Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-12 Thread NickBull
It's not impossible that there was something incorrect in their 
installation, but I do have other bikes with DiaComp centerpulls, plus the 
usual assortment of sidepulls, V-brakes, cantilever brakes, and disk 
brakes, so I think the problem was not installation-related.  

The fork I was using was built for 700C and required long-reach Tektro 
559's to reach the rims.  Then I switched it over to 650B and used some 
Tektro cyclo-cross sidepulls which worked fine (they got me through PBP in 
2011) but have no quick-release, so they were a pain in the butt.  That's 
why I switched to the Raid's, on which the pad-holders had to be pushed 
right down the bottom of the slot, maximizing the length of the lever arm.  
Standing astride the bike, squeezing the brake as hard as I can, and 
pushing hard down and forward, I could rock the bike and see the brake arms 
flex back and forth several mm at the pad-end.  Enough that if I set the 
pads parallel to the rim, then under braking force their front tips would 
angle upward toward the edge of the tire.  So I set the angle pointed 
slightly downward so that under braking force with the arms flexed forward, 
the pads would be parallel to the rim.  The Raid brakes themselves were 
bought on EBay from some charity in France that buys old bike parts and 
then resells them and donates the proceeds to charity.  They were clearly 
used, but I would not think that that would make them more flexible, just 
more likely to fail.  I did replace the red plastic pivot sheaths with 
brass ones bought from a guy in Israel, which helped somewhat.

If your Compass centerpulls had been available when I decided to get the 
new fork made, I might well have gone with them.  But buying NOS Raid's, 
plus fancier build requirements to get the Mafac braze-ons correct, was too 
daunting so I went the easy, cantilever route.  Anyway, for long-reach 
centerpulls, braze-ons are the way to go, in my opinion!

Nick

On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 4:23:35 PM UTC-4, Jan Heine wrote:

 I think there was something very wrong with your Raid setup, so I am glad 
 you are using a better-performing brake now! Being able to stop well is 
 important, and it's not worth risking an emergency room visit to try and 
 save a few dollars.

 Your braking problem is difficult to diagnose from a distance, and there 
 are many variables with bolt-on centerpulls. The interface between the yoke 
 and the fork crown matters greatly (unlike on a modern sidepull, where the 
 bolt takes all the load). If the fork crown is shaped in a way that makes 
 that interface less-than-optimal, it might affect your brake power. For 
 example, a curved surface, or a raised lip around the hole... That would be 
 my first guess.

 That is one of the reasons we offer the Compass centerpull brakes only for 
 braze-on mounting. With dedicated braze-ons, you eliminate any flex at the 
 fork crown/brake yoke interface, as well as within the brake yoke itself. 
 As long as you have decent pads and rims, your stopping power and 
 modulation will be among the best of any brake ever made.

 Jan Heine
 Compass Bicycles Ltd.
 Seattle WA USA
 http://www.compasscycle.com

 Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

 On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 8:15:11 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 Sorry, don't know.  I was just comparing between bikes so ... on the Ram 
 I could come to a full stop before the house number painted on the curb, 
 but with the Raid's I came to a full stop about ten feet after.  I would 
 guess the stopping distance was about 25 feet on the Ram, but that doesn't 
 mean a whole lot because I don't remember my target speed, and of course 
 the downward angle of the road matters.

 On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:49:12 PM UTC-4, ted wrote:

 Guess I'm lucky and/or not discerning, since I'm pretty satisfied with 
 how my Raid brake is working.
 Mildly curious, what was your stopping distance with with Shimano 
 medium-reach brakes on your Rambouillet?

 On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:21:45 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and 
 Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake 
 effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could 
 mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did 
 on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a 
 constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the 
 road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was 
 best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and 
 only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's. 
  
 For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.  
 Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the 
 correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the 
 slots, creating the longest possible lever 

Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-10 Thread NickBull
Sorry, don't know.  I was just comparing between bikes so ... on the Ram I 
could come to a full stop before the house number painted on the curb, but 
with the Raid's I came to a full stop about ten feet after.  I would guess 
the stopping distance was about 25 feet on the Ram, but that doesn't mean a 
whole lot because I don't remember my target speed, and of course the 
downward angle of the road matters.

On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:49:12 PM UTC-4, ted wrote:

 Guess I'm lucky and/or not discerning, since I'm pretty satisfied with how 
 my Raid brake is working.
 Mildly curious, what was your stopping distance with with Shimano 
 medium-reach brakes on your Rambouillet?

 On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:21:45 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and 
 Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake 
 effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could 
 mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did 
 on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a 
 constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the 
 road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was 
 best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and 
 only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's.  
 For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.  
 Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the 
 correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the 
 slots, creating the longest possible lever arm.  That may be why I had so 
 much difficulty getting these adjusted for acceptable braking distances.  
 Bolt-on Raid's would probably (but not definitely) have solved the problem, 
 so I had to make a hard choice between having Waterford build up a 
 cantilever fork or one with Mafac braze-ons.  Since they had no experience 
 with the latter, I was not all that confident that they'd get it right, and 
 since my Raid's were bought used and have some noticeable wear, I decided 
 that the millions of people riding on cantilever brakes (including me on my 
 Burley tandem and Soma Grand Randonneur) are probably not making too big of 
 a mistake, and I joined them.

 Nick

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 11:04:48 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:

 Minor update.
 This morning I took a little time and got the toe in down to something 
 approaching the amount I typically find works well on other brakes I have 
 set up.
 Rode up hill and down dale after that. The raid worked just fine. Lever 
 travel is about what I like. No squealing (except one or two modest very 
 low speed chirps). Braking power seemed fine to me. Controlled speed and 
 stopped the bike just fine.
 One caveat, I don't think I am a particularly demanding brake user. I've 
 got no complaints about how the CR720s and R559s I have used perform. I 
 gather some find those under powered and can't stand em, so as usual YMMV.

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:53:45 AM UTC-8, A. L Young wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero 
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same 
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more 
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more 
 mechanical advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of 
 the pivot in the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types 
 and when set up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the 
 mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.  

 Aaron Young
 The Dalles, OR   



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-10 Thread Jan Heine
I think there was something very wrong with your Raid setup, so I am glad 
you are using a better-performing brake now! Being able to stop well is 
important, and it's not worth risking an emergency room visit to try and 
save a few dollars.

Your braking problem is difficult to diagnose from a distance, and there 
are many variables with bolt-on centerpulls. The interface between the yoke 
and the fork crown matters greatly (unlike on a modern sidepull, where the 
bolt takes all the load). If the fork crown is shaped in a way that makes 
that interface less-than-optimal, it might affect your brake power. For 
example, a curved surface, or a raised lip around the hole... That would be 
my first guess.

That is one of the reasons we offer the Compass centerpull brakes only for 
braze-on mounting. With dedicated braze-ons, you eliminate any flex at the 
fork crown/brake yoke interface, as well as within the brake yoke itself. 
As long as you have decent pads and rims, your stopping power and 
modulation will be among the best of any brake ever made.

Jan Heine
Compass Bicycles Ltd.
Seattle WA USA
http://www.compasscycle.com

Follow our blog at http://janheine.wordpress.com/

On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 8:15:11 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 Sorry, don't know.  I was just comparing between bikes so ... on the Ram I 
 could come to a full stop before the house number painted on the curb, but 
 with the Raid's I came to a full stop about ten feet after.  I would guess 
 the stopping distance was about 25 feet on the Ram, but that doesn't mean a 
 whole lot because I don't remember my target speed, and of course the 
 downward angle of the road matters.

 On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:49:12 PM UTC-4, ted wrote:

 Guess I'm lucky and/or not discerning, since I'm pretty satisfied with 
 how my Raid brake is working.
 Mildly curious, what was your stopping distance with with Shimano 
 medium-reach brakes on your Rambouillet?

 On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:21:45 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and 
 Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake 
 effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could 
 mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did 
 on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a 
 constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the 
 road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was 
 best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and 
 only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's.  
 For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.  
 Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the 
 correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the 
 slots, creating the longest possible lever arm.  That may be why I had so 
 much difficulty getting these adjusted for acceptable braking distances.  
 Bolt-on Raid's would probably (but not definitely) have solved the problem, 
 so I had to make a hard choice between having Waterford build up a 
 cantilever fork or one with Mafac braze-ons.  Since they had no experience 
 with the latter, I was not all that confident that they'd get it right, and 
 since my Raid's were bought used and have some noticeable wear, I decided 
 that the millions of people riding on cantilever brakes (including me on my 
 Burley tandem and Soma Grand Randonneur) are probably not making too big of 
 a mistake, and I joined them.

 Nick

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 11:04:48 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:

 Minor update.
 This morning I took a little time and got the toe in down to something 
 approaching the amount I typically find works well on other brakes I have 
 set up.
 Rode up hill and down dale after that. The raid worked just fine. Lever 
 travel is about what I like. No squealing (except one or two modest very 
 low speed chirps). Braking power seemed fine to me. Controlled speed and 
 stopped the bike just fine.
 One caveat, I don't think I am a particularly demanding brake user. 
 I've got no complaints about how the CR720s and R559s I have used perform. 
 I gather some find those under powered and can't stand em, so as usual 
 YMMV.

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:53:45 AM UTC-8, A. L Young wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero 
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same 
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more 
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more 
 mechanical advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of 
 the pivot in the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both 
 types 
 and when 

Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-09 Thread NickBull
After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and 
Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake 
effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could 
mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did 
on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a 
constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the 
road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was 
best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and 
only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's.  
For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.  
Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the 
correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the 
slots, creating the longest possible lever arm.  That may be why I had so 
much difficulty getting these adjusted for acceptable braking distances.  
Bolt-on Raid's would probably (but not definitely) have solved the problem, 
so I had to make a hard choice between having Waterford build up a 
cantilever fork or one with Mafac braze-ons.  Since they had no experience 
with the latter, I was not all that confident that they'd get it right, and 
since my Raid's were bought used and have some noticeable wear, I decided 
that the millions of people riding on cantilever brakes (including me on my 
Burley tandem and Soma Grand Randonneur) are probably not making too big of 
a mistake, and I joined them.

Nick

On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 11:04:48 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:

 Minor update.
 This morning I took a little time and got the toe in down to something 
 approaching the amount I typically find works well on other brakes I have 
 set up.
 Rode up hill and down dale after that. The raid worked just fine. Lever 
 travel is about what I like. No squealing (except one or two modest very 
 low speed chirps). Braking power seemed fine to me. Controlled speed and 
 stopped the bike just fine.
 One caveat, I don't think I am a particularly demanding brake user. I've 
 got no complaints about how the CR720s and R559s I have used perform. I 
 gather some find those under powered and can't stand em, so as usual YMMV.

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:53:45 AM UTC-8, A. L Young wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero 
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same 
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more 
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more mechanical 
 advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of the pivot in 
 the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types and when set 
 up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the 
 mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.  

 Aaron Young
 The Dalles, OR   



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-09 Thread Patrick Moore
Interesting. Not immediately related, but similar: I had problems with cold
weather squealing with my single pivot, normal reach front equipped with
salmon pads; the rims are quite narrow. Modifying the shoe position for
better arch clearance for fenders, I installed thick washers behind the
pads -- and coincidentally, took the opportunity, while the pads were
removed, to give them a good sanding. The brakes not only clear the fender
better, but are stronger and don't squeal -- very refreshing.

On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:21 AM, NickBull nick.bike.b...@gmail.com wrote:

 After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and
 Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake
 effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could
 mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did
 on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a
 constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the
 road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was
 best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and
 only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's.
 For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.
 Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the
 correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the
 slots, creating the longest possible lever arm.  That may be why I had so
 much difficulty getting these adjusted for acceptable braking distances.
 Bolt-on Raid's would probably (but not definitely) have solved the problem,
 so I had to make a hard choice between having Waterford build up a
 cantilever fork or one with Mafac braze-ons.  Since they had no experience
 with the latter, I was not all that confident that they'd get it right, and
 since my Raid's were bought used and have some noticeable wear, I decided
 that the millions of people riding on cantilever brakes (including me on my
 Burley tandem and Soma Grand Randonneur) are probably not making too big of
 a mistake, and I joined them.

 Nick


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-09 Thread Matthew J
 Since they had no experience with the latter, I was not all that 
confident that they'd get it right, and since my Raid's were bought used 
and have some noticeable wear, I decided that the millions of people riding 
 on cantilever brakes (including me on my Burley tandem and Soma Grand 
Randonneur) are probably not making too big of a mistake, and I joined them.

I had a bike with braze-on MaxiCars.  Stopped on a dime.  You would 
definitely want someone who knows what they are doing setting up for you 
though.  



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-09 Thread Matthew J
Sorry, had MaxiCar hubs on the brain when I posted above.  Should read: 
braze-on Mafacs.

