Re: [R] Ranking
I used your code but deleted sep="\t" since there were no tabs in your email
and added the fill= argument I mentioned before.
David
Original message
From: Ashta <sewa...@gmail.com>
Date: 11/14/2015 6:40 PM (GMT-06:00)
To: David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu>
Cc: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R] Ranking
Thank you David,
My intention was if I change the status column to numeric
0= Lost and 1 Won, then I can use this numeric variables to calculate
the Percent game Won by each country.
how did you read the data first?
That was my problem. The actual data is in a file have to be read or laded.
Thank you !
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:10 PM, David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu> wrote:
> It is always good to read the manual page for a function, but especially when
> it is not working as you expected. In this case if you look at the arguments
> for read.table(), you will find one called fill=TRUE that is useful in this
> case.
>
> Based on your ifelse(), you seem to be assuming that a blank is not missing
> data but a lost game. You may also discover that in your example wins are
> coded as w and W. Since character variables get converted to factors by
> default, you could use something like:
>
>> levels(test$STATUS) <- c("L", "W", "W")
>> addmargins(xtabs(~Country+STATUS, test), 2)
>STATUS
> Country L W Sum
> FRA 2 3 5
> GER 1 3 4
> SPA 2 1 3
> UNK 1 2 3
> USA 1 2 3
>
> I'll let you figure out how to get the last column.
>
> David L. Carlson
> Department of Anthropology
> Texas A University
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ashta
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:28 PM
> To: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
> Subject: [R] Ranking
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following raw data some records don't have the second variable.
>
> test <- read.table(textConnection(" Country STATUS
> USA
> USAW
> USAW
> GER
> GERW
> GERw
> GERW
> UNKW
> UNK
> UNKW
> FRA
> FRA
> FRAW
> FRAW
> FRAW
> SPA
> SPAW
> SPA "),header = TRUE, sep= "\t")
> test
>
> It is not reading it correctly.
>
> Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, :
> line 17 did not have 2 elements
>
>
>
> After reading I want change the status column to numeric so that I
> can use the table function
>
> test$STATUS <- ifelse(is.na(test$STATUS), 0, 1)
>
> at the end I want the following table (Country, Won, Lost , Number of
> games played and % of score ) and pick the top 3 countries.
>
> COUNTRY Won Lost NG%W
> USA 21 3 (2/3)*100
> GER 31 4 (3/4)*100
> UNK 21 3 (2/3)*100
> FRA 3 25 (3/5)*100
> SPA 1 2 3 (1/3)*100
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking
It is perhaps worth mentioning that the OP's desire to do the
conversion to numeric to calculate won-lost percentages is completely
unnecessary and indicates that he/she could benefit by spending some
additional time learning R. See, e.g. ?tapply, ?table, ?prop.table,
and friends.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. And knowledge
is certainly not wisdom."
-- Clifford Stoll
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 8:28 PM, David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu> wrote:
> I used your code but deleted sep="\t" since there were no tabs in your email
> and added the fill= argument I mentioned before.
>
>
>
> David
>
>
>
> Original message
> From: Ashta <sewa...@gmail.com>
> Date: 11/14/2015 6:40 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu>
> Cc: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [R] Ranking
>
> Thank you David,
>
> My intention was if I change the status column to numeric
> 0= Lost and 1 Won, then I can use this numeric variables to calculate
> the Percent game Won by each country.
> how did you read the data first?
> That was my problem. The actual data is in a file have to be read or laded.
>
> Thank you !
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:10 PM, David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu> wrote:
>> It is always good to read the manual page for a function, but especially
>> when it is not working as you expected. In this case if you look at the
>> arguments for read.table(), you will find one called fill=TRUE that is
>> useful in this case.
>>
>> Based on your ifelse(), you seem to be assuming that a blank is not missing
>> data but a lost game. You may also discover that in your example wins are
>> coded as w and W. Since character variables get converted to factors by
>> default, you could use something like:
>>
>>> levels(test$STATUS) <- c("L", "W", "W")
>>> addmargins(xtabs(~Country+STATUS, test), 2)
>>STATUS
>> Country L W Sum
>> FRA 2 3 5
>> GER 1 3 4
>> SPA 2 1 3
>> UNK 1 2 3
>> USA 1 2 3
>>
>> I'll let you figure out how to get the last column.
>>
>> David L. Carlson
>> Department of Anthropology
>> Texas A University
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ashta
>> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:28 PM
>> To: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
>> Subject: [R] Ranking
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have the following raw data some records don't have the second variable.
>>
>> test <- read.table(textConnection(" Country STATUS
>> USA
>> USAW
>> USAW
>> GER
>> GERW
>> GERw
>> GERW
>> UNKW
>> UNK
>> UNKW
>> FRA
>> FRA
>> FRAW
>> FRAW
>> FRAW
>> SPA
>> SPAW
>> SPA "),header = TRUE, sep= "\t")
>> test
>>
>> It is not reading it correctly.
>>
>> Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, :
>> line 17 did not have 2 elements
>>
>>
>>
>> After reading I want change the status column to numeric so that I
>> can use the table function
>>
>> test$STATUS <- ifelse(is.na(test$STATUS), 0, 1)
>>
>> at the end I want the following table (Country, Won, Lost , Number of
>> games played and % of score ) and pick the top 3 countries.
>>
>> COUNTRY Won Lost NG%W
>> USA 21 3 (2/3)*100
>> GER 31 4 (3/4)*100
>> UNK 21 3 (2/3)*100
>> FRA 3 25 (3/5)*100
>> SPA 1 2 3 (1/3)*100
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> __
>> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
>> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
>> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] Ranking
Hi all,
I have the following raw data some records don't have the second variable.
test <- read.table(textConnection(" Country STATUS
USA
USAW
USAW
GER
GERW
GERw
GERW
UNKW
UNK
UNKW
FRA
FRA
FRAW
FRAW
FRAW
SPA
SPAW
SPA "),header = TRUE, sep= "\t")
test
It is not reading it correctly.
Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, :
line 17 did not have 2 elements
After reading I want change the status column to numeric so that I
can use the table function
test$STATUS <- ifelse(is.na(test$STATUS), 0, 1)
at the end I want the following table (Country, Won, Lost , Number of
games played and % of score ) and pick the top 3 countries.
COUNTRY Won Lost NG%W
USA 21 3 (2/3)*100
GER 31 4 (3/4)*100
UNK 21 3 (2/3)*100
FRA 3 25 (3/5)*100
SPA 1 2 3 (1/3)*100
Thank you in advance
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking
It is always good to read the manual page for a function, but especially when
it is not working as you expected. In this case if you look at the arguments
for read.table(), you will find one called fill=TRUE that is useful in this
case.
Based on your ifelse(), you seem to be assuming that a blank is not missing
data but a lost game. You may also discover that in your example wins are coded
as w and W. Since character variables get converted to factors by default, you
could use something like:
> levels(test$STATUS) <- c("L", "W", "W")
> addmargins(xtabs(~Country+STATUS, test), 2)
STATUS
Country L W Sum
FRA 2 3 5
GER 1 3 4
SPA 2 1 3
UNK 1 2 3
USA 1 2 3
I'll let you figure out how to get the last column.
David L. Carlson
Department of Anthropology
Texas A University
-Original Message-
From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ashta
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:28 PM
To: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
Subject: [R] Ranking
Hi all,
I have the following raw data some records don't have the second variable.
test <- read.table(textConnection(" Country STATUS
USA
USAW
USAW
GER
GERW
GERw
GERW
UNKW
UNK
UNKW
FRA
FRA
FRAW
FRAW
FRAW
SPA
SPAW
SPA "),header = TRUE, sep= "\t")
test
It is not reading it correctly.
Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, :
line 17 did not have 2 elements
After reading I want change the status column to numeric so that I
can use the table function
test$STATUS <- ifelse(is.na(test$STATUS), 0, 1)
at the end I want the following table (Country, Won, Lost , Number of
games played and % of score ) and pick the top 3 countries.
COUNTRY Won Lost NG%W
USA 21 3 (2/3)*100
GER 31 4 (3/4)*100
UNK 21 3 (2/3)*100
FRA 3 25 (3/5)*100
SPA 1 2 3 (1/3)*100
Thank you in advance
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking
Thank you David,
My intention was if I change the status column to numeric
0= Lost and 1 Won, then I can use this numeric variables to calculate
the Percent game Won by each country.
how did you read the data first?
That was my problem. The actual data is in a file have to be read or laded.
Thank you !
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 6:10 PM, David L Carlson <dcarl...@tamu.edu> wrote:
> It is always good to read the manual page for a function, but especially when
> it is not working as you expected. In this case if you look at the arguments
> for read.table(), you will find one called fill=TRUE that is useful in this
> case.
>
> Based on your ifelse(), you seem to be assuming that a blank is not missing
> data but a lost game. You may also discover that in your example wins are
> coded as w and W. Since character variables get converted to factors by
> default, you could use something like:
>
>> levels(test$STATUS) <- c("L", "W", "W")
>> addmargins(xtabs(~Country+STATUS, test), 2)
>STATUS
> Country L W Sum
> FRA 2 3 5
> GER 1 3 4
> SPA 2 1 3
> UNK 1 2 3
> USA 1 2 3
>
> I'll let you figure out how to get the last column.
>
> David L. Carlson
> Department of Anthropology
> Texas A University
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R-help [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Ashta
> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 4:28 PM
> To: R help <r-help@r-project.org>
> Subject: [R] Ranking
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have the following raw data some records don't have the second variable.
>
> test <- read.table(textConnection(" Country STATUS
> USA
> USAW
> USAW
> GER
> GERW
> GERw
> GERW
> UNKW
> UNK
> UNKW
> FRA
> FRA
> FRAW
> FRAW
> FRAW
> SPA
> SPAW
> SPA "),header = TRUE, sep= "\t")
> test
>
> It is not reading it correctly.
>
> Error in scan(file, what, nmax, sep, dec, quote, skip, nlines, na.strings, :
> line 17 did not have 2 elements
>
>
>
> After reading I want change the status column to numeric so that I
> can use the table function
>
> test$STATUS <- ifelse(is.na(test$STATUS), 0, 1)
>
> at the end I want the following table (Country, Won, Lost , Number of
> games played and % of score ) and pick the top 3 countries.
>
> COUNTRY Won Lost NG%W
> USA 21 3 (2/3)*100
> GER 31 4 (3/4)*100
> UNK 21 3 (2/3)*100
> FRA 3 25 (3/5)*100
> SPA 1 2 3 (1/3)*100
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> __
> R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
> PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
> and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list -- To UNSUBSCRIBE and more, see
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] ranking a vector in R
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:24:47AM +0200, Jessy wrote: Hello, May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. Hello: Try x - c(3, 2, 4, 1) rank(-x) [1] 2 3 1 4 Hope this helps. Petr Savicky. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] ranking a vector in R
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Jessy jmahac...@gmail.com wrote: May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. How about rank(-v), e.g., rank(-c(3,1,4,6,5)) [1] 4 5 3 1 2 /Christian [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] ranking a vector in R
Hi, dat-c(5,4,3,12,15) rank(-dat) [1] 3 4 5 2 1 rank(dat) [1] 3 2 1 4 5 A.K. - Original Message - From: Jessy jmahac...@gmail.com To: r-help@r-project.org Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 6:24 PM Subject: [R] ranking a vector in R Hello, May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. Regards, Jessy [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] ranking a vector in R
On 21/06/2012 07:24, Petr Savicky wrote: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:24:47AM +0200, Jessy wrote: Hello, May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. Hello: Try x - c(3, 2, 4, 1) rank(-x) [1] 2 3 1 4 Or more generally rank(-xtfrm(x)) which works also for non-numeric x. -- Brian D. Ripley, rip...@stats.ox.ac.uk Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/ University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self) 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA) Oxford OX1 3TG, UKFax: +44 1865 272595 __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] ranking a vector in R
Hello, May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. Regards, Jessy [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] ranking a vector in R
Hi Jessy, ?sort ?rank will be a good starting point. HTH, Jorge.- On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Jessy jmahac...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, May someone help me with how in R I can rank a vector from highest to lowest. i.e rank 1 (smallest rank) is given to the highest value instead of the usual way that it get's the highest rank. Regards, Jessy [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] Ranking submodels by AIC (more general question)
Here's a more general question following up on the specific question I asked earlier: Can anybody recommend an R command other than mle.aic() (from the wle package) that will give back a ranked list of submodels? It seems like a pretty basic piece of functionality, but the closest I've been able to find is stepAIC(), which as far as I can tell only gives back the best submodel, not a ranking of all submodels. Thanks in advance, Alexandra __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking submodels by AIC (more general question)
Alexandra, Have a look at add1 and drop1. Regards, Jan On 06/23/2011 07:32 PM, Alexandra Thorn wrote: Here's a more general question following up on the specific question I asked earlier: Can anybody recommend an R command other than mle.aic() (from the wle package) that will give back a ranked list of submodels? It seems like a pretty basic piece of functionality, but the closest I've been able to find is stepAIC(), which as far as I can tell only gives back the best submodel, not a ranking of all submodels. Thanks in advance, Alexandra __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking submodels by AIC (more general question)
Thanks for the suggestion. Those functions only provide part of the functionality I want. After a great deal more of drawing the internet, I've concluded that the correct answer to my question is dredge() from the package MuMIn. It seems to use the same AIC algorithm as AIC, which is perfect for making comparisons! Thanks again to everybody who's tried to help me out on this! Alexandra On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 21:29 +0200, Jan van der Laan wrote: Alexandra, Have a look at add1 and drop1. Regards, Jan On 06/23/2011 07:32 PM, Alexandra Thorn wrote: Here's a more general question following up on the specific question I asked earlier: Can anybody recommend an R command other than mle.aic() (from the wle package) that will give back a ranked list of submodels? It seems like a pretty basic piece of functionality, but the closest I've been able to find is stepAIC(), which as far as I can tell only gives back the best submodel, not a ranking of all submodels. Thanks in advance, Alexandra __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
On 2010-04-14 16:04, David Nemer wrote: Hello Guys, thank you all very much for the help! Sorry for my total lack of knowledge in R... so I did the correlation.. and got these results: cor(A, C, method = spearman) [1] 0.4922165 cor(B, C, method = spearman) [1] 0.1922412 cor(A, B, method = spearman) [1] -0.00889328 I don't know how to interpret them... so the correlation is good when it is really close to 1 or to 0? What about negative correlation?? Your questions suggest that it's time to do some studying. Crack open a stats book (or at least check Wikipedia). There is no such thing as a 'good' or 'bad' correlation. Everything depends on context. You shouldn't use a statistic if you don't understand it. -Peter Ehlers Cheers, -- David Nemer On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Gabor Grothendieckggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote: Try this: A- c(file1.java, file3.java, file2.java) B- c(file2.java, file4.java, file1.java) cor(A, B, method = spearman) [1] 0.5 On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM, David Nemerdavidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Cheers, -- David Nemer [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Peter Ehlers University of Calgary __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
Hello Guys, thank you all very much for the help! Sorry for my total lack of knowledge in R... so I did the correlation.. and got these results: cor(A, C, method = spearman) [1] 0.4922165 cor(B, C, method = spearman) [1] 0.1922412 cor(A, B, method = spearman) [1] -0.00889328 I don't know how to interpret them... so the correlation is good when it is really close to 1 or to 0? What about negative correlation?? Cheers, -- David Nemer On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendi...@gmail.com wrote: Try this: A - c(file1.java, file3.java, file2.java) B - c(file2.java, file4.java, file1.java) cor(A, B, method = spearman) [1] 0.5 On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Cheers, -- David Nemer [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
On 04/10/2010 01:22 AM, David Nemer wrote: Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Hi David, Are you sure you don't want the concordance between the rankings? If so, look at the irr package for some concordance functions. The example shows pretty much no concordance. Jim __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
Try this: A - c(file1.java, file3.java, file2.java) B - c(file2.java, file4.java, file1.java) cor(A, B, method = spearman) [1] 0.5 On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Cheers, -- David Nemer [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] Ranking correlation with R
Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Cheers, -- David Nemer [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
Dear David, Are the rankings the numbers? Like List 1: 1 3 2 If so you should be able to do it fairly easily with cor() If you have a lot of file names and need to extract the numbers look at ?strsplit or ?substring. This will be easier or harder depending how variable the names are. For instance with your example names x - c(file1.java,file2.java) as.numeric(substring(x,5,5)) [1] 1 2 but this assumes that there is only 1 number and that it always occurs as five characters from the left. Best regards, Joshua On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:22 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, Im fresh new in R, and Im supposed to write a code to give me a correlation between two rankings. So I have two ranking lists, which contain file names, e.g.: Ranking list 1: file1.java file3.java file2.java Ranking list 2: fiile2.java file4.java file1.java I need to see how much are these two ranking lists are alike, get a correlation between them. I dont even know where to start. Can anyone bring me some light or tips? Thank you in advance. Cheers, -- David Nemer [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Joshua Wiley Senior in Psychology University of California, Riverside http://www.joshuawiley.com/ __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Joshua, Thanks for your help. The ranking list doesn't have numbers (it doesn't matter the name of the file), just the file name, and the ranking is assumed base on the position of the file name in the list (so the first filename to appear is ranked number 1). So I guess I would just need to add the filenames into a vector (array) for both rankings and then compare them.. is You would add both lists to vectors. it right? And to compare them I would use cor() right? cor() requires numeric data. To use it in this case, you would need to come up with rankings based on the position for each file name, and use those pairs of numbers with cor(). Cheers, -- David Nemer -- Joshua Wiley Senior in Psychology University of California, Riverside http://www.joshuawiley.com/ __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
On Apr 9, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote: On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Joshua, Thanks for your help. The ranking list doesn't have numbers (it doesn't matter the name of the file), just the file name, and the ranking is assumed base on the position of the file name in the list (so the first filename to appear is ranked number 1). So I guess I would just need to add the filenames into a vector (array) for both rankings and then compare them.. is You would add both lists to vectors. it right? And to compare them I would use cor() right? cor() requires numeric data. To use it in this case, you would need to come up with rankings based on the position for each file name, and use those pairs of numbers with cor(). One possible source for such numbers would be row.names(dfrm) since by default (assuming they are in a data.frame) row.names are an ascending series of integers, but one could also number them by appending a colrankn=1:nrow(dfrm). Cheers, -- David Nemer -- Joshua Wiley Senior in Psychology David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
cor() requires numeric data. To use it in this case, you would need to come up with rankings based on the position for each file name, and use those pairs of numbers with cor(). One possible source for such numbers would be row.names(dfrm) since by default (assuming they are in a data.frame) row.names are an ascending series of integers, but one could also number them by appending a colrankn=1:nrow(dfrm). What about this? x - c(A,C,B) y - c(A,B,C) ranks - match(y,x) ranks [1] 1 3 2 cor(seq_along(x), ranks) [1] 0.5 It seems like as long as both sets of filenames contain exactly the same names, that should work. David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT -- Joshua Wiley Senior in Psychology University of California, Riverside http://www.joshuawiley.com/ __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Ranking correlation with R
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:23 AM, David Nemer davidne...@gmail.com wrote: Would that also work if in one ranking I have a filename that it is not in the other ranking? match() will return an NA, if it cannot find a match, in which case you could use the argument: use=pairwise.complete.obs) in cor() to have it only use pairs with complete data. Eg: Ranking X: A B C Ranking Y: A D C In this example, you would get a correlation of 1, because B from x does not match anything in y, and D from y does not match x, so you're left with A and C which are in the same positions. -- David Nemer -- Joshua Wiley Senior in Psychology University of California, Riverside http://www.joshuawiley.com/ __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] ranking the results of a questionnaire
dear experts, I reproduced an experiment (questionnaire) some times. The result of the experiment is a vector of 5 factors, say (A,B,C,D,E). In the original article the result is given in 5 pairs of mean and stDev for A .. E, e.g. mean_A=37.4 and sd_A=8.1. The interval for A,B,C,D,E values is 0..50. The original data frame is not available. For a comparison of my results L=(A',B',C',D',E') with the original G=(A,B,C,D,E) we can interpret that smaller sd-values are 'better'. But for the means the interpretation is a little bit complicated: a smaller mean value of A or B or E is 'better', but a bigger mean value for C or D is 'better'. To construct a quantified value of being 'better' and to rank my data L vs. the data G, I wrote a kind of an signed distance-function. Here is my simple code and an small example run: R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 L-c(32.8,5.3, 26.3,9.0, 35.1,6.2, 33.4,6.3, 22.9,12.9) G-c(37.4,8.1, 30.6,9.7, 32.0,7.9, 29.7, 9.0, 17.1,10.8) sigdist- function (L,G) sqrt( sign( G[1]-L[1] )*(G[1]-L[1])^2 + sign( G[2]-L[2] )*(G[2]-L[2])^2 + sign( G[3]-L[3] )*(G[3]-L[3])^2 + sign( G[4]-L[4] )*(G[4]-L[4])^2 - sign( G[5]-L[5] )*(G[5]-L[5])^2 + sign( G[6]-L[6])*(G[6]-L[6])^2 - sign( G[7]-L[7] )*(G[7]-L[7])^2 + sign( G[8]-L[8] )*(G[8]-L[8])^2 + sign( G[9]-L[9] )*(G[9]-L[9])^2 + sign( G[10]-L[10] )*(G[10]-L[10])^2 ) sigdist(L,G) [1] 6.588627 I like to interpret the positive value 6.588 that 'the L vector is better then G vector w.r.t. sigdist'. My questions are: 1. are there build-in functions in R calculating some (distance?)value with the possibility of a similar interpretation? 2. are there other ideas for a ranking of the experimental results L and G? Any comments, critique or hints are very welcome. Sincerely Wolfgang __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
