Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
sorry for my slow reply, this is what I worked out so far… my reproducible example and the code test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) m-match(unique(droplevels(test$samp.time.new)),test$samp.time.new) lab-as.character(test$samp.time[m]) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, ylim=lab, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) Now labels are correctly spaced and sorted out but still a “slight” problem persist: i.e. the reordering of samp.time.new within each site; in fact, I would like to have an ascending order of sampling time but for some reason I’m not able to work it out properly… any help much appreciated max -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lattice-dotplot-reorder-contiguous-levels-tp4643741p4644215.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:36 PM, maxbre mbres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote: sorry for my slow reply, this is what I worked out so far… my reproducible example and the code test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) m-match(unique(droplevels(test$samp.time.new)),test$samp.time.new) lab-as.character(test$samp.time[m]) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, ylim=lab, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) Now labels are correctly spaced and sorted out but still a “slight” problem persist: i.e. the reordering of samp.time.new within each site; in fact, I would like to have an ascending order of sampling time but for some reason I’m not able to work it out properly… For that, it should be enough to just reorder again by samp.time. Your label code doesn't work then (I haven't tried to figure out why), but your earlier idea using strsplit() does: test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site)), as.numeric(samp.time))) lab - sapply(strsplit(levels(test$samp.time.new), :, fixed=TRUE), [, 1) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, ylim=lab, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) -Deepayan __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM, maxbre mbres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote: my reproducible example test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) my objective is to use “site” as conditioning variable but with “samp.time” correctly grouped by “site”; the problem here is to ensure that levels of “samp.time” within each “site” are contiguous as otherwise they would be not contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between y axis categories -see dotplot -) I’ve been trying with this but without much success test$samp.time.new- with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site))) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the dotplot (I’m not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now) can anyone point me in the right direction? The problem here is that there is crossing between sites and samp.time. You can try some imaginative permutations of site, such as test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time, as.numeric(factor(site, levels = c(A, C, D, B, E) which gets all but site B right. There may be another permutation that works for everything, but it would be much easier to make a nested factor, i.e., test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) That just leaves getting the y-labels right, which I will leave for you to figure out. (Hint: ylim = some_function_of(levels(test$samp.time.new))) -Deepayan __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
thank you all for your helpful replies to bert the problem with relation =same is the plotting along y axis of all categories (samp.time) for all groups (sites); instead, I need to plot along y axis just the categories for each group effectively having a corresponding observation to danny your solution with ggplot works like a charm; I will keep an eye to ggplot2 for other new charts but for some reasons now I must stick on lattice (which is also my favourite by the way) to richard result3 is close to what I need but still not exactly what Iâm aiming to; I need y axis to be plotted as categories not as a continuous scale⦠I need the result proposed by danny to be translated into lattice⦠to deepayan thank you so much, Iâll carefully consider your hint and Iâll try to make it works (but still Iâm not sure I fully understand how to do it); as long as I can get to a viable solution Iâll post it back Just for your information my effort up to now (NOT WORKING!) was pointing toward this direction: 1- new character variable from samp.time to be used later as label for the plot: test$samp.lab-as.character(test$samp.time) 2- new factor variable with as many levels as the observations: test$samp.id - gl(length(test$samp.time), 1) 3- new factor variable based on âsamp.timeâ but with the order of levels based on âsiteâ, something like this (I think this is the crucial point where I'm likely to fail): test$samp.time.site - with(test, reorder(samp.time, as.numeric(site))) 4- new numeric level: nl - as.numeric(levels(test$samp.time.site)) 5- plotting (wrong): dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, ylim=test$samp.lab[nl], scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) Il 21/09/2012 08:55, Deepayan Sarkar ha scritto: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM, maxbrembres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote: my reproducible example test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) my objective is to use âsiteâ as conditioning variable but with âsamp.timeâ correctly grouped by âsiteâ; the problem here is to ensure that levels of âsamp.timeâ within each âsiteâ are contiguous as otherwise they would be not contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between y axis categories -see dotplot -) Iâve been trying with this but without much success test$samp.time.new- with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site))) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the dotplot (Iâm not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now) can anyone point me in the right direction? The problem here is that there is crossing between sites and samp.time. You can try some imaginative permutations of site, such as test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time, as.numeric(factor(site, levels = c(A, C, D, B, E) which gets all but site B right. There may be another permutation that works for everything, but it would be much easier to make a nested factor, i.e., test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) That just leaves getting the y-labels right, which I will leave for you to figure out. (Hint: ylim = some_function_of(levels(test$samp.time.new))) -Deepayan [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
deepayan, is that what you mean? but still the problem persists: nor correct neither contiguous labelling! I must probably reconsider everything from scratch: I'm bit confused now... test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) s-strsplit(levels(test$samp.time.new), :) s1- sapply(s, '[', 1) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, ylim=s1, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) Il 21/09/2012 08:55, Deepayan Sarkar ha scritto: On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:48 PM, maxbre mbres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote: my reproducible example test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) my objective is to use “site” as conditioning variable but with “samp.time” correctly grouped by “site”; the problem here is to ensure that levels of “samp.time” within each “site” are contiguous as otherwise they would be not contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between y axis categories -see dotplot -) I’ve been trying with this but without much success test$samp.time.new- with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site))) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the dotplot (I’m not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now) can anyone point me in the right direction? The problem here is that there is crossing between sites and samp.time. You can try some imaginative permutations of site, such as test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time, as.numeric(factor(site, levels = c(A, C, D, B, E) which gets all but site B right. There may be another permutation that works for everything, but it would be much easier to make a nested factor, i.e., test$samp.time.new - with(test, reorder(samp.time:site, as.numeric(site))) That just leaves getting the y-labels right, which I will leave for you to figure out. (Hint: ylim = some_function_of(levels(test$samp.time.new))) -Deepayan __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
