Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
There are a few of those, but not many. On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 11:31 AM José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I�aki Ucar wrote: > > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. > > The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) > > Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real > builds? > > Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) > -- > Jos� Ab�lio > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 16.10.07 WEST I�aki Ucar wrote: > 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the > release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. The part that worries me is the *in order*. :-) Do we need to do bootstrap builds that are later replaced by the real builds? Because other than that it is business as usual. :-) -- Jos� Ab�lio [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 17:01, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > > > Tom > > What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? > > I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I > know but time flies). > > I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Great, thanks! :) Basically, we need (correct me if I'm wrong, Tom): 1) A new user side tag. 2) For R, merge master in F32 and send a build to that side tag. 3) For all packages, either merge master into F32 or just increase the release version and send builds to that side tag *in order*. 4) When everything is built, create an update from that side tag. I have tooling in my Copr repo to resolve CRAN dependencies and create a list of lists of builds in order. I can give you that. But note that Bioc packages (and others) are not included. -- Iñaki Úcar ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tuesday, 23 June 2020 14.01.39 WEST Tom Callaway wrote: > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom What needs to be done and how can the work be streamlined? I asked this since this procedure will happen for other updates (in one year I know but time flies). I am a provenpackager so that I can drive the process. Regards, -- Jos� Ab�lio [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
Maybe Elliott? On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 15:01, Tom Callaway wrote: > > At this point, I simply don't have the time. > > Tom > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> >> On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> > >> > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am >> > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of >> > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not >> > > prevent someone else who wished to try to do so. >> > >> > Note that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag >> > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive >> > update like this. >> >> Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily >> volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. >> >> -- >> Iñaki Úcar >> >> ___ >> R-SIG-Fedora mailing list >> R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora -- Iñaki Úcar ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
At this point, I simply don't have the time. Tom On Tue, Jun 23, 2020, 6:06 AM Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of > > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not > > > prevent someone else who wished to try to do so. > > > > Note that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag > > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > > update like this. > > Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily > volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. > > -- > Iñaki Úcar > > ___ > R-SIG-Fedora mailing list > R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
Re: [R-sig-Fedora] R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 10:21, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > Given the huge amount of builds (and rebuilds) in this process, I am > > strongly disinclined to attempt this work for Fedora 32 (the idea of > > hundreds of bodhi overrides does not fill me with joy), but I would not > > prevent someone else who wished to try to do so. > > Note that this is no longer needed. It is possible to use a side tag > for F32 too, which is much easier and more appropriate for a massive > update like this. Any plan on doing this in a side tag for F32? I would happily volunteer, but I'm not a provenpackager. -- Iñaki Úcar ___ R-SIG-Fedora mailing list R-SIG-Fedora@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-fedora
