Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Hi Edzer, Cool, thanks for sharing! You seem to be working on really neat stuff. Greetings, -- Thiago V. dos Santos Postdoctoral Research FellowDepartment of Climate and Space Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan On Thursday, February 15, 2018, 10:11:31 AM EST, Edzer Pebesma wrote: On 02/15/2018 03:33 PM, Thiago V. dos Santos wrote: > Dear Edzer, > > As a heavy user of both raster and sp (for remote sensing products and > climate model outputs), I am really interested in the outcomes of your > meeting with Robert and Etienne. > > I was just wondering: eould it be possible/convenient at this point for > you to share them with us? > The meeting took place, as I reported here: https://twitter.com/edzerpebesma/status/960376392247476227 My agenda is pretty much on-line, and otherwise found in my two R talks of last week(s): https://github.com/edzer/rstudio_conf ; the talk at Bren School @ UCSB gives more details (and some results) for stars. The Bren talk was recorded, and I put it here: http://pebesma.staff.ifgi.de/Spatial-data-in-R--Pebesma--2018-02-07.m4v The RStudio::conf talk was recorded too, and should become available in a few weeks. Whenever there's something substantial to tell about stars, I'll report back here (and/or on twitter), anything about raster you'll have to ask Robert. Many regards, > Thanks! > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > University of Michigan > > > On Saturday, October 21, 2017, 5:32:59 AM EDT, Edzer Pebesma > wrote: > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > current issues. > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: >> Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention > to bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. >> >> Roger >> >> Roger Bivand >> Norwegian School of Economics >> Bergen, Norway >> >> >> >> Fra: Chris Reudenbach >> Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 >> Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? >> Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org <mailto:r-sig-geo@r-project.org> >> >> >> Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > work. Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus > needs and ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with > Robert about options such as if/how the interested community can support > would be more productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb > Roger Bivand: > The CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it > had, it would have been reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have > notes but no warnings or errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer > did not respond to CRAN requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, > you are suggesting a fork, and should rename any package. Only the > maintainer may update existing CRAN packages. I would not think that > forking an existing CRAN package is the most productive way of > contributing to the community. The package has many reverse > dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Mic
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
On 02/15/2018 03:33 PM, Thiago V. dos Santos wrote: > Dear Edzer, > > As a heavy user of both raster and sp (for remote sensing products and > climate model outputs), I am really interested in the outcomes of your > meeting with Robert and Etienne. > > I was just wondering: eould it be possible/convenient at this point for > you to share them with us? > The meeting took place, as I reported here: https://twitter.com/edzerpebesma/status/960376392247476227 My agenda is pretty much on-line, and otherwise found in my two R talks of last week(s): https://github.com/edzer/rstudio_conf ; the talk at Bren School @ UCSB gives more details (and some results) for stars. The Bren talk was recorded, and I put it here: http://pebesma.staff.ifgi.de/Spatial-data-in-R--Pebesma--2018-02-07.m4v The RStudio::conf talk was recorded too, and should become available in a few weeks. Whenever there's something substantial to tell about stars, I'll report back here (and/or on twitter), anything about raster you'll have to ask Robert. Many regards, > Thanks! > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > University of Michigan > > > On Saturday, October 21, 2017, 5:32:59 AM EDT, Edzer Pebesma > wrote: > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > current issues. > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: >> Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention > to bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. >> >> Roger >> >> Roger Bivand >> Norwegian School of Economics >> Bergen, Norway >> >> >> >> Fra: Chris Reudenbach >> Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 >> Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? >> Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org <mailto:r-sig-geo@r-project.org> >> >> >> Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > work. Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus > needs and ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with > Robert about options such as if/how the interested community can support > would be more productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb > Roger Bivand: > The CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it > had, it would have been reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have > notes but no warnings or errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer > did not respond to CRAN requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, > you are suggesting a fork, and should rename any package. Only the > maintainer may update existing CRAN packages. I would not think that > forking an existing CRAN package is the most productive way of > contributing to the community. The package has many reverse > dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, > 06.28 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving > updates? > Til: Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > > Great! I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out > properly: https:
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Dear Edzer, As a heavy user of both raster and sp (for remote sensing products and climate model outputs), I am really interested in the outcomes of your meeting with Robert and Etienne. I was just wondering: eould it be possible/convenient at this point for you to share them with us? Thanks! -- Thiago V. dos Santos Postdoctoral Research FellowDepartment of Climate and Space Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan On Saturday, October 21, 2017, 5:32:59 AM EDT, Edzer Pebesma wrote: The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with current issues. Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main memory but it already integrates with sf: https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to enhance > raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and depending on it. > Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in the tests, they do > not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to bring the package into > full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their work. Big > thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > The > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, and > should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the most > productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many reverse > dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > Bergen, > Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 06.28 > Emne: > Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > Til: > Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > Great! I'm keen, but > haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: > https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if > there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, > 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you > wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, > if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate > Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston > - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of > Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos > Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster > package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No > concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a > list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or i
