Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Ralf Stubner]

On 29.03.19 17:05, William Dunlap wrote:
> It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen that has the call to
> std::rand() that volesti/src/rotating.cpp contains.
> 
> RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:
>   static inline Scalar run(const Scalar& x, const Scalar& y)
>   {
> return x + (y-x) * Scalar(std::rand()) / Scalar(RAND_MAX);
>   }

The link between the two seems to be rounding.h which contains:

  // pick a random rotation
  MT R = MT::Random(n,n);

cheerio
ralf

-- 
Ralf Stubner
Senior Software Engineer / Trainer

daqana GmbH
Dortustraße 48
14467 Potsdam

T: +49 331 23 61 93 11
F: +49 331 23 61 93 90
M: +49 162 20 91 196
Mail: ralf.stub...@daqana.com

Sitz: Potsdam
Register: AG Potsdam HRB 27966
Ust.-IdNr.: DE300072622
Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Stefan Knirsch, Prof. Dr. Dr. Karl-Kuno Kunze



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[William Dunlap]

One can use 'g++ -E' to find the which include file is the culprit.  E.g.,

% g++ -c -E -I`R RHOME`/include -I`R RHOME`/site-library/Rcpp/include -I`R
RHOME`/site-library/RcppEigen/include -Iexternal/LPsolve_src/run_headers
-Iexternal/minimum_ellipsoid -Iinclude -Iinclude/volume
-Iinclude/generators -Iinclude/samplers -Iinclude/annealing
-Iinclude/convex_bodies -std=gnu++11 rotating.cpp | egrep '\|^#
*[0-9]+' | grep -C 1 '\'
# 315 "/usr/include/stdlib.h" 2 3 4
extern int rand (void) throw ();
# 1 "/usr/include/alloca.h" 1 3 4
--
# 114 "/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/cstdlib" 3
  using ::rand;
# 196 "/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/cstdlib" 3
--
# 5185 "/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algo.h" 3
 + std::rand() % ((__i - __first) + 1);
# 5218 "/usr/include/c++/4.8.2/bits/stl_algo.h" 3
--
# 455
"/home/R/R-3.5.2/lib64/R/site-library/RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h"
return x + (y-x) * Scalar(std::rand()) / Scalar(2147483647);
  offset = (std::size_t(std::rand()) * multiplier) / divisor;
return Scalar((std::rand() >> shift) - offset);
# 689
"/home/R/R-3.5.2/lib64/R/site-library/RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h"
--
# 295
"/home/R/R-3.5.2/lib64/R/site-library/RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/arch/CUDA/Half.h"
return x + (y-x) * half(float(std::rand()) / float(2147483647));
# 412 "/home/R/R-3.5.2/lib64/R/site-library/RcppEigen/include/Eigen/Core" 2

Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com


On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:37 AM William Dunlap  wrote:

> Oops, RcppEigen does contain compiled code, but its header files include
> much more code that doesn't get checked because it is not used in
> RcppEigen.so.
>
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:35 AM William Dunlap  wrote:
>
>> The check only looks at compiled code.  BH contains only headers, no
>> compiled code.
>>
>> Bill Dunlap
>> TIBCO Software
>> wdunlap tibco.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:27 AM Maxime Turgeon <
>> maxime.turg...@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Bill,
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing something, but if RcppEigen were the cause of the
>>> NOTE, wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not:
>>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html
>>>
>>> And for what it's worth, neither does BH:
>>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html
>>>
>>> Max
>>> --
>>> *From:* R-package-devel  on
>>> behalf of William Dunlap 
>>> *Sent:* March 29, 2019 12:05 PM
>>> *To:* Vissarion Fisikopoulos
>>> *Cc:* R Package Development
>>> *Subject:* Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
>>>
>>> It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen that has the call to
>>> std::rand() that volesti/src/rotating.cpp contains.
>>>
>>> RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:
>>>   static inline Scalar run(const Scalar& x, const Scalar& y)
>>>   {
>>> return x + (y-x) * Scalar(std::rand()) / Scalar(RAND_MAX);
>>>   }
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Dunlap
>>> TIBCO Software
>>> wdunlap tibco.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:43 AM William Dunlap 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > > Library lpSolveAPI uses rand() and srand() in lp_utils.c. We replace
>>> > > both functions with GetRNGstate(); PutRNGstate(); unif_rand(); from
>>> > > R’s internal random number generation routines as it is proposed in
>>> > > `Writing R Extensions`. Moreover if you run in folder `/src`:
>>> > > $ grep -r 'rand()'
>>> > > You just get:
>>> > > `utils.c:  range *= (LPSREAL) unif_rand();`
>>> > > which is our replacement. If you replace `rand()` with `srand` in
>>> grep
>>> > > search you get a null result.
>>> > > This NOTE appears because of our functions in `/src/include/samplers`
>>> > > where word `rand` appears a lot of times, for example
>>> > > `rand_point_generator()`.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think the note about using 'rand' comes from looking at strings
>>> > in the source code.  It is probably looking at undefined symbols in the
>>> > symbol table of the compiled and linked code with something like the
>>> > following
>>> >
>>> > % find volesti -iname "*o" | xargs nm -A -g --demangle | grep ' U ' |
>>> grep
>>> >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[William Dunlap]