my reproducible example test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) my objective is to use “site” as conditioning variable but with “samp.time” correctly grouped by “site”; the problem here is to ensure that levels of “samp.time” within each “site” are contiguous as otherwise they would be not contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between y axis categories -see dotplot -) I’ve been trying with this but without much success test$samp.time.new- with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site))) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the dotplot (I’m not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now) can anyone point me in the right direction? any help much appreciated thank you -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lattice-dotplot-reorder-contiguous-levels-tp4643741.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
I don't entirely understand what you want as an alternative. What is wrong with relation =same, the default? In any case, it sounds like you'll need to write your own panel function. If you look at panel.dotplot(), you'll see it's fairly straightforward, so modification should not be difficult. BTW, thanks for the reproducible example. I wouldn't have bothered at all without it, although maybe the result is the same so far as your concerned. Cheers, Bert On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 7:18 AM, maxbre mbres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote: my reproducible example test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A, B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902, 0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442, 10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315, 30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30, 0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61, 3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2, 4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)), .Names = c(site, conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame) dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = same)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) my objective is to use “site” as conditioning variable but with “samp.time” correctly grouped by “site”; the problem here is to ensure that levels of “samp.time” within each “site” are contiguous as otherwise they would be not contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between y axis categories -see dotplot -) I’ve been trying with this but without much success test$samp.time.new- with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site))) dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test, scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)), layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE ) I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the dotplot (I’m not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now) can anyone point me in the right direction? any help much appreciated thank you -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/lattice-dotplot-reorder-contiguous-levels-tp4643741.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. -- Bert Gunter Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics Internal Contact Info: Phone: 467-7374 Website: http://pharmadevelopment.roche.com/index/pdb/pdb-functional-groups/pdb-biostatistics/pdb-ncb-home.htm __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] lattice dotplot reorder contiguous levels
Is result3 what you are looking for?
test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L,
3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A,
B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902,
0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442,
10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315,
30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30,
0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61,
3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L,
3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L,
8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2,
4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)),
.Names = c(site,
conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame)
result0 -
dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test,
scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)),
layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE
)
result0
test$sample.time - as.numeric(as.character(test$samp.time))
result1 -
xyplot(sample.time ~ conc | site,
data=test,
scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = same)),
layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE,
panel=panel.dotplot)
result1
result2 -
update(result1, panel=function(x, y, ...) {
panel.xyplot(x, y, ...)
panel.rug(y=y)
}
)
result2
trellis.par.get(superpose.line)
new.col - c(trellis.par.get(superpose.line)$col, darkgreen, darkblue)
trellis.par.set(superpose.line=list(col=new.col),
superpose.symbol=list(col=new.col))
result3 -
xyplot(sample.time ~ conc | site,
groups=samp.time, pch=16,
data=test,
scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation =
same), alternating=1),
layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE,
par.settings = list(clip = list(panel = off)),
panel=function(x, y, ...) {
panel.xyplot(x, y, ...)
gg - list(...)$groups
subs - list(...)$subscripts
col=trellis.par.get(superpose.line)$col
panel.rug(y=unique(y),
col=unique(col[match(gg[subs], levels(gg))]))
for (uy in unique(y))
panel.axis(side=right, at=uy, outside=TRUE,
text.col=col[match(uy, levels(gg))],
line.col=col[match(uy, levels(gg))])
}
)
result3
On 9/20/12, maxbre mbres...@arpa.veneto.it wrote:
my reproducible example
test-structure(list(site = structure(c(1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 1L, 2L,
2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 2L, 3L,
3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 3L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 5L), .Label = c(A,
B, C, D, E), class = factor), conc = c(2.32, 0.902,
0.468, 5.51, 1.49, 0.532, 0.72, 0.956, 0.887, 20, 30, 2.12, 0.442,
10, 50, 110, 3.36, 2.41, 20, 70, 3610, 100, 4.79, 20, 0.0315,
30, 60, 1, 3.37, 80, 1.21, 0.302, 0.728, 1.29, 30, 40, 90, 30,
0.697, 6.25, 0.576, 0.335, 20, 10, 620, 40, 9.98, 4.76, 2.61,
3.39, 20, 4.59), samp.time = structure(c(2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L,
4L, 5L, 4L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 9L, 8L, 7L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 3L,
3L, 2L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 4L, 1L, 4L, 6L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 3L,
8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 8L, 4L, 9L, 3L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 8L, 1L), .Label = c(2,
4, 12, 24, 96, 135, 167, 168, 169), class = factor)),
.Names = c(site,
conc, samp.time), row.names = c(NA, 52L), class = data.frame)
dotplot(samp.time~conc|site, data=test,
scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)),
layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE
)
my objective is to use “site” as conditioning variable but with “samp.time”
correctly grouped by “site”; the problem here is to ensure that levels of
“samp.time” within each “site” are contiguous as otherwise they would be not
contiguous in the dot plot itself (i.e, avoid that sort of holes in between
y axis categories -see dotplot -)
I’ve been trying with this but without much success
test$samp.time.new-
with(test,reorder(samp.time,as.numeric(site)))
dotplot(samp.time.new~conc|site, data=test,
scales=list(x=list(log=10), y = list(relation = free)),
layout=c(1,5), strip=FALSE, strip.left=TRUE
)
I think (I hope) a possible different solution is to create for ylim a
proper character vector of different length to pass to each panel of the
dotplot (I’m not posting this attempt because too much confused up to now)
can anyone point me in the right direction?
any help much appreciated
thank you
--
View this message in context:
