Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-06 Thread J. R. M. Hosking

Abelian wrote:

Dear ALL
I have a list of data below
0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
all of them are ninty.
Nowaday, i try to find a distribution to fit those data.
Firstly, I normalize the data, i.e.. (x-mean(X))/(sd(X))
i utilize the SAS to fit my data. Then i obtain the result below
##-
 Parameters for Lognormal
Distribution

 Parameter   Symbol
Estimate

 Threshold   Theta
-1.51062
 Scale
Zeta  0.237283
 Shape   Sigma
0.593481
 
Mean

0.001321
 Std
Dev   0.982435
##---
however, i confuse about the threshold parameter..
How to get it? Does it be able to be calculated by R?



Function pelln3 in package lmom will estimate all 3 parameters
of the 3-parameter lognormal distribution, including the threshold ...

 x - scan(textConnection(
+ 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
+ 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
+ 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
+ 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
+ 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
+ 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
+ ))
Read 39 items

 y - (x-mean(x))/sd(x)

 library(lmom)
 pelln3(samlmu(y))
  zeta mu  sigma
-1.5362134  0.2554631  0.5896735



J. R. M. Hosking

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-05 Thread Bernardo Rangel Tura
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 01:13 -0400, jim holtman wrote:
 Here is what I get from using 'fitdistr' in R to fit to a lognormal.
 The resulting density plot from the distribution seems to be a reason
 match to the data.
 
  x - scan()
 1: 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 9: 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 14: 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 22: 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 27: 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 35: 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
 40:
 Read 39 items
  plot(density(x))
  library(MASS)
  fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
  meanlogsdlog
   -0.134806360.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)
  lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')

Hi Jim

I agree with your solution but my plot result not fine.
I obtain same result.
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
 meanlogsdlog   
  -0.134806360.19118861 
 ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)

In plot when I use points (blue) and curve (green) the fit o lognormal
and density(data) is fine but when I use lines (red) the fit is bad (in
attach I send a PDF of my output)

Do you know why this  happen?

Thanks in advance

-- 
Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D
National Institute of Cardiology
Brazil

P.S. my script is

x - scan()
0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873

require(MASS)
fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
pdf(adj.pdf)
plot(density(x))
lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)
dev.off()




adj.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-05 Thread Mike Lawrence
You didn't properly specify the x-axis coordinates in your call to lines():

plot(density(x))
lines(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)


On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bernardo Rangel Tura
t...@centroin.com.br wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 01:13 -0400, jim holtman wrote:
 Here is what I get from using 'fitdistr' in R to fit to a lognormal.
 The resulting density plot from the distribution seems to be a reason
 match to the data.

  x - scan()
 1: 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 9: 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 14: 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 22: 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 27: 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 35: 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
 40:
 Read 39 items
  plot(density(x))
  library(MASS)
  fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
      meanlog        sdlog
   -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)
  lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')

 Hi Jim

 I agree with your solution but my plot result not fine.
 I obtain same result.
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
     meanlog        sdlog
  -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)

 In plot when I use points (blue) and curve (green) the fit o lognormal
 and density(data) is fine but when I use lines (red) the fit is bad (in
 attach I send a PDF of my output)

 Do you know why this  happen?

 Thanks in advance

 --
 Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D
 National Institute of Cardiology
 Brazil

 P.S. my script is

 x - scan()
 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873

 require(MASS)
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
 pdf(adj.pdf)
 plot(density(x))
 lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
 points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
 curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)
 dev.off()



 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.





-- 
Mike Lawrence
Graduate Student
Department of Psychology
Dalhousie University

Looking to arrange a meeting? Check my public calendar:
http://tinyurl.com/mikes-public-calendar

~ Certainty is folly... I think. ~

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-05 Thread Charles Annis, P.E.
The data suggest a lognormal threshold to me (and perhaps to the originator,
based on his title).

##
x - c(0.80010, 0.72299, 0.69893, 0.99597, 0.89200, 0.69312, 0.73613,
1.13559, 0.85009, 0.85804, 0.73324, 1.04826, 0.84002, 1.76330, 0.71980,
0.89416, 0.89450, 0.98670, 0.83571, 0.73833, 0.66549, 
0.93641, 0.80418, 0.95285, 0.76876, 0.82588, 1.09394, 1.00195, 1.14976,
0.80008, 1.11947, 1.09484, 0.81494, 0.68696, 0.82364, 0.84390, 0.71402,
0.80293, 1.02873)

# plot the original density

x.threshold - 0

qqnorm(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)

qqline(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)


# plot the lognormal density with a threshold

x.threshold - 0.63

qqnorm(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)

qqline(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)


# compute and plot the associated log likelihoods

x.threshold - 0

loglikelihood - 1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold), mean(log(x
- x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold)))

x.threshold - 0.63

loglikelihood.63 - 1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold),
mean(log(x - x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold)))

x.minus.x.threshold - x - x.threshold

plot(x.minus.x.threshold, loglikelihood.63, xlim = c(0, 2), ylim =c(0, 3.5))

points(x, loglikelihood, col=red)

# compare loglikelihood ratio with chi-square

sum.loglikelihood - sum(loglikelihood)
print(sum.loglikelihood)
sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum(loglikelihood.63)
print(sum.loglikelihood.63)

log.likelihiood.ratio - sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum.loglikelihood

print(log.likelihiood.ratio)

significant.difference - qchisq(p = 0.95, df = 1)/2

print(significant.difference)
#



Charles Annis, P.E.

charles.an...@statisticalengineering.com
phone: 561-352-9699
eFax:  614-455-3265
http://www.StatisticalEngineering.com
 
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Lawrence
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 8:13 AM
To: t...@centroin.com.br
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] threshold distribution

You didn't properly specify the x-axis coordinates in your call to lines():

plot(density(x))
lines(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)


On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bernardo Rangel Tura
t...@centroin.com.br wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 01:13 -0400, jim holtman wrote:
 Here is what I get from using 'fitdistr' in R to fit to a lognormal.
 The resulting density plot from the distribution seems to be a reason
 match to the data.

  x - scan()
 1: 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 9: 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 14: 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 22: 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 27: 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 35: 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
 40:
 Read 39 items
  plot(density(x))
  library(MASS)
  fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
      meanlog        sdlog
   -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)
  lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')

 Hi Jim

 I agree with your solution but my plot result not fine.
 I obtain same result.
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
     meanlog        sdlog
  -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)

 In plot when I use points (blue) and curve (green) the fit o lognormal
 and density(data) is fine but when I use lines (red) the fit is bad (in
 attach I send a PDF of my output)

 Do you know why this  happen?

 Thanks in advance

 --
 Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D
 National Institute of Cardiology
 Brazil

 P.S. my script is

 x - scan()
 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873

 require(MASS)
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
 pdf(adj.pdf)
 plot(density(x))
 lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
 points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
 curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)
 dev.off()



 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide
http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.





-- 
Mike Lawrence
Graduate Student
Department of Psychology
Dalhousie University

Looking to arrange a meeting? Check my public calendar:
http://tinyurl.com/mikes-public-calendar

~ Certainty is folly... I think. ~

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code

Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-05 Thread Charles Annis, P.E.
In my haste I forgot to take the logs of the likelihoods.  How embarrassing.
The conclusion is unchanged - the data support a non-zero threshold.

Here's the corrected code:

x.threshold - 0

loglikelihood - log(1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold),
mean(log(x - x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold

sum.loglikelihood - sum(loglikelihood)

print(sum.loglikelihood)

x.threshold - 0.63

loglikelihood.63 - log(1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold),
mean(log(x - x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold

sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum(loglikelihood.63)

print(sum.loglikelihood.63)

x.minus.x.threshold - x - x.threshold

plot(loglikelihood.63 ~ x.minus.x.threshold, xlim = c(0, 2), ylim =c(-10,
2))

points(x, loglikelihood, col=red)


log.likelihiood.ratio - sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum.loglikelihood

print(log.likelihiood.ratio)

significant.difference - qchisq(p = 0.95, df = 1)/2

print(significant.difference)




Charles Annis, P.E.

charles.an...@statisticalengineering.com
phone: 561-352-9699
eFax:  614-455-3265
http://www.StatisticalEngineering.com
 

-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Charles Annis, P.E.
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:39 AM
To: 'Mike Lawrence'; t...@centroin.com.br
Cc: 'r-help'
Subject: Re: [R] threshold distribution

The data suggest a lognormal threshold to me (and perhaps to the originator,
based on his title).

##
x - c(0.80010, 0.72299, 0.69893, 0.99597, 0.89200, 0.69312, 0.73613,
1.13559, 0.85009, 0.85804, 0.73324, 1.04826, 0.84002, 1.76330, 0.71980,
0.89416, 0.89450, 0.98670, 0.83571, 0.73833, 0.66549, 
0.93641, 0.80418, 0.95285, 0.76876, 0.82588, 1.09394, 1.00195, 1.14976,
0.80008, 1.11947, 1.09484, 0.81494, 0.68696, 0.82364, 0.84390, 0.71402,
0.80293, 1.02873)

# plot the original density

x.threshold - 0

qqnorm(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)

qqline(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)


# plot the lognormal density with a threshold

x.threshold - 0.63

qqnorm(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)

qqline(log(x - x.threshold), datax = TRUE)


# compute and plot the associated log likelihoods

x.threshold - 0

loglikelihood - 1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold), mean(log(x
- x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold)))

x.threshold - 0.63

loglikelihood.63 - 1/(x-x.threshold) * dnorm(log(x - x.threshold),
mean(log(x - x.threshold)), sd(log(x - x.threshold)))

x.minus.x.threshold - x - x.threshold

plot(x.minus.x.threshold, loglikelihood.63, xlim = c(0, 2), ylim =c(0, 3.5))

points(x, loglikelihood, col=red)

# compare loglikelihood ratio with chi-square

sum.loglikelihood - sum(loglikelihood)
print(sum.loglikelihood)
sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum(loglikelihood.63)
print(sum.loglikelihood.63)

log.likelihiood.ratio - sum.loglikelihood.63 - sum.loglikelihood

print(log.likelihiood.ratio)

significant.difference - qchisq(p = 0.95, df = 1)/2

print(significant.difference)
#



Charles Annis, P.E.

charles.an...@statisticalengineering.com
phone: 561-352-9699
eFax:  614-455-3265
http://www.StatisticalEngineering.com
 
-Original Message-
From: r-help-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-help-boun...@r-project.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Lawrence
Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 8:13 AM
To: t...@centroin.com.br
Cc: r-help
Subject: Re: [R] threshold distribution

You didn't properly specify the x-axis coordinates in your call to lines():

plot(density(x))
lines(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')
points(x,dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='blue')
curve(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='green',add=T)


On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Bernardo Rangel Tura
t...@centroin.com.br wrote:
 On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 01:13 -0400, jim holtman wrote:
 Here is what I get from using 'fitdistr' in R to fit to a lognormal.
 The resulting density plot from the distribution seems to be a reason
 match to the data.

  x - scan()
 1: 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 9: 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 14: 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 22: 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 27: 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 35: 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
 40:
 Read 39 items
  plot(density(x))
  library(MASS)
  fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
      meanlog        sdlog
   -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)
  lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')

 Hi Jim

 I agree with your solution but my plot result not fine.
 I obtain same result.
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
     meanlog        sdlog
  -0.13480636    0.19118861
  ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)

 In plot when I use points (blue) and curve (green) the fit o lognormal
 and density(data) is fine but when I use lines (red) the fit is bad (in
 attach I send a PDF of my output)

 Do you know why this  happen?

 Thanks in advance

 --
 Bernardo Rangel Tura, M.D,MPH,Ph.D
 National Institute of Cardiology
 Brazil

 P.S. my script is

 x - scan

[R] threshold distribution

2009-04-04 Thread Abelian
Dear ALL
I have a list of data below
0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
all of them are ninty.
Nowaday, i try to find a distribution to fit those data.
Firstly, I normalize the data, i.e.. (x-mean(X))/(sd(X))
i utilize the SAS to fit my data. Then i obtain the result below
##-
 Parameters for Lognormal
Distribution

 Parameter   Symbol
Estimate

 Threshold   Theta
-1.51062
 Scale
Zeta  0.237283
 Shape   Sigma
0.593481
 
Mean
0.001321
 Std
Dev   0.982435
##---
however, i confuse about the threshold parameter..
How to get it? Does it be able to be calculated by R?
Thanks a lot..

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.


Re: [R] threshold distribution

2009-04-04 Thread jim holtman
Here is what I get from using 'fitdistr' in R to fit to a lognormal.
The resulting density plot from the distribution seems to be a reason
match to the data.

 x - scan()
1: 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
9: 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
14: 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
22: 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
27: 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
35: 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
40:
Read 39 items
 plot(density(x))
 library(MASS)
 fitdistr(x, 'lognormal')
 meanlogsdlog
  -0.134806360.19118861
 ( 0.03061468) ( 0.02164785)
 lines(dlnorm(x, -.1348, .1911), col='red')


On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Abelian abelian1...@gmail.com wrote:
 Dear ALL
 I have a list of data below
 0.80010 0.72299 0.69893 0.99597 0.89200 0.69312 0.73613 1.13559
 0.85009 0.85804 0.73324 1.04826 0.84002
 1.76330 0.71980 0.89416 0.89450 0.98670 0.83571 0.73833 0.66549
 0.93641 0.80418 0.95285 0.76876 0.82588
 1.09394 1.00195 1.14976 0.80008 1.11947 1.09484 0.81494 0.68696
 0.82364 0.84390 0.71402 0.80293 1.02873
 all of them are ninty.
 Nowaday, i try to find a distribution to fit those data.
 Firstly, I normalize the data, i.e.. (x-mean(X))/(sd(X))
 i utilize the SAS to fit my data. Then i obtain the result below
 ##-
                                             Parameters for Lognormal
 Distribution

                                                 Parameter   Symbol
 Estimate

                                                 Threshold   Theta
 -1.51062
                                                 Scale
 Zeta      0.237283
                                                 Shape       Sigma
 0.593481

 Mean
 0.001321
                                                 Std
 Dev                   0.982435
 ##---
 however, i confuse about the threshold parameter..
 How to get it? Does it be able to be calculated by R?
 Thanks a lot..

 __
 R-help@r-project.org mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
 and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.




-- 
Jim Holtman
Cincinnati, OH
+1 513 646 9390

What is the problem that you are trying to solve?

__
R-help@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.