Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-10 Thread chris


 This was where the problem was.thier setup did not follow this
standard
 and was trying to
 assign 255.255.255.254 as the IP *sigh*

This leads me to a questions. I have a mix of nas servers that I need to use
on the same radius
server. One needs the Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254  attribute and one
needs *nothing*
sent.

I have each nas setup seperate in client clauses. How can I choose to send
the attribute out to only the nas servers that need it?

 -Chris

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



RE: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-10 Thread Frank Danielson

You could use identifiers in your client clauses like so-

Client 1.2.3.4
Identifier noip
/Client

Client 1.2.3.5
Identifier send254
/Client

Client 1.2.4.6
Identifier noip
/Client

Client 1.2.3.7
Identifier send254
/Client

Handler Client-Identifier=noip
Do auth and send no Framed-IP-Address
/Handler

Handler Client-Identifier=send254
Do auth and send 255.255.255.254
/Handler

-Original Message-
From: chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?



 This was where the problem was.thier setup did not follow this
standard
 and was trying to
 assign 255.255.255.254 as the IP *sigh*

This leads me to a questions. I have a mix of nas servers that I need to use
on the same radius
server. One needs the Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254  attribute and one
needs *nothing*
sent.

I have each nas setup seperate in client clauses. How can I choose to send
the attribute out to only the nas servers that need it?

 -Chris

===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-10 Thread Karl Gaissmaier

Hi Chris,

chris schrieb:
 
  This was where the problem was.thier setup did not follow this
 standard
  and was trying to
  assign 255.255.255.254 as the IP *sigh*
 
 This leads me to a questions. I have a mix of nas servers that I need to use
 on the same radius
 server. One needs the Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254  attribute and one
 needs *nothing*
 sent.

what NAS's do you have? Are they not able to configure them with
dynamic ip address pools and you specify in the reply items just
from which ip pool they shall spent an ip address?

See the following axample for my ascends (in the users file):

pools-foo Password = ascend, Service-Type = Outbound-User
Ascend-IP-Pool-Definition = 1 10.0.0.1 254
...
...
DEFAULT Service-Type = Framed-User, Auth-Type = System
Framed-Protocol = MP,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
Framed-Routing = None,
Idle-Timeout = 1800,
Session-Timeout = 43200,
Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 1,
Ascend-Source-IP-Check = Source-IP-Check-Yes,
Ascend-Link-Compression = Link-Comp-MS-Stac

here you see Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 1, as defined in the same
users file and the Ascend NAS fetches this after reboot or with
a special remote config refresh.

Anyway, you should spent an Idenifier in the Client Clause like:

Client foo.bar.baz
Identifier  foo
Secret mysecret
/Client

Client yep.bar.baz
Identifier  yep
Secret mysecret
/Client

and then you can sezup different handlers for the different
Clients with different users file:

Handler Client-Identifier=foo
AuthBy FILE
Filenamefoo-users
/AuthBy
/Handler

Handler Client-Identifier=yep
AuthBy FILE
Filenameyep-users
/AuthBy
/Handler

or you use just one handler and fifferntiate in teh single users file like:

DEFAULT Service-Type = Framed-User, Auth-Type = System, Client-Identifier = foo
 foo reply items 

DEFAULT Service-Type = Framed-User, Auth-Type = System, Client-Identifier = yep
 yep reply items 

Hope this helps

Regards
Charly
-- 
Karl Gaissmaier  Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Network Administration
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



(RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-08 Thread chris

I am having the weirdest issue.  If I add a user into the users file with
the simple line
test123   Auth-Type = System

They can authenticate and go on thier merry way

If the user is not in there and gets caught by the default

DEFAULT Auth-Type = System
Port-Limit = 2,
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
Framed-Routing = None,
Idle-Timeout = 1800,
Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP,
Framed-MTU = 1500

They still auth ok(I see the user/pass combo pass the test), but it does
weird things that wont let the
user complete logon. What *seems* to be happening is that it is not throwing
back an IP for the end user. Anyone seen this happen before? I do not want
to have to add every user to the users file.

TIA
Chris



===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-08 Thread Karl Gaissmaier

Hi Chris,

chris schrieb:
 
 I am having the weirdest issue.  If I add a user into the users file with
 the simple line
 test123   Auth-Type = System
 
 They can authenticate and go on thier merry way
 
 If the user is not in there and gets caught by the default
 
 DEFAULT Auth-Type = System
 Port-Limit = 2,
 Service-Type = Framed-User,
 Framed-Protocol = PPP,
 Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
 Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
 Framed-Routing = None,
 Idle-Timeout = 1800,
 Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP,
 Framed-MTU = 1500
 
 They still auth ok(I see the user/pass combo pass the test), but it does
 weird things that wont let the
 user complete logon. What *seems* to be happening is that it is not throwing
 back an IP for the end user. Anyone seen this happen before? I do not want
 to have to add every user to the users file.

Really, you don't have to do this for every user. If it is not a typo
in your e-mail then it is in your users file. You MUST have whitespace
in front of your Reply Items.

Please always turn debug on and send it as partt of the questions.
In the debug we could see what reply items are sent back to the NAS.

Regards
Charly

P.S. is this really a working example with this Framed-IP-Address?


-- 
Karl Gaissmaier  Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Network Administration
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-08 Thread chris

There is whitespace in there, its an email glitch

- Original Message -
From: Karl Gaissmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?


 Hi Chris,

 chris schrieb:
 
  I am having the weirdest issue.  If I add a user into the users file
with
  the simple line
  test123   Auth-Type = System
 
  They can authenticate and go on thier merry way
 
  If the user is not in there and gets caught by the default
 
  DEFAULT Auth-Type = System
  Port-Limit = 2,
  Service-Type = Framed-User,
  Framed-Protocol = PPP,
  Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
  Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
  Framed-Routing = None,
  Idle-Timeout = 1800,
  Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP,
  Framed-MTU = 1500
 
  They still auth ok(I see the user/pass combo pass the test), but it does
  weird things that wont let the
  user complete logon. What *seems* to be happening is that it is not
throwing
  back an IP for the end user. Anyone seen this happen before? I do not
want
  to have to add every user to the users file.

 Really, you don't have to do this for every user. If it is not a typo
 in your e-mail then it is in your users file. You MUST have whitespace
 in front of your Reply Items.

 Please always turn debug on and send it as partt of the questions.
 In the debug we could see what reply items are sent back to the NAS.

 Regards
 Charly

 P.S. is this really a working example with this Framed-IP-Address?


 --
 Karl Gaissmaier  Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany
 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Network Administration


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-08 Thread Hugh Irvine


Hello Chris -

It looks to me like your DEFAULT entry is not correct.

It should look like this (there *must* be white space at the beginning of the 
second and subsequent lines):

DEFAULT Auth-Type = System
Port-Limit = 2,
Service-Type = Framed-User,
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
Framed-Routing = None,
Idle-Timeout = 1800,
Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP,
Framed-MTU = 1500

regards

Hugh


On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:57, chris wrote:
 I am having the weirdest issue.  If I add a user into the users file with
 the simple line
 test123   Auth-Type = System

 They can authenticate and go on thier merry way

 If the user is not in there and gets caught by the default

 DEFAULT Auth-Type = System
 Port-Limit = 2,
 Service-Type = Framed-User,
 Framed-Protocol = PPP,
 Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
 Framed-IP-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
 Framed-Routing = None,
 Idle-Timeout = 1800,
 Framed-Compression = Van-Jacobson-TCP-IP,
 Framed-MTU = 1500

 They still auth ok(I see the user/pass combo pass the test), but it does
 weird things that wont let the
 user complete logon. What *seems* to be happening is that it is not
 throwing back an IP for the end user. Anyone seen this happen before? I do
 not want to have to add every user to the users file.

 TIA
 Chris



 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

-- 
Radiator: the most portable, flexible and configurable RADIUS server
anywhere. Available on *NIX, *BSD, Windows 95/98/2000, NT, MacOS X.
-
Nets: internetwork inventory and management - graphical, extensible,
flexible with hardware, software, platform and database independence.
===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.



Re: (RADIATOR) User auths if in the users file only?

2002-07-08 Thread chris


 P.S. is this really a working example with this Framed-IP-Address?

Yes, this is the DEFAULT selection, which is my understanding that is
follows some rfc that
states this address should be converted to one from a dynamic pool.

This was where the problem was.thier setup did not follow this standard
and was trying to
assign 255.255.255.254 as the IP *sigh*

Problem solved.


Thanks,
Chris

P.S.Sorry about the whitespace confusion.



 --
 Karl Gaissmaier  Computing Center,University of Ulm,Germany
 Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Network Administration
 ===
 Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
 Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
 'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.


===
Archive at http://www.open.com.au/archives/radiator/
Announcements on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.