The check only looks at compiled code.  BH contains only headers, no
compiled code.

Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com


On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:27 AM Maxime Turgeon <
maxime.turg...@mail.mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Hi Bill,
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but if RcppEigen were the cause of the NOTE,
> wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not:
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html
>
> And for what it's worth, neither does BH:
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html
>
> Max
> --
> *From:* R-package-devel  on behalf
> of William Dunlap 
> *Sent:* March 29, 2019 12:05 PM
> *To:* Vissarion Fisikopoulos
> *Cc:* R Package Development
> *Subject:* Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
>
> It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen that has the call to
> std::rand() that volesti/src/rotating.cpp contains.
>
> RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:
>   static inline Scalar run(const Scalar& x, const Scalar& y)
>   {
> return x + (y-x) * Scalar(std::rand()) / Scalar(RAND_MAX);
>   }
>
>
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:43 AM William Dunlap  wrote:
>
> > > Library lpSolveAPI uses rand() and srand() in lp_utils.c. We replace
> > > both functions with GetRNGstate(); PutRNGstate(); unif_rand(); from
> > > R’s internal random number generation routines as it is proposed in
> > > `Writing R Extensions`. Moreover if you run in folder `/src`:
> > > $ grep -r 'rand()'
> > > You just get:
> > > `utils.c:  range *= (LPSREAL) unif_rand();`
> > > which is our replacement. If you replace `rand()` with `srand` in grep
> > > search you get a null result.
> > > This NOTE appears because of our functions in `/src/include/samplers`
> > > where word `rand` appears a lot of times, for example
> > > `rand_point_generator()`.
> >
> > I don't think the note about using 'rand' comes from looking at strings
> > in the source code.  It is probably looking at undefined symbols in the
> > symbol table of the compiled and linked code with something like the
> > following
> >
> > % find volesti -iname "*o" | xargs nm -A -g --demangle | grep ' U ' |
> grep
> > rand
> > volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_rlp.o: U storevarandweight
> > volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_price.o: U rand_uniform
> > volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_utils.o: U unif_rand
> > volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_lib.o: U rand_uniform
> > volesti/src/rotating.o: U rand
> > volesti/src/volesti.so: U rand@@GLIBC_2.2.5
> > volesti/src/volesti.so: U unif_rand
> >
> > You will have to poke through the boost headers or docs to see how to
> avoid
> > using rand in volesti/src/rotating.cpp.
> >
> > Bill Dunlap
> > TIBCO Software
> > wdunlap tibco.com
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:12 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos <
> fisi...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> @Henrik: thanks a lot for your reply.
> >>
> >> I did one more submission (the third) and I am posting below my answer
> >> to the automatic cran email with 2 NOTES.
> >>
> >> Looking forward to your feedback.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Vissarion.
> >>
> >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:04, Vissarion Fisikopoulos  >
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Dear all,
> >> >
> >> > We got the results from the automated check for our package. There are
> >> > two NOTEs in both checks in Windows and Debian. We are sure that the
> >> > rejections are false positive, so with this e-mail we try to explain
> >> > why. Please find our explanations below.
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:40, 
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Dear maintainer,
> >> > >
> >> > > package volesti_0.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> >> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
> >> > > Windows: <
> >>
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/volesti_0.0.0_20190328_151546/Windows/00check.log
> >> >
> >> > > Status: 2 NOTEs
> >> > > Debian: <
> >>
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/volesti_0.0.0_20190328_151546/Debian/00check.log
> >> >
> >> > > Statu

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Ralf Stubner]

On 29.03.19 17:27, Maxime Turgeon wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but if RcppEigen were the cause of the NOTE, 
> wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not: 
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html
> 
> And for what it's worth, neither does BH: 
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html

Both RcppEigen and BH provide header only libraries which are only
compiled by packages making use of it. And the rand symbol is only
searched for in the resulting/compiled libraries.

