( here 
 http://www.math.uvic.ca/faculty/reed/dPlN.3.pdf i.e. the original paper on 
 Double Pareto Log Normal Distribution ).   can you please see the 
 correction in this 
 linkhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0048964
  (in Supporting Information section, appendix S1), does your suggested code 
 coincide with the correction on this link? as I can see   Actually, I am 
 interested in the most right curve in figure 4. and if we plot the curve 
 with same order of the paper's parameters you suggests: 
 plot(x,ddpln(x,a=2.8,b=.01,v=6.5,t=0.45),log='xy',type='l') the curve is 
 different from the one in the paper??   Thanks   
 **  Bander 
 Alzahrani,  *!
   From: d...@vims.edu   To: cs_2...@hotmail.com   CC: 
   r-h...@stat.math.ethz.ch   Subject: Re: [R] Double Pareto Log Normal 
   Distribution DPLN   Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 19:09:34 + 
   ...Additionally...your set of parameters match none of the curves in 
   figure 4. I think the ordering of the parameters as listed on the 
   graphs is different than in the text of the article. The 'v' 
   parameter controls the location of the 'elbow' and should be near log(x) 
   in each graph, while the 't' parameter is the sharpness of the elbow. So 
   eyeballing the elbows: log(c(80,150,300))= 4.382027 5.010635 
   5.703782 These appear to match positional parameter #4 in 

Re: [R] variable standardization in manova() call

2013-11-16 Thread Sergio Fonda
 thank you for your reply.
However, your remark was not so clear to me
so I attach a short script I tried to launch. The comparison between
results got from MANOVA() call with the non-standardized and
standardized version of the same data frame, convinced me that it is
not necessary to standardize data before calling MANOVA. The only
difference you get is in the residuals values, of course.
Could you kindly confirm my conclusion?

All the best,
Sergio Fonda
__
set.seed(1234)
# non- standardized series
x1 =  rnorm(n=10, mean=50, sd=11)
x2 =  rnorm(n=10, mean=93, sd=23)
x1 =  rnorm(n=10, mean=217, sd=52)
fact= rep(1:2,20)
glob1=data.frame(cbind(x1,x2,x3,fact))
fitta1=manova(cbind(x1,x2,x3)~fact, data=glob1)
fitta1.wilks=summary(fitta1, test=Wilks)
summary.aov(fitta1)

#after standardization
x.stand=scale(glob1[,-4])
glob2=data.frame(x.stand,fact)
fitta2=manova(cbind(x1,x2,x3)~fact, data=glob2)
fitta2.wilks=summary(fitta2, test=Wilks)
summary.aov(fitta2)

2013/11/4 Sergio Fonda sergio.fond...@gmail.com:
 Hi,
 I'm not able to get information about the following question:

 is the variables standardization a default option in manova() (stats package)?
 Or if you want to compare variables with different units or scales and
 rather different variances, you have to previously standardize the
 variables ?

 Thanks a lot for any help,

 Sergio Fonda
 www.unimore.it

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] export vector with write() introduces line breaks

2013-11-16 Thread Martin Batholdy
Hi,

I have a long vector which I want to export as a simple ascii text file via
write(1:600, file='test.txt', sep=',')

When I open the text file with my text editor I see that the data is structured 
in columns.
So it seems that line breaks are introduced.

How can I prevent this?


Thank you!

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] export vector with write() introduces line breaks

2013-11-16 Thread Bert Gunter
1. Read ?write carefully. Note what it says about write() writing to
columns and the link to cat().

2. Use cat() with appropriate arguments to write your file instead.

e.g.

cat(1:600, file=yourfile,fill=FALSE)

Cheers,
Bert

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Martin Batholdy
batho...@googlemail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 I have a long vector which I want to export as a simple ascii text file via
 write(1:600, file='test.txt', sep=',')

 When I open the text file with my text editor I see that the data is 
 structured in columns.
 So it seems that line breaks are introduced.

 How can I prevent this?


 Thank you!

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.



-- 

Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics

(650) 467-7374

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] contour plot axis correspondence

2013-11-16 Thread ivo welch
I am struggling with a contour plot.  I want to place a cross over the
minimum.  alas, I don't seem to be able to map axes appropriately.
here is what I mean:

N - 1000

rm - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)
rx - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)
rt - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)

exploss - function(hdgM,hdgX) {
## this could be any function that is not vectorized
losscosts - function(FirmV) { D - 50; ifelse( FirmVD, 0.2*(D-FirmV), 0) }
FirmV - 100*(1+rt)*(1+rm)*(1+rx) + 100*(hdgM*(1+rm)-hdgM) +
100*(hdgX*(1+rx)-hdgX)
mean( losscosts( FirmV ) )
}

ss - seq(-2,0.5,0.1)
MX - expand.grid( hdgM= ss, hdgX= ss )
MX$z - unlist(lapply( 1:nrow(MX), function(i) with(MX,
exploss(hdgM[i],hdgX[i])) ))

M - matrix(MX$z, nrow=length(ss), ncol=length(ss))
rownames(M) - colnames(M) - ss

filled.contour( x=ss, y=ss, M )

vline - function(x, y=c(-99,99), ...) lines(c(x,x), y, ...)
vline(-0.5, col=blue, lwd=3 )


how do I map the -0.5 in the vline() to the true -0.5?  it is drawn .

as a sidenote, it was not easy to figure out how I could plot an z
function for an x-axis and y-axis.  plot(x,y) is very intuitive.  it
would have been nice to have analogous plot3d(x,y,z) and
contour(x,y,z) functions.  as with everything in R, it probably
exists, but I did not find it.  my above code had to map MX (with
x,y,z columns) into a matrix first.

advice appreciated.

best,

/iaw


Ivo Welch (ivo.we...@gmail.com)

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] contour plot axis correspondence

2013-11-16 Thread William Dunlap
filled.contour() makes two plots (the contour plot and the legend) and
must adjust some par() parameters to do that.  It appears to set them back
to a state where you cannot easily add things to the plot.  There is a trick
mentioned in Stackoverflow a while back about how to use the plot.title
argument to fiddle with filled.contour() plots.  In your case you could do 
something
like

x - 11:15
y - 101:108
z - outer(x,y,function(x,y)sin(x^2.5+y^.9/1.2))
filled.contour(x,y,z, plot.title=abline(v=12, h=103))

If you call abline() after filled.contour you can see how it the horizontal
margin settings do not correspond to the plot you are trying to add to.

abline(v=12, h=103, lwd=3, col=red, lty=2)

Bill Dunlap
Spotfire, TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com


 -Original Message-
 From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On 
 Behalf
 Of ivo welch
 Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:40 AM
 To: r-help
 Subject: [R] contour plot axis correspondence
 
 I am struggling with a contour plot.  I want to place a cross over the
 minimum.  alas, I don't seem to be able to map axes appropriately.
 here is what I mean:
 
 N - 1000
 
 rm - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)
 rx - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)
 rt - rnorm(N, mean=0.0, sd=0.4)
 
 exploss - function(hdgM,hdgX) {
 ## this could be any function that is not vectorized
 losscosts - function(FirmV) { D - 50; ifelse( FirmVD, 0.2*(D-FirmV), 
 0) }
 FirmV - 100*(1+rt)*(1+rm)*(1+rx) + 100*(hdgM*(1+rm)-hdgM) +
 100*(hdgX*(1+rx)-hdgX)
 mean( losscosts( FirmV ) )
 }
 
 ss - seq(-2,0.5,0.1)
 MX - expand.grid( hdgM= ss, hdgX= ss )
 MX$z - unlist(lapply( 1:nrow(MX), function(i) with(MX,
 exploss(hdgM[i],hdgX[i])) ))
 
 M - matrix(MX$z, nrow=length(ss), ncol=length(ss))
 rownames(M) - colnames(M) - ss
 
 filled.contour( x=ss, y=ss, M )
 
 vline - function(x, y=c(-99,99), ...) lines(c(x,x), y, ...)
 vline(-0.5, col=blue, lwd=3 )
 
 
 how do I map the -0.5 in the vline() to the true -0.5?  it is drawn .
 
 as a sidenote, it was not easy to figure out how I could plot an z
 function for an x-axis and y-axis.  plot(x,y) is very intuitive.  it
 would have been nice to have analogous plot3d(x,y,z) and
 contour(x,y,z) functions.  as with everything in R, it probably
 exists, but I did not find it.  my above code had to map MX (with
 x,y,z columns) into a matrix first.
 
 advice appreciated.
 
 best,
 
 /iaw
 
 
 Ivo Welch (ivo.we...@gmail.com)
 
 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] optimization

2013-11-16 Thread Prof J C Nash (U30A)
There are lots of errors in your code. In particular, the optimization
routines do not like functions that ignore the parameters.

And you have not provided out or out1 to the optimizer -- they are
returned as elements of func(), but not correctly.

Please try some of the examples for optim or optimx to learn how to
structure your problem.

JN


On 13-11-16 06:00 AM, r-help-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
 Message: 19
 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:17:47 -0800 (PST)
 From: IZHAK shabsogh ishaqb...@yahoo.com
 To: r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org
 Subject: [R] optimization
 Message-ID:
   1384535867.58595.yahoomail...@web142506.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
 Content-Type: text/plain
 
 x1-c(5.548,4.896,1.964,3.586,3.824,3.111,3.607,3.557,2.989,18.053,3.773,1.253,2.094,2.726,1.758,5.011,2.455,0.913,0.890,2.468,4.168,4.810,34.319,1.531,1.481,2.239,4.204,3.463,1.727)
 y-c(2.590,3.770,1.270,1.445,3.290,0.930,1.600,1.250,3.450,1.096,1.745,1.060,0.890,2.755,1.515,4.770,2.220,0.590,0.530,1.910,4.010,1.745,1.965,2.555,0.770,0.720,1.730,2.860,0.760)
 x2-c(0.137,2.499,0.419,1.699,0.605,0.677,0.159,1.699,0.340,2.899,0.082,0.425,0.444,0.225,0.241,0.099,0.644,0.266,0.351,0.027,0.030,3.400,1.499,0.351,0.082,0.518,0.471,0.036,0.721)
 k-rep(1,29)
 x-data.frame(k,x1,x2)
 
 freg-function(y,x1,x2){
   reg- rlm(y ~ x1 + x2 , data=x)
   return(reg)
 }
 
 
  func - function(x1,x2,b){
   fit-freg(y,x1,x2)
 b-c(coef(fit))
   dv-1+ b[2]*x2^b[3]
 dv1-b[2]*x2^b[3]*log(x2)
   out - ( x1/(1+ b[2]*x2^b[3]))
   out1-  c(-x1*x2^b[3]/dv^2,-x1* dv1/dv^2)
 return(list( out,out1))
}
 optim(par=c(b[2],b[3]), fn=out, gr =out1,
 method = c(BFGS),
 lower = -Inf, upper = Inf,
 control = list(), hessian = T)
 can someone help me try running this code because i try many occasion but 
 prove  abortive. the aim is
 to optimize the parameter of the model that is parameter estimates using 
 optimization 
 
   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] optimization

2013-11-16 Thread Dennis Murphy
 There are lots of errors in your code. In particular, the optimization
 routines do not like functions that ignore the parameters.

I would like to nominate this delicious riposte as a fortune
candidate. Anyone to second the motion?

Dennis

On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Prof J C Nash (U30A) nas...@uottawa.ca wrote:
 There are lots of errors in your code. In particular, the optimization
 routines do not like functions that ignore the parameters.

