[R-sig-eco] Poisson regression

2012-05-24 Thread Mahnaz Rabbaniha
Dear all


to find relation between non-normal response with independents variable i
use this code:

model1-gam(Clupeidae~s(depth)+s(temperature)+s(salinity),poisson)

the result shown is:

There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)
 warnings(model1)
Warning messages:
1: In dpois(y, mu, log = TRUE) : non-integer x = 2.079542 Error in
cat(list(...), file, sep, fill, labels, append) :
  argument 2 (type 'list') cannot be handled by 'cat'


what is meaning it?

do i allow use it for continue?

thanks
-- 
Mahnaz

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


Re: [R-sig-eco] Poisson regression

2012-05-24 Thread Gavin Simpson
On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:41 +0430, Mahnaz Rabbaniha wrote:
 Dear all
 
 
 to find relation between non-normal response with independents variable i
 use this code:
 
 model1-gam(Clupeidae~s(depth)+s(temperature)+s(salinity),poisson)

I don't know if this is the problem or not, but you can't call the model
that way. if you don't name arguments then you must list them in the
order the function expects. You don;t say which `gam()` you use but
assuming it is `mgcv:::gam()` then the second argument is `data` and you
passed it a function `poisson`.

Does it work if you do:

model1-gam(Clupeidae~s(depth)+s(temperature)+s(salinity),
family = poisson)

?

Really though you should be passing it both a data and a family
argument. Assuming your data are in object named `mydata` then:

model1-gam(Clupeidae~s(depth)+s(temperature)+s(salinity),
data = mydata, family = poisson)

would be the correct way to work with the function.

G

 the result shown is:
 
 There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)
  warnings(model1)
 Warning messages:
 1: In dpois(y, mu, log = TRUE) : non-integer x = 2.079542 Error in
 cat(list(...), file, sep, fill, labels, append) :
   argument 2 (type 'list') cannot be handled by 'cat'
 
 
 what is meaning it?
 
 do i allow use it for continue?
 
 thanks

-- 
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%
 Dr. Gavin Simpson [t] +44 (0)20 7679 0522
 ECRC, UCL Geography,  [f] +44 (0)20 7679 0565
 Pearson Building, [e] gavin.simpsonATNOSPAMucl.ac.uk
 Gower Street, London  [w] http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucfagls/
 UK. WC1E 6BT. [w] http://www.freshwaters.org.uk
%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%~%

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


Re: [R-sig-eco] Poisson regression

2012-05-24 Thread Highland Statistics Ltd






--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 11:41:06 +0430
From: Mahnaz Rabbaniharab.mah...@gmail.com
To: r-sig-ecologyr-sig-ecology@r-project.org
Subject: [R-sig-eco] Poisson regression
Message-ID:
canlcanxsf0zpyc-r22f32veeeyjq7kfn8ksgkxffc44uty_...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain

Dear all


to find relation between non-normal response with independents variable i
use this code:

model1-gam(Clupeidae~s(depth)+s(temperature)+s(salinity),poisson)

the result shown is:

There were 50 or more warnings (use warnings() to see the first 50)

warnings(model1)

Warning messages:
1: In dpois(y, mu, log = TRUE) : non-integer x = 2.079542 Error in
cat(list(...), file, sep, fill, labels, append) :
   argument 2 (type 'list') cannot be handled by 'cat'


what is meaning it?

do i allow use it for continue?




Check whether your Clupeidae variable contains non-integers...

Alain



thanks



--

Dr. Alain F. Zuur
First author of:

1. Analysing Ecological Data (2007).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN and Smith, GM. Springer. 680 p.
URL: www.springer.com/0-387-45967-7


2. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. (2009).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, N, Saveliev, AA, and Smith, GM. Springer.
http://www.springer.com/life+sci/ecology/book/978-0-387-87457-9


3. A Beginner's Guide to R (2009).
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Meesters, EHWG. Springer
http://www.springer.com/statistics/computational/book/978-0-387-93836-3


4. Zero Inflated Models and Generalized Linear Mixed Models with R. (2012) 
Zuur, Saveliev, Ieno.
http://www.highstat.com/book4.htm

Other books: http://www.highstat.com/books.htm


Statistical consultancy, courses, data analysis and software
Highland Statistics Ltd.
6 Laverock road
UK - AB41 6FN Newburgh
Tel: 0044 1358 788177
Email: highs...@highstat.com
URL: www.highstat.com
URL: www.brodgar.com

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


[R-sig-eco] Multiple comparisons among predictors generated from same data

2012-05-24 Thread J Straka
Hello,

I'm planning on using a regression model to describe seed set of plants (my
response) using some sort of predictor based on temperature.  I have a
number of temperature variables calculated from the same set of data
(hourly temperatures for the growing season, converted to variables such as
average temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, degree-days
above zero Celsius, degree days above ten Celsius, etc...), and I want to
decide which one should be included in my model. I know that I would
ideally select one based on prior knowledge of the system (e.g. so-called
planned comparisons or choosing a temperature threshold that is known to
be important for the development of seeds), but not much is known about
this system.

I've been warned against testing the significance of multiple predictors
using p-values, unless I use Bonferroni correction (or some equivalent).
Unfortunately, using Bonferroni correction would result in something like p
= 0.05/7 (for seven different temperature variables); a rather small value
for detecting anything! I was wondering whether it would be appropriate to
instead use likelihood-based techniques (direct comparisons of
log-likelihoods or AIC scores) to compare a series of models using each of
the alternative predictors in turn, and choose the most relevant
temperature variable (i.e. predictor) based on that.

Thoughts on the validity of this approach? Would any adjustments have to be
made for multiple comparisons if I used this strategy?

Jason Straka
University of Victoria

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology