Re: [R] Slightly off-topic --- distribution name.

2004-09-15 Thread A.J. Rossini

Have you checked Johnson and Kotz?  That's the obvious place to start
looking for distributions beyond the usual.

Rolf Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I've built R functions to ``effect'' a particular distribution, and
 would like to find out if that distribution is already ``known'' by
 an existing name.  (I.e. suppose it were called the ``Melvin''
 distribution --- I've built dmelvin, pmelvin, qmelvin, and rmelvin as
 it were, but I need a real name to substitute for melvin.)

 The distribution is really just a toy --- but it provides a nice (and
 ``non-obviouse'') example of a two parameter distribution where both
 the moment and maximum likelihood equations for the parameter
 estimators are readily solvable, but at the same time are
 ``interesting''.  So it's good for exercises in an intro math-stats
 course.

 The distribution is simply that of the ***difference*** of two
 independent exponential variates, with different parameters.

 I.e.  X = U - V  where U ~ exp(beta) and V ~ exp(alpha) (where
 E(U) = beta, E(V) = alpha).

 This makes the distribution of X something like an asymetric Laplace
 distribution, with its mode at 0.  (One could shift the mode too, but
 that would add a third parameter, which would be de trop.)

 Anyhow:  Is this a ``known'' distribution?  Does it have a name?
 (I've never seen it mentioned in any of the intro math-stat books
 that I've looked into.) If not, can anyone suggest a good name for
 it?  (Don't be rude now!)

   cheers,

   Rolf Turner
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 P. S.  To save you putting pen to paper and working it out,
the density function is

{ exp(x/alpha)/(alpha + beta) for x = 0
   f(x) = {
{ exp(-x/beta)/(alpha + beta) for x = 0

The mean and variance are mu = beta - alpha and
sigma^2 = alpha^2 + beta^2 respectfully. :-)

 __
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
 PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


-- 
Anthony Rossini Research Associate Professor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.analytics.washington.edu/ 
Biomedical and Health Informatics   University of Washington
Biostatistics, SCHARP/HVTN  Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
UW (Tu/Th/F): 206-616-7630 FAX=206-543-3461 | Voicemail is unreliable
FHCRC  (M/W): 206-667-7025 FAX=206-667-4812 | use Email

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachme...{{dropped}}

__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html


Re: [R] Slightly off-topic --- distribution name.

2004-09-15 Thread David Scott
I believe this is the skew-Laplace distribution, although the skew-Laplace 
does allow for the location of the mode of the distribution to vary.

Have a look at the function dskewlap in HyperbolicDist. The help on that 
function gives a reference to a paper by Feiller et al which describes the 
distribution.

David Scott

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Rolf Turner wrote:
I've built R functions to ``effect'' a particular distribution, and
would like to find out if that distribution is already ``known'' by
an existing name.  (I.e. suppose it were called the ``Melvin''
distribution --- I've built dmelvin, pmelvin, qmelvin, and rmelvin as
it were, but I need a real name to substitute for melvin.)
The distribution is really just a toy --- but it provides a nice (and
``non-obviouse'') example of a two parameter distribution where both
the moment and maximum likelihood equations for the parameter
estimators are readily solvable, but at the same time are
``interesting''.  So it's good for exercises in an intro math-stats
course.
The distribution is simply that of the ***difference*** of two
independent exponential variates, with different parameters.
I.e.  X = U - V  where U ~ exp(beta) and V ~ exp(alpha) (where
E(U) = beta, E(V) = alpha).
This makes the distribution of X something like an asymetric Laplace
distribution, with its mode at 0.  (One could shift the mode too, but
that would add a third parameter, which would be de trop.)
Anyhow:  Is this a ``known'' distribution?  Does it have a name?
(I've never seen it mentioned in any of the intro math-stat books
that I've looked into.) If not, can anyone suggest a good name for
it?  (Don't be rude now!)
cheers,
Rolf Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P. S.  To save you putting pen to paper and working it out,
  the density function is
  { exp(x/alpha)/(alpha + beta) for x = 0
f(x) = {
  { exp(-x/beta)/(alpha + beta) for x = 0
  The mean and variance are mu = beta - alpha and
  sigma^2 = alpha^2 + beta^2 respectfully. :-)
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html
_
David Scott Department of Statistics, Tamaki Campus
The University of Auckland, PB 92019
AucklandNEW ZEALAND
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86830 Fax: +64 9 373 7000
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Graduate Officer, Department of Statistics
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help
PLEASE do read the posting guide! http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html