 And you have not provided out or out1 to the optimizer -- they are
 returned as elements of func(), but not correctly.

 Please try some of the examples for optim or optimx to learn how to
 structure your problem.

 JN


 On 13-11-16 06:00 AM, r-help-requ...@r-project.org wrote:
 Message: 19
 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:17:47 -0800 (PST)
 From: IZHAK shabsogh ishaqb...@yahoo.com
 To: r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org
 Subject: [R] optimization
 Message-ID:
   1384535867.58595.yahoomail...@web142506.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
 Content-Type: text/plain

 x1-c(5.548,4.896,1.964,3.586,3.824,3.111,3.607,3.557,2.989,18.053,3.773,1.253,2.094,2.726,1.758,5.011,2.455,0.913,0.890,2.468,4.168,4.810,34.319,1.531,1.481,2.239,4.204,3.463,1.727)
 y-c(2.590,3.770,1.270,1.445,3.290,0.930,1.600,1.250,3.450,1.096,1.745,1.060,0.890,2.755,1.515,4.770,2.220,0.590,0.530,1.910,4.010,1.745,1.965,2.555,0.770,0.720,1.730,2.860,0.760)
 x2-c(0.137,2.499,0.419,1.699,0.605,0.677,0.159,1.699,0.340,2.899,0.082,0.425,0.444,0.225,0.241,0.099,0.644,0.266,0.351,0.027,0.030,3.400,1.499,0.351,0.082,0.518,0.471,0.036,0.721)
 k-rep(1,29)
 x-data.frame(k,x1,x2)

 freg-function(y,x1,x2){
   reg- rlm(y ~ x1 + x2 , data=x)
   return(reg)
 }


  func - function(x1,x2,b){
   fit-freg(y,x1,x2)
 b-c(coef(fit))
   dv-1+ b[2]*x2^b[3]
 dv1-b[2]*x2^b[3]*log(x2)
   out - ( x1/(1+ b[2]*x2^b[3]))
   out1-  c(-x1*x2^b[3]/dv^2,-x1* dv1/dv^2)
 return(list( out,out1))
}
 optim(par=c(b[2],b[3]), fn=out, gr =out1,
 method = c(BFGS),
 lower = -Inf, upper = Inf,
 control = list(), hessian = T)
 can someone help me try running this code because i try many occasion but 
 prove  abortive. the aim is
 to optimize the parameter of the model that is parameter estimates using 
 optimization

   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] optimization

2013-11-16 Thread Rolf Turner

On 11/17/13 11:49, Dennis Murphy wrote:

There are lots of errors in your code. In particular, the optimization
routines do not like functions that ignore the parameters.

I would like to nominate this delicious riposte as a fortune
candidate. Anyone to second the motion?


Indeed.  I so second!

cheers,

Rolf Turner

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Change date time to epoch time

2013-11-16 Thread vivek kumar singh
Hi All,

I have time series data in (Year-month-date-hour-minute-second) format 
and i want to convert it to epoch time.

I have tried the following:
* Sys.time()**
**[1] 2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT**
** as.numeric(Sys.time())**
**[1] 1384656006**
** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**
**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**
**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
*
Please let me know which function in R converts date-time to epoch time.

Regards,
Vivek

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Change date time to epoch time

2013-11-16 Thread David Winsemius


On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:46 PM, vivek kumar singh wrote:


Hi All,

I have time series data in (Year-month-date-hour-minute-second) format
and i want to convert it to epoch time.

I have tried the following:
* Sys.time()**
**[1] 2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT**
** as.numeric(Sys.time())**
**[1] 1384656006**


Should we assume this is epoch time?


** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**
**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**


If it is then this is close:

as.numeric(as.POSIXct(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT))

(You may need to supply an appropriate TZ offset in seconds

?POSIXct


--  
David.



**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
*
Please let me know which function in R converts date-time to epoch  
time.


Regards,
Vivek

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


David Winsemius, MD
Alameda, CA, USA

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Change date time to epoch time

2013-11-16 Thread Jeff Newmiller
There are many epochs. Which one are you interested in? If you are interested 
in the POSIX time_t epoch, then you could look at ?DateTimeClasses to find out 
about ?as.POSIXct. You might also find my email on inputting zones informative 
[1].

Also, per the Posting Guide, please don't post in html format... it messes up 
your R code.

[1] https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2013-August/357939.html
---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.usBasics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...1k
--- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

vivek kumar singh vksingh.ii...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,

I have time series data in (Year-month-date-hour-minute-second) format 
and i want to convert it to epoch time.

I have tried the following:
* Sys.time()**
**[1] 2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT**
** as.numeric(Sys.time())**
**[1] 1384656006**
** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**
**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
** as.numeric(2013-11-17 10:39:46 MYT)**
**[1] NA**
**Warning message:**
**NAs introduced by coercion **
*
Please let me know which function in R converts date-time to epoch
time.

Regards,
Vivek

   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] 2SLS for panel data, re

2013-11-16 Thread Phdstudent2
Hi Millo Giovanni,

Thanks for your response.  In regards to my STATA code it would be:

xi:xtiverg wecon polrightsreversed lnrgdpch execleft mulim2 c100rat 
c1100rat i.year
(trade fdistockgdp = lnpop lnarea devcountrycomlanguage bitcum), re.

Any suggestions will help so much..
Regards




On Thursday, November 14, 2013 8:12:33 AM UTC-8, Phdstudent2 wrote:

 Hi, 

 I am trying to estimate a 2sls using panel data (random effect model). I 
 tried the same estimation in STATA using the ivtreg2 command. However 
 STATA 
 and R are giving me two different results. I figure there is something 
 with 
 my R code: 

 iv=plm(formula=wecon~fdistockgdp +trade + polrightsreversed +lnrgdpch + 
 execleft + muslim2+c100rat +c111rat +yeardum| polrightsreversed+lnrgdpch+ 
 execleft+muslim2+c100rat+c111rat+yeardum 
 +lnpop+lnarea+devcountrycomlanguage+bitcum, 
 data = women, index = c(country, year), random.method = c(swar), 
 inst.method = c(bvk), model=random) 
 summary(iv) 

 Coefficients : 
 Estimate Std. Error t-value  Pr(|t|) 
 (Intercept)   -0.2258528  0.2951301 -0.7653 0.4441954 
 fdistockgdp   -0.0067207  0.0077315 -0.8693 0.3847993 
 trade  0.0068462  0.0023687  2.8903 0.0038863 ** 
 polrightsreversed  0.0092366  0.0106174  0.8699 0.3844229 
 lnrgdpch   0.1246679  0.0389043  3.2045 0.0013724 ** 
 execleft   0.1118046  0.0340817  3.2805 0.0010524 ** 
 muslim2   -0.0044742  0.0012433 -3.5986 0.0003270 *** 
 c100rat0.0226208  0.0595134  0.3801 0.7039114 
 c111rat0.0165951  0.0618339  0.2684 0.7884310 
 yeardum19820.1479947  0.0588824  2.5134 0.0120282 * 
 yeardum19830.1783255  0.0606153  2.9419 0.0032958 ** 
 yeardum19840.0344572  0.0597167  0.5770 0.5639907 
 yeardum19850.2206961  0.0610344  3.6159 0.0003060 *** 
 yeardum19860.2428015  0.0649779  3.7367 0.0001912 *** 
 yeardum19870.0489043  0.0615708  0.7943 0.4271186 
 yeardum19880.2243599  0.0605343  3.7063 0.0002155 *** 
 yeardum19890.2215060  0.0624042  3.5495 0.0003940 *** 
 yeardum19900.0688333  0.0607056  1.1339 0.2569648 
 yeardum19910.1370871  0.0638830  2.1459 0.0319892 * 
 yeardum19920.1851857  0.0630868  2.9354 0.0033655 ** 
 yeardum19930.0904620  0.0698526  1.2950 0.1954420 
 yeardum19940.1003735  0.0737431  1.3611 0.1736137 
 yeardum19950.1164818  0.0721240  1.6150 0.1064494 
 yeardum19960.0482520  0.0787232  0.6129 0.5399837 
 yeardum19970.1049161  0.0895001  1.1722 0.2412247 
 yeardum19980.2191887  0.1109757  1.9751 0.0483807 * 
 yeardum19990.1573342  0.1397150  1.1261 0.2602422 
 yeardum20000.1532796  0.1627206  0.9420 0.3463059 
 --- 
  However STATA gives me 
  
 --- 
 wecon |  Coef.   Std. Err.  zP|z| [95% Conf. 
 Interval] 
 --+- 
 --- 
 trade |   .0093915   .0027483 3.42   0.001  .004005 
 .014778 
   fdistockgdp |  -.0169171   .0092405-1.83   0.067-.0350281 
 .0011938 
 polrightsreversed |   .0165855   .0119176 1.39   0.164-.0067726 
 .0399436 
  lnrgdpch |   .1045675   .0431179 2.43   0.015 .0200579 
 .189077 
  execleft |   .1373652   .0384442 3.57   0.000 .0620159 
 .2127145 
   muslim2 |  -.0043645   .0013551-3.22   0.001-.0070205 
 -.0017085 
   c100rat |   .0480539   .0657304 0.73   0.465-.0807752 
 .1768831 
   c111rat |   .0170048   .0676272 0.25   0.801-.1155421 
 .1495516 

 Really would appreciate any help explaining why the results are so 
 different 

 [[alternative HTML version deleted]] 

 __ 
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list 
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help 
 PLEASE do read the posting guide 
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html 
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. 

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] repeated-measures multiple regression/ANCOVA/MANCOVA

2013-11-16 Thread Jakub Szewczyk
Dear List,

I am trying to analyze a dataset where I have 1 continuous
between-item variable (C), and 2 factorial within-item variables (3-
and 2-level: F3, F2). I'm interested in whether slope of C is
different from 0 at different combinations of F3 and F2, and whether
it varies between these combinations.

And unfortunately I need a decent anova-like table with p-values. The
reason is that 1) this analysis is going to be repeated 9 times for
different parts of the data (not comparable), so such an omnibus table
will give a good overview of which places need a follow up with
simpler models; 2) this is the norm in my field of reseach, although
usually with factorial variables only.

I'm wondering how to do it properly in R without falling into any
pitfalls, avoiding violations of any assumptions (like sphericity) and
what is the most apropriate type of sum of squares for this analysis.


The 2 solutions I found so far are:

based on nlme::lme():
 res.lme = nlme::lme(data=d, y ~ C * F3 * F2, random = ~ 1|item/F3/F2)
 anova(res.lme) for type I SS
 Anova(res.lme, type=II/III) # for type II/III SS

based on lmerTest package:
 res.lmertest = lmerTest::lmer(data=d, y ~ C * F3 * F2 + (1|item))
 anova(res.lmertest) # for type III SS


I also considered running repeated-measures ANCOVA using aov() with
nested error terms, but that wouldn't protect me against sphericity
assumption violations.

I also considered using car::Anova() for running a repeated-measures
MANCOVA analysis, but if I got this thread right
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.r.general/270271/focus=270275),
this is (at present) not possible to do.

Are these ways of analyzing data valid?

Concerning the type of SS: I tried to read all discussions in this
list on this topic. If I got it right, since I'm interested in
interactions of C with other factors in the first place, in my case
using SS type III would make sense - is this a good logic?

Many thanks for help,
Jakub

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Bug in predict.lm?

2013-11-16 Thread jlh.membership
This definitely looks like a bug and should really be reported. Denes' 
diagnosis is right on.

I get the bug here: 
 z - lm(rnorm(10)~I(1:10))
 
 predict(z, int=conf, scale=1)
Error in predict.lm(z, int = conf, scale = 1) : object 'w' not found

And also here:
 z - lm(rnorm(10)~I(1:10))
 
 predict(z, se.fit=T, scale=1)
Error in predict.lm(z, se.fit = T, scale = 1) : object 'w' not found

**
platform   x86_64-w64-mingw32  
arch   x86_64  
os mingw32 
system x86_64, mingw32 
status 
major  3   
minor  0.2 
year   2013
month  09  
day25  
svn rev63987   
language   R   
version.string R version 3.0.2 (2013-09-25)
nickname   Frisbee Sailing
**

-Original Message-
From: peter dalgaard [mailto:pda...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 4:36 AM
To: Charles Berry
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] Bug in predict.lm?


On 16 Nov 2013, at 03:06 , Charles Berry ccbe...@ucsd.edu wrote:

 Rolf Turner r.turner at auckland.ac.nz writes:
 
 
 
 I *do* see the same phenomenon that Bert describes and the code of
 predict.lm()
 *does* appear to contain a bug.  There is a line:
 
 [snip]
 
 
 The operative difference between my set-up and Chuck's is that I am 
 using version 3.0.2 Patched.  So I am very puzzled as to why Chuck 
 does *not* get an error thrown!
 
 
 [rest deleted]
 
 The answer is that I made a rookie error.
 
 I ran
 
  example(predict.lm)
 
 before trying Bert's ECM.
 
 And then I did not bother to see what example(predict.lm) left lying 
 around in R_GlobalEnv ...
 
 As you can probably guess, there was an object called 'w'.
 
 So predict.lm finds it and is.null(w) is FALSE.
 
 Mea culpa!

Hmm, maybe, but this is the sort of thing that code analysis tries to catch (as 
in no visible binding for global variable 'w').
Apparently, the code checker is not smart enough to detect cases where a local 
variable is _sometimes_ not defined.

--
Peter Dalgaard, Professor,
Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 
Frederiksberg, Denmark
Phone: (+45)38153501
Email: pd@cbs.dk  Priv: pda...@gmail.com

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Apply function to one specific column / Alternative to for loop

2013-11-16 Thread umair durrani
This might be of some use : 
http://nsaunders.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/a-brief-introduction-to-apply-in-r/

Umair Durrani

email: umairdurr...@outlook.com


 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:30:29 -0800
 From: ron...@gmx.net
 To: r-help@r-project.org
 Subject: [R] Apply function to one specific column / Alternative to for loop
 
 Hi guys, I am a total newbie to R, so I hope this isn't a totally dumb
 question. I have a dataframe with a title in one row and the corresponding
 values in the next rows. Let's take this example: 
 
 test_df - data.frame(cbind(titel = , x = 4:5, y = 1:2))
 test_df = rbind(cbind(titel=1.Test, x=, y=), test_df,
 cbind(titel=2.Test, x=, y=), test_df, cbind(titel=3.Test, x=,
 y=), test_df)
 
 test_df
titel x y
 1 1.Test
 24 1
 35 2
 4 2.Test
 54 1
 65 2
 7 3.Test
 84 1
 95 2
 
 What I want to have is:
titel x y
 2 1.Test 4 1
 3 1.Test 5 2
 5 2.Test 4 1
 6 2.Test 5 2
 8 3.Test 4 1
 9 3.Test 5 2
 
 In my example, the title is in every third line, but in my real data there
 is no pattern. Each title has at least one line but can have x lines.
 
 I was able to solve my problem in a for loop with the following code:
 test_df$titel - as.character(test_df$titel)
 for (i in 1:nrow(test_df))
 {
   if (nchar(test_df$titel[i])==0){
 test_df$titel[i]=test_df$titel[i-1]
   }
 }
 test_df - subset(test_df,test_df$x!=)
 
 
 The problem is, I have a lot of data and the for loop is obviously very
 slow. Is there a more elegant way to achieve the same? I think I have to use
 the apply function, but I don't know how to use it with just one column.
 
 
 
 
 --
 View this message in context: 
 http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Apply-function-to-one-specific-column-Alternative-to-for-loop-tp4680566.html
 Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 
 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
  
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Calculate Range

2013-11-16 Thread SCRIPTHAM
Hi

My R version is the current version as at 15 Nov 2013.

I have tried to calculate range using tapply() with FUN=range.
tapply() returns two fields, the ID field and a field of two text items one
is the maximum and the other is the minimum.
I take as the difference max - min, does R use a different term for range in
tapply?

I have also tried
aggregate() with Fun=range, with Fun=min and FUN=max 
and they also gave problems.

What is the best route to calculate ranges for groups within a data frame.

Thanks.
Scriptham.






--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Calculate-Range-tp4680579.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Apply function to one specific column / Alternative to for loop

2013-11-16 Thread arun
Hi,
Try:
indx - grep(Test,test_df[,1])  ##assuming that there is some pattern
 res - within(test_df[-indx,],titel - rep(test_df$titel[indx], 
diff(c(indx,nrow(test_df)+1))-1))

## If you need to change the class

res[] - lapply(res,function(x) if(any(grepl([[:alpha:]],x))) as.character(x) 
else as.numeric(as.character(x)))


##Using data.frame(cbind()), etc. creates 


A.K.




On Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:14 AM, Stageexp ron...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi guys, I am a total newbie to R, so I hope this isn't a totally dumb
question. I have a dataframe with a title in one row and the corresponding
values in the next rows. Let's take this example: 

test_df - data.frame(cbind(titel = , x = 4:5, y = 1:2))
test_df = rbind(cbind(titel=1.Test, x=, y=), test_df,
cbind(titel=2.Test, x=, y=), test_df, cbind(titel=3.Test, x=,
y=), test_df)

test_df
   titel x y
1 1.Test    
2        4 1
3        5 2
4 2.Test    
5        4 1
6        5 2
7 3.Test    
8        4 1
9        5 2

What I want to have is:
   titel x y
2 1.Test 4 1
3 1.Test 5 2
5 2.Test 4 1
6 2.Test 5 2
8 3.Test 4 1
9 3.Test 5 2

In my example, the title is in every third line, but in my real data there
is no pattern. Each title has at least one line but can have x lines.

I was able to solve my problem in a for loop with the following code:
test_df$titel - as.character(test_df$titel)
for (i in 1:nrow(test_df))
{
  if (nchar(test_df$titel[i])==0){
    test_df$titel[i]=test_df$titel[i-1]
  }
}
test_df - subset(test_df,test_df$x!=)


The problem is, I have a lot of data and the for loop is obviously very
slow. Is there a more elegant way to achieve the same? I think I have to use
the apply function, but I don't know how to use it with just one column.




--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Apply-function-to-one-specific-column-Alternative-to-for-loop-tp4680566.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] order() function, decreasing=TRUE unexpected behaviour

2013-11-16 Thread Hawthorne Beyer
There appears to be an issue with the decreasing=TRUE option on the order() 
function that indicates either a bug or perhaps a design flaw (potentially 
flawed because I would suggest the majority of users would expect different 
behaviour).

# demonstration of problem:
x - c(2,1,3,4,5)
order(x)
order(x, decreasing=TRUE)

order(x) correctly reports the order as:
2 1 3 4 5
I expected the result for order(x, decreasing=TRUE) to be:
4 5 3 2 1
but the values actually reported are:
5 4 3 1 2
which is also the result of order(-x) (this may indicate a possible cause of 
this issue?).

Thus, the decreasing=TRUE option in the order() function does not reverse the 
order of the values reported under the default of decreasing=FALSE in an 
example with no ties. If this behaviour is by design I am struggling to 
understand what purpose the decreasing=TRUE option serves and would like to 
suggest that this is not consistent with how many (most?) users would expect 
this option to work.

Tested on R2.15.3 and 3.0.1 (both x86_64 linux-gnu) with identical results. I 
have also tried it on other series of numbers with the same result.

Apologies if this has been discussed or reported elsewhere but I could not find 
any relevant posts. Perhaps I have failed to understand some fundamental issue? 
Sorry if this is me being dimwitted - it does seem hard to believe that there 
is a bug in a relatively straightforward r-base function. But I thought I would 
mention this as it could impact many people.

Many thanks to all the R developers and R community for producing and 
supporting such an outstanding and invaluable product.
Hawthorne Beyer
University of Queensland


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] r documentation rugarch egarch

2013-11-16 Thread randomsamson
Hi,

I`m about to switch from STATA to R and have serious troubles to find proper
documentations on the internet.
Right now I try to find a proper documentation of the eGARCH model being
part of the rugarch package.

Neither here
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/vignettes/Introduction_to_the_rugarch_package.pdf
nor here
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/rugarch.pdf
could i find some information that was helping.

In this post
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/RUGARCH-eGARCH-and-variance-targeting-td4634896.html
someone proposes to read the vignette on how the unconditional variance is
calculated for the eGARCH
model
I don`t know what is meant by vignette. 

The R-built-in help function tells me about eGARCH: assymetry term: gamma1
Thanks a lot R-help. This is relly a lot of information.

I`d like to find out about the eGARCH model notation used in R, the settings
and estimation techniques that are used and/or can be configured in this
case, ...

When searching the internet I`ve also not been very successful.

When working with STATA I`ve so far never had troubles to find the right
information.
So i think I`m not in general too stupid to do some search on the internet.

Please can anyone tell me what this vignette is supposed to be and where
to find it?

Thanks a lot,
Samson










--
View this message in context: 
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/r-documentation-rugarch-egarch-tp4680580.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] selecting optimal cluster validation score

2013-11-16 Thread email
Hi:

I have calculated the Silhouette score and Dunn score after
hierarchical clustering for 3 clusters:

#Distance measure
d - dist(USArrests, method = euclidean)
#Hierarchical clustering
hc - hclust(dist(USArrests), ave)
#calculating silhouette value for 3 clusters
sil- silhouette(cutree(hc, k=3), d)
#calculating Dunn index for 3 clusters
clus - cutree(hc, 3)
dun - dunn(d, clus)

How can the best of the two score be obtained? Is there any package to
automatically obtain the optimal (or best) of the Silhouette and the
Dunn scores ?

Regards:
John

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] R for a stats intro for undergrads in the US?

2013-11-16 Thread Spencer Graves

Hello, All:


  Would anyone recommend R for an introductory statistics class for 
freshman psychology students in the US?  If yes, might there be any 
notes for such available?



  I just checked r-projects.org and CRAN contributed documentation 
and found nothing.



  I have a friend who teaches such a class, and wondered if R might 
be suitable.  The alternative is SPSS at $406 per student.



  Thanks,
  Spencer


--
Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
President and Chief Technology Officer
Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
751 Emerson Ct.
San José, CA 95126
ph:  408-655-4567
web:  www.structuremonitoring.com

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] R for a stats intro for undergrads in the US?

2013-11-16 Thread umair durrani
Hi Spencer,
I would definitely recommend R for introductory stats. course because it is 
free and easy to learn. You can visit www.twotorials.com for two-minute 
tutorials on R. Also www.coursera.org offers many free courses on R, for intro 
stats check this out: https://www.coursera.org/course/stats1
Hope this helps,
Umair Durrani

email: umairdurr...@outlook.com


 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:19:16 -0800
 From: spencer.gra...@prodsyse.com
 To: R-help@r-project.org
 Subject: [R] R for a stats intro for undergrads in the US?
 
 Hello, All:
 
 
Would anyone recommend R for an introductory statistics class for 
 freshman psychology students in the US?  If yes, might there be any 
 notes for such available?
 
 
I just checked r-projects.org and CRAN contributed documentation 
 and found nothing.
 
 
I have a friend who teaches such a class, and wondered if R might 
 be suitable.  The alternative is SPSS at $406 per student.
 
 
Thanks,
Spencer
 
 
 -- 
 Spencer Graves, PE, PhD
 President and Chief Technology Officer
 Structure Inspection and Monitoring, Inc.
 751 Emerson Ct.
 San José, CA 95126
 ph:  408-655-4567
 web:  www.structuremonitoring.com
 
 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
  
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] R for a stats intro for undergrads in the US?

2013-11-16 Thread Spencer Graves
Hi, Umair Durrani:


   Thanks very much for the quick reply.  The course you mentioned 
does not feature psychology, that I could see. However, my friend 
might be able to use pieces of that course in hers.


   Thanks again.
   Spencer


On 11/16/2013 7:58 PM, umair durrani wrote:
 /Hi Spencer,/
 /
 /
 /I would definitely recommend R for introductory stats. course because 
 it is free and easy to learn. You can visit www.twotorials.com for 
 two-minute tutorials on R. Also www.coursera.org offers many free 
 courses on R, for intro stats check this out: 
 /https://www.coursera.org/course/stats1

 Hope this helps,
 /Umair Durrani/
 /email: umairdurr...@outlook.com mailto:umairdurr...@hotmail.com/


  Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 18:19:16 -0800
  From: spencer.gra...@prodsyse.com
  To: R-help@r-project.org
  Subject: [R] R for a stats intro for undergrads in the US?
 
  Hello, All:
 
 
  Would anyone recommend R for an introductory statistics class for
  freshman psychology students in the US? If yes, might there be any
  notes for such available?
 
 
  I just checked r-projects.org and CRAN contributed documentation
  and found nothing.
 
 
  I have a friend who teaches such a class, and wondered if R might
  be suitable. The alternative is SPSS at $406 per student.
 
 
  Thanks,
  Spencer
 
  __
  R-help@r-project.org mailing list
  https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
  PLEASE do read the posting guide 
 http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
  and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] order() function, decreasing=TRUE unexpected behaviour

2013-11-16 Thread Jeff Newmiller
I think you are confused, and there is no problem with the order function. Keep 
in mind that order returns the index values in a sequence such that when the 
result of the order function is used as indexes for the original sequence then 
the data will be sorted as desired. You may see the error of your ways more 
clearly if you use a vector of strings like c(b,a,c,d,e) instead of 
integer values.

Please configure your email client to send plain text to this list as the 
Posting Guide requests, as HTML messes up R code.
---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.usBasics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...1k
--- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

Hawthorne Beyer h.be...@uq.edu.au wrote:
There appears to be an issue with the decreasing=TRUE option on the
order() function that indicates either a bug or perhaps a design flaw
(potentially flawed because I would suggest the majority of users would
expect different behaviour).

# demonstration of problem:
x - c(2,1,3,4,5)
order(x)
order(x, decreasing=TRUE)

order(x) correctly reports the order as:
2 1 3 4 5
I expected the result for order(x, decreasing=TRUE) to be:
4 5 3 2 1
but the values actually reported are:
5 4 3 1 2
which is also the result of order(-x) (this may indicate a possible
cause of this issue?).

Thus, the decreasing=TRUE option in the order() function does not
reverse the order of the values reported under the default of
decreasing=FALSE in an example with no ties. If this behaviour is by
design I am struggling to understand what purpose the decreasing=TRUE
option serves and would like to suggest that this is not consistent
with how many (most?) users would expect this option to work.

Tested on R2.15.3 and 3.0.1 (both x86_64 linux-gnu) with identical
results. I have also tried it on other series of numbers with the same
result.

Apologies if this has been discussed or reported elsewhere but I could
not find any relevant posts. Perhaps I have failed to understand some
fundamental issue? Sorry if this is me being dimwitted - it does seem
hard to believe that there is a bug in a relatively straightforward
r-base function. But I thought I would mention this as it could impact
many people.

Many thanks to all the R developers and R community for producing and
supporting such an outstanding and invaluable product.
Hawthorne Beyer
University of Queensland


   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] r documentation rugarch egarch

2013-11-16 Thread Jeff Newmiller
You don't seem to read very well. The rugarch vignette that you said you read 
clearly states that questions on that package should be directed to the 
R-sig-finance mailing list. This is not that list.

Before you go deliver this screed to that forum, you may want to give yourself 
some time to cool off because at this rate you are only going to alienate 
people who otherwise might help you. If you fail to adjust your approach, we 
the users of and contributors to R who answer each others questions on our own 
time (not tech support staff paid to put up with irate buyers of R, since said 
staff don't exist) are merely going to wait quietly for you to go back to 
wherever you came from.

PS: You might try typing the word vignette into Google.
---
Jeff NewmillerThe .   .  Go Live...
DCN:jdnew...@dcn.davis.ca.usBasics: ##.#.   ##.#.  Live Go...
  Live:   OO#.. Dead: OO#..  Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/BatteriesO.O#.   #.O#.  with
/Software/Embedded Controllers)   .OO#.   .OO#.  rocks...1k
--- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

randomsamson joh...@web.de wrote:
Hi,

I`m about to switch from STATA to R and have serious troubles to find
proper
documentations on the internet.
Right now I try to find a proper documentation of the eGARCH model
being
part of the rugarch package.

Neither here
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/vignettes/Introduction_to_the_rugarch_package.pdf
nor here
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rugarch/rugarch.pdf
could i find some information that was helping.

In this post
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/RUGARCH-eGARCH-and-variance-targeting-td4634896.html
someone proposes to read the vignette on how the unconditional
variance is
calculated for the eGARCH
model
I don`t know what is meant by vignette. 

The R-built-in help function tells me about eGARCH: assymetry term:
gamma1
Thanks a lot R-help. This is relly a lot of information.

I`d like to find out about the eGARCH model notation used in R, the
settings
and estimation techniques that are used and/or can be configured in
this
case, ...

When searching the internet I`ve also not been very successful.

When working with STATA I`ve so far never had troubles to find the
right
information.
So i think I`m not in general too stupid to do some search on the
internet.

Please can anyone tell me what this vignette is supposed to be and
where
to find it?

Thanks a lot,
Samson










--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/r-documentation-rugarch-egarch-tp4680580.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] The smallest enclosing ball problem

2013-11-16 Thread Berend Hasselman

Forgot to forward my answer to R-help.

Berend


On 16-11-2013, at 13:11, Hans W.Borchers hwborch...@googlemail.com wrote:

 I wanted to solve the following geometric optimization problem, sometimes 
 called the enclosing ball problem:
 
   Given a set P = {p_1, ..., p_n} of n points in R^d, find a point p_0 such 
   that max ||p_i - p_0|| is minimized.
 
 A known algorithm to solve this as a Qudratic Programming task is as follows:
 
   Define matrix C = (p_1, ..., p_n), i.e. coordinates of points in columns,
   and minimize
   x' C' C x - \sum (p_i' p_i) x_i
   subject to
   \sum x_1 = 1, x_i = 0 .
 
 Let x0 = (x0_1, ..., x0_n) be an optimal solution, then the linear combination
 
   p0 = \sum x0_i p_i
 
 is the center of the smallest enclosing ball, and the negative value of the 
 objective function at x0 is the squared radius of the ball.
 
 As an example, find the smallest ball enclosing the points (1,0,0), (0,1,0), 
 and (0.5, 0.5, 0.1) in 3-dim. space. We would expect the center of the ball 
 to 
 be at (0.5, 0.5, 0), and with radius 1/sqrt(2).
 
   C - matrix( c(1, 0, 0.5,
  0, 1, 0.5,
  0, 0, 0.1), ncol = 3, byrow = TRUE)
 
   # We need to define D = 2C' C, d = (p_i' p_i), A = c(1,1,1), and b = 1
   D - 2 * t(C) %*% C
   d - apply(C^2, 2, sum)
   A - matrix(1, nrow = 1, ncol = 3)
   b - 1
 
   # Now solve with solve.QP() in package quadprog ...
   require(quadprog)
   sol1 - solve.QP(D, d, t(A), b, meq = 1)
 
   # ... and check the result
   sum(sol1$solution)  # 1
   p0 - c(C %*% sol1$solution)# 0.50  0.50 -2.45
   r0 - sqrt(-sol1$value) # 2.55
 
   # distance of all points to the center
   sqrt(colSums((C - p0)^2))   # 2.55 2.55 2.55
 
 As a result we get a ball such that all points lie on the boundary.
 The same happens for 100 points in 100-dim. space (to keep D positive 
 definite, n = d is required).
 That is a very nice, even astounding result, but not what I had hoped for!
 


At the risk of making a complete fool of myself.

Why the restriction:  \sum x_1 = 1, x_i = 0 ?

Isn’t just  x_i = 0 sufficient?

Change your code with this

A - diag(3)
b - rep(0,3)
sol2 - solve.QP(D, d, A, b, meq = 0)
sol2

resulting in this

$solution
[1] 0.5 0.5 0.0
$value
[1] -0.5
$unconstrained.solution
[1]  12.75  12.75 -24.50
$iterations
[1] 2 0
$Lagrangian
[1] 0.00 0.00 0.49
$iact
[1] 3

And $solution seems to be what you want.

And:

p0 - c(C %*% sol2$solution)
r0 - sqrt(-sol2$value)

# distance of all points to the center
sqrt(colSums((C - p0)^2))

gives the same results as LowRankQP for the last expression.

Berend



 Compare this with another quadratic programming solver in R, for example 
 LowRankQP() in the package of the same name.
 
   require(LowRankQP)
   sol2 - LowRankQP(D, -d, A, b, u = rep(3, 3), method=LU)
 
   p2 - c(C %*% sol2$alpha)   # 5.00e-01 5.00e-01 1.032019e-12
   sqrt(colSums((C - p2)^2))   # 0.7071068 0.7071068 0.100
 
 The correct result, and we get correct solutions in higher dimensions, too. 
 LowRankQP works also if we apply it with n  d, e.g., 100 points in 2- 
 or 3-dimensional space, when matrix D is not positive definite -- solve.QP( ) 
 does not work in these cases.
 
 *** What do I do wrong in calling solve.QP()? ***
 
 My apologies for this overly long request. I am sending it through the weekend
 hoping that someone may have a bit of time to look at it more closely.
 
 Hans Werner
 
 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Calculate Range

2013-11-16 Thread Jim Lemon

On 11/17/2013 08:49 AM, SCRIPTHAM wrote:

Hi

My R version is the current version as at 15 Nov 2013.

I have tried to calculate range using tapply() with FUN=range.
tapply() returns two fields, the ID field and a field of two text items one
is the maximum and the other is the minimum.
I take as the difference max - min, does R use a different term for range in
tapply?

I have also tried
aggregate() with Fun=range, with Fun=min and FUN=max
and they also gave problems.

What is the best route to calculate ranges for groups within a data frame.


Hi Scriptham,
It looks like you want to get the difference between the maximum and 
minimum values rather than the actual values. Define a function:


range_span-function(x) return(diff(range(x)))

and use that as the FUN argument.

Jim

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.