Re: [racket-users] Official Docker images for Racket
Am 03.09.2015 um 07:19 schrieb Rickard Andersson: > I've previously tried to minimize the build without any success, so if > you can make a base image using only busybox or alpine linux without any > problems that'd obviously be preferable. I would welcome that as well. I was doing some experiments on my local machine to get a good Dockerfile but up to now I am not satisfied with the results. Best wishes, Daniel > > On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Asumu Takikawa wrote: > >> On 2015-09-02 15:35:25 -0700, Jack Firth wrote: >>> I do a lot of Racket development in Docker, and it's a pretty big pain. >>> There's a handful of images on Docker Hub but they're pretty >>> unmaintained, >>> usually lag behind a version or two, tend to be built off an >>> unnecessarily >>> large base image like ubuntu, don't offer a snapshot build, and don't >>> offer >>> "minimal Racket" versions. I'd like to work on this and add some Racket >>> images to the Official images like other languages have. Has anyone else >>> worked on this? >> >> That sounds great and if you put Racket images up I would happily use >> them. >> >> I did look into building images on Dockerhub a while ago and had trouble >> getting builds to finish (ran out of memory), but it looks like they have >> improved the infrastructure since then. >> >> Cheers, >> Asumu >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [racket-users] Official Docker images for Racket
I've previously tried to minimize the build without any success, so if you can make a base image using only busybox or alpine linux without any problems that'd obviously be preferable. On Wed, 2 Sep 2015, Asumu Takikawa wrote: On 2015-09-02 15:35:25 -0700, Jack Firth wrote: I do a lot of Racket development in Docker, and it's a pretty big pain. There's a handful of images on Docker Hub but they're pretty unmaintained, usually lag behind a version or two, tend to be built off an unnecessarily large base image like ubuntu, don't offer a snapshot build, and don't offer "minimal Racket" versions. I'd like to work on this and add some Racket images to the Official images like other languages have. Has anyone else worked on this? That sounds great and if you put Racket images up I would happily use them. I did look into building images on Dockerhub a while ago and had trouble getting builds to finish (ran out of memory), but it looks like they have improved the infrastructure since then. Cheers, Asumu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [racket-users] Official Docker images for Racket
On 2015-09-02 15:35:25 -0700, Jack Firth wrote: > I do a lot of Racket development in Docker, and it's a pretty big pain. > There's a handful of images on Docker Hub but they're pretty unmaintained, > usually lag behind a version or two, tend to be built off an unnecessarily > large base image like ubuntu, don't offer a snapshot build, and don't offer > "minimal Racket" versions. I'd like to work on this and add some Racket > images to the Official images like other languages have. Has anyone else > worked on this? That sounds great and if you put Racket images up I would happily use them. I did look into building images on Dockerhub a while ago and had trouble getting builds to finish (ran out of memory), but it looks like they have improved the infrastructure since then. Cheers, Asumu -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[racket-users] Official Docker images for Racket
I do a lot of Racket development in Docker, and it's a pretty big pain. There's a handful of images on Docker Hub but they're pretty unmaintained, usually lag behind a version or two, tend to be built off an unnecessarily large base image like ubuntu, don't offer a snapshot build, and don't offer "minimal Racket" versions. I'd like to work on this and add some Racket images to the Official images like other languages have. Has anyone else worked on this? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
