Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
I don't have a problem with this, but there are a few challenges. - continuity: there used to be an R wiki, but it eventually disappeared (http://wiki.r-project.org now redirects to the main www.r-project.org page) - actual contributions: I never got much feedback or contributions to http://glmm.wikidot.com/glmmFAQ (which is now moved to https://github.com/bbolker/mixedmodels-misc/blob/master/glmmFAQ.rmd ). If individual task view maintainers wanted to post their stuff on GitHub, it would make it easy for *some* users (those with a bit more technical facility) to raise issues and submit pull requests ...) On 17-02-11 12:09 PM, Spencer Graves wrote: > Hi, Ben et al.: > > > What do you think about converting the Task Views into a wiki? > > > The Wikimedia rules do pretty well in inviting anyone to > contribute material, ensuring that it is noteworthy and high quality, > and managing any conflicts -- and no one person has to be responsible > for any specific thing. > > > Spencer Graves > > > On 2017-02-10 10:51 AM, Ben Bolker wrote: >>I definitely read the task views and advise others to do so. I >> don't know how representative my little corner of the world is, >> though. >> >>I have an embryonic task view on mixed models at >> https://github.com/bbolker/mixedmodels-misc/blob/master/MixedModels.ctv >> but the perfect is the enemy of the good ... >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:56 AM, J C Nashwrote: >>> We'd be more than happy to have you contribute directly. The goal is not >>> just an >>> information session, but to get some movement to ways to make the >>> package >>> collection(s) >>> easier to use effectively. Note to selves: "effectively" is important >>> -- we >>> could make >>> things easy by only recommending a few packages. >>> >>> Best, JN >>> >>> >>> On 2017-02-10 09:29 AM, Michael Dewey wrote: Dear all That seems an interesting session. I am the maintainer of one of the CRAN Task Views (MetaAnalysis) and will attend unless I am successful in the draw for Wimbledon tickets. Just in case I strike lucky one question I would have raised from the floor if I were there would have been "Does anyone read the Task Views?". Since I started mine I have received only a couple of suggestions for additions including a very abrupt one about a package which had been included for months but whose author clearly did not read before writing. So I would ask whether we need to focus much energy on the Task Views. So, maybe see you there, maybe not. On 16/01/2017 14:57, ProfJCNash wrote: > Navigating the Jungle of R Packages > > The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, > especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this > richness of choice speaks to the popularity and > importance of R, the large number of contributed packages > makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for > their work. > > A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in > Brussels. The tentative structure is three short > introductory presentations, followed by discussion or > planning work to improve the tools available to help > users find the best R package and function for their needs. > > The currently proposed topics are > > - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform >similar functions to be accessed by unified calls > > - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views > > - search and sort tools to find packages. > > At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for > the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations > at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will > contribute to an increased team effort after the conference > to improve the the support for R users in these areas. > > > John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > >>> __ >>> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
Certainly Google can be useful, but it can also be infuriatingly time-wasting when one needs to sort out related tools that do slightly different things. Then good, up-to-date task views are important, and wrappers such as I and some others are trying to develop can be a way to ease the chore of applying the tools or changing between related ones where there isn't enough information on which is best. Perhaps Jim, Spencer, and I (others welcome!) can come up with some small examples to show where Google / sos / other search tools and the task views (Julia?) can be illustrated to provide guidance. After all, the purpose of the UseR! session is to try to develop improved ways to access R's packages. Cheers, John Nash On 2017-02-10 05:26 PM, Jim Lemon wrote: This discussion started me thinking about searching for a function or package, as many questions on the R help list indicate the that poster couldn't find (or hasn't searched for) what they want. I don't think I have ever used task views. If I haven't got a clue where to look for something, I use Google. I can't recall an occasion when I didn't get an answer, even if it was that what I wanted didn't exist. Perhaps we should ask why Google is so good at answering uninformed questions, in particular about R. I'm not the only person on the help list who advises the clueless to try Google. Jim On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Ben Bolkerwrote: I definitely read the task views and advise others to do so. I don't know how representative my little corner of the world is, though. I have an embryonic task view on mixed models at https://github.com/bbolker/mixedmodels-misc/blob/master/MixedModels.ctv but the perfect is the enemy of the good ... On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:56 AM, J C Nash wrote: We'd be more than happy to have you contribute directly. The goal is not just an information session, but to get some movement to ways to make the package collection(s) easier to use effectively. Note to selves: "effectively" is important -- we could make things easy by only recommending a few packages. Best, JN On 2017-02-10 09:29 AM, Michael Dewey wrote: Dear all That seems an interesting session. I am the maintainer of one of the CRAN Task Views (MetaAnalysis) and will attend unless I am successful in the draw for Wimbledon tickets. Just in case I strike lucky one question I would have raised from the floor if I were there would have been "Does anyone read the Task Views?". Since I started mine I have received only a couple of suggestions for additions including a very abrupt one about a package which had been included for months but whose author clearly did not read before writing. So I would ask whether we need to focus much energy on the Task Views. So, maybe see you there, maybe not. On 16/01/2017 14:57, ProfJCNash wrote: Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
