[RBW] Re: Good pedals for both SPD clip-in and street shoe riding?

[George Cline]

I use these,  Shimano PD-EH500's, although similar to the a530, they have a 
pretty flat platform with replaceable pins for "stiction" in your street 
shoes.\:

https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/shimano/PD-EH500.html

I've been pretty happy with them, they live on my gravel bike.

George in NoCal

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 1:36:21 PM UTC-8 Patrick Moore wrote:

> The Monocog gets ridden on bosque singletrack and sandy acequia roads, 
> where I prefer to be clipped in, but also gets used to drag the dog on his 
> 2-mile run, where flat pedals would be convenient.
>
> I've used the standard Shimano M324 and A530 several times, and don't 
> really like either -- they're neither fish nor fowl, and I want a pedal 
> that is *both* fish* and* fowl.
>
> Is there any such thing as a pedal that feels like a flat pedal when you 
> are wearing boat shoes or walking shoes, and that works well with cleats 
> when in your Shimano SPD shoes? 
>
> I would not be surprised if the answer is a resounding and echoing "OF 
> COURSE NOT!!". Perhaps the solution is one of the remade beartrap pedals 
> with XL MKS clips and long straps, but the question is worth asking.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 
>
> ---
> Patrick Moore
> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/c4d4a761-89cb-4a05-bfdb-fcb57c577b5en%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: Good pedals for both SPD clip-in and street shoe riding?

[George Cline]

I use these,  Shimano PD-EH500's, although similar to the a530, they have a 
pretty flat platform with replaceable pins for "stiction" in your street 
shoes.\:

https://bike.shimano.com/en-EU/product/component/shimano/PD-EH500.html

I've been pretty happy with them, they like on my gravel bike.

George in NoCal

On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 1:36:21 PM UTC-8 Patrick Moore wrote:

> The Monocog gets ridden on bosque singletrack and sandy acequia roads, 
> where I prefer to be clipped in, but also gets used to drag the dog on his 
> 2-mile run, where flat pedals would be convenient.
>
> I've used the standard Shimano M324 and A530 several times, and don't 
> really like either -- they're neither fish nor fowl, and I want a pedal 
> that is *both* fish* and* fowl.
>
> Is there any such thing as a pedal that feels like a flat pedal when you 
> are wearing boat shoes or walking shoes, and that works well with cleats 
> when in your Shimano SPD shoes? 
>
> I would not be surprised if the answer is a resounding and echoing "OF 
> COURSE NOT!!". Perhaps the solution is one of the remade beartrap pedals 
> with XL MKS clips and long straps, but the question is worth asking.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -- 
>
> ---
> Patrick Moore
> Alburquerque, Nuevo Mexico, Etats Unis d'Amerique, Orbis Terrarum
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/a9c6e392-e766-4d15-b853-fe7d78e3cb18n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Studded Tire Experience, help

[Michael Morrissey]

I have studded snow tires and used to use them to commute to work here in 
New York City on my vintage 80s mountain bike. I LOVE THEM. It's so fun to 
just go anywhere with confidence.

Check out a ride I went on here on my YouTube channel:
https://youtu.be/B0xyW6dUSow

For trail riding in Maine though, I would buy a Surly Wednesday in a 
heartbeat. Have you seen the latest color for the Ice Cream Truck? It's an 
amazing pale green.

m


On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 7:13:22 PM UTC-5 Ian A wrote:

> My experience is similar to Steven's. I'm in Alberta, Canada and am 
> running Ice Spikers Pro (folding bead) 26"x2.1". 
>
> I would add to Steven's comment that riding on a snow trail which has been 
> walked on can be hard going; bouncing around and finding it hard to pick a 
> line, which is essential in snow as momentum is everything.. Those areas 
> are where the fat bikes sail along. Deep snow is basically not ridable at 
> all.
>
> IanA Alberta Canada
>
> On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 3:19:56 PM UTC-7 Steven Sweedler wrote:
>
>> David, I rode 26” x 2.2 tires with aggressive studs for many years in New 
>> Hampshire. The riding was a struggle unless very well packed or after a 
>> thaw  and then another hard freeze.  When conditions are good, its a lot of 
>> fun. Steve
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:49 AM David Wadstrup  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I recently moved to Maine, and would really like to keep riding trails 
>>> even in these snowy, icy conditions.  So, I'm hoping for some advice.  I 
>>> initially thought a fat bike might be in order, but after diving deep into 
>>> Surly Wednesday research, I've decided that it's just not for me -- I'd 
>>> much rather ski, or even snowshoe, if there's a significant amount of new, 
>>> unpacked snow.  What I'm mostly interested in riding is our local, hilly, 
>>> graveled trails that are fully snow covered and that see a lot of foot 
>>> traffic even in winter(walkers, skiers, snowshoers, fat bike riders, even 
>>> some snowmobiles.)  So here are my questions to those of you who have 
>>> experience with winter trail riding...
>>>
>>> 1) I can fit a 2.6 tire on my Susie.  Is this fat enough to ride snowy, 
>>> icy, chewed up, packed trails?  I'm sure it's possible, but is fun?  I know 
>>> a fat bike would give better float, and roll over everything more, but 
>>> would my plus sized 29er tires handle it ok? Would it float enough and roll 
>>> over enough to make investing in a set of VERY expensive 2.6 studded tires 
>>> be worth it?  Or will it just be mostly a slog?
>>>
>>> 2) Regarding studded tires...I've used 40mm wide Nokian Hakkas for 
>>> wintertime commuting in the city, but am going to need something wider, 
>>> something designed for trail riding.  The two best options as far as I can 
>>> see are the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Pros and the 45North Wrathchilds.  The 
>>> Schwalbes only come in a 2.25" width, the 45Norths in a 2.6".  Obviously, 
>>> wider sounds better, but there are some mitigating factors... 
>>>
>>> On the one hand, the 45Norths are considerably more expensive than the 
>>> Schwalbes.  They have less studs, and they seem to be prone to exceptional 
>>> stud loss and have garnered a number of negative reviews.  There are two 
>>> versions of them, though.  One, a 60TPi version with "regular" sized studs; 
>>> two, a 120TPI version with "XL" sized studs.  They are similar in price.  
>>> From what I can gather, the 120/XL version seems to be the version that 
>>> sees the most stud loss and is the one almost all of the online negative 
>>> reviews reference.  Does anyone have any experience with either of these 
>>> versions?  Is my assumption that the 60TPI loses less studs correct?  What 
>>> do you think of this tire generally?  Is it wide enough for packed, snowy 
>>> trails?
>>>
>>> On the other hand, the Schwalbe Ice Spikers are much less expensive.  
>>> They have considerably more studs.  Their current version seem to have far 
>>> few negative reviews.  But they are .35" narrower -- that's 9mm! I would 
>>> think that this 9mm would make a huge difference in performance in the 
>>> conditions I'm looking to use them in, but maybe it won't?  Maybe 2.25 and 
>>> 2.6 tires will be comparable? Maybe the greater stud count and better 
>>> reviews and lower cost outweighs the extra width of the 45North?  What  do 
>>> you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks for whatever advice you might have.  Oh, and in case it makes a 
>>> difference --  I'll be running them with tubes and will not need to ride 
>>> these tires on pavement before getting to the trailhead(it's right outside 
>>> my door, practically!)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://g

Re: [RBW] Studded Tire Experience, help

[Ian A]

My experience is similar to Steven's. I'm in Alberta, Canada and am running 
Ice Spikers Pro (folding bead) 26"x2.1". 

I would add to Steven's comment that riding on a snow trail which has been 
walked on can be hard going; bouncing around and finding it hard to pick a 
line, which is essential in snow as momentum is everything.. Those areas 
are where the fat bikes sail along. Deep snow is basically not ridable at 
all.