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 at 17:51 Robert J. Hijmans wrote: > For a variety of reasons, I have not been able to do much work on raster > for the past year. And most of my thinking about it, and some work, has > been around a next generation replacement that is simpler in use and much > faster. > But for now, over the coming months, I will make sure that it gets updated > and bugs get fixed. > > Best, Robert > > Excellent, thanks Robert! So I had somewhere to collect issues I made a (now stale) fork of the R-forge repo here: https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge I plan to review each issue mentioned and summarize them, but for now it's a reasonable place to keep the notes. Should we simply email you details of issues, or use the systems on r-forge, or do you perhaps plan to migrate to Github? If the plan is to stay where it is I'll just use my repo to share ideas and planned updates. On Github I think the potential for collective contribution from the comunity is far greater. I'd also love to see raster converted to roxygen2 (I'm happy to do that, just need to know if it's a welcome change) and to have a suite of automated tests in the package as well. If SVN/r-forge is going to the be the system used that's fine, but I really think we need a more accessible forum for sharing issues, and I'm quite sure that most people will ignore anything that anyone else sets up unless you approve it. Cheers, Mike > > On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Barry Rowlingson < > b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk > > wrote: > > > Here's what I think should happen: > > > > Robert Hijmans lets us know what his vision of raster is, and how he > plans > > to support it. > > > > He should say if he wishes to carry on as maintainer or not. If not, we > > need a new maintainer and then we can think about moving development to > > gitlab, or whatever. > > > > Barry > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Alexander Brown > wrote: > > > > > I too expect to rely on the raster package for years, and would be > > willing > > > to help to the extent of my ability and resources. > > > > > > Alex Brown (a.br...@ieee.org) > > > http://faculty.uml.edu/abrown --> > > > https://sites.google.com/site/alexbrownuml > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Vijay Lulla > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I > > will > > > be > > > > very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community > > > > leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to > > move > > > > forward. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Vijay. > > > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < > > > > edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge > > GH > > > > > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a > mature > > > > > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > > > > > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > > > > > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to > the > > > > > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > > > > > current issues. > > > > > > > > > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans > > and > > > > > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and > integration > > > of > > > > > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > > > > > > > > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it > > > doesn't > > > > > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > > > > > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > > > > > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > > > > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > > > > > > > > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. > > Feed > > > > > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few > weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > &g
[R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
For a variety of reasons, I have not been able to do much work on raster for the past year. And most of my thinking about it, and some work, has been around a next generation replacement that is simpler in use and much faster. But for now, over the coming months, I will make sure that it gets updated and bugs get fixed. Best, Robert On Sunday, October 22, 2017, Barry Rowlingson > wrote: > Here's what I think should happen: > > Robert Hijmans lets us know what his vision of raster is, and how he plans > to support it. > > He should say if he wishes to carry on as maintainer or not. If not, we > need a new maintainer and then we can think about moving development to > gitlab, or whatever. > > Barry > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Alexander Brown wrote: > > > I too expect to rely on the raster package for years, and would be > willing > > to help to the extent of my ability and resources. > > > > Alex Brown (a.br...@ieee.org) > > http://faculty.uml.edu/abrown --> > > https://sites.google.com/site/alexbrownuml > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Vijay Lulla > > wrote: > > > > > Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I > will > > be > > > very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community > > > leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to > move > > > forward. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vijay. > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < > > > edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > > > > > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge > GH > > > > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > > > > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > > > > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > > > > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > > > > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > > > > current issues. > > > > > > > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans > and > > > > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration > > of > > > > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > > > > > > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it > > doesn't > > > > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > > > > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > > > > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > > > > > > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. > Feed > > > > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > > > > > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > > > > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > > > > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes > > in > > > > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve > attention > > to > > > > bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > > > > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > > > > > Roger Bivand > > > > > Norwegian School of Economics > > > > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > > > > > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > > > > > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving > updates? > > > > > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > > > work. > > > > Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs > > and > > > > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert > about > > > > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be > > more > > > > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.1
