Re: [R] modelling and R misconceptions; was: package installtion

2011-11-17 Thread Uwe Ligges
This is hopeless, since you never seem to listen to our advice, 
therefore this will be my very last try:


So you actually need local advice, both for statistical concepts and R 
related. No statistics software can estimate effects of variables that 
you observed to be constant (e.g. 0) all the time. If any software does, 
please delete it a once from your machine.
Instead, ask a local statistician for advice on your problem. You 
certainly want to show the data and your model to the local expert - 
since you don't show us. And then you want to ask for local R course 
since reading the documentation seems not to help. Applying mtrace() in 
a non exiting object shows this straight away.


Uwe Ligges






On 17.11.2011 15:49, Scott Raynaud wrote:

I believe the problem is a column of zeroes in my x matrix.  I have tried the 
suggestions in the documentation,
so now to try to confirm the probelm I'd like to run debug.  Here's where I 
think the problem is:

###~~  Fitting the model using lmer funtion~~###
(fitmodel- lmer(modelformula,data,family=binomial(link=logit),nAGQ=1))
mtrace(fitmodel)

I added the mtrace to catch the error, but get the following:

Error in mtrace(fitmodel) : Can't find fitmodel

How can I debug this?


- Original Message -
From: Rolf Turnerrolf.tur...@xtra.co.nz
To: Scott Raynaudscott.rayn...@yahoo.com
Cc: r-help@r-project.orgr-help@r-project.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: [R] package installtion

On 17/11/11 05:37, Scott Raynaud wrote:

That might be an option if it weren't my most important predictor.  I'm 
thinking my best bet is to use MLWin for the estimation since it will properly 
set fixed effects
   to 0.  All my other sample size simulation programs use SAS PROC IML which I 
don't have/can't afford.  I like R since it's free, but I can't work around the 
problem
I'm currently having.


This is the ``push every possible button until you get a result and to hell 
with what
anything actually means'' approach to statistics.  The probability of getting a
*meaningful* result from this approach is close to zero.

Why don't you try to *understand* what is going on, rather than wildly throwing
every possible piece of software at the problem until one such piece runs?

 cheers,

 Rolf Turner


__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] modelling and R misconceptions; was: package installtion

2011-11-17 Thread Scott Raynaud
My responses are in brackets below, plus a final note after the main text.

- Original Message -
From: Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de
To: Scott Raynaud scott.rayn...@yahoo.com
Cc: r-help@r-project.org r-help@r-project.org
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [R] modelling and R misconceptions; was: package installtion

This is hopeless [That's a matter of perception-even concentration camp 
prisoners 
found a way to hope (see Viktor Frankl)], since you never [never is a strong 
word 
and many times leads to cognitive errors] seem to listen to our 
advice [It's possible that I misunderstood your recommedations (more likely), 
or that you communicated poorly (less likely)], 
therefore this will be my very last try:

So you actually need local advice [Yes I need advice-that's why I post here!], 
both for statistical concepts and R related [I don't claim to be a statistical 
genius, 
but I can hold my own.  Now, R is a different matter].  No statistics software 
can estimate effects of variables that you observed to be constant (e.g. 0) 
all the time [I think you misuderstood my intentions-I never wanted to estimate 
effects that are 0 all of the time]. If any software does, 
please delete it a once from your machine.
Instead, ask a local statistician for advice on your problem. You 
certainly want to show the data and your model to the local expert - 
since you don't show us. [I gave a detailed explanation in a previous post 
which I repeat here:


|OK, I'm using William Browne's MLPowSim to create an R script which will 
simulate samples for estimation of sample size in mixed models.  I have subjects
| nested in hospitals with hospitals treated as random and all of my covariates 
at level 1.  My outcome is death, so it's binary and I'll have a fixed and 
|random intercept.  My interest is in the relation of the covariates to the 
outcome.  
| 
|My most important variable is gestational age (GA) which my investigators 
divide thusly: 23-24, 25-26, 27-28, 29-30 and 31-32.  I have recoded the
| dummies for GA in the script according to the MLPowSim instructions to a 
random multinomial variable:
| 
|   macpred-rmultinom(n2,1,c(.1031,.1482,.2385,.4404,.0698)) 
|   x[,3]-macpred[1,][l2id]
|   x[,4]-macpred[2,][l2id]
|   x[,5]-macpred[3,][l2id]
|   x[,6]-macpred[4,][l2id]
|
|GA 23-24 is the reference with p=.0698.  I started with a structured sampling 
scheme of 20, 60, 100, 120 and 140 level 2 units.  My level 2 units have 
|different sizes.  So at 20 I had 5 hospitals with 100 patients, 4 with 280, 3 
with 460, 3 with 640, 3 with 820 and 2 with 1000.  Thus, at 60 hospitals, I 
have 15, 
|12, 9, 9, 9, 6 with the same cell sample sizes.
| 
|According to the MLPowSim documentation, with small probablities it's possible 
to have a column of zeroes in the X matrix if there are not many units in 
|the random factor.  R will choke on this but MLWin sets the associated fixed 
effects to 0.  When R choked, I increased from 20 to 60 as my minimum as 
|suggested in the MLPowSim documentation.  Still no luck.


Since this is a simulation, I assume once and a while that by chance a 
coefficient could be 0. 
In fact, Browne mentions as much in his documentation.  There is a bit more to 
my simulation, 
but I thought I'd try to keep it as simple as possible, at least at the outset.]


And then you want to ask for local R course 
since reading the documentation seems not to help [You got that right!]. 
Applying mtrace() in 
a non exiting object shows this straight away.

Uwe Ligges


Apparently I misuderstood the prupose of mtrace after reading the 
documentation-I thought it was 
to debug problems of the sort I've encountered.  Michael Weylandt provided 
appropriate direction 
in the previous post for which I am grateful.

Not all of us can be intellectual superstars.  That's why we ask for help.  
This much I did read and understand
from the R posting guide:

Responding to other posts: 
* Rudeness and ad hominem comments are not acceptable. Brevity is OK. 
It's a good lesson to learn.


On 17.11.2011 15:49, Scott Raynaud wrote:
 I believe the problem is a column of zeroes in my x matrix.  I have tried the 
 suggestions in the documentation,
 so now to try to confirm the probelm I'd like to run debug.  Here's where I 
 think the problem is:

 ###~~      Fitting the model using lmer funtion    ~~###
 (fitmodel- lmer(modelformula,data,family=binomial(link=logit),nAGQ=1))
 mtrace(fitmodel)

 I added the mtrace to catch the error, but get the following:

 Error in mtrace(fitmodel) : Can't find fitmodel

 How can I debug this?


 - Original Message -
 From: Rolf Turnerrolf.tur...@xtra.co.nz
 To: Scott Raynaudscott.rayn...@yahoo.com
 Cc: r-help@r-project.orgr-help@r-project.org
 Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [R] package installtion

 On 17/11/11 05:37, Scott Raynaud wrote