IanA Alberta Canada

On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 3:19:56 PM UTC-7 Steven Sweedler wrote:

> David, I rode 26” x 2.2 tires with aggressive studs for many years in New 
> Hampshire. The riding was a struggle unless very well packed or after a 
> thaw  and then another hard freeze.  When conditions are good, its a lot of 
> fun. Steve
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:49 AM David Wadstrup  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I recently moved to Maine, and would really like to keep riding trails 
>> even in these snowy, icy conditions.  So, I'm hoping for some advice.  I 
>> initially thought a fat bike might be in order, but after diving deep into 
>> Surly Wednesday research, I've decided that it's just not for me -- I'd 
>> much rather ski, or even snowshoe, if there's a significant amount of new, 
>> unpacked snow.  What I'm mostly interested in riding is our local, hilly, 
>> graveled trails that are fully snow covered and that see a lot of foot 
>> traffic even in winter(walkers, skiers, snowshoers, fat bike riders, even 
>> some snowmobiles.)  So here are my questions to those of you who have 
>> experience with winter trail riding...
>>
>> 1) I can fit a 2.6 tire on my Susie.  Is this fat enough to ride snowy, 
>> icy, chewed up, packed trails?  I'm sure it's possible, but is fun?  I know 
>> a fat bike would give better float, and roll over everything more, but 
>> would my plus sized 29er tires handle it ok? Would it float enough and roll 
>> over enough to make investing in a set of VERY expensive 2.6 studded tires 
>> be worth it?  Or will it just be mostly a slog?
>>
>> 2) Regarding studded tires...I've used 40mm wide Nokian Hakkas for 
>> wintertime commuting in the city, but am going to need something wider, 
>> something designed for trail riding.  The two best options as far as I can 
>> see are the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Pros and the 45North Wrathchilds.  The 
>> Schwalbes only come in a 2.25" width, the 45Norths in a 2.6".  Obviously, 
>> wider sounds better, but there are some mitigating factors... 
>>
>> On the one hand, the 45Norths are considerably more expensive than the 
>> Schwalbes.  They have less studs, and they seem to be prone to exceptional 
>> stud loss and have garnered a number of negative reviews.  There are two 
>> versions of them, though.  One, a 60TPi version with "regular" sized studs; 
>> two, a 120TPI version with "XL" sized studs.  They are similar in price.  
>> From what I can gather, the 120/XL version seems to be the version that 
>> sees the most stud loss and is the one almost all of the online negative 
>> reviews reference.  Does anyone have any experience with either of these 
>> versions?  Is my assumption that the 60TPI loses less studs correct?  What 
>> do you think of this tire generally?  Is it wide enough for packed, snowy 
>> trails?
>>
>> On the other hand, the Schwalbe Ice Spikers are much less expensive.  
>> They have considerably more studs.  Their current version seem to have far 
>> few negative reviews.  But they are .35" narrower -- that's 9mm! I would 
>> think that this 9mm would make a huge difference in performance in the 
>> conditions I'm looking to use them in, but maybe it won't?  Maybe 2.25 and 
>> 2.6 tires will be comparable? Maybe the greater stud count and better 
>> reviews and lower cost outweighs the extra width of the 45North?  What  do 
>> you think?
>>
>> Thanks for whatever advice you might have.  Oh, and in case it makes a 
>> difference --  I'll be running them with tubes and will not need to ride 
>> these tires on pavement before getting to the trailhead(it's right outside 
>> my door, practically!)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/102cccef-ddb1-420a-b2ba-1241b115acfeo%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
> -- 
> Steven Sweedler
> Plymouth, New Hampshire
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://grou

Re: [RBW] Re: Chambray shirt deal alert

[J Schwartz]

Greetings All
Similarly I purchased a Medium and have washed and dried it *thrice* 
(without wearing it beyond trying it on)
It's still too big and not in my comfort zone.
If anyone would like an unworn but washed and dried Medium , I'd be happy 
to sell for 90% of what I paid including shipping 
So $30.
best
JS

On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 3:56:21 PM UTC-5 Jay P wrote:

> I bought the size L shirt from Berkeleyan but it is, alas, after a 
> wash/dry cycle too small.  These do indeed shrink a lot.   It's now on the 
> edge between M and L but as I like things a little roomy I know that I'm 
> not going to wear this.   If you are interested in buying ($20) and picking 
> up at my home in Berkeley, please be in touch !
>
> Jay P.
> Berkeley, CA
>
> On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8 Berkeleyan wrote:
>
>> Shorts also claimed, but for anyone curious, they are exactly 18 inches 
>> across the top, laying flat. So 36 circumference, in size 36! The cuffs are 
>> 11.5 inches across, flat, and are 20.5 inches below the waist, along the 
>> sides.
>>
>> - Andrew, Berkeley
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 5:28:27 PM UTC-8 Berkeleyan wrote:
>>
>>> The shirt has been claimed AND taken off my front porch! The shorts are 
>>> still here... if I drop a lot of weight, they might fit. But not for a 
>>> while. I'm glad to take measurements of the actual waist circumference, if 
>>> needed.
>>>
>>> - Andrew
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/35d2f165-0142-435a-92c3-d545201f219bn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Studded Tire Experience, help