Greetings
Ralf

-- 
Ralf Stubner
Senior Software Engineer / Trainer

daqana GmbH
Dortustraße 48
14467 Potsdam

T: +49 331 23 61 93 11
F: +49 331 23 61 93 90
M: +49 162 20 91 196
Mail: ralf.stub...@daqana.com

Sitz: Potsdam
Register: AG Potsdam HRB 27966
Ust.-IdNr.: DE300072622
Geschäftsführer: Dr.-Ing. Stefan Knirsch, Prof. Dr. Dr. Karl-Kuno Kunze



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Maxime Turgeon]

Hi Bill,

Maybe I'm missing something, but if RcppEigen were the cause of the NOTE, 
wouldn't RcppEigen also get the same NOTE? However, it does not: 
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RcppEigen.html

And for what it's worth, neither does BH: 
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_BH.html

Max

From: R-package-devel  on behalf of 
William Dunlap 
Sent: March 29, 2019 12:05 PM
To: Vissarion Fisikopoulos
Cc: R Package Development
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

It looks like it is not boost but RcppEigen that has the call to
std::rand() that volesti/src/rotating.cpp contains.

RcppEigen/include/Eigen/src/Core/MathFunctions.h:
  static inline Scalar run(const Scalar& x, const Scalar& y)
  {
return x + (y-x) * Scalar(std::rand()) / Scalar(RAND_MAX);
  }


Bill Dunlap
TIBCO Software
wdunlap tibco.com


On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:43 AM William Dunlap  wrote:

> > Library lpSolveAPI uses rand() and srand() in lp_utils.c. We replace
> > both functions with GetRNGstate(); PutRNGstate(); unif_rand(); from
> > R’s internal random number generation routines as it is proposed in
> > `Writing R Extensions`. Moreover if you run in folder `/src`:
> > $ grep -r 'rand()'
> > You just get:
> > `utils.c:  range *= (LPSREAL) unif_rand();`
> > which is our replacement. If you replace `rand()` with `srand` in grep
> > search you get a null result.
> > This NOTE appears because of our functions in `/src/include/samplers`
> > where word `rand` appears a lot of times, for example
> > `rand_point_generator()`.
>
> I don't think the note about using 'rand' comes from looking at strings
> in the source code.  It is probably looking at undefined symbols in the
> symbol table of the compiled and linked code with something like the
> following
>
> % find volesti -iname "*o" | xargs nm -A -g --demangle | grep ' U ' | grep
> rand
> volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_rlp.o: U storevarandweight
> volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_price.o: U rand_uniform
> volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_utils.o: U unif_rand
> volesti/src/lp_solve/lp_lib.o: U rand_uniform
> volesti/src/rotating.o: U rand
> volesti/src/volesti.so: U rand@@GLIBC_2.2.5
> volesti/src/volesti.so: U unif_rand
>
> You will have to poke through the boost headers or docs to see how to avoid
> using rand in volesti/src/rotating.cpp.
>
> Bill Dunlap
> TIBCO Software
> wdunlap tibco.com
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 2:12 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos 
> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> @Henrik: thanks a lot for your reply.
>>
>> I did one more submission (the third) and I am posting below my answer
>> to the automatic cran email with 2 NOTES.
>>
>> Looking forward to your feedback.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Vissarion.
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 11:04, Vissarion Fisikopoulos 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> > We got the results from the automated check for our package. There are
>> > two NOTEs in both checks in Windows and Debian. We are sure that the
>> > rejections are false positive, so with this e-mail we try to explain
>> > why. Please find our explanations below.
>> >
>> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 16:40,  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Dear maintainer,
>> > >
>> > > package volesti_0.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
>> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
>> > > Windows: <
>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/volesti_0.0.0_20190328_151546/Windows/00check.log
>> >
>> > > Status: 2 NOTEs
>> > > Debian: <
>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/volesti_0.0.0_20190328_151546/Debian/00check.log
>> >
>> > > Status: 2 NOTEs
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
>> > > If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for
>> help on the R-package-devel mailing list:
>> > > <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
>> > > If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
>> reply-all to this message and explain.
>> > >
>> > > More details are given in the directory:
>> > > <
>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/volesti_0.0.0_20190328_151546/
>> >
>> > > The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
>> > >
>> > > No strong

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[William Dunlap]

CRIPTION:
>> > > Minkowski (9:17)
>> > > Polytopes (4:49)
>> > > Volesti (7:71)
>> > > polytopes (8:39, 10:83)
>> > > volesti (7:50)
>> > > zonotopes (9:44)
>> > These words, except of 'volesti' (which is the name of our package),
>> > describe geometrical concepts.
>> >
>> > > Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
>> > > Check: compiled code, Result: NOTE
>> > >   File 'volesti/libs/i386/volesti.dll':
>> > > Found 'rand', possibly from 'rand' (C)
>> > >   Object: 'rotating.o'
>> > >   File 'volesti/libs/x64/volesti.dll':
>> > > Found 'rand', possibly from 'rand' (C)
>> > >   Object: 'rotating.o'
>> > >
>> > >   Compiled code should not call entry points which might terminate R
>> nor
>> > >   write to stdout/stderr instead of to the console, nor use Fortran
>> I/O
>> > >   nor system RNGs.
>> > >
>> > >   See 'Writing portable packages' in the 'Writing R Extensions'
>> manual.
>> > >
>> > > Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
>> > > Check: compiled code, Result: NOTE
>> > >   File 'volesti/libs/volesti.so':
>> > > Found 'rand', possibly from 'rand' (C)
>> > >   Object: 'rotating.o'
>> > >
>> > >   Compiled code should not call entry points which might terminate R
>> nor
>> > >   write to stdout/stderr instead of to the console, nor use Fortran
>> I/O
>> > >   nor system RNGs.
>> >
>> > Library lpSolveAPI uses rand() and srand() in lp_utils.c. We replace
>> > both functions with GetRNGstate(); PutRNGstate(); unif_rand(); from
>> > R’s internal random number generation routines as it is proposed in
>> > `Writing R Extensions`. Moreover if you run in folder `/src`:
>> > $ grep -r 'rand()'
>> > You just get:
>> > `utils.c:  range *= (LPSREAL) unif_rand();`
>> > which is our replacement. If you replace `rand()` with `srand` in grep
>> > search you get a null result.
>> > This NOTE appears because of our functions in `/src/include/samplers`
>> > where word `rand` appears a lot of times, for example
>> > `rand_point_generator()`.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > Vissarion Fisikopoulos
>>
>> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 22:03, Henrik Bengtsson
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > Not a CRAN maintainer, but from my experience, it sounds like you're
>> > hitting some very unusual hiccup here - that's unfortunate.  I just
>> > had a look around at ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ and your
>> > package is not there anymore. Just a wild guess but I wonder if your
>> > email reply back to CRAN ends up in their spam folders?
>> >
>> > BTW, what are the two NOTEs you're getting?  Maybe they're avoidable.
>> > Since packages with all OKs can go straight through the CRAN incoming
>> > checks and be published automatically (at least if the package is
>> > already on CRAN), I try to walk an extra mile just avoid NOTEs in my
>> > packages even if I know they're false positives.
>> >
>> > My $.02
>> >
>> > /Henrik
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:28 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos
>> >  wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > we have resubmitted the package 'volesti'. I got the email and
>> > > confirmed submission. Later I got the confirmation email starting:
>> > > "The following package was uploaded to CRAN:..." and then the email on
>> > > automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous
>> > > submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are
>> > > false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us
>> > > on this.
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Vissarion
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:15, Τόλης Χαλκής 
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.
>> > > >
>> > > > Chalkis Apostolos
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
>> > > > r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[William Dunlap]

minate R
> nor
> > >   write to stdout/stderr instead of to the console, nor use Fortran I/O
> > >   nor system RNGs.
> > >
> > >   See 'Writing portable packages' in the 'Writing R Extensions' manual.
> > >
> > > Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
> > > Check: compiled code, Result: NOTE
> > >   File 'volesti/libs/volesti.so':
> > > Found 'rand', possibly from 'rand' (C)
> > >   Object: 'rotating.o'
> > >
> > >   Compiled code should not call entry points which might terminate R
> nor
> > >   write to stdout/stderr instead of to the console, nor use Fortran I/O
> > >   nor system RNGs.
> >
> > Library lpSolveAPI uses rand() and srand() in lp_utils.c. We replace
> > both functions with GetRNGstate(); PutRNGstate(); unif_rand(); from
> > R’s internal random number generation routines as it is proposed in
> > `Writing R Extensions`. Moreover if you run in folder `/src`:
> > $ grep -r 'rand()'
> > You just get:
> > `utils.c:  range *= (LPSREAL) unif_rand();`
> > which is our replacement. If you replace `rand()` with `srand` in grep
> > search you get a null result.
> > This NOTE appears because of our functions in `/src/include/samplers`
> > where word `rand` appears a lot of times, for example
> > `rand_point_generator()`.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Vissarion Fisikopoulos
>
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019 at 22:03, Henrik Bengtsson
>  wrote:
> >
> > Not a CRAN maintainer, but from my experience, it sounds like you're
> > hitting some very unusual hiccup here - that's unfortunate.  I just
> > had a look around at ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ and your
> > package is not there anymore. Just a wild guess but I wonder if your
> > email reply back to CRAN ends up in their spam folders?
> >
> > BTW, what are the two NOTEs you're getting?  Maybe they're avoidable.
> > Since packages with all OKs can go straight through the CRAN incoming
> > checks and be published automatically (at least if the package is
> > already on CRAN), I try to walk an extra mile just avoid NOTEs in my
> > packages even if I know they're false positives.
> >
> > My $.02
> >
> > /Henrik
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:28 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > we have resubmitted the package 'volesti'. I got the email and
> > > confirmed submission. Later I got the confirmation email starting:
> > > "The following package was uploaded to CRAN:..." and then the email on
> > > automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous
> > > submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are
> > > false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us
> > > on this.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Vissarion
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:15, Τόλης Χαλκής 
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.
> > > >
> > > > Chalkis Apostolos
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
> > > > r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > > > From: "Maëlle SALMON" 
> > > > > To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> > > > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> > > > > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> > > > > Bcc:
> > > > > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> > > > > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> > > > >  Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly):
> > > > > https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard
> > > > >
> > > > > Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via
> > > > > R-package-devel  skrev:
> > > > >
> > > > >   We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on
> the FTP
> > > > > server
> > > > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > > > >
> > > > > |
> > > > > |
> > > > > |  |
> > > > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  |
> > > > >
> > > &g

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Vissarion Fisikopoulos]

 already on CRAN), I try to walk an extra mile just avoid NOTEs in my
> packages even if I know they're false positives.
>
> My $.02
>
> /Henrik
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:28 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos
>  wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > we have resubmitted the package 'volesti'. I got the email and
> > confirmed submission. Later I got the confirmation email starting:
> > "The following package was uploaded to CRAN:..." and then the email on
> > automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous
> > submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are
> > false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us
> > on this.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Vissarion
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:15, Τόλης Χαλκής  wrote:
> > >
> > > Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.
> > >
> > > Chalkis Apostolos
> > >
> > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
> > > r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > > From: "Maëlle SALMON" 
> > > > To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> > > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> > > > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> > > > Bcc:
> > > > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> > > > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> > > >  Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly):
> > > > https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard
> > > >
> > > > Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via
> > > > R-package-devel  skrev:
> > > >
> > > >   We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the 
> > > > FTP
> > > > server
> > > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > > >
> > > > |
> > > > |
> > > > |  |
> > > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >  |
> > > >
> > > >  |
> > > >
> > > >  |
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP
> > > > server.
> > > > Maëlle.
> > > >
> > > > Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson <
> > > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> skrev:
> > > >
> > > >  You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
> > > >
> > > >   ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
> > > >
> > > > /Henrik
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch 
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > > > > > Dear all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have
> > > > not got
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > > > > > normal? Is
> > > > > > there any way to get informed for the review process?
> > > > >
> > > > > Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> > > > > are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has 
> > > > > started)?
> > > > > They'll both have subject lines like
> > > > >
> > > > > CRAN submission 
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The first one will start out saying something like
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > > > > > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > > > > > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
> > > > maintainer of
> > > > > > this package.
> > > > >
> > > > > and then ask you to confirm submission.
> > > > >
> > > > > The second one will start like
> > > > >
> > > > > > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The following package

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Henrik Bengtsson]

Not a CRAN maintainer, but from my experience, it sounds like you're
hitting some very unusual hiccup here - that's unfortunate.  I just
had a look around at ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/ and your
package is not there anymore. Just a wild guess but I wonder if your
email reply back to CRAN ends up in their spam folders?

BTW, what are the two NOTEs you're getting?  Maybe they're avoidable.
Since packages with all OKs can go straight through the CRAN incoming
checks and be published automatically (at least if the package is
already on CRAN), I try to walk an extra mile just avoid NOTEs in my
packages even if I know they're false positives.

My $.02

/Henrik

On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 6:28 AM Vissarion Fisikopoulos
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> we have resubmitted the package 'volesti'. I got the email and
> confirmed submission. Later I got the confirmation email starting:
> "The following package was uploaded to CRAN:..." and then the email on
> automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous
> submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are
> false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us
> on this.
>
> Best regards,
> Vissarion
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:15, Τόλης Χαλκής  wrote:
> >
> > Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.
> >
> > Chalkis Apostolos
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
> > r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Forwarded message --
> > > From: "Maëlle SALMON" 
> > > To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> > > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> > > Bcc:
> > > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> > > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> > >  Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly):
> > > https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard
> > >
> > > Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via
> > > R-package-devel  skrev:
> > >
> > >   We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP
> > > server
> > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > >
> > > |
> > > |
> > > |  |
> > > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> > >
> > >
> > >  |
> > >
> > >  |
> > >
> > >  |
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP
> > > server.
> > > Maëlle.
> > >
> > > Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson <
> > > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> skrev:
> > >
> > >  You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
> > >
> > >   ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
> > >
> > > /Henrik
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > > > > Dear all,
> > > > >
> > > > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have
> > > not got
> > > > > a
> > > > > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > > > > normal? Is
> > > > > there any way to get informed for the review process?
> > > >
> > > > Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> > > > are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> > > > They'll both have subject lines like
> > > >
> > > > CRAN submission 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The first one will start out saying something like
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > > > > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > > > > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
> > > maintainer of
> > > > > this package.
> > > >
> > > > and then ask you to confirm submission.
> > > >
> > > > The second one will start like
> > > >
> > > > > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> > > > >
> > > > > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > > > > ===
>

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Vissarion Fisikopoulos]

Hello,

we have resubmitted the package 'volesti'. I got the email and
confirmed submission. Later I got the confirmation email starting:
"The following package was uploaded to CRAN:..." and then the email on
automated check complaining about the same 2 notes as in the previous
submission. I answered (reply to all) explaining why those notes are
false positives. Then no news for 9 days. Could you please update us
on this.

Best regards,
Vissarion


On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:15, Τόλης Χαλκής  wrote:
>
> Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.
>
> Chalkis Apostolos
>
> On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
> r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: "Maëlle SALMON" 
> > To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> >  Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly):
> > https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard
> >
> > Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via
> > R-package-devel  skrev:
> >
> >   We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP
> > server
> > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> >
> > |
> > |
> > |  |
> > CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
> >
> >
> >  |
> >
> >  |
> >
> >  |
> >
> >
> >
> > We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP
> > server.
> > Maëlle.
> >
> > Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson <
> > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> skrev:
> >
> >  You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
> >
> >   ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
> >
> > /Henrik
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have
> > not got
> > > > a
> > > > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > > > normal? Is
> > > > there any way to get informed for the review process?
> > >
> > > Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> > > are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> > > They'll both have subject lines like
> > >
> > > CRAN submission 
> > >
> > >
> > > The first one will start out saying something like
> > > >
> > > > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > > > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > > > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
> > maintainer of
> > > > this package.
> > >
> > > and then ask you to confirm submission.
> > >
> > > The second one will start like
> > >
> > > > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> > > >
> > > > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > > > ===
> > > >
> > > > Package Information:
> > > > Package: rgl
> > >
> > > A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
> > >
> > > Duncan Murdoch
> > >
> > > __
> > > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -- Forwarded message --
> > From: "Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel" 
> > To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> > henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> > Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Τόλης Χαλκής]

Of course we will resubmit. Thank you all for the info.

