[regext] REGEXT Interim Meeting 2019MAY30

[Roger D Carney]

Good Morning,


I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting Thursday May 30th at 
16:00 UTC for 60 minutes.



We plan to focus the discussion around Reporting.



Agenda

  1.  Reporting 
Repository/Structure/Reports
 (how does the Data Set File 
Format fit in).



We will once again use Zoom as a conferencing tool, please use this 
link to connect to the meeting.



Thanks
Roger

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees: add feature to inquire balance and credit limit?

[Gould, James]

Thomas,

The primary purpose of draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees is fees and credits, and 
returning the balance and credit limit in the response to a transform command 
is an optional feature that the server can choose to support.  I don't see an 
issue with a server deciding to return the balance and credit limit information 
in the response to a billable transform command, but I don't believe it should 
be a requirement.  Providing a mechanism to explicitly query for the balance 
and credit limit information is best suited with an object mapping such as the 
Balance Mapping.  
  
—
 
JG



James Gould
Distinguished Engineer
jgo...@verisign.com

703-948-3271
12061 Bluemont Way
Reston, VA 20190

Verisign.com  

On 5/16/19, 4:59 AM, "Thomas Corte"  wrote:

Hello,

On 15/05/2019 19:52, Gould, James wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> I view the balance and credit limit information as separate from the
> fee information supported by draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees.  The balance
> and credit limit information can optionally be returned by
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees, but I believe it's better to support a
> specific query mechanism.

To me, this means that the current state of the fee extension is
somewhat inconsistent, since it does include balance information in some
contexts but not in others. Either it is a purely fee related extension
(in which case the balance/credit limit features should be removed
altogether), or it's a general extension dealing with all billing issues
(in which case a query feature should be added).

> The Balance Mapping, which is registered
> in the EPP Extension Registry
> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml),
> enables querying for the balance and credit limit information
> directly.  The Low Balance Mapping, which is also registered in the
> EPP Extension Registry, supports a poll message when the available
> credit falls below a pre-defined threshold.  Is there interest in
> these extensions?

The Balance Mapping in the EPP Extension Registry looks like a viable
option, we'd consider implementing it if it became an IETF standard.

Best regards,

Thomas

-- 
TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of:
Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9   Fax: +49 231 9703-200
D-44227 Dortmund   E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com
Germany


___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Re: [regext] draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees: add feature to inquire balance and credit limit?

[Thomas Corte]

Hello,

On 15/05/2019 19:52, Gould, James wrote:

> Thomas,
> 
> I view the balance and credit limit information as separate from the
> fee information supported by draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees.  The balance
> and credit limit information can optionally be returned by
> draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees, but I believe it's better to support a
> specific query mechanism.

To me, this means that the current state of the fee extension is
somewhat inconsistent, since it does include balance information in some
contexts but not in others. Either it is a purely fee related extension
(in which case the balance/credit limit features should be removed
altogether), or it's a general extension dealing with all billing issues
(in which case a query feature should be added).

> The Balance Mapping, which is registered
> in the EPP Extension Registry
> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/epp-extensions/epp-extensions.xhtml),
> enables querying for the balance and credit limit information
> directly.  The Low Balance Mapping, which is also registered in the
> EPP Extension Registry, supports a poll message when the available
> credit falls below a pre-defined threshold.  Is there interest in
> these extensions?

The Balance Mapping in the EPP Extension Registry looks like a viable
option, we'd consider implementing it if it became an IETF standard.

Best regards,

Thomas

-- 
TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of:
Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222
Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9   Fax: +49 231 9703-200
D-44227 Dortmund   E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com
Germany

___
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext