Re: [R-sig-eco] Adonis and Random Effects

2013-03-09 Thread Erin Nuccio
Hi Steve and R list,

I was hoping you could clarify something you mentioned in previous post.

A quick recap...  I have a split-plot design where I determined the microbial 
communities at 3 grasslands (see post script for design).  I am trying quantify 
the how much of my community can be explained by Treatment or Grassland effect. 
 After talking with a statistician, it seems like treating Grassland as a Fixed 
effect would be reasonable (because I have such a small number of grasslands).

You mentioned that if I treat Grassland as a Fixed effect, and use the 
following formula, the Grassland effect would not be tested correctly:

adonis(formula = community_distance_matrix ~ Treatment*Grassland + 
GrasslandPlot, strata = GrasslandPlot)

Why is this?  Is there any way to remedy this?  

Thanks for your feedback,
Erin


Experimental design:
4 split plots * 2 Treatments * 3 Grasslands = 24 observations
Treatment: 2 levels (each within 1 split plot)
Grassland: 3 levels
GrasslandPlot: 12 levels (4 split plots nested in 3 Grasslands)





On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Steve Brewer wrote:

 Erin,
 
 There have been a lot of similar queries (e.g., repeated measures, nested
 permanova). Jari can correct me if I am wrong, but as far as I know, no
 one has developed a way to define multiple error terms in adonis.
 
 
 You can use adonis, however, to get the split-plot effects. If you want to
 make a grassland a random effect, use the following statement
 
 adonis(formula = community_distance_matrix ~ Treatment + Grassland +
 GrasslandPlot, strata = GrasslandPlot)
 
 
 The treatment effect will be correct because the residual error term
 (which is equivalent to treatment x GrasslandPlot interaction nested
 within Grassland) is the correct error term. The Grassland effect,
 however, will not be tested correctly because it is using the residual
 error term when it should be using GrasslandPLot as the error term. You
 can determine what the F stat for Grassland should be, however, using the
 Ms Grassland and MS GrasslandPlot from the anova table to construct the F
 test. You just won't get a p-value for the test.
 
 If you want to treat Grassland as a fixed effect, the model is similar but
 defines the interaction
 
 adonis(formula = community_distance_matrix ~ Treatment*Grassland +
 GrasslandPlot, strata = GrasslandPlot)
 
 
 In this case, the treatment x grassland interaction will be tested
 correctly, as will the treatment effect, but not the Grassland effect.
 
 Unfortunately, you cannot just take averages of abundances across the
 treatment and control in each plot and then do a separate analysis of
 Grassland and GrasslandPLot (unless you're using Euclidean distances). I
 suspect you're not using Euclidean distances.
 
 Hope this helps some.
 
 Good luck,
 Steve
 
 
 J. Stephen Brewer 
 Professor 
 Department of Biology
 PO Box 1848
 University of Mississippi
 University, Mississippi 38677-1848
 Brewer web page - http://home.olemiss.edu/~jbrewer/
 FAX - 662-915-5144
 Phone - 662-915-1077
 
 
 
 
 On 2/4/13 1:14 AM, Erin Nuccio enuc...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 Hello List,
 
 Is adonis capable of modeling random effects?  I'm analyzing the impact
 of a treatment on the microbial community in a split-plot design (2
 treatments per plot, 4 plots per grassland, 3 grasslands total). I would
 like to quantify how much of the variance is due to the Treatment versus
 the Grassland.  It seems like Grassland should be a random effect, since
 there are thousands of grasslands, and I'm only looking at 3.
 
 Thanks for your help,
 Erin
 
 
 Here are my factors:
 'data.frame':24 obs. of  4 variables:
 $ Treatment: Factor w/ 2 levels T1,T2: 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 ...
 $ Grassland: Factor w/ 3 levels G1,G2,G3: 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
 ...
 $ Plot : Factor w/ 4 levels P1,P2,P3,P4: 1 2 2 3 4 1 3 2
 1 2 ...
 $ GrasslandPlot: Factor w/ 12 levels G1:P1,G1:P2,G1:P3..: 9 10 2 3
 4 5 7 2 5 6 ...
 
 And here's the error message:
 Error in `contrasts-`(`*tmp*`, value = contr.funs[1 + isOF[nn]]) :
 contrasts can be applied only to factors with 2 or more levels
 In addition: Warning messages:
 1: In Ops.factor(1, Grassland) : | not meaningful for factors
 2: In Ops.factor(1, GrasslandPlot) : | not meaningful for factors
 
 ___
 R-sig-ecology mailing list
 R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
 https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology
 
 

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology


[R-sig-eco] AIC

2013-03-09 Thread Mahnaz Rabbaniha
HI DEAR ALL

maybe my question is basically but I will be so glad for answer :

in the result of GLM in base of family = poisson,  AIC: Inf , What is the
meaning?

thanks all


-- 
Mahnaz Rabbaniha
marine ecology PhD
Iranian Fisheries Research Organization (IFRO)
P.O.Box: 14155-6116 , P.Code: 1411816618*
Tehran, IRAN
Phone:   +98 21 44580953
Fax:   +98 21 44580583
Mobile:  +98 912 5790377

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
R-sig-ecology mailing list
R-sig-ecology@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-ecology