[Steven Sweedler]

David, I rode 26” x 2.2 tires with aggressive studs for many years in New
Hampshire. The riding was a struggle unless very well packed or after a
thaw  and then another hard freeze.  When conditions are good, its a lot of
fun. Steve

On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:49 AM David Wadstrup 
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I recently moved to Maine, and would really like to keep riding trails
> even in these snowy, icy conditions.  So, I'm hoping for some advice.  I
> initially thought a fat bike might be in order, but after diving deep into
> Surly Wednesday research, I've decided that it's just not for me -- I'd
> much rather ski, or even snowshoe, if there's a significant amount of new,
> unpacked snow.  What I'm mostly interested in riding is our local, hilly,
> graveled trails that are fully snow covered and that see a lot of foot
> traffic even in winter(walkers, skiers, snowshoers, fat bike riders, even
> some snowmobiles.)  So here are my questions to those of you who have
> experience with winter trail riding...
>
> 1) I can fit a 2.6 tire on my Susie.  Is this fat enough to ride snowy,
> icy, chewed up, packed trails?  I'm sure it's possible, but is fun?  I know
> a fat bike would give better float, and roll over everything more, but
> would my plus sized 29er tires handle it ok? Would it float enough and roll
> over enough to make investing in a set of VERY expensive 2.6 studded tires
> be worth it?  Or will it just be mostly a slog?
>
> 2) Regarding studded tires...I've used 40mm wide Nokian Hakkas for
> wintertime commuting in the city, but am going to need something wider,
> something designed for trail riding.  The two best options as far as I can
> see are the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Pros and the 45North Wrathchilds.  The
> Schwalbes only come in a 2.25" width, the 45Norths in a 2.6".  Obviously,
> wider sounds better, but there are some mitigating factors...
>
> On the one hand, the 45Norths are considerably more expensive than the
> Schwalbes.  They have less studs, and they seem to be prone to exceptional
> stud loss and have garnered a number of negative reviews.  There are two
> versions of them, though.  One, a 60TPi version with "regular" sized studs;
> two, a 120TPI version with "XL" sized studs.  They are similar in price.
> From what I can gather, the 120/XL version seems to be the version that
> sees the most stud loss and is the one almost all of the online negative
> reviews reference.  Does anyone have any experience with either of these
> versions?  Is my assumption that the 60TPI loses less studs correct?  What
> do you think of this tire generally?  Is it wide enough for packed, snowy
> trails?
>
> On the other hand, the Schwalbe Ice Spikers are much less expensive.  They
> have considerably more studs.  Their current version seem to have far few
> negative reviews.  But they are .35" narrower -- that's 9mm! I would think
> that this 9mm would make a huge difference in performance in the conditions
> I'm looking to use them in, but maybe it won't?  Maybe 2.25 and 2.6 tires
> will be comparable? Maybe the greater stud count and better reviews and
> lower cost outweighs the extra width of the 45North?  What  do you think?
>
> Thanks for whatever advice you might have.  Oh, and in case it makes a
> difference --  I'll be running them with tubes and will not need to ride
> these tires on pavement before getting to the trailhead(it's right outside
> my door, practically!)
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/102cccef-ddb1-420a-b2ba-1241b115acfeo%40googlegroups.com
> 
> .
>
-- 
Steven Sweedler
Plymouth, New Hampshire

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALimyf%2BJ8hmJ9JZqEzk7PFYW5Sf%2Bp2oyQt%2BXQ1hwtYGS6tjBiQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[RBW] Re: Studded Tire Experience, help

[Jesse Stoddard]

Can't speak to winter trail riding, but in case it's at all helpful: I've 
been rambling around the 'hood (Michigan) w/ the 2.25" Ice Spiker Pros 
(wire-bead) for the past couple seasons without incident. Bedded them on 
cement for 5 or 10 miles and haven't lost a single stud.

