Re: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21 -- Draft open for comment
FYI On 2/11/2013 12:15 PM, Casey A Mullin wrote: [Cross-posted widely. Please excuse the duplication] Colleagues, The MLA-BCC RDA Music Implementation Task Force is happy to announce the release of the first complete draft of Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21. This document represents over sixteen months of effort by the task force to determine and articulate best practices for the description of music resources (chiefly scores and audio recordings). In the increasingly decentralized environment of library metadata standards, this document addresses the need for specific guidance for catalogers describing music resources that is authoritative, yet flexible to the needs of individual institutions. It is intended to supplement the text of RDA itself, and accounts for (though does not presume full adherence to) the Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PS). The task force invites broad input regarding these best practices, from both specialists within the music community and non-specialists who work with music materials (or manage those who do). Formal means for collecting community feedback and incorporating it into revisions of the best practices document on an ongoing basis are still being developed. For the current draft, please send feedback directly to the task force chair (yours truly) at cmul...@stanford.edu. Additionally, these best practices decisions will be the topic of a panel discussion at the MLA Annual Meeting in San Jose, CA on February 28, 2013, entitled RDA Best Practices for Music: A Conversation. Specific topics to be discussed will be based directly on feedback gathered from e-mail responses in advance of the meeting, and from those attending the session (in town hall fashion). Whether or not you are able to attend the MLA session, we want to hear from you!! The current draft may be found here: http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2013/RDA_Best_Practices_for_Music_Cataloging.pdf Many thanks, Casey Mullin Chair, MLA-BCC RDA Music Implementation Task Force -- Casey A. Mullin Head, Data Control Unit Metadata Department Stanford University Libraries 650-736-0849 cmul...@stanford.edu http://www.caseymullin.com -- Those who need structured and granular data and the precise retrieval that results from it to carry out research and scholarship may constitute an elite minority rather than most of the people of the world (sadly), but that talented and intelligent minority is an important one for the cultural and technological advancement of humanity. It is even possible that if we did a better job of providing access to such data, we might enable the enlargement of that minority. -Martha Yee -- *Karen Gorss Benko* Catalog Librarian Collection liaison to Russian and English Williams College Williamstown, Massachusetts karen.gorss.be...@williams.edu 413-597-4322
Re: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21 -- Draft open for comment
I have been waiting for the answer for this question too. A string of $e composer,$e performer or $e adapter? Thanks. Erica On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Nancy Sack s...@hawaii.edu wrote: Casey, thanks to you and your committee for this monumental work. I have one question (for now ;)): on p. 72, could you specify what $e term(s) is/are appropriate for the first case (when performers/performing ensembles are recorded in a 100/110 field (and in 245 $c) because they are treated as adapters. Also, one correction: on p. 23, I think 261 is supposed to be 264? Thanks. Nancy On 2/11/2013 7:15 AM, Casey A Mullin wrote: [Cross-posted widely. Please excuse the duplication] Colleagues, The MLA-BCC RDA Music Implementation Task Force is happy to announce the release of the first complete draft of Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21. This document represents over sixteen months of effort by the task force to determine and articulate best practices for the description of music resources (chiefly scores and audio recordings). In the increasingly decentralized environment of library metadata standards, this document addresses the need for specific guidance for catalogers describing music resources that is authoritative, yet flexible to the needs of individual institutions. It is intended to supplement the text of RDA itself, and accounts for (though does not presume full adherence to) the Library of Congress-Program for Cooperative Cataloging Policy Statements (LC-PCC PS). The task force invites broad input regarding these best practices, from both specialists within the music community and non-specialists who work with music materials (or manage those who do). Formal means for collecting community feedback and incorporating it into revisions of the best practices document on an ongoing basis are still being developed. For the current draft, please send feedback directly to the task force chair (yours truly) at cmul...@stanford.edu. Additionally, these best practices decisions will be the topic of a panel discussion at the MLA Annual Meeting in San Jose, CA on February 28, 2013, entitled RDA Best Practices for Music: A Conversation. Specific topics to be discussed will be based directly on feedback gathered from e-mail responses in advance of the meeting, and from those attending the session (in town hall fashion). Whether or not you are able to attend the MLA session, we want to hear from you!! The current draft may be found here: http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2013/RDA_Best_Practices_for_Music_Cataloging.pdf Many thanks, Casey Mullin Chair, MLA-BCC RDA Music Implementation Task Force -- Casey A. Mullin Head, Data Control Unit Metadata Department Stanford University Libraries 650-736-0849 cmul...@stanford.edu http://www.caseymullin.com -- Those who need structured and granular data and the precise retrieval that results from it to carry out research and scholarship may constitute an elite minority rather than most of the people of the world (sadly), but that talented and intelligent minority is an important one for the cultural and technological advancement of humanity. It is even possible that if we did a better job of providing access to such data, we might enable the enlargement of that minority. -Martha Yee -- Nancy Sack Cataloging Department University of Hawaii at Manoa 2550 McCarthy Mall Honolulu, HI 96822 phone: 808-956-2648 fax: 808-956-5968 e-mail: s...@hawaii.edu -- Erica S. Chang Cataloging Librarian University of Hawaii Library (808) 956-2768
Re: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21
There appears to be a contradiction between the following two instructions:
2.3.1.7. Title Proper--Titles of Parts, Sections, and Supplements
MLA recommendation: Follow LC-PCC PS.