On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 12:30:57 PM UTC-5, Matthew J wrote:

  Since they had no experience with the latter, I was not all that 
 confident that they'd get it right, and since my Raid's were bought used 
 and have some noticeable wear, I decided that the millions of people riding 
  on cantilever brakes (including me on my Burley tandem and Soma Grand 
 Randonneur) are probably not making too big of a mistake, and I joined them.

 I had a bike with braze-on MaxiCars.  Stopped on a dime.  You would 
 definitely want someone who knows what they are doing setting up for you 
 though.  



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-09 Thread ted
Guess I'm lucky and/or not discerning, since I'm pretty satisfied with how 
my Raid brake is working.
Mildly curious, what was your stopping distance with with Shimano 
medium-reach brakes on your Rambouillet?

On Monday, March 9, 2015 at 9:21:45 AM UTC-7, NickBull wrote:

 After a couple of years of trying to get my Raid brakes with arches and 
 Kool Stop red pads to 1) not squeal intermittently, and 2) brake 
 effectively, I finally gave up and bought a new fork for which I could 
 mount cantilever brakes.  The final straw was a comparison test that I did 
 on a gentle hill near where I live, where I rode several bikes at a 
 constant 20mph speed toward a particularly noticeable crack crossing the 
 road and then did a panic stop at that point.  The stopping distance was 
 best for the Shimano medium-reach brakes that came on my Rambouillet, and 
 only slightly worse for Dia Compe 600's and for Tektro CR720's and R559's.  
 For the Raid's it was a good ten feet of additional stopping distance.  
 Note that on my Raid brakes, in order for them to contact the rim at the 
 correct angle, the pad-holders were slammed as far down as possible in the 
 slots, creating the longest possible lever arm.  That may be why I had so 
 much difficulty getting these adjusted for acceptable braking distances.  
 Bolt-on Raid's would probably (but not definitely) have solved the problem, 
 so I had to make a hard choice between having Waterford build up a 
 cantilever fork or one with Mafac braze-ons.  Since they had no experience 
 with the latter, I was not all that confident that they'd get it right, and 
 since my Raid's were bought used and have some noticeable wear, I decided 
 that the millions of people riding on cantilever brakes (including me on my 
 Burley tandem and Soma Grand Randonneur) are probably not making too big of 
 a mistake, and I joined them.

 Nick

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 11:04:48 PM UTC-5, ted wrote:

 Minor update.
 This morning I took a little time and got the toe in down to something 
 approaching the amount I typically find works well on other brakes I have 
 set up.
 Rode up hill and down dale after that. The raid worked just fine. Lever 
 travel is about what I like. No squealing (except one or two modest very 
 low speed chirps). Braking power seemed fine to me. Controlled speed and 
 stopped the bike just fine.
 One caveat, I don't think I am a particularly demanding brake user. I've 
 got no complaints about how the CR720s and R559s I have used perform. I 
 gather some find those under powered and can't stand em, so as usual YMMV.

 On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:53:45 AM UTC-8, A. L Young wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero 
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same 
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more 
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more 
 mechanical advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of 
 the pivot in the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types 
 and when set up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the 
 mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.  

 Aaron Young
 The Dalles, OR   



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-07 Thread Aaron Young
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted.ke...@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero levers
 to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same (except for
 being aero). Do you know when levers started having more mechanical
 advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more mechanical
advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of the pivot in
the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types and when set
up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the
mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.

Aaron Young
The Dalles, OR

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-07 Thread Joe Broach
At risk of veering off topic, I wish some clever producer would figure out
a Speedial variable leverage setup for road levers. There's so much
variation in brake MA, hand strength, and just personal preference, I think
it'd be a killer product. Even moreso now with road discs that could
generally use more lever pull. I've ridden all sorts of road setups, and
almost all of them had too much MA for my liking.

Best,
joe broach
portland, or

On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Aaron Young 1ce...@gmail.com wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted.ke...@comcast.net wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more mechanical
 advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of the pivot in
 the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types and when set
 up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the
 mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.

 Aaron Young
 The Dalles, OR

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 RBW Owners Bunch group.
 To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
 email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
 Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
 For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-07 Thread ted
Minor update.
This morning I took a little time and got the toe in down to something 
approaching the amount I typically find works well on other brakes I have 
set up.
Rode up hill and down dale after that. The raid worked just fine. Lever 
travel is about what I like. No squealing (except one or two modest very 
low speed chirps). Braking power seemed fine to me. Controlled speed and 
stopped the bike just fine.
One caveat, I don't think I am a particularly demanding brake user. I've 
got no complaints about how the CR720s and R559s I have used perform. I 
gather some find those under powered and can't stand em, so as usual YMMV.

On Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 7:53:45 AM UTC-8, A. L Young wrote:


 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:19 PM, ted ted@comcast.net javascript: 
 wrote:

 It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero 
 levers to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same 
 (except for being aero). Do you know when levers started having more 
 mechanical advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?


 My understanding is that the more modern aero levers have more mechanical 
 advantage than the older non-aero style due to the position of the pivot in 
 the handle and direction of cable pull.  I've used both types and when set 
 up correctly had no complaints about braking, so maybe the 
 mechanical-advantage advantage isn't the biggest issue.  

 Aaron Young
 The Dalles, OR   


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-06 Thread Bill Lindsay
Thanks. I'm about to execute a M.A.F.A.C. Racer project and I'm noticing the 
stock brake lever pulls a ton of cable.  Modern levers don't pull as much.  So 
if the brakes want you to pull a bunch of cable and you have the pads all the 
way up and you use levers that don't pull a lot of cable, that's the triple 
whammy for squishy (but powerful) braking.  The math gets kind of gnarly but 
that's the tendency.  I want to have it sorted before I get these posts brazed 
on.  I'm leaning towards using the stock levers

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-06 Thread ted
If I remember right (all markings have worn off), the levers are Dia-Comp 
Grand Comp aero. I think they are fairly typical pre brifter aero levers.

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 4:45:43 PM UTC-8, Bill Lindsay wrote:

 Thanks for sharing.  What brakelevers did you use?  

 On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 4:40:40 PM UTC-8, ted wrote:

 I was curious about trying out a mafac raid front brake on my AHH (650b) 
 and found a pair for a price I thought wasn't too much.
 It's still early days yet, but I thought I would offer a few preliminary 
 observations.

 First and last, these are big brakes.

 I have seen the reach on these quoted as starting at 66mm. The RBW 
 geometry charts says reach for my bike is 65mm. I have the pad holders 
 slammed to the top of the slot and I think they will be ok, but I really 
 would rather have more room to go up with them. Of course getting braze-on 
 pivots would allow a bit of latitude on the reach.

 If you want to run 40+mm tires with fenders, and easily get your wheel 
 out without letting out air, a Raid will do that. I extended the slot in 
 the L bracket on my front longboard about 1/8 inch and have it all the way 
 up. That gives reasonable clearance over my soma GR tire and the brake arm 
 barely touches the fender when I release the straddle cable. I would say 
 there is room in there for a 50mm fender, and that that would be better 
 with a tire that size (~42mm).

 It seems like the leverage is relatively high since any compliance in the 
 system, or significant gap between the pads and the rim, results in a bunch 
 of lever travel.

 They can squeal really badly if not toed in enough. Jan Heine has said 
 that they stop squealing after a few rainy rides, but I live in the SF bay 
 area (land of drought) so that's not gonna help me much. I have not yet 
 sorted out how much toe in is needed and gotten that and no more dialed in. 
 I suspect I have more toe in than necessary at the moment. I currently have 
 more lever travel than I would like, so I hope I will be able to sort 
 things out with less toe in, but no squealing, and firm up the feel. 

 The old pads that came with my brakes didn't seem very good. The new 
 kool-stop pads from Compass bikes seem like, well Matthauser pads. So not 
 much to complain about there. I expect stopping power will go up a bit now 
 that I have the new pads fitted.

 If anybody else is interested in doing similar experimenting, a guy on 
 the 650B group (nobody I know) is selling a pair.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-06 Thread ted
I wouldn't argue against going with components made for each other. I think 
you'r on solid ground there. 

I also completely agree about wanting to know what you'r likely to get 
before having pivots brazed on. That's one reason I was happy to find an 
old pair of Raids with the stock arches. Much less commitment than paying 
for the new Compass brakes and dealing with getting custom torch work done. 
It would be nice if Jan could see his way clear to getting bolt on arches 
forged. I understand that the development costs are a significant 
impediment. Perhaps if the brakes sell well, he can start getting arches 
too so more folks can have access to his new release of this old cult 
classic.

It's a bit lost in the mists of time, but I think I bought the aero levers 
to replace older non aero levers, and that they seemed the same (except for 
being aero). Do you know when levers started having more mechanical 
advantage? Was that a Mafac versus others differentiator?

I don't know if I would conclude a lot about the Racers based on the Raids, 
or vice-versa. The geometry is quite different, though perhaps the ratios 
(and thus the behavior) are about the same. Decades ago I had a bike with 
Mafac Racers on it. I eventually replaced them with Dia-Comp or SunTour 
campi copy side pulls. I don't recall being disappointed with the 
performance of the side pulls, though I did live in much flatter territory 
then so ...

Have you posted in a prior thread about your Racer project? I am curious 
how you find them compared to say typical dual pivot side pulls. 

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 5:33:52 PM UTC-8, Bill Lindsay wrote:

 Thanks. I'm about to execute a M.A.F.A.C. Racer project and I'm noticing 
 the stock brake lever pulls a ton of cable.  Modern levers don't pull as 
 much.  So if the brakes want you to pull a bunch of cable and you have 
 the pads all the way up and you use levers that don't pull a lot of cable, 
 that's the triple whammy for squishy (but powerful) braking.  The math gets 
 kind of gnarly but that's the tendency.  I want to have it sorted before I 
 get these posts brazed on.  I'm leaning towards using the stock levers

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-06 Thread Steve Palincsar

On 03/06/2015 08:33 PM, Bill Lindsay wrote:

Thanks. I'm about to execute a M.A.F.A.C. Racer project and I'm noticing the stock brake 
lever pulls a ton of cable.  Modern levers don't pull as much.  So if the brakes 
want you to pull a bunch of cable and you have the pads all the way up and 
you use levers that don't pull a lot of cable, that's the triple whammy for squishy (but 
powerful) braking.  The math gets kind of gnarly but that's the tendency.  I want to have 
it sorted before I get these posts brazed on.  I'm leaning towards using the stock levers



I had Mafac levers on my first tandem, which also had Mafac brakes. The 
lever effort for emergency braking was so high squeezing that 
double-drilled lever would make my eyes bulge  make the veins on my 
neck stand out.   I have bolt-on Mafac Raids on my Kogswell, operated by 
Shimano aero brake levers and the combination is just perfect.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[RBW] Re: mafac raid brake

2015-03-06 Thread Bill Lindsay
Thanks for sharing.  What brakelevers did you use?  

On Friday, March 6, 2015 at 4:40:40 PM UTC-8, ted wrote:

 I was curious about trying out a mafac raid front brake on my AHH (650b) 
 and found a pair for a price I thought wasn't too much.
 It's still early days yet, but I thought I would offer a few preliminary 
 observations.

 First and last, these are big brakes.

 I have seen the reach on these quoted as starting at 66mm. The RBW 
 geometry charts says reach for my bike is 65mm. I have the pad holders 
 slammed to the top of the slot and I think they will be ok, but I really 
 would rather have more room to go up with them. Of course getting braze-on 
 pivots would allow a bit of latitude on the reach.

 If you want to run 40+mm tires with fenders, and easily get your wheel out 
 without letting out air, a Raid will do that. I extended the slot in the L 
 bracket on my front longboard about 1/8 inch and have it all the way up. 
 That gives reasonable clearance over my soma GR tire and the brake arm 
 barely touches the fender when I release the straddle cable. I would say 
 there is room in there for a 50mm fender, and that that would be better 
 with a tire that size (~42mm).

 It seems like the leverage is relatively high since any compliance in the 
 system, or significant gap between the pads and the rim, results in a bunch 
 of lever travel.

 They can squeal really badly if not toed in enough. Jan Heine has said 
 that they stop squealing after a few rainy rides, but I live in the SF bay 
 area (land of drought) so that's not gonna help me much. I have not yet 
 sorted out how much toe in is needed and gotten that and no more dialed in. 
 I suspect I have more toe in than necessary at the moment. I currently have 
 more lever travel than I would like, so I hope I will be able to sort 
 things out with less toe in, but no squealing, and firm up the feel. 

 The old pads that came with my brakes didn't seem very good. The new 
 kool-stop pads from Compass bikes seem like, well Matthauser pads. So not 
 much to complain about there. I expect stopping power will go up a bit now 
 that I have the new pads fitted.

 If anybody else is interested in doing similar experimenting, a guy on the 
 650B group (nobody I know) is selling a pair.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups RBW 
Owners Bunch group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.