[RBW] Re: Brief (largely OT) question

2013-01-18 Thread Montclair BobbyB
Tom: Good on ya for sticking with the Jubilees... NICE TOUCH!!!  I believe 
the original crank had a 42/52 combo.  I would think you'd simply need to 
mount the front derailleur slightly lower on the seat tube (and position it 
to accommodate the wider distance/range created by the 46/32 combo).  Would 
there be any reason the derailleur cage couldn't handle this extra distance?

Can't wait to see this baby... 

BB

 

On Friday, January 18, 2013 1:24:28 PM UTC-5, Pudge wrote:

  This group is such a resource – I hope Jim (and others) will tolerate a 
 very brief and targeted (but admittedly OT) question.  Perhaps any replies 
 could be off-line?

  

 I’m building up a 1970s Raleigh Competition, recently refitted and 
 beautifully restored as a rando bike.  I’ll be using Huret Jubilee 
 derailleurs.  Am I correct that I can safely choose a 14 tooth gap in the 
 front – like, say, a 46-32?  Probably a new Herse crankset, maybe a TA 
 Cyclotouriste.  

  

 Thanks all.

  

 Tom

  
  
 --
  
 

 To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you 
 that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice 
 contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and 
 cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under 
 the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions 
 or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
 tax-related matters addressed herein.
 
 

 This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the 
 addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
 confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
 email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
 copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. 
 If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) 
 735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any 
 email) and any printout thereof.

 Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their 
 professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
 
 ==
  



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/Hgsb8CHKoU4J.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Brief (largely OT) question

2013-01-18 Thread ted
On some older front derailleurs the inner side of the cage does not
come down as far as they do now days. If it doesn't reach low enough
that might impact how well it upshifts across the larger (14 vs 10
tooth) change in ring size. Going the other way, I found that a new fd
didn't work the way I wanted with a 42/45 setup because with the outer
plate set close to the big ring the inner plate ran into the small
ring.

On Jan 18, 1:51 pm, Montclair BobbyB montclairbob...@gmail.com
wrote:
 Tom: Good on ya for sticking with the Jubilees... NICE TOUCH!!!  I believe
 the original crank had a 42/52 combo.  I would think you'd simply need to
 mount the front derailleur slightly lower on the seat tube (and position it
 to accommodate the wider distance/range created by the 46/32 combo).  Would
 there be any reason the derailleur cage couldn't handle this extra distance?

 Can't wait to see this baby...

 BB







 On Friday, January 18, 2013 1:24:28 PM UTC-5, Pudge wrote:

   This group is such a resource – I hope Jim (and others) will tolerate a
  very brief and targeted (but admittedly OT) question.  Perhaps any replies
  could be off-line?

  I’m building up a 1970s Raleigh Competition, recently refitted and
  beautifully restored as a rando bike.  I’ll be using Huret Jubilee
  derailleurs.  Am I correct that I can safely choose a 14 tooth gap in the
  front – like, say, a 46-32?  Probably a new Herse crankset, maybe a TA
  Cyclotouriste.

  Thanks all.

  Tom

  --- 
  ---
  

  To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you
  that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice
  contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and
  cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under
  the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions
  or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any
  tax-related matters addressed herein.
  
  

  This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the
  addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or
  confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this
  email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
  copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited.
  If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212)
  735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any
  email) and any printout thereof.

  Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their
  professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
  
  === 
  ===

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.



[RBW] Re: Brief (largely OT) question

2013-01-18 Thread Ron Mc
I think BB has it right - the vertical right cage clearance over the bare 
large ring is clear a penny all the way around, but usually just the front 
end of the derailleur will be the close end, since the cage arc will have a 
larger radius than the chainring.  

On Friday, January 18, 2013 3:51:12 PM UTC-6, Montclair BobbyB wrote:

 Tom: Good on ya for sticking with the Jubilees... NICE TOUCH!!!  I believe 
 the original crank had a 42/52 combo.  I would think you'd simply need to 
 mount the front derailleur slightly lower on the seat tube (and position it 
 to accommodate the wider distance/range created by the 46/32 combo).  Would 
 there be any reason the derailleur cage couldn't handle this extra distance?

 Can't wait to see this baby... 

 BB

  

 On Friday, January 18, 2013 1:24:28 PM UTC-5, Pudge wrote:

  This group is such a resource – I hope Jim (and others) will tolerate a 
 very brief and targeted (but admittedly OT) question.  Perhaps any replies 
 could be off-line?

  

 I’m building up a 1970s Raleigh Competition, recently refitted and 
 beautifully restored as a rando bike.  I’ll be using Huret Jubilee 
 derailleurs.  Am I correct that I can safely choose a 14 tooth gap in the 
 front – like, say, a 46-32?  Probably a new Herse crankset, maybe a TA 
 Cyclotouriste.  

  

 Thanks all.

  

 Tom

  
  
 --
  
 

 To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we advise you 
 that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice 
 contained in this message was not intended or written to be used, and 
 cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under 
 the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state or local tax law provisions 
 or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
 tax-related matters addressed herein.
 
 

 This email (and any attachments thereto) is intended only for use by the 
 addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or 
 confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
 email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or 
 copying of this email (and any attachments thereto) is strictly prohibited. 
 If you receive this email in error please immediately notify me at (212) 
 735-3000 and permanently delete the original email (and any copy of any 
 email) and any printout thereof.

 Further information about the firm, a list of the Partners and their 
 professional qualifications will be provided upon request.
 
 ==
  




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/FEnT3cB_XdUJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.