EXAMPLES:
245 00 Musical theatre for classical singers. $p Soprano (p. 8)
AND
2.5.2. Designation of Edition
The most common designations of edition in music resources fall into category
g), a statement indicating ... a particular voice range or format for notated
music.
Treat a statement indicating a particular voice range that is not grammatically
linked to the title, other title information, etc. as a designation of edition,
whether or not it includes the word edition or its equivalent.
EXAMPLES:
250 Tenor. (p.14)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 3:46 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21 --
Draft open for comment (fwd) (fwd)
Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21.
http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2013/RDA_Best_Practices_for_Music_Cataloging.pdf
Interesting, and a lot of work.
I was surprised to see no examples of $4 relator codes or $e relator
terms.
I was surprised to see examples of 260, when PCC has said that no new
RDA records are to have 260. I was also suprised to see the copyright
symbols used in 260 examples, as opposed to c and p.
I was surprised to see no examples of 336 RDA media content, but
rather examples of 344 and 347. The fact that samples were not in
field tag order, I found confusing.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__
Connect with Queens Library:
* QueensLibrary.org
http://www.queenslibrary.org/
* Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/queenslibrarynyc
* Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/queenslibrary
* LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/company/queens-library
* Google+
https://plus.google.com/u/0/116278397527253207785
* Foursquare
https://foursquare.com/queenslibrary
* YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/queenslibrary
* Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/qbpllid/
* Goodreads
http://www.goodreads.com/group/show/58240.Queens_Library
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient,
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
Re: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21
Regina-- in this instance the examples for 2.3.1.7 and 2.5.2 are correct. In
the 1st, the Musical theatre for classical singers has unique contents for
each of the voices; the volume for alto (as well as the ones for mezzo, tenor
and bass/baritone) contains a completely different repertoire than that for the
soprano.
Thus, it is different from, as in the 2nd example, an edition for Tenor of the
same music, set for a different voice range in a different edition.
I hope this helps clarify what seems to be a contradiction, but isn't.
Regards,
Rick McRae
Catalog / Reference Librarian
Sibley Music Library
Eastman School of Music
(585) 274-1370
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of Shapiro, Regina
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:47 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: Re: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21
There appears to be a contradiction between the following two instructions:
2.3.1.7. Title Proper--Titles of Parts, Sections, and Supplements MLA
recommendation: Follow LC-PCC PS.
EXAMPLES:
245 00 Musical theatre for classical singers. $p Soprano (p. 8)
AND
2.5.2. Designation of Edition
The most common designations of edition in music resources fall into category
g), a statement indicating ... a particular voice range or format for notated
music.
Treat a statement indicating a particular voice range that is not grammatically
linked to the title, other title information, etc. as a designation of edition,
whether or not it includes the word edition or its equivalent.
EXAMPLES:
250 Tenor. (p.14)
-Original Message-
From: Resource Description and Access / Resource Description and Access
[mailto:RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA] On Behalf Of J. McRee Elrod
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 3:46 PM
To: RDA-L@LISTSERV.LAC-BAC.GC.CA
Subject: [RDA-L] Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21 --
Draft open for comment (fwd) (fwd)
Best Practices for Music Cataloging using RDA and MARC21.
http://bcc.musiclibraryassoc.org/BCC-Historical/BCC2013/RDA_Best_Practices_for_Music_Cataloging.pdf
Interesting, and a lot of work.
I was surprised to see no examples of $4 relator codes or $e relator terms.
I was surprised to see examples of 260, when PCC has said that no new RDA
records are to have 260. I was also suprised to see the copyright symbols used
in 260 examples, as opposed to c and p.
I was surprised to see no examples of 336 RDA media content, but rather
examples of 344 and 347. The fact that samples were not in field tag order, I
found confusing.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__
Connect with Queens Library:
* QueensLibrary.org
http://www.queenslibrary.org/
* Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/queenslibrarynyc
* Twitter
http://www.twitter.com/queenslibrary
* LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/company/queens-library
* Google+
https://plus.google.com/u/0/116278397527253207785
* Foursquare
https://foursquare.com/queenslibrary
* YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/queenslibrary
* Flickr
http://www.flickr.com/photos/qbpllid/
* Goodreads
http://www.goodreads.com/group/show/58240.Queens_Library
The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer.
