[RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-06 Thread alan lavine
Thank you all for the suggestions.  I have several B-17's on different 
bikes so first thing, I'll try eliminating the one(s) that hurt.  But 
ultimately, I suspect I'll be trying another brand or style.

On Saturday, October 4, 2014 8:33:18 AM UTC-4, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made 
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have 
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower 
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do 
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and 
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are 
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but never 
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more 
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be 
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not 
 crushed, but disappointed.  

 Any ideas or suggestions from the group?  Please don't mention recumbents, 
 as that's really my last resort option and I'm not there yet.

 Best,
 Alan


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-06 Thread Garth
alan, It's a saddle .  It's meant to work FOR You, not against you. It's a 
means to the experience of riding a bike. A means, not an end.  It's not 
the saddles fault, or ages fault, or anyone's fault.  You simply have a 
desire for something else that only You know of, and it's calling you . 

Go about your way with joyous abandon and everything will work out, it 
always does . 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-05 Thread Ron Mc
David, perfect description.  

Gee, Michael, I did go back to the company and found them curiously 
defensive and somewhat whiny about their financial position.  Selle 
Titanico X - I'm 215 lbs. (6''3)  - supposed to be the right saddle for 
me.  

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v728/bulldog1935/Raleigh/F%20Moser/aaaP4130003.jpg

9 months on saddle, the question was what are they going to do.  The 
discoloration is because the leather was stretching and the glue laminating 
the leather to the plastic was extruding through the leather. Design?  Q/C? 
 Regardless, the saddle was at the end of its useful life for me.  

And yes, I rode many comfortable miles on the saddle, and the 
third-of-the-stretch-bolt that is left might take someone lighter person 
many more miles than it was going to take me.  

Rivet is not without their quirks, either.  It's very round and sits very 
different - hard at first contact.  When you get down the road, you realize 
the support is just fine and is quite comfortable in spite of no feeling 
cushy.  The error she made on the saddle is the hole radius at the back of 
the cut-out is too small, making the saddle deform to a ridge that has the 
potential to be personally intruding.  

Higher-grade Brooks are still superior, their design was never broken, but 
in the standard grades, have seen several Q/C problems with them, as well.  


On Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:53:36 PM UTC-5, cyclot...@gmail.com wrote:

 Or try the B17 if you're currently running a Professional, Swift, or other 
 narrow saddle. 
 Basically whichever Brooks you currently have, go to the next wider model 
 and see if that works better (conventional wisdom says it should).

 Cheers,
 David

 it isn't a contest. Just enjoy the ride. - Seth Vidal




 On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Ron Mc bulld...@gmail.com javascript: 
 wrote:

 Riding regularly on Brooks B17 (semi-upright moustache cockpit) and both 
 Selle AnAtomica and Rivet Indy on my drop-bar go-fast, my broken in B17 
 Special is still the coziest.  My AnAtomica never stopped stretching, and 
 replacing it with the Rivet worked out better in the long-run (the Rivet 
 settled in and quit stretching).  We've heard from some on the forum who 
 don't like the B17 and found the Rivet Pearl worked for them.  

 I agree on a fully upright bike, Brooks B67 (bigger) or B72 (biggest) is 
 the way to go. The B68 has been discontinued.  You'd likely also have to 
 drop the seat post a bit or these wide saddles will rub your thighs.  

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:36:11 PM UTC-5, dougP wrote:

 Alan:

 I've used Brooks B17 for a number of years, and found there is 
 noticeable variation in comfort from saddle to saddle. Hey, not all cows 
 are alike!  My strategy is to put the most comfortable one on my Atlantis, 
 as that's the bike I'll do longer rides on, the next one on another bike 
 that's not as demanding, and my crummy one (ruined by rain  neglect) on my 
 utility bike.  

 Of course, this assumes you have at least one Brooks that's comfortable 
 for your longest time in the saddle.  If they're all uncomfortable, maybe 
 time for a change.  I've been told Rivets are pretty good but haven't 
 ridden on myself.  The opinion comes from a guy who rents high end bikes to 
 fussy customers, and he's found his clients who don't bring their own 
 saddle don't complain about the Rivets.  

 dougP

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:33:18 AM UTC-7, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made 
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have 
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower 
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do 
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and 
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are 
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but never 
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more 
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be 
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not 
 crushed, but disappointed.  

 Any ideas or suggestions from the group?  Please don't mention 
 recumbents, as that's really my last resort option and I'm not there yet.

 Best,
 Alan

  -- 
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
 email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com javascript:.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owne...@googlegroups.com 
 javascript:.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the 

Re: [RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-05 Thread Michael Hechmer
I'm sorry to read both that you have had such bad luck and that they didn't 
want to own a mfg defect.  I wonder if the early ones, labeled Robusto, 
which is what I have, are better?  I believe that originally they were 
buying Brooks saddles and modifying them before they got into their own 
leather.  Also the company founder died suddenly (I think while riding in 
Death Valley) and that too may have contributed to a loss of control over 
the product.

It would be interesting to hear from others who have more recent purchases. 
 Sometimes these quality issues get turned around.

Michael

On Sunday, October 5, 2014 7:52:51 AM UTC-4, Ron Mc wrote:

 David, perfect description.  

 Gee, Michael, I did go back to the company and found them curiously 
 defensive and somewhat whiny about their financial position.  Selle 
 Titanico X - I'm 215 lbs. (6''3)  - supposed to be the right saddle for 
 me.  


 http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v728/bulldog1935/Raleigh/F%20Moser/aaaP4130003.jpg

 9 months on saddle, the question was what are they going to do.  The 
 discoloration is because the leather was stretching and the glue laminating 
 the leather to the plastic was extruding through the leather. Design?  Q/C? 
  Regardless, the saddle was at the end of its useful life for me.  

 And yes, I rode many comfortable miles on the saddle, and the 
 third-of-the-stretch-bolt that is left might take someone lighter person 
 many more miles than it was going to take me.  

 Rivet is not without their quirks, either.  It's very round and sits very 
 different - hard at first contact.  When you get down the road, you realize 
 the support is just fine and is quite comfortable in spite of no feeling 
 cushy.  The error she made on the saddle is the hole radius at the back of 
 the cut-out is too small, making the saddle deform to a ridge that has the 
 potential to be personally intruding.  

 Higher-grade Brooks are still superior, their design was never broken, but 
 in the standard grades, have seen several Q/C problems with them, as well.  


 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:53:36 PM UTC-5, cyclot...@gmail.com wrote:

 Or try the B17 if you're currently running a Professional, Swift, or 
 other narrow saddle. 
 Basically whichever Brooks you currently have, go to the next wider model 
 and see if that works better (conventional wisdom says it should).

 Cheers,
 David

 it isn't a contest. Just enjoy the ride. - Seth Vidal




 On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Ron Mc bulld...@gmail.com wrote:

 Riding regularly on Brooks B17 (semi-upright moustache cockpit) and both 
 Selle AnAtomica and Rivet Indy on my drop-bar go-fast, my broken in B17 
 Special is still the coziest.  My AnAtomica never stopped stretching, and 
 replacing it with the Rivet worked out better in the long-run (the Rivet 
 settled in and quit stretching).  We've heard from some on the forum who 
 don't like the B17 and found the Rivet Pearl worked for them.  

 I agree on a fully upright bike, Brooks B67 (bigger) or B72 (biggest) is 
 the way to go. The B68 has been discontinued.  You'd likely also have to 
 drop the seat post a bit or these wide saddles will rub your thighs.  

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:36:11 PM UTC-5, dougP wrote:

 Alan:

 I've used Brooks B17 for a number of years, and found there is 
 noticeable variation in comfort from saddle to saddle. Hey, not all cows 
 are alike!  My strategy is to put the most comfortable one on my Atlantis, 
 as that's the bike I'll do longer rides on, the next one on another bike 
 that's not as demanding, and my crummy one (ruined by rain  neglect) on 
 my 
 utility bike.  

 Of course, this assumes you have at least one Brooks that's comfortable 
 for your longest time in the saddle.  If they're all uncomfortable, maybe 
 time for a change.  I've been told Rivets are pretty good but haven't 
 ridden on myself.  The opinion comes from a guy who rents high end bikes 
 to 
 fussy customers, and he's found his clients who don't bring their own 
 saddle don't complain about the Rivets.  

 dougP

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:33:18 AM UTC-7, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made 
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have 
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower 
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do 
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and 
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are 
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but 
 never 
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more 
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be 
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not 
 crushed, but disappointed.  

 Any ideas 

[RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-04 Thread dougP
Alan:

I've used Brooks B17 for a number of years, and found there is noticeable 
variation in comfort from saddle to saddle. Hey, not all cows are alike!  
My strategy is to put the most comfortable one on my Atlantis, as that's 
the bike I'll do longer rides on, the next one on another bike that's not 
as demanding, and my crummy one (ruined by rain  neglect) on my utility 
bike.  

Of course, this assumes you have at least one Brooks that's comfortable for 
your longest time in the saddle.  If they're all uncomfortable, maybe time 
for a change.  I've been told Rivets are pretty good but haven't ridden on 
myself.  The opinion comes from a guy who rents high end bikes to fussy 
customers, and he's found his clients who don't bring their own saddle 
don't complain about the Rivets.  

dougP

On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:33:18 AM UTC-7, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made 
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have 
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower 
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do 
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and 
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are 
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but never 
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more 
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be 
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not 
 crushed, but disappointed.  

 Any ideas or suggestions from the group?  Please don't mention recumbents, 
 as that's really my last resort option and I'm not there yet.

 Best,
 Alan


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-04 Thread Ron Mc
Riding regularly on Brooks B17 (semi-upright moustache cockpit) and both 
Selle AnAtomica and Rivet Indy on my drop-bar go-fast, my broken in B17 
Special is still the coziest.  My AnAtomica never stopped stretching, and 
replacing it with the Rivet worked out better in the long-run (the Rivet 
settled in and quit stretching).  We've heard from some on the forum who 
don't like the B17 and found the Rivet Pearl worked for them.  

I agree on a fully upright bike, Brooks B67 (bigger) or B72 (biggest) is 
the way to go. The B68 has been discontinued.  You'd likely also have to 
drop the seat post a bit or these wide saddles will rub your thighs.  

On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:36:11 PM UTC-5, dougP wrote:

 Alan:

 I've used Brooks B17 for a number of years, and found there is noticeable 
 variation in comfort from saddle to saddle. Hey, not all cows are alike!  
 My strategy is to put the most comfortable one on my Atlantis, as that's 
 the bike I'll do longer rides on, the next one on another bike that's not 
 as demanding, and my crummy one (ruined by rain  neglect) on my utility 
 bike.  

 Of course, this assumes you have at least one Brooks that's comfortable 
 for your longest time in the saddle.  If they're all uncomfortable, maybe 
 time for a change.  I've been told Rivets are pretty good but haven't 
 ridden on myself.  The opinion comes from a guy who rents high end bikes to 
 fussy customers, and he's found his clients who don't bring their own 
 saddle don't complain about the Rivets.  

 dougP

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:33:18 AM UTC-7, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made 
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have 
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower 
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do 
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and 
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are 
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but never 
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more 
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be 
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not 
 crushed, but disappointed.  

 Any ideas or suggestions from the group?  Please don't mention 
 recumbents, as that's really my last resort option and I'm not there yet.

 Best,
 Alan



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: baby boomer blues

2014-10-04 Thread cyclotourist
Or try the B17 if you're currently running a Professional, Swift, or other
narrow saddle.
Basically whichever Brooks you currently have, go to the next wider model
and see if that works better (conventional wisdom says it should).

Cheers,
David

it isn't a contest. Just enjoy the ride. - Seth Vidal




On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Ron Mc bulldog...@gmail.com wrote:

 Riding regularly on Brooks B17 (semi-upright moustache cockpit) and both
 Selle AnAtomica and Rivet Indy on my drop-bar go-fast, my broken in B17
 Special is still the coziest.  My AnAtomica never stopped stretching, and
 replacing it with the Rivet worked out better in the long-run (the Rivet
 settled in and quit stretching).  We've heard from some on the forum who
 don't like the B17 and found the Rivet Pearl worked for them.

 I agree on a fully upright bike, Brooks B67 (bigger) or B72 (biggest) is
 the way to go. The B68 has been discontinued.  You'd likely also have to
 drop the seat post a bit or these wide saddles will rub your thighs.

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:36:11 PM UTC-5, dougP wrote:

 Alan:

 I've used Brooks B17 for a number of years, and found there is noticeable
 variation in comfort from saddle to saddle. Hey, not all cows are alike!
 My strategy is to put the most comfortable one on my Atlantis, as that's
 the bike I'll do longer rides on, the next one on another bike that's not
 as demanding, and my crummy one (ruined by rain  neglect) on my utility
 bike.

 Of course, this assumes you have at least one Brooks that's comfortable
 for your longest time in the saddle.  If they're all uncomfortable, maybe
 time for a change.  I've been told Rivets are pretty good but haven't
 ridden on myself.  The opinion comes from a guy who rents high end bikes to
 fussy customers, and he's found his clients who don't bring their own
 saddle don't complain about the Rivets.

 dougP

 On Saturday, October 4, 2014 5:33:18 AM UTC-7, alan lavine wrote:

 I've been an avid recreational cyclist for over 30 yrs, and have made
 numerous adjustments to compensate for aging (I'm now 65).  These have
 included larger frames, higher handlebars, wider more supple tires, lower
 gears, etc.  I'm slower and less aggressive in my riding style and now do
 credit card rather than self-contained touring.  Still. I'm more fit and
 slim than most of my peers, and still enjoy whatever riding I can do.

 But now the unthinkable has happened.my beloved Brooks saddles are
 hurting my butt!  I don't have much padding there to begin with, but never
 have had saddle problems before.  I'm guessing its because of a more
 upright riding position dictated by lower back and neck issues.  I'd be
 crushed if I had to move away from leather saddleswell, maybe not
 crushed, but disappointed.

 Any ideas or suggestions from the group?  Please don't mention
 recumbents, as that's really my last resort option and I'm not there yet.

 Best,
 Alan

  --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.