[R] Fw: Granger casuality test in r

2018-11-30 Thread Eneida Permeti via R-help
 

   - Forwarded Message - From: Eneida Permeti 
To: John C Frain Sent: Friday, 
November 30, 2018, 9:24:01 AM PSTSubject: Re: [R] Granger casuality test in r
  Dear JohnThank you for responding me.I have attached my data. I am studying 
the relationship between Public debt and economic growth.The time series of 
public debt is not stationary an I have differenced it.Than I have estimated a 
VAR model.But by the results of Granger causality test, I am afraid that 
something is wrong.Please can you help me?Best regardsEneida Permeti
On Friday, November 30, 2018, 8:17:09 AM PST, John C Frain 
 wrote:  
 
 
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 14:40, Eneida Permeti via R-help  
wrote:


The results of my Granger causality test in r are below. VARp is my VAR model 
and I have two endogenous variables. From the results, I have only 
instantaneous causality. What does it mean?Thank you so much
> causality(VARp,cause="The.economic.growth")
$Granger

    Granger causality H0: The.economic.growth do not Granger-cause
    The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.4038, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.8573


$Instant

    H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.economic.growth and
    The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355


> causality(VARp,cause="The.differenced.public.debt")
$Granger

    Granger causality H0: The.differenced.public.debt do not Granger-cause
    The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.70214, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.6572


$Instant

    H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.differenced.public.debt and
    The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


It appears that you have not found Granger causality.  I would not be surprised 
at this result.
You growth rate is almost equivalent to the log difference of GPD at constant 
prices. (real GDP). I suspect that your   The.differenced.public.debt is at 
current prices and is not log transformed.
Granger Causality requires you to control for other variables.  For example 
other variables may be causing both of your variables. If such is the case your 
finding of Granger Causality may be spurious.
3 Aranleigh Park
Rathfarnham
Dublin 14
Ireland
www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.html
mailto:fra...@tcd.ie
mailto:fra...@gmail.com 
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Fw: Granger casuality test in r

2018-11-30 Thread Eneida Permeti via R-help
 

   - Forwarded Message - From: Eneida Permeti 
To: John C Frain Sent: Friday, 
November 30, 2018, 9:24:01 AM PSTSubject: Re: [R] Granger casuality test in r
  Dear JohnThank you for responding me.I have attached my data. I am studying 
the relationship between Public debt and economic growth.The time series of 
public debt is not stationary an I have differenced it.Than I have estimated a 
VAR model.But by the results of Granger causality test, I am afraid that 
something is wrong.Please can you help me?Best regardsEneida Permeti
On Friday, November 30, 2018, 8:17:09 AM PST, John C Frain 
 wrote:  
 
 
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 14:40, Eneida Permeti via R-help  
wrote:


The results of my Granger causality test in r are below. VARp is my VAR model 
and I have two endogenous variables. From the results, I have only 
instantaneous causality. What does it mean?Thank you so much
> causality(VARp,cause="The.economic.growth")
$Granger

    Granger causality H0: The.economic.growth do not Granger-cause
    The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.4038, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.8573


$Instant

    H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.economic.growth and
    The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355


> causality(VARp,cause="The.differenced.public.debt")
$Granger

    Granger causality H0: The.differenced.public.debt do not Granger-cause
    The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.70214, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.6572


$Instant

    H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.differenced.public.debt and
    The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


It appears that you have not found Granger causality.  I would not be surprised 
at this result.
You growth rate is almost equivalent to the log difference of GPD at constant 
prices. (real GDP). I suspect that your   The.differenced.public.debt is at 
current prices and is not log transformed.
Granger Causality requires you to control for other variables.  For example 
other variables may be causing both of your variables. If such is the case your 
finding of Granger Causality may be spurious.
3 Aranleigh Park
Rathfarnham
Dublin 14
Ireland
www.tcd.ie/Economics/staff/frainj/home.html
mailto:fra...@tcd.ie
mailto:fra...@gmail.com 
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Granger casuality test in r

2018-11-30 Thread Eneida Permeti via R-help


The results of my Granger causality test in r are below. VARp is my VAR model 
and I have two endogenous variables. From the results, I have only 
instantaneous causality. What does it mean?Thank you so much
> causality(VARp,cause="The.economic.growth")
$Granger

Granger causality H0: The.economic.growth do not Granger-cause
The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.4038, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.8573


$Instant

H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.economic.growth and
The.differenced.public.debt

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355


> causality(VARp,cause="The.differenced.public.debt")
$Granger

Granger causality H0: The.differenced.public.debt do not Granger-cause
The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
F-Test = 0.70214, df1 = 6, df2 = 8, p-value = 0.6572


$Instant

H0: No instantaneous causality between: The.differenced.public.debt and
The.economic.growth

data:  VAR object VARp
Chi-squared = 6.0964, df = 1, p-value = 0.01355
Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.