I can totally see being tempted by the extra width of the 45North's, but 
the reviews of their various studded offerings seem to suggest some QC 
issues if nothing else.
On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 9:48:58 AM UTC-5 David Wadstrup wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I recently moved to Maine, and would really like to keep riding trails 
> even in these snowy, icy conditions.  So, I'm hoping for some advice.  I 
> initially thought a fat bike might be in order, but after diving deep into 
> Surly Wednesday research, I've decided that it's just not for me -- I'd 
> much rather ski, or even snowshoe, if there's a significant amount of new, 
> unpacked snow.  What I'm mostly interested in riding is our local, hilly, 
> graveled trails that are fully snow covered and that see a lot of foot 
> traffic even in winter(walkers, skiers, snowshoers, fat bike riders, even 
> some snowmobiles.)  So here are my questions to those of you who have 
> experience with winter trail riding...
>
> 1) I can fit a 2.6 tire on my Susie.  Is this fat enough to ride snowy, 
> icy, chewed up, packed trails?  I'm sure it's possible, but is fun?  I know 
> a fat bike would give better float, and roll over everything more, but 
> would my plus sized 29er tires handle it ok? Would it float enough and roll 
> over enough to make investing in a set of VERY expensive 2.6 studded tires 
> be worth it?  Or will it just be mostly a slog?
>
> 2) Regarding studded tires...I've used 40mm wide Nokian Hakkas for 
> wintertime commuting in the city, but am going to need something wider, 
> something designed for trail riding.  The two best options as far as I can 
> see are the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Pros and the 45North Wrathchilds.  The 
> Schwalbes only come in a 2.25" width, the 45Norths in a 2.6".  Obviously, 
> wider sounds better, but there are some mitigating factors... 
>
> On the one hand, the 45Norths are considerably more expensive than the 
> Schwalbes.  They have less studs, and they seem to be prone to exceptional 
> stud loss and have garnered a number of negative reviews.  There are two 
> versions of them, though.  One, a 60TPi version with "regular" sized studs; 
> two, a 120TPI version with "XL" sized studs.  They are similar in price. 
>  From what I can gather, the 120/XL version seems to be the version that 
> sees the most stud loss and is the one almost all of the online negative 
> reviews reference.  Does anyone have any experience with either of these 
> versions?  Is my assumption that the 60TPI loses less studs correct?  What 
> do you think of this tire generally?  Is it wide enough for packed, snowy 
> trails?
>
> On the other hand, the Schwalbe Ice Spikers are much less expensive.  They 
> have considerably more studs.  Their current version seem to have far few 
> negative reviews.  But they are .35" narrower -- that's 9mm! I would think 
> that this 9mm would make a huge difference in performance in the conditions 
> I'm looking to use them in, but maybe it won't?  Maybe 2.25 and 2.6 tires 
> will be comparable? Maybe the greater stud count and better reviews and 
> lower cost outweighs the extra width of the 45North?  What  do you think?
>
> Thanks for whatever advice you might have.  Oh, and in case it makes a 
> difference --  I'll be running them with tubes and will not need to ride 
> these tires on pavement before getting to the trailhead(it's right outside 
> my door, practically!)
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/68ac2622-6249-48d9-95a2-f361cc0b3831n%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Re: Chambray shirt deal alert

[Jay P]

I bought the size L shirt from Berkeleyan but it is, alas, after a wash/dry 
cycle too small.  These do indeed shrink a lot.   It's now on the edge 
between M and L but as I like things a little roomy I know that I'm not 
going to wear this.   If you are interested in buying ($20) and picking up 
at my home in Berkeley, please be in touch !

Jay P.
Berkeley, CA

On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8 Berkeleyan wrote:

> Shorts also claimed, but for anyone curious, they are exactly 18 inches 
> across the top, laying flat. So 36 circumference, in size 36! The cuffs are 
> 11.5 inches across, flat, and are 20.5 inches below the waist, along the 
> sides.
>
> - Andrew, Berkeley
>
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 5:28:27 PM UTC-8 Berkeleyan wrote:
>
>> The shirt has been claimed AND taken off my front porch! The shorts are 
>> still here... if I drop a lot of weight, they might fit. But not for a 
>> while. I'm glad to take measurements of the actual waist circumference, if 
>> needed.
>>
>> - Andrew
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/3c0dda57-a4b3-48c0-a651-b7892f51887fn%40googlegroups.com.