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017, Barry Rowlingson wrote: Here's what I think should happen: Robert Hijmans lets us know what his vision of raster is, and how he plans to support it. Right, this is essential, and is planned for the meeting Edzer mentioned in February 2018. I've added an issue to r-spatial/discuss: https://github.com/r-spatial/discuss/issues/17 simply to have a place to talk. This is the place (for now) to look for information as it accrues. The raster repo is under SVN on R-Forge, of course. I'll be writing to Robert and others directly about this. Roger He should say if he wishes to carry on as maintainer or not. If not, we need a new maintainer and then we can think about moving development to gitlab, or whatever. Barry On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Alexander Brown wrote: I too expect to rely on the raster package for years, and would be willing to help to the extent of my ability and resources. Alex Brown (a.br...@ieee.org) http://faculty.uml.edu/abrown --> https://sites.google.com/site/alexbrownuml On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Vijay Lulla wrote: > Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I will be > very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community > leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to move > forward. > > Thanks, > Vijay. > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < > edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > > current issues. > > > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of > > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't > > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > > > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in > > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to > > bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > Roger Bivand > > > Norwegian School of Economics > > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > > > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > > > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > > > > > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > work. > > Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and > > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more > > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > > The > > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been > > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or > > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, > > and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing > CRAN > > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the > > most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has > many > > reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > > welcome. > > Ro
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Here's what I think should happen: Robert Hijmans lets us know what his vision of raster is, and how he plans to support it. He should say if he wishes to carry on as maintainer or not. If not, we need a new maintainer and then we can think about moving development to gitlab, or whatever. Barry On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 1:16 AM, Alexander Brown wrote: > I too expect to rely on the raster package for years, and would be willing > to help to the extent of my ability and resources. > > Alex Brown (a.br...@ieee.org) > http://faculty.uml.edu/abrown --> > https://sites.google.com/site/alexbrownuml > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Vijay Lulla > wrote: > > > Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I will > be > > very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community > > leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to move > > forward. > > > > Thanks, > > Vijay. > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < > > edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > > > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > > > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > > > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > > > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > > > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > > > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > > > current issues. > > > > > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > > > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration > of > > > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > > > > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it > doesn't > > > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > > > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > > > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > > > > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > > > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > > > > > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > > > > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > > > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > > > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes > in > > > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention > to > > > bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > > > Roger Bivand > > > > Norwegian School of Economics > > > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > > > > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > > > > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > > > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > > work. > > > Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs > and > > > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > > > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be > more > > > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > > > The > > > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have > been > > > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings > or > > > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > > > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a > fork, > > > and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing > > CRAN > > > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is > the > > > most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has > > many > > > reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > > > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions > are >
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
I too expect to rely on the raster package for years, and would be willing to help to the extent of my ability and resources. Alex Brown (a.br...@ieee.org) http://faculty.uml.edu/abrown --> https://sites.google.com/site/alexbrownuml On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Vijay Lulla wrote: > Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I will be > very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community > leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to move > forward. > > Thanks, > Vijay. > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < > edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > > > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > > current issues. > > > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of > > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't > > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > > > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in > > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to > > bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > Roger Bivand > > > Norwegian School of Economics > > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > > > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > > > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > > > > > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their > work. > > Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and > > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more > > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > > The > > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been > > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or > > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, > > and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing > CRAN > > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the > > most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has > many > > reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > > > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, > > 06.28 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving > > updates? > Til: Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > Great! > > I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: > > https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if > > there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On > > Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at > it, > > if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in > about > > a week, if that would work. > S
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Just like Mike I too will rely on raster for many years still and I will be very happy to support efforts on this or whatever else the community leaders (Edzer, Roger, and others) decide is the best way for us to move forward. Thanks, Vijay. On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 5:32 AM, Edzer Pebesma < edzer.pebe...@uni-muenster.de> wrote: > The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH > repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature > state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of > extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 > years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the > raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with > current issues. > > Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and > Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of > rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. > > Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't > want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for > rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main > memory but it already integrates with sf: > > https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 > > and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed > back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. > > > On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to > enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and > depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in > the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to > bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > > > Roger > > > > Roger Bivand > > Norwegian School of Economics > > Bergen, Norway > > > > > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their work. > Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > The > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, > and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the > most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many > reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, > 06.28 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving > updates? > Til: Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > Great! > I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: > https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if > there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On > Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, > if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about > a week, if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > > Associate Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University > of Houston - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of > Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. > dos Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the > raster package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. > No concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept > a list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll g
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
The the NOTEs on CRAN and the issues raised on Mike's raster-rforge GH repo to me suggest that raster has, for a while now, reached a mature state. Of course, you'd wish that raster development, in terms of extending its power and features, would continue the pace it did 10 years ago, but that's a different issue. Mike has write access to the raster r-forge sources, it shouldn't be hard to support Robert with current issues. Right after rstudio::conf (Feb 4/5) I'm meeting with Robert Hijmans and Etienne Racine, to discuss, and work on raster future and integration of rasters and stars. Anyone interested, feel free to join. Stars has the ambition to jump over raster, in the sense that it doesn't want to have the local hard drive as a limitation. That calls for rethinking quite a few things. So far, things are still all in main memory but it already integrates with sf: https://gist.github.com/edzer/381dac079ddcd5174be31209675b3822 and handles time stacks of different attributes in single objects. Feed back welcome as always; will write up the first blog in a few weeks. On 10/21/2017 10:41 AM, Roger Bivand wrote: > Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to enhance > raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and depending on it. > Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in the tests, they do > not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to bring the package into > full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Chris Reudenbach > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org > > > Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their work. Big > thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and > ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about > options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more > productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > The > CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been > reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or > errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN > requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, and > should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN > packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the most > productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many reverse > dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards > incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are > welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > Bergen, > Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 06.28 > Emne: > Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > Til: > Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > Great! I'm keen, but > haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: > https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if > there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, > 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you > wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, > if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate > Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston > - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of > Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos > Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster > package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No > concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a > list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll get to it. > > I'd > support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. > > > Cheers, Mike > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via > R-sig-Geo, < > r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > I > realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > > > CRAN over a year ago. > > > > I also noticed that Robert's particip
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Yes, this sounds fruitful. For now, I suggest that those wishing to enhance raster do so in an additional package enhancing raster and depending on it. Immediately, we should help Robert resolve the notes in the tests, they do not affect functionality now, but deserve attention to bring the package into full CRAN compliance. I can help with this. Roger Roger Bivand Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Norway Fra: Chris Reudenbach Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 09.01 Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? Til: r-sig-geo@r-project.org Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their work. Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: > The CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards incompatibilities would be crucial. > > Of course, all contributions are welcome. > > Roger > > Roger Bivand > Norwegian School of Economics > Bergen, Norway > > > > Fra: Michael Sumner > Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 06.28 > Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > Til: Hodgess, Erin > Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List > > > Great! I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll get to it. > > I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. > > Cheers, Mike > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < > r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > > CRAN over a year ago. > > > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > > scarce. > > > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving > updates? > > > > Greetings, > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > > University of Michigan > > > > ___ > > R-sig-Geo mailing list > > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > > > -- > Dr. Michael Sumner > Software and Database Engineer > Australian Antarctic Division > 203 Channel Highway > Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-projec
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Many of us rely on the raster package as a crucial basis for their work. Big thank to Robert. Nevertheless to contribute needs to focus needs and ressources. Maybe an information exchange/discussion with Robert about options such as if/how the interested community can support would be more productive. cheers Chris Am 21.10.2017 um 06:52 schrieb Roger Bivand: The CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards incompatibilities would be crucial. Of course, all contributions are welcome. Roger Roger Bivand Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Norway Fra: Michael Sumner Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 06.28 Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? Til: Hodgess, Erin Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List Great! I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll get to it. > > I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. > > Cheers, Mike > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < > r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > > CRAN over a year ago. > > > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > > scarce. > > > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving > updates? > > > > Greetings, > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > > University of Michigan > > > > ___ > > R-sig-Geo mailing list > > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > > > -- > Dr. Michael Sumner > Software and Database Engineer > Australian Antarctic Division > 203 Channel Highway > Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo -- Dr Christoph Reudenbach, Philipps-University of Marburg, Faculty of Geography, GIS and Environmental Modeling, Deutschhausstr. 10, D-35032 Marburg, fon: ++49.(0)6421.2824296, fax: ++49.(0)6421.2828950, web: gis-ma.org, giswerk.org, moc.environmentalinformatics-marburg.de ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
The CRAN raster package has not been abandoned, if it had, it would have been reclassified as orphaned. Its test results have notes but no warnings or errors. It would be orphaned if the maintainer did not respond to CRAN requests to resolve test errors. Consequently, you are suggesting a fork, and should rename any package. Only the maintainer may update existing CRAN packages. I would not think that forking an existing CRAN package is the most productive way of contributing to the community. The package has many reverse dependencies, so setting up a test framework to find backwards incompatibilities would be crucial. Of course, all contributions are welcome. Roger Roger Bivand Norwegian School of Economics Bergen, Norway Fra: Michael Sumner Sendt: lørdag 21. oktober, 06.28 Emne: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? Til: Hodgess, Erin Kopi: R-sig-geo Mailing List Great! I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll get to it. > > I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. > > Cheers, Mike > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < > r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > > CRAN over a year ago. > > > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > > scarce. > > > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving > updates? > > > > Greetings, > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > > University of Michigan > > > > ___ > > R-sig-Geo mailing list > > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > > > -- > Dr. Michael Sumner > Software and Database Engineer > Australian Antarctic Division > 203 Channel Highway > Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Great! I'm keen, but haven't done the work needed to flesh this out properly: https://github.com/mdsumner/raster-rforge/issues I have not checked if there's been any commits to r-forge since I cloned this. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 12:58 Hodgess, Erin, wrote: > I could take a swat at it, if you wish. Please do send me the list of > fixes. I could start in about a week, if that would work. > Sincerely, > Erin > > > Erin M. Hodgess > Associate Professor > Department of Mathematics and Statistics > University of Houston - Downtown > mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu > > > From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of Michael > Sumner > Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM > To: Thiago V. dos Santos > Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List > Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? > > No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. > > I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but > not sure when or if I'll get to it. > > I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. > > Cheers, Mike > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < > r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > > > Dear list, > > > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > > CRAN over a year ago. > > > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > > scarce. > > > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving > updates? > > > > Greetings, > > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > > University of Michigan > > > > ___ > > R-sig-Geo mailing list > > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > > > -- > Dr. Michael Sumner > Software and Database Engineer > Australian Antarctic Division > 203 Channel Highway > Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
I could take a swat at it, if you wish. Please do send me the list of fixes. I could start in about a week, if that would work. Sincerely, Erin Erin M. Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Houston - Downtown mailto: hodge...@uhd.edu From: R-sig-Geo on behalf of Michael Sumner Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 8:05 PM To: Thiago V. dos Santos Cc: R-sig-geo Mailing List Subject: Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates? No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but not sure when or if I'll get to it. I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > Dear list, > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > CRAN over a year ago. > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > scarce. > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving updates? > > Greetings, > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > University of Michigan > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
Re: [R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
No, it's effectively abandoned. No concrete plans known. I'm interested to keep it going and have kept a list of fixes needed, but not sure when or if I'll get to it. I'd support any efforts in this, I'll rely on raster for many years still. Cheers, Mike On Sat, 21 Oct 2017, 02:05 Thiago V. dos Santos via R-sig-Geo, < r-sig-geo@r-project.org> wrote: > Dear list, > > I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on > CRAN over a year ago. > > I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather > scarce. > > I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving updates? > > Greetings, > -- Thiago V. dos Santos > > Postdoctoral Research Fellow > Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering > University of Michigan > > ___ > R-sig-Geo mailing list > R-sig-Geo@r-project.org > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo > -- Dr. Michael Sumner Software and Database Engineer Australian Antarctic Division 203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania 7050 Australia [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
[R-sig-Geo] Is the raster package still receiving updates?
Dear list, I realized that the latest version of the raster package was released on CRAN over a year ago. I also noticed that Robert's participation in this list has become rather scarce. I was just wondering whether the raster package is still receiving updates? Greetings, -- Thiago V. dos Santos Postdoctoral Research Fellow Department of Climate and Space Science and Engineering University of Michigan ___ R-sig-Geo mailing list R-sig-Geo@r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-geo