Chalkis Apostolos

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 10:05, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel <
r-package-devel@r-project.org> wrote:

>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Maëlle SALMON" 
> To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
>  Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly):
> https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard
>
> Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via
> R-package-devel  skrev:
>
>   We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP
> server
> CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
>
> |
> |
> |  |
> CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays
>
>
>  |
>
>  |
>
>  |
>
>
>
> We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP
> server.
> Maëlle.
>
> Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson <
> henrik.bengts...@gmail.com> skrev:
>
>  You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
>
>   ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
>
> /Henrik
>
> On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch 
> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have
> not got
> > > a
> > > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > > normal? Is
> > > there any way to get informed for the review process?
> >
> > Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> > are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> > They'll both have subject lines like
> >
> > CRAN submission 
> >
> >
> > The first one will start out saying something like
> > >
> > > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
> maintainer of
> > > this package.
> >
> > and then ask you to confirm submission.
> >
> > The second one will start like
> >
> > > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> > >
> > > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > > ===
> > >
> > > Package Information:
> > > Package: rgl
> >
> > A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
> >
> > Duncan Murdoch
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel" 
> To: Duncan Murdoch , Henrik Bengtsson <
> henrik.bengts...@gmail.com>
> Cc: r-package-devel@r-project.org
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 07:56:45 + (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel]

--- Begin Message ---
 Sorry, the link was removed (by my copy-pasting it wrongly): 
https://itsalocke.com/cransays/articles/dashboard

Den onsdag 13 mars 2019 08:54:00 CET, Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel 
 skrev:  
 
  We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP server
CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays

| 
| 
|  | 
CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays


 |

 |

 |



We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP server.
Maëlle.

    Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson 
 skrev:  
 
 You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:

  ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch  wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
> > a
> > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > normal? Is
> > there any way to get informed for the review process?
>
> Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> They'll both have subject lines like
>
> CRAN submission 
>
>
> The first one will start out saying something like
> >
> > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
> > this package.
>
> and then ask you to confirm submission.
>
> The second one will start like
>
> > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> >
> > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > ===
> >
> > Package Information:
> > Package: rgl
>
> A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  
    [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
  
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

--- End Message ---
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Maëlle SALMON via R-package-devel]

--- Begin Message ---
 We at Locke Data have made an hourly updated dashboard based on the FTP server
CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays

| 
| 
|  | 
CRAN incoming dashboard • cransays


 |

 |

 |



We hope it makes data more accessible whilst reducing load on the FTP server.
Maëlle.

Den tisdag 12 mars 2019 21:37:12 CET, Henrik Bengtsson 
 skrev:  
 
 You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:

  ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch  wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
> > a
> > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > normal? Is
> > there any way to get informed for the review process?
>
> Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> They'll both have subject lines like
>
> CRAN submission 
>
>
> The first one will start out saying something like
> >
> > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
> > this package.
>
> and then ask you to confirm submission.
>
> The second one will start like
>
> > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> >
> > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > ===
> >
> > Package Information:
> > Package: rgl
>
> A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

--- End Message ---
__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Uwe Ligges]

My fault as I habe not spotted that. Can you pls resubmit as we do no 
longer have your original submission yet?


Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 13.03.2019 00:10, Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and 
we "replied to all" to the e-mail

  in order to explain why we believe it were both false positives.

Best,
Chalkis Apostolos

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 00:27, Uwe Ligges 
> wrote:


Not normal, if you tell us which package you are talking about, the
CRAN
team can check what happened in case you did not simply forget to
confirm your submission.

Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 12.03.2019 21:30, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
 > You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
 >
 > ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
 >
 > /Henrik
 >
 > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch
mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
 >>
 >> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
 >>> Dear all,
 >>>
 >>> We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we
have not got
 >>> a
 >>> positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is
this
 >>> normal? Is
 >>> there any way to get informed for the review process?
 >>
 >> Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm
that you
 >> are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has
started)?
 >> They'll both have subject lines like
 >>
 >> CRAN submission 
 >>
 >>
 >> The first one will start out saying something like
 >>>
 >>> Dear Duncan Murdoch
 >>> Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
 >>> You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
maintainer of
 >>> this package.
 >>
 >> and then ask you to confirm submission.
 >>
 >> The second one will start like
 >>
 >>> [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html
]
 >>>
 >>> The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
 >>> ===
 >>>
 >>> Package Information:
 >>> Package: rgl
 >>
 >> A while later you should get a third message about the automatic
checks.
 >>
 >> Duncan Murdoch
 >>
 >> __
 >> R-package-devel@r-project.org
 mailing list
 >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >
 > __
 > R-package-devel@r-project.org
 mailing list
 > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
 >

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org 
mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Τόλης Χαλκής]

The name of the package is "volesti". Both checks returned two Notes and we
"replied to all" to the e-mail
 in order to explain why we believe it were both false positives.

Best,
Chalkis Apostolos

On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 at 00:27, Uwe Ligges 
wrote:

> Not normal, if you tell us which package you are talking about, the CRAN
> team can check what happened in case you did not simply forget to
> confirm your submission.
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
> On 12.03.2019 21:30, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> > You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:
> >
> > ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/
> >
> > /Henrik
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have
> not got
> >>> a
> >>> positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> >>> normal? Is
> >>> there any way to get informed for the review process?
> >>
> >> Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> >> are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> >> They'll both have subject lines like
> >>
> >> CRAN submission 
> >>
> >>
> >> The first one will start out saying something like
> >>>
> >>> Dear Duncan Murdoch
> >>> Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> >>> You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the
> maintainer of
> >>> this package.
> >>
> >> and then ask you to confirm submission.
> >>
> >> The second one will start like
> >>
> >>> [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> >>>
> >>> The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> >>> ===
> >>>
> >>> Package Information:
> >>> Package: rgl
> >>
> >> A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
> >>
> >> Duncan Murdoch
> >>
> >> __
> >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
> > __
> > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Uwe Ligges]

Not normal, if you tell us which package you are talking about, the CRAN 
team can check what happened in case you did not simply forget to 
confirm your submission.


Best,
Uwe Ligges

On 12.03.2019 21:30, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:

You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:

ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch  wrote:


On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:

Dear all,

We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
a
positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
normal? Is
there any way to get informed for the review process?


Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
They'll both have subject lines like

CRAN submission 


The first one will start out saying something like


Dear Duncan Murdoch
Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
this package.


and then ask you to confirm submission.

The second one will start like


[This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]

The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
===

Package Information:
Package: rgl


A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.

Duncan Murdoch

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel


__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Henrik Bengtsson]

You can also "follow" your package submission on the CRAN FTP server:

   ftp://cran.r-project.org/incoming/

/Henrik

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 1:26 PM Duncan Murdoch  wrote:
>
> On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
> > a
> > positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> > normal? Is
> > there any way to get informed for the review process?
>
> Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you
> are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)?
> They'll both have subject lines like
>
> CRAN submission 
>
>
> The first one will start out saying something like
> >
> > Dear Duncan Murdoch
> > Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
> > You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
> > this package.
>
> and then ask you to confirm submission.
>
> The second one will start like
>
> > [This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]
> >
> > The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
> > ===
> >
> > Package Information:
> > Package: rgl
>
> A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.
>
> Duncan Murdoch
>
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Duncan Murdoch]

On 12/03/2019 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:

Dear all,

We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
a
positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
normal? Is
there any way to get informed for the review process?


Did you get the two messages after submission (one to confirm that you 
are the maintainer, the second to let you know the review has started)? 
They'll both have subject lines like


CRAN submission 


The first one will start out saying something like


Dear Duncan Murdoch
Someone has submitted the package rgl to CRAN.
You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
this package.


and then ask you to confirm submission.

The second one will start like


[This was generated from CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html]

The following package was uploaded to CRAN:
===

Package Information:
Package: rgl 


A while later you should get a third message about the automatic checks.

Duncan Murdoch

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

Re: [R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Ben Bolker]

  Sounds like it fell through the cracks somewhere.

  The foghorn package   is a
convenient way to check on CRAN status.

On 2019-03-12 2:57 p.m., Τόλης Χαλκής wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
> a
> positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
> normal? Is
> there any way to get informed for the review process?
> 
> Best regards,
> -Chalkis Apostolos
> 
>   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> __
> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

[R-pkg-devel] CRAN review

[Τόλης Χαλκής]

Dear all,

We have submitted a package to CRAN in 25th of February and we have not got
a
positive or a negative answer for the submission since then. Is this
normal? Is
there any way to get informed for the review process?

Best regards,
-Chalkis Apostolos

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

__
R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel