Re: reiser4progs 1.0.4
On Saturday 19 March 2005 21:03, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
On Friday 18 March 2005 21:59, Jindrich Makovicka wrote:
Vitaly Fertman wrote:
so 1.0.3 1.0.4 bail out. Using fsck.reiser4 --build-sb from
reiser4progs 1.0.3 rendered the filesystem created under 1.0.0 unusable,
fsck.reiser4 --build-sb is supposed to fix evth. what goes wrong?
sorry I didn't replied earlier, but I didn't have a spare disk
available. here it goes. 40GB partition was mkfs'ed with 1.0.0,
populated somehow (about 32k files, 400MB), then fsck --build-sb from
1.0.4 was run:
I think I didn't run mkfs 1.0.4. I once tried debugfs.reiser4 -C on the
which progs version debugfs was from?
test partition before fsck, as I had run it on one of my live partitions
previously, because I originally thought it does the migration (the
partition seems to have survived). Can this be the cause too? Is it
it should not, there were found fs super block backups of some previous
fs on the device you were fscking.
still possible to migrate such partition to 1.0.4 or I should do full
backup dd if=/dev/zero /dev/hdXX mkfs restore?
the patch should be able to fix fs metadata. Run
fsck.reiser4 --build-fs --nomkid device
--
Thanks,
Vitaly Fertman
= progs/fsck/fsck.c 1.160 vs edited =
--- 1.160/progs/fsck/fsck.c 2005-02-10 13:18:59 +03:00
+++ edited/progs/fsck/fsck.c 2005-03-21 14:36:06 +03:00
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static errno_t fsck_init(fsck_parse_t *d
{bitmap, required_argument, 0, 'B'},
{unused, no_argument, NULL, 'u'},
{oldfs, no_argument, NULL, 'O'},
+ {nomkid, no_argument, NULL, 'N'},
{0, 0, 0, 0}
};
@@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ static errno_t fsck_init(fsck_parse_t *d
return USER_ERROR;
}
- while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, L:VhnqafU:b:r?dB:plo:c:uyO,
+ while ((c = getopt_long(argc, argv, L:VhnqafU:b:r?dB:plo:c:uyON,
options, option_index)) = 0)
{
switch (c) {
@@ -238,6 +239,9 @@ static errno_t fsck_init(fsck_parse_t *d
case 'O':
aal_set_bit(data-options, FSCK_OPT_OLD);
break;
+ case 'N':
+ aal_set_bit(data-options, FSCK_OPT_OLD);
+ break;
}
}
@@ -534,6 +538,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
fsck_opt(parse_data, FSCK_OPT_WHOLE) REPAIR_WHOLE |
fsck_opt(parse_data, FSCK_OPT_OLD) REPAIR_WHOLE |
fsck_opt(parse_data, FSCK_OPT_OLD) REPAIR_NO_MKID |
+ fsck_opt(parse_data, FSCK_OPT_NOMKID) REPAIR_NO_MKID |
fsck_opt(parse_data, FSCK_OPT_YES) REPAIR_YES;
repair.bitmap_file = parse_data.bitmap_file;
= progs/fsck/fsck.h 1.28 vs edited =
--- 1.28/progs/fsck/fsck.h 2005-01-17 14:57:42 +03:00
+++ edited/progs/fsck/fsck.h 2005-03-21 14:33:42 +03:00
@@ -40,7 +40,8 @@ typedef enum fsck_options {
FSCK_OPT_RO = 0x3,
FSCK_OPT_DEBUG = 0x4,
FSCK_OPT_WHOLE = 0x5,
-FSCK_OPT_OLD = 0x6
+FSCK_OPT_OLD = 0x6,
+FSCK_OPT_NOMKID = 0x7
} fsck_options_t;
typedef struct fsck_parse {
Re: Reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 kernel
2.6.11-mm2 has been stable for me, whereas my -mm patches on vanilla hack jobs seem to lock up every few days on AMD64. -mm has its annoyances, however, so an updated vanilla patch would be greatly appreciated. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 12:58 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: Hello On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:40, Lars Tobias Børsting wrote: Hi, The 2.6.11 kernel has been out for some days now, but no Reiser4 patch has yet been released for it at http://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/. I need to update to 2.6.11 but I need Reiser4 support. Has anybody got any idea of if it will be long until a release? Thanks! reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 should get out this week -- Jake Maciejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 kernel
2.6.11-mm2 has been stable for me, whereas my -mm patches on vanilla hack jobs seem to lock up every few days on AMD64. -mm has its annoyances, however, so an updated vanilla patch would be greatly appreciated. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 12:58 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote: Hello On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:40, Lars Tobias Børsting wrote: Hi, The 2.6.11 kernel has been out for some days now, but no Reiser4 patch has yet been released for it at http://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/. I need to update to 2.6.11 but I need Reiser4 support. Has anybody got any idea of if it will be long until a release? Thanks! reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 should get out this week -- Jake Maciejewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could someone please let me know the list of Reiser4 patches to apply from 2.6.11.4-mm4-broken-out to the 2.6.11.4 kernel source. When I apply the entire patch I can't compile -- it breaks on SERIO -- some other unrelated patch. Thanks Jim
Re: Reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 kernel
quote sender=Jim Miller
2.6.11-mm2 has been stable for me, whereas my -mm patches on vanilla
hack jobs seem to lock up every few days on AMD64. -mm has its
annoyances, however, so an updated vanilla patch would be greatly
appreciated.
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 12:58 +0300, Vladimir Saveliev wrote:
Hello
On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 11:40, Lars Tobias B?rsting wrote:
Hi,
The 2.6.11 kernel has been out for some days now, but no Reiser4 patch
has yet been released for it at
http://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/. I need to update
to 2.6.11
but I need Reiser4 support.
Has anybody got any idea of if it will be long until a
release? Thanks!
reiser4 patch for 2.6.11 should get out this week
Could someone please let me know the list of Reiser4 patches to apply from
2.6.11.4-mm4-broken-out to the 2.6.11.4 kernel source. When I apply the
entire patch I can't compile -- it breaks on SERIO -- some other unrelated
patch.
I made a random serio patch that comments the offending lines of code,
so that you can continue to compile the kernel.
Eugene
--
1024D/A6D12F80 print D51D 2633 8DAC 04DB 7265 9BB8 5883 6DAA A6D1 2F80
main(i) { putchar(182623909 (i-1) * 531|!!(i7)6) main(++i); }
diff -Naurb -X /home/kinfect/w/dontdiff
2.6.11.3-BAK/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
2.6.11.3-COPY/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h
--- 2.6.11.3-BAK/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h 2005-03-15
13:21:16.0 +0800
+++ 2.6.11.3-COPY/drivers/input/serio/i8042-x86ia64io.h 2005-03-15
13:39:44.0 +0800
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@
if (dmi_check_system(i8042_dmi_noloop_table))
i8042_noloop = 1;
- if (dmi_check_system(i8042_dmi_nomux_table))
- i8042_nomux = 1;
+/* if (dmi_check_system(i8042_dmi_nomux_table))*/
+/* i8042_nomux = 1;*/
#endif
return 0;
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Google: Financial Supplies
Good Afternoon! Please find qualified suppliers for blank check paper, check printing software and magnetic business ink through Google. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclientie=UTF-8rls=GGLC,GGLC:1969-53,GGLC:enq=blank+check+paper%2C+magnetic+ink+for+inkjets Thank you very much. Sidney Dunkirk Marketing Relationship Representative Globalzon Consulting Group To change your communication preference please click on: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/[EMAIL PROTECTED] or simply reply to this Email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
Free Printers ! ...and Essential Business Tools.
Good Afternoon! Top quality products, solutions and special promos at the following sites: 1. DELL http://www.DELL.com 2. G7 http://www.globalzon2k/vc2030.html 3. Hewlett Packard http://www.HP.com 4. Neovi Corporation http://www.globalzon2k.com/NV2005.html /// FEATURED PROMO OFFER:/// FREE Printer! http://www.globalzon2k/vc2030.html Thank you very much. Sidney Dunkirk Marketing Relationship Representative Globalzon Consulting Group To change your communication preference please click on: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/[EMAIL PROTECTED] or simply reply to this Email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
