Re: [R] slightly off topic...
The fact that the attachment to someone with a .de domain has them labeled mit de Wort "Teil" suggests that the labeling is being done at the final destination, since the server is set up with English messages. wie er scharfsinnig bemerkte[1] :-) Looking at the ASCII version of one such email reveals: - the part or Teil is how my thunderbird (English at work, German at home) announces the parts of multipart emails. Neither "part 1.2" nor "Teil 1.2" is written anywhere in the source. - the r-help list footer somehow ended up as separate part of the email Cheers, Claudia -- Claudia Beleites Dipartimento dei Materiali e delle Risorse Naturali Università degli Studi di Trieste Via Alfonso Valerio 6/a I-34127 Trieste phone: +39 0 40 5 58-37 68 email: cbelei...@units.it __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] slightly off topic...
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:20 PM, David Winsemius wrote: [snip] > Steve; > > Your mail client may be doing further filtering than the server. he server > passes on .txt and .pdf files. There was a posting with an attachment two > days ago. The third item in this thread: > [R] barplot with varaible-width bars > > You should be able to see something with your browser. [/snip] Turns out I just wasn't looking closely enough -- I use gmail through my webrowser, so attachments do come through. I guess I confused this mailing list with another (which does strip attachments). Anyway, thanks for the clarification. > The fact that the attachment to someone with a .de domain has them labeled > mit de Wort "Teil" suggests that the labeling is being done at the final > destination, since the server is set up with English messages. wie er scharfsinnig bemerkte[1] -steve [1] Blame these guys if that's actually something offensive: http://dictionary.reverso.net/german-english/scharfsinnig -- Steve Lianoglou Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | Weill Medical College of Cornell University Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] slightly off topic...
On Feb 2, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Steve Lianoglou wrote: Hi, On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Sacha Viquerat wrote: i'm sorry to bother but... sometimes theres an attachment in the posts on the list, a single file called: Teil 1.2 whys that? i dont want to open it to find out, as i have used computers before ;) therefore i suspect it to be either some security problem OR to be the alternative HTML version that is claimed to have been deleted. any light-shedding would be appreciated! That's weird -- I don't ever recall seeing an attachment come through on this list before. If I'm not mistaken, I think mailman is set to explicitly removes attachments from emails before it is broadcast to this list ... but I'm not 100% sure. Steve; Your mail client may be doing further filtering than the server. he server passes on .txt and .pdf files. There was a posting with an attachment two days ago. The third item in this thread: [R] barplot with varaible-width bars You should be able to see something with your browser. The fact that the attachment to someone with a .de domain has them labeled mit de Wort "Teil" suggests that the labeling is being done at the final destination, since the server is set up with English messages. -steve David Winsemius, MD West Hartford, CT __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] slightly off topic...
Hi, On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Sacha Viquerat wrote: > i'm sorry to bother but... > sometimes theres an attachment in the posts on the list, a single file > called: > > Teil 1.2 > > whys that? i dont want to open it to find out, as i have used computers > before ;) > therefore i suspect it to be either some security problem OR to be the > alternative HTML version that is claimed to have been deleted. any > light-shedding would be appreciated! That's weird -- I don't ever recall seeing an attachment come through on this list before. If I'm not mistaken, I think mailman is set to explicitly removes attachments from emails before it is broadcast to this list ... but I'm not 100% sure. -steve -- Steve Lianoglou Graduate Student: Computational Systems Biology | Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | Weill Medical College of Cornell University Contact Info: http://cbio.mskcc.org/~lianos/contact __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] slightly off topic...
i'm sorry to bother but... sometimes theres an attachment in the posts on the list, a single file called: Teil 1.2 whys that? i dont want to open it to find out, as i have used computers before ;) therefore i suspect it to be either some security problem OR to be the alternative HTML version that is claimed to have been deleted. any light-shedding would be appreciated! __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] [slightly off topic] Sweave with markdown
Thank you all, I think I have a good list of options now. The best suited to my personal taste seems to be the Brew package, which I completely overlooked until I looked at the source examples. If I can persuade my text editor (textmate) to recognize the markup and also execute the R chunks, I'll have my dream workflow: a single text file with both text (in a lightweight, email friendly markup), and the R commands together. The MultiMarkdown extension allows me to convert the brewed file into whatever output one could wish for: LaTeX, Html, pdf, rtf,... I'll probably be using the html conversion for routine work, and the LaTeX one when a clean printed version is needed. The use of dev.copy or some similar command should make easy the creation of both bitmap and vector versions of the graphs if needed. Thanks again everyone! baptiste On 23 May 2008, at 13:30, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: You could check out the brew package: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2007/000327.html On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:37 AM, baptiste Auguié <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DeaR list, Has anyone tried to mix the Sweave paradigm with the Markdown[*] (and co.) syntax? Would this be hard to implement? My tiny understanding of Sweave is that one can define new drivers for the text part, while some functions that deal with the R code would not require any modification. Here's the reason I'm interested in Mardown for a driver. I've been orbiting around Sweave for several weeks, and while I understand the great value of this "literate programming", I'm a bit put off by the technical aspect. I'm a LateX user, and a R user (you'd have guessed, albeit fairly novice), so the problem is not to get it working (i got some writings done with Sweave), but more of getting an efficient workflow. I find the LaTeX commands overly intruding in the middle of my R source code, plus the relatively slow compilation of latex makes it quite impractical for quick studies ( I once spent 20 minutes trying to get the graph to be at a sensible scale on the page). As an alternative, I'm resorting to having a folder per study (I'm physicist, doing data analysis for optical spectroscopy), with one R file per analysis and a text file to keep track of the experimental conditions. When the data is really important / interesting, I've also tried to write a package: great for storing the data, functions and commands in a consistent manner (this works fine, but it cannot be a solution for quick trial experiments. Also, the figures cannot be included in the html doc as far as I know.) I was considering some alternatives to Sweave, namely R2HTML and odfWeave, but in the former the source syntax is no less disturbing than LaTeX (although the zero compilation time is a plus), while for the latter I do not have a decent compatible editor (on a Mac, I tried Openoffice and Abiword but the fonts look like my handwriting for some obscure reason). Maybe I'll give it another shot at some stage, I just usually prefer plain text files. Any input welcome, Baptiste [*]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown _ Baptiste Auguié Physics Department University of Exeter Stocker Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QL, UK Phone: +44 1392 264187 http://newton.ex.ac.uk/research/emag http://projects.ex.ac.uk/atto __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting- guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. _ Baptiste Auguié Physics Department University of Exeter Stocker Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QL, UK Phone: +44 1392 264187 http://newton.ex.ac.uk/research/emag http://projects.ex.ac.uk/atto __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] [slightly off topic] Sweave with markdown
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:37 AM, baptiste Auguié <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (although the zero compilation time is a plus), while for the latter I do > not have a decent compatible editor (on a Mac, I tried Openoffice and > Abiword but the fonts look like my handwriting for some obscure reason). > Maybe I'll give it another shot at some stage, I just usually prefer plain > text files. Try using NeoOffice or the development version of OpenOffice. The new version (3.0) of OpenOffice is better integrated into OS X and should probably do the trick http://download.openoffice.org/3.0beta/ It is beta, but it has been pretty stable for me. Max __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] [slightly off topic] Sweave with markdown
You could check out the brew package: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2007/000327.html On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:37 AM, baptiste Auguié <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > DeaR list, > > Has anyone tried to mix the Sweave paradigm with the Markdown[*] (and co.) > syntax? Would this be hard to implement? My tiny understanding of Sweave is > that one can define new drivers for the text part, while some functions that > deal with the R code would not require any modification. Here's the reason > I'm interested in Mardown for a driver. > > I've been orbiting around Sweave for several weeks, and while I understand > the great value of this "literate programming", I'm a bit put off by the > technical aspect. I'm a LateX user, and a R user (you'd have guessed, albeit > fairly novice), so the problem is not to get it working (i got some writings > done with Sweave), but more of getting an efficient workflow. I find the > LaTeX commands overly intruding in the middle of my R source code, plus the > relatively slow compilation of latex makes it quite impractical for quick > studies ( I once spent 20 minutes trying to get the graph to be at a > sensible scale on the page). > > As an alternative, I'm resorting to having a folder per study (I'm > physicist, doing data analysis for optical spectroscopy), with one R file > per analysis and a text file to keep track of the experimental conditions. > When the data is really important / interesting, I've also tried to write a > package: great for storing the data, functions and commands in a consistent > manner (this works fine, but it cannot be a solution for quick trial > experiments. Also, the figures cannot be included in the html doc as far as > I know.) > > I was considering some alternatives to Sweave, namely R2HTML and odfWeave, > but in the former the source syntax is no less disturbing than LaTeX > (although the zero compilation time is a plus), while for the latter I do > not have a decent compatible editor (on a Mac, I tried Openoffice and > Abiword but the fonts look like my handwriting for some obscure reason). > Maybe I'll give it another shot at some stage, I just usually prefer plain > text files. > > Any input welcome, > > Baptiste > > [*]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown > > _ > > Baptiste Auguié > > Physics Department > University of Exeter > Stocker Road, > Exeter, Devon, > EX4 4QL, UK > > Phone: +44 1392 264187 > > http://newton.ex.ac.uk/research/emag > http://projects.ex.ac.uk/atto > > __ > R-help@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code. > __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
[R] [slightly off topic] Sweave with markdown
DeaR list, Has anyone tried to mix the Sweave paradigm with the Markdown[*] (and co.) syntax? Would this be hard to implement? My tiny understanding of Sweave is that one can define new drivers for the text part, while some functions that deal with the R code would not require any modification. Here's the reason I'm interested in Mardown for a driver. I've been orbiting around Sweave for several weeks, and while I understand the great value of this "literate programming", I'm a bit put off by the technical aspect. I'm a LateX user, and a R user (you'd have guessed, albeit fairly novice), so the problem is not to get it working (i got some writings done with Sweave), but more of getting an efficient workflow. I find the LaTeX commands overly intruding in the middle of my R source code, plus the relatively slow compilation of latex makes it quite impractical for quick studies ( I once spent 20 minutes trying to get the graph to be at a sensible scale on the page). As an alternative, I'm resorting to having a folder per study (I'm physicist, doing data analysis for optical spectroscopy), with one R file per analysis and a text file to keep track of the experimental conditions. When the data is really important / interesting, I've also tried to write a package: great for storing the data, functions and commands in a consistent manner (this works fine, but it cannot be a solution for quick trial experiments. Also, the figures cannot be included in the html doc as far as I know.) I was considering some alternatives to Sweave, namely R2HTML and odfWeave, but in the former the source syntax is no less disturbing than LaTeX (although the zero compilation time is a plus), while for the latter I do not have a decent compatible editor (on a Mac, I tried Openoffice and Abiword but the fonts look like my handwriting for some obscure reason). Maybe I'll give it another shot at some stage, I just usually prefer plain text files. Any input welcome, Baptiste [*]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markdown _ Baptiste Auguié Physics Department University of Exeter Stocker Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4QL, UK Phone: +44 1392 264187 http://newton.ex.ac.uk/research/emag http://projects.ex.ac.uk/atto __ R-help@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
