Re: epsilon vs varepsilon (was Re: [racket-users] Unicode subscripts in code and scribble)
Thanks! I've pushed those fixes too. Robby On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Max New wrote: > Makes sense to follow TeX. > > Why not make the same change for \phi, \vartheta, \varrho and \varpi ? > > \varsigma looks to be correct, most likely because some PL researchers > actually use it :) > > -Max Stewart New > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: >> >> Jens Axel kindly tracked down this link: >> >> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98013/varepsilon-vs-epsilon >> >> and so I'm now planning to change how DrRacket treats \epsilon so that >> it inserts ϵ instead of the "backwards 3" that it currently does. >> >> Please let me know if that sounds wrong to you. >> >> Robby >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard >> wrote: >> > That reminds me: >> > >> > In DrRacket \epsilon is displayed the same way \varepsilon is. >> > >> > /Jens Axel >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: epsilon vs varepsilon (was Re: [racket-users] Unicode subscripts in code and scribble)
Makes sense to follow TeX. Why not make the same change for \phi, \vartheta, \varrho and \varpi ? \varsigma looks to be correct, most likely because some PL researchers actually use it :) -Max Stewart New On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > Jens Axel kindly tracked down this link: > > http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98013/varepsilon-vs-epsilon > > and so I'm now planning to change how DrRacket treats \epsilon so that > it inserts ϵ instead of the "backwards 3" that it currently does. > > Please let me know if that sounds wrong to you. > > Robby > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard > wrote: > > That reminds me: > > > > In DrRacket \epsilon is displayed the same way \varepsilon is. > > > > /Jens Axel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
epsilon vs varepsilon (was Re: [racket-users] Unicode subscripts in code and scribble)
Jens Axel kindly tracked down this link: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/98013/varepsilon-vs-epsilon and so I'm now planning to change how DrRacket treats \epsilon so that it inserts ϵ instead of the "backwards 3" that it currently does. Please let me know if that sounds wrong to you. Robby On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote: > That reminds me: > > In DrRacket \epsilon is displayed the same way \varepsilon is. > > /Jens Axel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
