Re: [R] Optimisation with Normalisation Constraint

2018-06-22 Thread Hans W Borchers
One way will be to solve this as an ordinary optimization problem with
an equality constraint. Function `alabama::auglag` can do this:

library(alabama)
fn <- function(p) sum((df$y - p[1]*exp(-p[2]*df$x))^2)
heq <- function(p) sum(p[1]*exp(-p[2]*df$x)) - 5

# Start with initial values near first solution
sol <- auglag(c(4, 4), fn=fn, heq=heq)

Solution with myfit:4.1344.078
Solution with auglag:   4.126763 4.017768

The equality constraint is still fulfilled:

a <- sol$par[1]; lambda <- sol$par[2]
sum(a*exp(-lambda*df$x))
## [1] 5

Plot the differences of these two solutions:

plot(df$x, a*exp(-lambda*df$x) - predict(myfit), type='l')

Interestingly, the difference between 5 and `predict(myfit)` is *not*
just evenly spread across all 15 points.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Optimisation with Normalisation Constraint

2018-06-20 Thread David Winsemius


> On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:50 AM, Lorenzo Isella  wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
> I have a problem I haver been struggling with for a while: I need to
> carry out a non-linear fit (and this is the
> easy part).
> I have a set of discrete values {x1,x2...xN} and the corresponding
> {y1, y2...yN}. The difficulty is that I would like the linear fit to
> preserve the sum of the values y1+y2+...yN.
> I give an example below (for which there may even be an analytical
> solution, but that is not the point here)
> 
> 
> library(minpack.lm)
> 
> 
> 
> set.seed(124)
> 
> z <- rexp(3000,3)
> 
> 
> zf <- z[z<= 0.5 | z>=0.9]
> 
> myhist <- hist(zf, plot=FALSE) 
> 
> 
> df <- data.frame(x=myhist$mids, y=myhist$density)
> 
> 
> 
> myfit <- nlsLM(y~(A*exp(-lambda*x))
>   ,data=df, start=list(A=1,lambda=1))
> 
> 
> 
>> sum(myhist$density)
> [1] 5
>> sum(predict(myfit))
> [1] 4.931496
> 
> 
> I would like sum(predict(myfit)) to be exactly 5 from the start,
> without renormalising a posteriori the fit.

Wouldn't that happen if you minimized that absolute deviations from the fit 
rather than minimizing the sums of squares??
> 
> Any suggestion is appreciated.
> Cheers
> 
> Lorenzo
> 

David Winsemius
Alameda, CA, USA

'Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.'   
-Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] Optimisation with Normalisation Constraint

2018-06-20 Thread Jeff Newmiller
I recommend posting this on a mathematics discussion forum like Stack Exchange 
and (re-)reading the Posting Guide for this mailing list.

I think you are going to need to re-write your model function to algebraically 
combine your original model along with the constraint, and then use the 
original model alone for prediction... but I haven't tried it so might be quite 
far off the mark.

On June 20, 2018 8:50:48 AM PDT, Lorenzo Isella  
wrote:
>Dear All,
>I have a problem I haver been struggling with for a while: I need to
>carry out a non-linear fit (and this is the
>easy part).
>I have a set of discrete values {x1,x2...xN} and the corresponding
>{y1, y2...yN}. The difficulty is that I would like the linear fit to
>preserve the sum of the values y1+y2+...yN.
>I give an example below (for which there may even be an analytical
>solution, but that is not the point here)
>
>
>library(minpack.lm)
>
>
>
>set.seed(124)
>
>z <- rexp(3000,3)
>
>
>zf <- z[z<= 0.5 | z>=0.9]
>
>myhist <- hist(zf, plot=FALSE) 
>
>
>
>df <- data.frame(x=myhist$mids, y=myhist$density)
>
>
>
>myfit <- nlsLM(y~(A*exp(-lambda*x))
>,data=df, start=list(A=1,lambda=1))
>
>
>
>> sum(myhist$density)
>[1] 5
>> sum(predict(myfit))
>[1] 4.931496
>
>
>I would like sum(predict(myfit)) to be exactly 5 from the start,
>without renormalising a posteriori the fit.
>
>Any suggestion is appreciated.
>Cheers
>
>Lorenzo
>
>__
>R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>PLEASE do read the posting guide
>http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.

-- 
Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


[R] Optimisation with Normalisation Constraint

2018-06-20 Thread Lorenzo Isella

Dear All,
I have a problem I haver been struggling with for a while: I need to
carry out a non-linear fit (and this is the
easy part).
I have a set of discrete values {x1,x2...xN} and the corresponding
{y1, y2...yN}. The difficulty is that I would like the linear fit to
preserve the sum of the values y1+y2+...yN.
I give an example below (for which there may even be an analytical
solution, but that is not the point here)


library(minpack.lm)



set.seed(124)

z <- rexp(3000,3)


zf <- z[z<= 0.5 | z>=0.9]

myhist <- hist(zf, plot=FALSE) 




df <- data.frame(x=myhist$mids, y=myhist$density)



myfit <- nlsLM(y~(A*exp(-lambda*x))
   ,data=df, start=list(A=1,lambda=1))




sum(myhist$density)

[1] 5

sum(predict(myfit))

[1] 4.931496


I would like sum(predict(myfit)) to be exactly 5 from the start,
without renormalising a posteriori the fit.

Any suggestion is appreciated.
Cheers

Lorenzo

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.