hi, first up let me apologise for breaking the thread. i subscribed to this list after the initial email went out. i'm not completely sure if the original post was to prompt a discussion here, but now there's a discussion, i'm jumping in! i'm a psychologist, and one of the challenges is the number of packages required to do what is "standard practice", and getting them all to work together. to do an ANOVA (the bread and butter of psych research) with all it's assumption checks, contrasts, corrections, etc. requires in the order of seven packages. our solution to this is to create an "uber" package, which makes use of all these things behind a single function call (with many arguments), which is what our jmv package is: https://www.jamovi.org/jmv/ we represent an extreme, we even handle plots, but there are other examples of more intermediate solutions: afex, psych, etc. i appreciate this is somewhat at odds with (what i perceive to be) the R ethos, which is giving people very fine control over the intermediate parts of one's analysis, but it is another approach to making it easier for people to find appropriate tools for their field. for me, the key is being "goal-centred", "what is a person in my field trying to achieve?" rather than "analysis-centred"; "this package provides analysis X" ... but i appreciate this is likely an unpopular position. i'll definitely be attending this session at use!R, and happy to espouse more unpopular views cheers jonathon Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
This discussion started me thinking about searching for a function or package, as many questions on the R help list indicate the that poster couldn't find (or hasn't searched for) what they want. I don't think I have ever used task views. If I haven't got a clue where to look for something, I use Google. I can't recall an occasion when I didn't get an answer, even if it was that what I wanted didn't exist. Perhaps we should ask why Google is so good at answering uninformed questions, in particular about R. I'm not the only person on the help list who advises the clueless to try Google. Jim On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Ben Bolkerwrote: > I definitely read the task views and advise others to do so. I > don't know how representative my little corner of the world is, > though. > > I have an embryonic task view on mixed models at > https://github.com/bbolker/mixedmodels-misc/blob/master/MixedModels.ctv > but the perfect is the enemy of the good ... > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:56 AM, J C Nash wrote: >> We'd be more than happy to have you contribute directly. The goal is not >> just an >> information session, but to get some movement to ways to make the package >> collection(s) >> easier to use effectively. Note to selves: "effectively" is important -- we >> could make >> things easy by only recommending a few packages. >> >> Best, JN >> >> >> On 2017-02-10 09:29 AM, Michael Dewey wrote: >>> >>> Dear all >>> >>> That seems an interesting session. I am the maintainer of one of the CRAN >>> Task Views (MetaAnalysis) and will attend >>> unless I am successful in the draw for Wimbledon tickets. >>> >>> Just in case I strike lucky one question I would have raised from the >>> floor if I were there would have been "Does anyone >>> read the Task Views?". Since I started mine I have received only a couple >>> of suggestions for additions including a very >>> abrupt one about a package which had been included for months but whose >>> author clearly did not read before writing. So I >>> would ask whether we need to focus much energy on the Task Views. >>> >>> So, maybe see you there, maybe not. >>> >>> >>> On 16/01/2017 14:57, ProfJCNash wrote: Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >>> >> >> __ >> R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
We'd be more than happy to have you contribute directly. The goal is not just an information session, but to get some movement to ways to make the package collection(s) easier to use effectively. Note to selves: "effectively" is important -- we could make things easy by only recommending a few packages. Best, JN On 2017-02-10 09:29 AM, Michael Dewey wrote: Dear all That seems an interesting session. I am the maintainer of one of the CRAN Task Views (MetaAnalysis) and will attend unless I am successful in the draw for Wimbledon tickets. Just in case I strike lucky one question I would have raised from the floor if I were there would have been "Does anyone read the Task Views?". Since I started mine I have received only a couple of suggestions for additions including a very abrupt one about a package which had been included for months but whose author clearly did not read before writing. So I would ask whether we need to focus much energy on the Task Views. So, maybe see you there, maybe not. On 16/01/2017 14:57, ProfJCNash wrote: Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
Re: [R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
Dear all That seems an interesting session. I am the maintainer of one of the CRAN Task Views (MetaAnalysis) and will attend unless I am successful in the draw for Wimbledon tickets. Just in case I strike lucky one question I would have raised from the floor if I were there would have been "Does anyone read the Task Views?". Since I started mine I have received only a couple of suggestions for additions including a very abrupt one about a package which had been included for months but whose author clearly did not read before writing. So I would ask whether we need to focus much energy on the Task Views. So, maybe see you there, maybe not. On 16/01/2017 14:57, ProfJCNash wrote: Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel -- Michael http://www.dewey.myzen.co.uk/home.html __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[R-pkg-devel] UseR! Session: Navigating the jungle of R packages.
Navigating the Jungle of R Packages The R ecosystem has many packages in various collections, especially CRAN, Bioconductor, and GitHub. While this richness of choice speaks to the popularity and importance of R, the large number of contributed packages makes it difficult for users to find appropriate tools for their work. A session on this subject has been approved for UseR! in Brussels. The tentative structure is three short introductory presentations, followed by discussion or planning work to improve the tools available to help users find the best R package and function for their needs. The currently proposed topics are - wrapper packages that allow diverse tools that perform similar functions to be accessed by unified calls - collaborative mechanisms to create and update Task Views - search and sort tools to find packages. At the time of writing we have tentative presenters for the topics, but welcome others. We hope these presentations at useR! 2017 will be part of a larger discussion that will contribute to an increased team effort after the conference to improve the the support for R users in these areas. John Nash, Julia Silge, Spencer Graves __ R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel