[R] Canonical method for S engine selection?
Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed
different processing depending on interpreter
(either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be?
if (condition) {
# Do S-PLUS code
} else {
# Do R code
}
Looking for something akin to the C preprocessor directive
USING_R, but for S.
--
SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Canonical method for S engine selection?
On 12/6/2006 5:02 PM, Paul Roebuck wrote:
Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed
different processing depending on interpreter
(either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be?
if (condition) {
# Do S-PLUS code
} else {
# Do R code
}
Looking for something akin to the C preprocessor directive
USING_R, but for S.
See ?is.R. This function is defined in both R and current versions of
S-PLUS; there are instructions for how to put together a test that works
in older S-PLUS versions too.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
Re: [R] Canonical method for S engine selection?
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Paul Roebuck wrote: Assuming script 'common.q' contains code that needed different processing depending on interpreter (either S-PLUS or R), what should the condition be? I believe exists(is.R) is.R() is a reliable condition. -thomas __ R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.