Re: [RBW] Anyone in Boise,ID that can help facilitate a purchase?

[Igor]

Found a way .. thanks
On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 12:37:32 PM UTC-5 Igor wrote:

> I think there's a bit of a 'we cant ship it to a buyer'
>
> The shop won't ship (probably dealer/brand rules)
>
> Similar question stands for residents of Escondido, CA :D
> On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 11:56:08 AM UTC-5 campyo...@me.com wrote:
>
>> Philip:
>>
>> Have you considered using a service like Taskrabbit? I looked into that 
>> once when I was shipping a bike and needed someone to get the box over the 
>> “last mile” to the buyer.
>>
>> You could probably have someone pick up the bike and take it to a local 
>> bike shop for packing and shipping.
>>
>> --Eric Norris
>> campyo...@me.com
>> Insta: @CampyOnlyGuy
>> YouTube: YouTube.com/CampyOnlyGuy  
>>
>> On Jan 6, 2021, at 8:51 AM, Philip Barrett  wrote:
>>
>> I had that on ebay recently (not bike related). I just had UPS pick it up 
>> as a scheduled delivery so all the seller had to do was pack it. They were 
>> fine with that.
>>
>> On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 10:02:36 AM UTC-6 Igor wrote:
>>
>>> Found a (not a Rivendell) fat bike at a shop..they won't ship it..but 
>>> maybe one of you can help me out? it's snow and winter here and the only 
>>> thing missing from my stable is a fat bike
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>> Igor,
>>> Ann Arbor, MI
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/1f9635cb-1899-4e6a-8089-7b40517910a9n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> 
>> .
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/dd0be5c9-c7a2-4c4d-8f30-5e8dd3e7fdacn%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: Any Simworks Fun 3 Bar users out there?

[Collin A]

I liked them more than the Get-rounds, mostly because the grips position 
was further back (thanks long top-tube rivs) and the 30-ish deg backsweep 
agreed with my setup. Also works great for bag strapping.

Highly recommended, and I even have a set of the crmo sitting sadly in my 
parts box...

Cheers,
Collin in Sacramento

On Thursday, January 7, 2021 at 8:52:23 AM UTC-8 Bones wrote:

> I'm curious about these and how they compare to the Getaround bars. A 
> little more sweep and rise, good forward position. They look kinda sweet. 
> Are they?
>
> Thanks,
> Bones
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/0f407f0a-1827-4b43-98fb-fac208553fdfn%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Re: Completing the Rivendell catalog archive

[Paul Richardson]

not the host of the archive, but a happy and frequent user of it.

On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 11:01:14 PM UTC-5 eric...@gmail.com wrote:

> I've considered it and think it would be valuable to those interested. 
> Some great articles and gear not to mention heartbreaking prices of yore. 
>
> Do you host the readers archive? 
>
> On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 2:45:26 PM UTC-5 Paul Richardson wrote:
>
>> would you ever consider digitizing them and adding to the readers archive 
>> ?  i know it'd be a ton of work...
>>
>> paul
>> takoma park, md.
>>
>> On Saturday, January 2, 2021 at 7:00:51 PM UTC-5 eric...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Pete. I've got that one! Crazy and fun
>>>
>>> On Friday, January 1, 2021 at 3:27:26 PM UTC-5 Pete B wrote:
>>>
 Eric, keep an eye out for the "Hiawathan Holidays" catalogs. I have the 
 second one, 22 pages on newsprint. It's notable because the descriptions 
 for each item in the catalog are written in verse. Pics below.

 Pete
 Arlington, VA

 On Tuesday, December 29, 2020 at 9:13:21 AM UTC-5 eric...@gmail.com 
 wrote:

> As some of you may have noticed from my previous posts this year, I'm 
> attempting to catalog a full run of Rivendell catalogs. For now I am 
> focussed only on catalogs and not attending to flyers and bike 
> announcements. Here are pictures of what I've amassed so far. 
>
> [image: IMG_3061.jpg]
>
> [image: IMG_3062.JPG]
>
> I'm unsure what's missing and hopeful that some stray members can help 
> fill in the gaps. At this point I'm trying to get some kind of record of 
> what I'm missing. I would be interested to purchase missing catalogs as 
> well. 
>
> This is tricky as the catalogs were dated, then dated and numbered, 
> then dated, and then numbered. From what I can tell I am missing the 
> first 
> catalog and perhaps another somewhere down the line. 
>
> Things get fuzzy late in the run. Catalog 19 is undated but has a the 
> tweed Nigel Smythe borders of the previous two catalogs, suggesting 
> somewhere around 2007. I had assumed that the undated 20th catalog (black 
> and white cover) is the most recent. But then there's the 2018 bicycles 
> and 
> frames catalog which is unnumbered, suggesting this is the 21st.
>
> Thanks again for input and wisdom. 
>


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/885f9ae6-18b7-46ec-aae9-8302caca8874n%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Any Simworks Fun 3 Bar users out there?

[Bones]

I'm curious about these and how they compare to the Getaround bars. A 
little more sweep and rise, good forward position. They look kinda sweet. 
Are they?

Thanks,
Bones

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/9f829297-c142-4f33-aa11-0c076ff29d5fn%40googlegroups.com.

[RBW] Studded Tire Experience, help

[David Wadstrup]

Hello,

I recently moved to Maine, and would really like to keep riding trails even 
in these snowy, icy conditions.  So, I'm hoping for some advice.  I 
initially thought a fat bike might be in order, but after diving deep into 
Surly Wednesday research, I've decided that it's just not for me -- I'd 
much rather ski, or even snowshoe, if there's a significant amount of new, 
unpacked snow.  What I'm mostly interested in riding is our local, hilly, 
graveled trails that are fully snow covered and that see a lot of foot 
traffic even in winter(walkers, skiers, snowshoers, fat bike riders, even 
some snowmobiles.)  So here are my questions to those of you who have 
experience with winter trail riding...

1) I can fit a 2.6 tire on my Susie.  Is this fat enough to ride snowy, 
icy, chewed up, packed trails?  I'm sure it's possible, but is fun?  I know 
a fat bike would give better float, and roll over everything more, but 
would my plus sized 29er tires handle it ok? Would it float enough and roll 
over enough to make investing in a set of VERY expensive 2.6 studded tires 
be worth it?  Or will it just be mostly a slog?

2) Regarding studded tires...I've used 40mm wide Nokian Hakkas for 
wintertime commuting in the city, but am going to need something wider, 
something designed for trail riding.  The two best options as far as I can 
see are the Schwalbe Ice Spiker Pros and the 45North Wrathchilds.  The 
Schwalbes only come in a 2.25" width, the 45Norths in a 2.6".  Obviously, 
wider sounds better, but there are some mitigating factors... 

On the one hand, the 45Norths are considerably more expensive than the 
Schwalbes.  They have less studs, and they seem to be prone to exceptional 
stud loss and have garnered a number of negative reviews.  There are two 
versions of them, though.  One, a 60TPi version with "regular" sized studs; 
two, a 120TPI version with "XL" sized studs.  They are similar in price. 
 From what I can gather, the 120/XL version seems to be the version that 
sees the most stud loss and is the one almost all of the online negative 
reviews reference.  Does anyone have any experience with either of these 
versions?  Is my assumption that the 60TPI loses less studs correct?  What 
do you think of this tire generally?  Is it wide enough for packed, snowy 
trails?

On the other hand, the Schwalbe Ice Spikers are much less expensive.  They 
have considerably more studs.  Their current version seem to have far few 
negative reviews.  But they are .35" narrower -- that's 9mm! I would think 
that this 9mm would make a huge difference in performance in the conditions 
I'm looking to use them in, but maybe it won't?  Maybe 2.25 and 2.6 tires 
will be comparable? Maybe the greater stud count and better reviews and 
lower cost outweighs the extra width of the 45North?  What  do you think?

Thanks for whatever advice you might have.  Oh, and in case it makes a 
difference --  I'll be running them with tubes and will not need to ride 
these tires on pavement before getting to the trailhead(it's right outside 
my door, practically!)

Thanks,

David


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/102cccef-ddb1-420a-b2ba-1241b115acfeo%40googlegroups.com.